Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
The Contributions of Alessandro D’Atri to Organization and Information Systems Studies Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Dealing with Critical IS Research: Artifacts, Drifts, Electronic Panopticon and Illusions of Empowerment

verfasst von : Marcello Martinez, Mario Pezzillo Iacono

Erschienen in: Designing Organizational Systems

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The chapter explores the diversity of topics, views and perspectives focused on the relationship between information systems (IS) and control, from a critical perspective. The work reflects upon the framework of Critical IS Research and its relation to Foucaultian approach and IS practice, informing the discussion on the ways IS and managerial Discourses framing the organizational reality. For this purpose, a case study of call centre outsourced industry is presented. We have explained how the overlapping between “electronic panopticon” and “commitment practices” used by management becomes a powerful tool for exerting influence and control in the sense of self-discipline and self-regulation. From this point of view, these tools are merely illusions of empowerment, representing only an apparent departure from traditional form of control, reiterating the idea of technological Discourse as a means of manipulation.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Restructuring the Design Science Research Knowledge Base
Nächstes Kapitel User Centered Systems Design: The Bridging Role of Justificatory Knowledge
Fußnoten
1
Emancipation was a central thrust of the early Frankfurt School, partly explainable by its Marxist lineage. The concept of emancipation developed by Alvesson and Wilmott [28] describes the process through which “individuals and groups become freed from repressive social and ideological conditions, in particular those that place socially unnecessary restrictions upon the development and articulation of human consciousness” (p. 432). In Habermas view, emancipation requires what he calls “communicative action”. One of the key themes in his writings is the need for mutual understanding through undistorted communication/language. In relation to IS the concept of emancipation leads to “emancipator IS development” and to “participatory design”, including the organizational use of IS. The concern is how the development and use of IS entrench social structures that oppress organizational actors. From this point of view, IS should be designed, not just for organizational effectiveness, but also to emancipate people from undesirable social and physical constraints.
 
