Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Decision Aiding Process in the Frame of the Strategic Farm Management

verfasst von : Evangelia Krassadaki, Nikolaos F. Matsatsinis

Erschienen in: Operational Research in Business and Economics

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter is focused on strategy tools adapted for the needs of the agricultural sector. The increasing complexity and high level of changes in the agricultural context and economic sector lead to the development of new tools and a new specialty, the strategic adviser. An adviser based on specific knowledge, skills and tools offers services at small or very small farm exploitations on strategy issues.
Strategic Analysis is the process of conducting research on the business environment within which an organisation operates and on the organisation itself, in order to formulate strategy. Definitions of strategic analysis often differ, but the following attributes are commonly associated with it, like (a) the identification and evaluation of data relevant to strategy formulation, (b) the definition and analysis of the external and internal environment and (c) a range of analytical methods that can be employed in the analysis.
Commonly used analytical methods in strategic analysis are SWOT, PEST, Porter’s five forces, four corner’s analysis, value chain, early warning scans, war gaming, etc. The subsequent sections of this chapter focus on strategic analysis for farms, as the business context. The PerfEA and the Risk Wheel are presented, as two useful tools for a strategic adviser. The tools are proposed in the European-level Leonardo da Vinci project (STRAT-Training), and are adapted for the farm sector. The tools support the adviser for (a) exploring farm environment, (b) managing risks and (c) setting up an integrated strategy.
In addition, some aspects in the context of decision aiding process are discussed. Thus, as a twofold effort herein, we discuss issues related with complex situation in agro-businesses, like risks handling, and via presenting farm strategy tools we make links with decision science and multi-criteria decision making.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bańkowska K (2005) Podstawy decyzji zawodowych rolników w dobie polaryzacji struktury gospodarstw. In: Woźniak MG (ed) Nierówności społeczne a wzrost gospodarczy. Kapitał ludzki i intelektualny, część 2. Rzeszów, Poland, pp 465–471 Bańkowska K (2005) Podstawy decyzji zawodowych rolników w dobie polaryzacji struktury gospodarstw. In: Woźniak MG (ed) Nierówności społeczne a wzrost gospodarczy. Kapitał ludzki i intelektualny, część 2. Rzeszów, Poland, pp 465–471
Zurück zum Zitat Bossel H (2001) Assessing viability and sustainability: a systems-based approach for deriving comprehensive indicator sets. Conserv Ecol 5(2):12 Bossel H (2001) Assessing viability and sustainability: a systems-based approach for deriving comprehensive indicator sets. Conserv Ecol 5(2):12
Zurück zum Zitat Brim OG et al (1962) Personality and decision processes, studies in the social psychology of thinking. Stanford University Press, Stanford Brim OG et al (1962) Personality and decision processes, studies in the social psychology of thinking. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Zurück zum Zitat Celik Y, Peker K (2009) Benefit/cost analysis of mushroom production for diversification of income in developing countries. Bulg J Agric Sci 15(3):228–236 Celik Y, Peker K (2009) Benefit/cost analysis of mushroom production for diversification of income in developing countries. Bulg J Agric Sci 15(3):228–236
Zurück zum Zitat CIMA (The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants) (2007) Strategic analysis tools. Topic gateway series no. 34 CIMA (The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants) (2007) Strategic analysis tools. Topic gateway series no. 34
Zurück zum Zitat Devaud JM, Groussaud G, Jacquet-Lagreze E (1980) UTADIS: Une methode de construction de fonctions d'utilite additives rendant compte de jugements globaux. European Working Group on Multicriteria Decision Aid, Bochum Devaud JM, Groussaud G, Jacquet-Lagreze E (1980) UTADIS: Une methode de construction de fonctions d'utilite additives rendant compte de jugements globaux. European Working Group on Multicriteria Decision Aid, Bochum
