Skip to main content

2019 | Buch

Decentralization and Governance Capacity

The Case of Turkey

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

It is widely assumed that the relationship between governance capacity and decentralization determines the success in governance, but how does this relationship function is largely contested. Does decentralization lead to an improvement in governance capacities, or are certain capacities preconditioned in order for decentralization to lead better governance? Relying on an empirical study of Turkish provincial municipalities, the book argues success in decentralization is strongly influenced by the socioeconomic conditions in the province and to a lesser extent by the local government’s capacity. The book provides a novel approach to capacity building practices and decentralization reforms by suggesting that the relationship between decentralization and governance capacity should be addressed not only on the organizational but also on the developmental level. In this way, the book proposes asymmetrical decentralization according to socio-economic development at subnational level for better governance outcomes.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter
Chapter 1. Introduction
Abstract
The introduction sets out the major issues the book examines, highlighting the most prominent discussions in the literature on the relationship between decentralization and governance capacity. Noting the ambiguous relationship between decentralization and better governance, the Introduction puts forward the research questions the book addresses, namely ‘how should policymakers decide on the degree of decentralization to ensure the best outcome in public governance?’ and ‘how do governance capacities affect this outcome?’. Explaining the political and practical relevance of these questions, the introduction explains the importance of the issue to public administration, governance, and development studies.
Evrim Tan
Chapter 2. Decentralization and Capacity in Public Governance
Abstract
This chapter outlines the theoretical and conceptual dimensions of public governance, decentralization, and governance capacity. Laying out the usage of decentralization and capacity from a public governance perspective, the chapter connects the disparate literature of governance, decentralization, and capacity in a functional and analytical way, and puts forward the hypotheses about the relationships between decentralization and governance capacity to be tested in the country case of Turkey.
Evrim Tan
Chapter 3. Turkey’s Local Government Reform Process
Abstract
This chapter elaborates the local government reform process of Turkey in the 2000s and evaluates the outcomes of decentralization reforms. The chapter familiarizes the reader with the characteristics of the public administration system in Turkey focusing particularly on the relationship between central and local government. A further emphasis is given on public management reforms after 2002 that reshaped the local government. Other sections in the chapter focus on the actors in local governance, namely central government, local government, and non-state actors, and analyze their roles and functions in public governance.
Evrim Tan
Chapter 4. Local Governance Capacities in Turkey
Abstract
This chapter explores the local government capacities in Turkey in the aftermath of decentralization reforms. Relying on the international and national reports, as well as surveys conducted with majors and deputy majors of provincial municipalities, the chapter analyzes financial, material, managerial, planning, communication, and human resources capabilities in local government.
Evrim Tan
Chapter 5. What Is the Relationship Between Governance Capacity and Decentralization?
Abstract
This chapter presents the findings and models explaining the relationship between decentralization and governance capacity in Turkish local government. The chapter starts with presenting the methodological choices and operationalization of key variables used in the analysis. The chapter tests the hypotheses on the relationship between governance capacities and decentralization, and interprets the findings to address the research questions.
Evrim Tan
Chapter 6. Conclusion: Toward an Asymmetrical Decentralization Design
Abstract
The conclusion discusses the generalizability of the findings from the Turkish case. By doing that, the conclusion argues a certain level of socio-economic development is necessary in order to decentralization theories to hold, and an asymmetrical decentralization design based on provincial socio-economic development can improve the predictability and success of decentralization policies. The conclusion also shares certain policy recommendations to support the effective implementation of asymmetric decentralization arrangements and on capacity building practices in public sector organizations.
Evrim Tan
Backmatter
Metadaten
Titel
Decentralization and Governance Capacity
verfasst von
Dr. Evrim Tan
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Electronic ISBN
978-3-030-02047-7
Print ISBN
978-3-030-02046-0
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02047-7

Premium Partner