2
The name used is fictitious.
 
3
The author of this paragraph is Alessia Berni, alessia.berni@uniparthenope.it.
 
Literatur
1.
Ezzamel, M., Willmott, H., & Worthington, F. (2001). Power, control and resistance in the factory that time forgot. Journal of Management Studies, 38(8), 1053–1080.CrossRef
2.
Contu, A. (2007). Groups and teams at work. In: H. Willmott, D. Knights (Eds.), Introducing organizational behaviour and management. London: Thomson Learning.
3.
Willmott, H. (2005). Theorizing contemporary control: Some postructuralist responses to some critical realist questions. Organization, 12(5), 747–780.CrossRef
4.
Doolin, B., & McLeod, L. (2005). Towards critical interpretivism in IS research. In: D. Howcroft, E. M. Trauth (Eds.), Handbook of critical information systems research: Theory and application (pp. 244–271). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
5.
Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Klein, H. K., & Brooke, C. (2008). Exploring the critical research agenda in information systems research. Information Systems Journal, 18(2), 123–135.CrossRef
6.
Adler, P. S., Forbes, L. C., & Willmott, H. (2007). Critical management studies. Academy of Management Annals, 1, 119–179.CrossRef
7.
Avgerou, C., Mansell, R., Quah, D., & Silverstone, R. (2007). The Oxford handbook of information and communication technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
Braverman, H. (1974). Labour and monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.
9.
Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing critical management research. London: Sage.
10.
Ashcraft, K. L. (2009). Gender and diversity: Other ways to make a difference. In M. Alvesson, T. Bridgman, & H. Willmott (Eds.), Oxford handbook of critical management studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Spicer, A., Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2009). Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies. Human Relations, 62(4), 537–560.CrossRef
12.
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (1992). Critical management studies. London: Sage.
13.
Pezzillo Iacono, M., Toraldo, M. L. (2011). Handbook dei critical management studies review: Prospettive critiche agli studi manageriali. Performance & Management, 2, 49–54.
14.
Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T., & Willmott, H. (Eds.). (2009). Oxford handbook of critical management studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
Pezzillo Iacono, M., Esposito, V., Mercurio, R. (2012) Controllo manageriale e regolazione dell’identità organizzativa: la prospettiva dei Critical Management Studies. Management Control, 1, 7–26.
16.
Howcroft, D. (2009). Information System. In M. Alvesson, T. Bridgman, & H. Willmott (Eds.), Oxford handbook of critical management studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
Doolin, B. (2002). Enterprise discourse, professional identity and the organizational control of hospital clinicians. Organization Studies, 23(3), 369–390.CrossRef
18.
McLoughlin, I., & Harris, M. (1997). Innovation, organizational change and technology. London: International Thompson Business Paper.
19.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–28.CrossRef
20.
Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2005). Basic assumptions of the critical research perspectives in information systems. In D. Howcroft & E. Trauth (Eds.), Handbook of critical information systems research: Theory and application (pp. 19–46). UK, Edward Elgar: Aldershot.
21.
Brocklesby, J., & Cummings, S. (1996). Foucault plays Habermas: An alternative philosophical underpinning for critical systems thinking. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47(6), 741–754.
22.
Myers, M. D., & Klein, H. (2011). A set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 17–36.
23.
Brooke, C. (2002). Critical research in information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 17(2), 45–47.CrossRef
24.
Jones, G. (2009). Poststructuralism. In M. Alvesson, T. Bridgman, & H. Willmott (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of critical management studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
Fournier, V., & Grey, C. (2000). At the critical moment: Conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Human Relations, 53(1), 7–32.CrossRef
26.
Sveningsson, S., & Alvesson, M. (2003). Managing managerial identities: Organizational fragmentation, discourse and Identity Struggle. Human Relations, 56(10), 1141–1193.CrossRef
27.
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 619–644.CrossRef
28.
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (1992). On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 17(3), 432–464.
29.
Consiglio, S., Moschera, L., Berni, A., Cicellin, M. (2010) Institutional logics and the rise of a new organisational field, 6th New Institutionalism Workshop, Lyon.
30.
Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53(9), 1125–1149.CrossRef
31.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. New York: Vintage.
32.
du Gay, P., & Salaman, G. (1992). The cult[ure] of the consumer. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 615–633.CrossRef
33.
Barker, R. J. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 408–437.CrossRef
34.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
35.
Franco, M., & Mariano, S. (2007). Information technology repositories and knowledge management processes: A qualitative analysis. Vine, 37(4), 440–451.CrossRef
36.
Doolin, B. (2009). Information systems and power: A Foucauldian perspective. In C. Brooke (Ed.), Critical management perspectives on information systems (pp. 211–230). Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
37.
Bauman, Z. (2001). Community: Seeking safety in an insecure world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
38.
Bauman, Z. (2002). Society under siege. Cambridge : Polity Press.
39.
Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization. The human consequences. New York: Columbia University Press.
40.
Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York: Basic Books.
41.
Cooper, R. (1991). Formal organization as representation: Remote control, displacement, abbreviation. In M. Reed & M. Hughes (Eds.), Rethinking organization. London: Sage.
42.
Alvesson, M. (2010). Self-doubters, strugglers, storytellers, surfers and others: Images of self-identities in organization studies. Human Relations, 63(2), 193–217.CrossRef
43.
Sewell, G., & Wilkinson, B. (1992). “Someone to watch over me”: Surveillance, discipline and the just-in-time labour process. Sociology, 26(2), 271–289.CrossRef
44.
Ciborra, C. U. (2000). A critical review of the literature on the management of corporate information infrastructure. In C. U. Ciborra (Ed.), From control to drift: The dynamics of corporate information infrastructures (pp. 15–40). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
Klecun, E. (2011) Information and communication technologies as control mechanisms. Proceeding VII CMS International Conference, Naples.
46.
Ciborra, C. U. (2002). The labyrinths of information: Challenging the wisdom of systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
Rajao, R., & Hayes, N. (2009). Conceptions of control and IT artefacts: An institutional account of the Amazon rainforest monitoring system. Journal of Information Technology, 24(4), 320–331.CrossRef
48.
Fligstein, N. (1990). The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
49.
Martinez, M. (2011). ICT, productivity and organizational complementarity. In: C. Rossignoli, A. Carugati (Eds.), Emerging themes in information systems and organization studies (pp. 271–281). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
50.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428.CrossRef
51.
Bloomfield, B., & Coombs, R. (1992). Information technology, control And power: The centralization and decentralization debate revisited. Journal of Management Studies, 29(4), 459–470.CrossRef
52.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organizations Science, 16(4), 409–421.CrossRef
53.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practices: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.CrossRef
54.
Knights, D., & Murrey, F. (1994). Managers divided: Organizational politics and IT management. London: Wiley.
55.
Introna, L. D. (1997). Management, information and power. London: Macmillan.
56.
Bloomfield, B., & Danieli, A. (1995). The role of management consultants in the devleopment of information technology: The indissoluble nature of socio-political and technical skills. Journal of Management Studies, 33(1), 27–46.
57.
Brooke, C. (2009). Critical perspective on information systems. Oxford: Elsevier.
58.
Mulholland, K. (2002). Gender, emotional labour and team working in a call centre. Team Working in a Call Centre, Personnel Review, 31(3), 283–303.
59.
Berni, A. Pezzillo Iacono, M., Martinez, M. (2012) Organizational change and dynamics of control: An analysis of Italian Call Center Workplace. Chinese Business Review, 11(4), 402–410.
60.
Callaghan, G., & Thompson, P. (2002). (2002), “We recruit attitude”: The selection and shaping of routine call centre labour. Journal of Management Studies, 39(2), 233–254.CrossRef
61.
Fernie, S., & Metcalf, D. (1998). (Not) hanging on the telephone: Payment systems in the new sweatshops. CEP Discussion paper, 390, 1–41.
62.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
63.
Jabar, M. A., Sidi, F., Selamat, M. H., Ghani, A. A. A., & Ibrahim, H. (2009). An Investigation into methods and concepts of qualitative research in information system research. Computer and information Science, 2(4), 47–54.
64.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1993). CASE tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly, 17(3), 309–340.CrossRef
65.
Macdonald, C. L., Sirianni C. (Eds.) (1996) Working in the service society. Temple University Press. Philadelphia.
66.
Bain, P., Taylor, P. (2000) Entrapped by the “electronic panopticon” Worker.resistance in the call centre, New Technology. Work and Employment, 15(1), 2–18.
67.
Canonico, P., De Nito, E., Mangia, G., Mercurio, R., & Esposito, V. (2009). Interpreting projects: Bureaucratical mechanisms to enforce control or lever for change. Organizacja I Zarzadanie, 3(7), 5–16.
68.
Kunda, G. (1992). Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
69.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
70.
Knight, D., Willmott, H. (2011) Organizational analysis. Essential readings, Cengage learning EMEA.
Metadaten
Titel
Dealing with Critical IS Research: Artifacts, Drifts, Electronic Panopticon and Illusions of Empowerment
verfasst von
Marcello Martinez
Mario Pezzillo Iacono
Copyright-Jahr
2013
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch
Designing Organizational Systems

Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33370-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-33371-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2013

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33371-2_5