Zurück zum Zitat Eden C (1994) Cognitive mapping and problem structuring for system dynamics model building. Syst Dyn Rev 10(2–3):257–276CrossRef Eden C (1994) Cognitive mapping and problem structuring for system dynamics model building. Syst Dyn Rev 10(2–3):257–276CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gasson R (1973) Goals and values of farmers. J Agric Econ 24(3):521–524CrossRef Gasson R (1973) Goals and values of farmers. J Agric Econ 24(3):521–524CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harman WL, Eidman VR, Hatch RE, Claypool PL (1972) Relating farm and operator characteristic to multiple goals. South J Agric Econ 4(1):215–220CrossRef Harman WL, Eidman VR, Hatch RE, Claypool PL (1972) Relating farm and operator characteristic to multiple goals. South J Agric Econ 4(1):215–220CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hayashi K (2000) Multicriteria analysis for agricultural resource management: a critical survey and future perspectives. Eur J Oper Res 122(2):486–500CrossRef Hayashi K (2000) Multicriteria analysis for agricultural resource management: a critical survey and future perspectives. Eur J Oper Res 122(2):486–500CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahan D (2008) Managing risk in farming (Farm management extension guide). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome Kahan D (2008) Managing risk in farming (Farm management extension guide). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
Zurück zum Zitat Kaya T, Kahraman C (2011) A fuzzy approach to e-banking website quality assessment based on an integrated AHP-ELECTRE method. Technol Econ Dev Econ 17(2):313–334CrossRef Kaya T, Kahraman C (2011) A fuzzy approach to e-banking website quality assessment based on an integrated AHP-ELECTRE method. Technol Econ Dev Econ 17(2):313–334CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klein J, Cooper D (1982) Cognitive maps of decision-makers in a complex game. J Oper Res Soc 33:63–71CrossRef Klein J, Cooper D (1982) Cognitive maps of decision-makers in a complex game. J Oper Res Soc 33:63–71CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Linstone HA, Turoff M (1975) The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA Linstone HA, Turoff M (1975) The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA
Zurück zum Zitat Mankins M, Steele R (2006) Stop making plans. Start making decisions. Business Magazine, Decision Making, Harvard Business Review (January issue): 75–76 Mankins M, Steele R (2006) Stop making plans. Start making decisions. Business Magazine, Decision Making, Harvard Business Review (January issue): 75–76
Zurück zum Zitat Matsatsinis NF, Samaras A (2001) MCDA and preference disaggregation in group decision support systems. Eur J Oper Res 130:414–429CrossRef Matsatsinis NF, Samaras A (2001) MCDA and preference disaggregation in group decision support systems. Eur J Oper Res 130:414–429CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matsatsinis NF, Grigoroudis E, Samaras A (2005) Aggregation and disaggregation of preferences for collective decision-making. Group Decis Negot 14:217–232CrossRef Matsatsinis NF, Grigoroudis E, Samaras A (2005) Aggregation and disaggregation of preferences for collective decision-making. Group Decis Negot 14:217–232CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mintzberg H, Raisinghani D, Théorêt A (1976) The structure of ‘unstructured’ decision processes. Adm Sc Q 21:246–275CrossRef Mintzberg H, Raisinghani D, Théorêt A (1976) The structure of ‘unstructured’ decision processes. Adm Sc Q 21:246–275CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Paelnick JHP (1976) Qualitative multiple criteria analysis, environmental protection and multiregional development. Pap Reg Sci Assoc 36:59–74CrossRef Paelnick JHP (1976) Qualitative multiple criteria analysis, environmental protection and multiregional development. Pap Reg Sci Assoc 36:59–74CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roy B (1993) Decision science or decision-aid science? Eur J Oper Res 66:184–203CrossRef Roy B (1993) Decision science or decision-aid science? Eur J Oper Res 66:184–203CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Sahin A, Gunden C, Cankurt M, Miran B, Yildirim I (2013) Determination of farmers’ goal state ments priorities and factors effective on decision (an application of fuzzy pairwise comparison analysis). Proceedings of the 1st Annual International Interdisciplinary Conference (AIIC 2013), Azores, Portugal, pp 537–544 Sahin A, Gunden C, Cankurt M, Miran B, Yildirim I (2013) Determination of farmers’ goal state ments priorities and factors effective on decision (an application of fuzzy pairwise comparison analysis). Proceedings of the 1st Annual International Interdisciplinary Conference (AIIC 2013), Azores, Portugal, pp 537–544
