nach oben

Population and Environment

Erschienen in:

01.09.2006 | Original Paper

Declining fertility on the frontier: the Ecuadorian Amazon

verfasst von: David L. Carr, William K. Y. Pan, Richard E. Bilsborrow

Erschienen in: Population and Environment | Ausgabe 1/2006

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper examines farm and household characteristics associated with a rapid fertility decline in a forest frontier of the Ecuadorian Amazon. The Amazon basin and other rainforests in the tropics are among the last frontiers in the ongoing global fertility transition. The pace of this transition along agricultural frontiers will likely have major implications for future forest transitions, rural development, and ultimately urbanization in frontier areas. The study here is based upon data from a probability sample of 172 women who lived on the same farm in 1990 and 1999. These data are from perhaps the first region-wide longitudinal survey of fertility in an agricultural frontier. Descriptive analyses indicate that fertility has plummeted in the region, which is surprising since it had remained high and unchanging among migrant colonists up to 1990. Thus only half of the women in our sample reported having a birth during the 1990–1999 time period, and most women report in 1999 that they do not want to have any more children. Analyses, controlling for women’s age, corroborate hypotheses about land-fertility relations. For example, women from households with a legal land title had fewer than half as many children as those from households without a title. Large cattle (pasture) holdings and hiring laborers to work on the farm (which may replace household labor) are both related to socio-economic status that is traditionally associated with lower fertility. Similarly, distance to the nearest community center is positively related to fertility. Factors negatively related to fertility include increasing temporary out-migration of adult men or women from the household, asset accumulation, and access to electricity.

Vorheriger Artikel Population, nutrition and agriculture

Nächster Artikel Environmental resettlement and social dis/re-articulation in Inner Mongolia, China

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

We refer to the “frontier” as a rapidly changing region experiencing population growth and land appropriation, characterized by plentiful land and scarcity of labor and capital (Almeida, 1992).

Further, increased education and literacy help women to acquire, and take advantage of, information about family planning facilities and contraceptives. A large literature exists on the topic (Bongaarts, 1978; Caldwell, 1980; Cleland & Rodriguez, 1988; Easterlin, 1978; Easterlin & Crimmins, 1982; Lesthaege et al., 1981; Mc Devitt, 1996; Newman, 1986; Singh, 1994; Singh, Casterline, & Cleland, 1985; United Nations, 1987; Weinberger, 1987) good, but perhaps integrate in text?

However, one study from Bangladesh showed this relation only when land is pooled among extended families (Saha, 1993).

There are further critiques of the relation between resource access and fertility. First, a larger farm may lead to higher fertility not because more children help on the farm, or because it can support more children but rather because a larger farm allows for greater resource security, and thus for more surviving children (Clay and Johnson, 1992). Many other studies finds insignificant differences in family size relative to resource access (e.g., Firebaugh, 1982; Nagarajan & Krishnamoorthy, 1992; Tuladhar et al., 1982).

In this sample, none of the migrants are husbands; virtually all are older sons and daughters migrating off the plot to find work. Further, only 21 household reported having received remittances.

Agadjanian, V. (2001). Women’s work and fertility in a sub-Saharan urban setting: A social environment approach. Journal of Biosocial Science, 32(1), 17–35.CrossRef

Almeida, A. (1992). The colonization of the Amazon. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Anderton, D., & Bean, L. (1985). Birth spacing and fertility limitation: A behavioral analysis of a nineteenth century frontier population. Demography, 22(2), 169–183.CrossRef

Bertrand, J., de Salazar, S., Mazariegos, L., Salanic, V., Rice, J., & Sow, C. (1999). Promoting birthspacing among the Maya-Quiche of Guatemala. International Family Planning Perspectives, 25(4), 160–167.CrossRef

Binswanger, H., & Mc Intire, J. (1987). Behavioral and material determinants of production relations in land-abundant tropical agriculture. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 36(1), 73–99.CrossRef

Bongaarts, J. (1978). A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility. Population and Development Review, 4(1 March), 105–132.CrossRef

Bulatao R., & Lee, R. (Eds.) (1983). Determinants of fertility in developing countries. New York: Academic Press.

Burke, B. (1995). Mexican immigrants shape California’s fertility future. Population Today, 23(9), 4–6.

Cain, M. (1984). On the relationship between landholding and fertility. New York: New York Center for Policy Study.

Caldwell, J. C. (1980). Mass education as a determinant of the timing of fertility decline. Population and Development Review, 6(2), 225–255.CrossRef

Caldwell, J. C., & Caldwell, P. (1987). The cultural context of high fertility in sub-Saharan Africa. Population and Development Review, 13(3), 409–437.CrossRef

Carr, D. L. (2003). Manejo de recusos y fecundidad en la Reserva de la Biosfera Sian Ka’an: Campos, recursos, y anticoncepción en la aldea langostera de Punta Allen, México. In: E. Tuñon Pablos (Ed), Género y medio ambiente en México, Centroamérica y el Caribe. Mexico City: Editorial del Colegio Sur.