Zurück zum Zitat Simon H (1960) The new science of management decision. Harper, New YorkCrossRef Simon H (1960) The new science of management decision. Harper, New YorkCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sinuany-Stern Z, Mehrez A, Hadad Y (2011) An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units. Int Trans Oper Res 7:109–124CrossRef Sinuany-Stern Z, Mehrez A, Hadad Y (2011) An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units. Int Trans Oper Res 7:109–124CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Solano C, León H, Pérez E, Herrero M (2001) Characterising objective profiles of Costa Rican dairy farmers. Agric Syst 67(3):153–179CrossRef Solano C, León H, Pérez E, Herrero M (2001) Characterising objective profiles of Costa Rican dairy farmers. Agric Syst 67(3):153–179CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tsoukias A (2007) On the concept of decision aiding process: an operational perspective. Ann Oper Res 154:3–27CrossRef Tsoukias A (2007) On the concept of decision aiding process: an operational perspective. Ann Oper Res 154:3–27CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van Kooten GC, Schoney RA, Hayward KA (1986) An alternative approach to the evaluation of goal hierarchies among farmers. West J Agric Econ 11(1):40–49 van Kooten GC, Schoney RA, Hayward KA (1986) An alternative approach to the evaluation of goal hierarchies among farmers. West J Agric Econ 11(1):40–49
Zurück zum Zitat Wallace MT, Moss JE (2002) Farmer decision-making with conflicting goals: a recursive strategic programming analysis. J Agric Econ 53(1):82–100CrossRef Wallace MT, Moss JE (2002) Farmer decision-making with conflicting goals: a recursive strategic programming analysis. J Agric Econ 53(1):82–100CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Witte E (1972) Field research on complex decision-making processes—the phase theorem. International Studies of Management and Organization 2(2):156–182 Witte E (1972) Field research on complex decision-making processes—the phase theorem. International Studies of Management and Organization 2(2):156–182
Zurück zum Zitat Zaerpour N, Rabbani M, Gharehgozli AH, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R (2008) Make-to-order or make-to-stock decision by a novel hybrid approach. Adv Eng Inform 22(2):186–201CrossRef Zaerpour N, Rabbani M, Gharehgozli AH, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R (2008) Make-to-order or make-to-stock decision by a novel hybrid approach. Adv Eng Inform 22(2):186–201CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Tamosaitiene J (2011) Selection of construction enterprises management strategy based on the SWOT and multi-criteria analysis. Arch Civ Mech Eng XI(4):1063–1082CrossRef Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Tamosaitiene J (2011) Selection of construction enterprises management strategy based on the SWOT and multi-criteria analysis. Arch Civ Mech Eng XI(4):1063–1082CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zopounidis C, Doumpos M (1998) Developing a multicriteria decision support system for financial classification problems: the FINCLAS system. Optim Methods Softw 8:277–304CrossRef Zopounidis C, Doumpos M (1998) Developing a multicriteria decision support system for financial classification problems: the FINCLAS system. Optim Methods Softw 8:277–304CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zopounidis C, Matsatsinis NF, Doumpos M (1996) FINEVA: a multicriteria knowledge-based decision support system for the assessment of corporate performance and viability. In the International Conference on Intelligent Technologies in Human-Related Sciences, pp 175–182 Zopounidis C, Matsatsinis NF, Doumpos M (1996) FINEVA: a multicriteria knowledge-based decision support system for the assessment of corporate performance and viability. In the International Conference on Intelligent Technologies in Human-Related Sciences, pp 175–182
Metadaten
Titel
Decision Aiding Process in the Frame of the Strategic Farm Management
verfasst von
Evangelia Krassadaki
Nikolaos F. Matsatsinis
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33003-7_6

Premium Partner