Carr, D. L. (2005). Population, land use, and deforestation in the Sierra de Lacandón National Park, Petén, Guatemala. The Professional Geographer, 57(2), 157–168.CrossRef

Centro de Estudios sobre Población y Desarrollo Social (CEPAR) (2000). Encuesta Demografica y de Salud Materna e Infantil. ENDEMAIN III. Quito: CEPAR and US Centers for Disease Control.

Chayanov, A. V. (1986). The theory of peasant economy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Cincotta, R. P., Wisnewski, J., & Engelman, R. (2000) Human population in the biodiversity hotspots. Nature, 404(6781), 990–992.CrossRef

Clay, D., & Johnson, N. E. (1992). Size of the farm or size of the family: Which comes first? Population Studies, 46, 491–505.CrossRef

Cleland, J., & Rodriguez, G. (1988). The effect of parental education on marital fertility in developing countries. Population Studies, 42(3), 419–442.CrossRef

Coale, A. (1973). The demographic transition. International Population Conference. Leige: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population.

Coomes, O., Grimard, F., & Diaz, V. (2001). Peasant farm size and family size: A causality analysis from the Peruvian Amazon. Northeast Universities Development Consortium Conference (NEUDC), Boston University.

Davis, K. (1963). The theory of change and response in modern demographic history. Population Index, 29(4), 345–366.CrossRef

Desai, S., & Alva, S. (1998). Land redistribution: A population stabilization strategy? Economic and Political Weekly, March 7, 533–536.

Diamond, I., Clements, S., Stone, N. & Ingham, R. (1999). Female education and fertility: examining the links. In: C. H. Bledsoe, J. B. Casterline, J. A. Johnson-Kuhn, & J. G. Haaga (Eds.), Critical perspectives on schooling and fertility in the developing world (pp. 23–48). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Doveri, A. (2000). Land, fertility, and family: A selected review of the literature in historical demography. Genus, LVI(3–4), 19–59.

Dreze, J., & Murthi, M. (2001). Fertility, education, and development: Evidence from India. Population and Development Review, 27(1), 33–63.CrossRef

Driscoll, A., & Upchurch, D. (1995). Post-immigration childbearing patterns of Mexican women in the United States. San Francisco, California: Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America.

Easterlin, R. A. (1971). Does human fertility adjust to the environment? American Economic Review, 61, 399–407.

Easterlin, R. A. (1978). The economics and sociology of fertility: A synthesis. In: C. Tilly (Ed.), Historical studies of changing fertility (pp. 57–133). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Easterlin, R. A., & Crimmins E. M. (1982). An exploratory study of the “synthesis framework” of fertility determination with world fertility survey data. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute, World Fertility Survey Scientific Report.

Ellis, F. (1993). Peasant economics: Farm households and agrarian development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Entwisle, B., & Hermalin, A., Kamnuansilpa, P., & Chamratrithirong, A. (1984). A multilevel model of family planning availability and contraceptive use in rural Thailand. Demography, 21, 559–574.CrossRef

Fennelly, K., & Cornwell, G., & Casper, L. (1992). A comparison of the fertility of Dominican, Puerto Rican and mainland Puerto Rican adolescents. Family Planning Perspectives, 3, 107–110.CrossRef

Firebaugh, G. (1982). Population density and fertility in 22 Indian villages. Demography, 19(4), 481–494.

Freedman, R. (1997). Do family planning programs affect fertility preferences? A literature review. Studies in Family Planning, 28(1), 1–13.CrossRef

Geist, H. J., & Lambin, E. F. (2001). What drives tropical deforestation? A meta-analysis of proximate and underlying causes of deforestation based on sub-national case study evidence. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: LUCC International Project Office, 116.

Gorwaney, N., & van Arsdol, M., Heer, D., & Schuerman, L. (1991). Migration from Latin American countries to the United States: The economic, social and reproductive lives of Hispanic female immigrants, 1980. International Migration, 29(4), 573–599.CrossRef

Grandia, L. S. N., Corzo, A., Obando, O., & Ochoa, L. H. (2001). Salud, Migración y Recursos Naturales en Petén: Resultados del Módulo Ambiental en la Encuesta de Salud Materno Infantil 1999. Guatemala City, Guatemala: Insituto Nacional de Estadistica de Guatemala, United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Measure/DHS+, Macro International Inc.

Guilkey, D., & Jayne, S. (1997). Fertility transition in Zimbabwe: Determinants of contraceptive use and method choice. Population Studies, 51(2), 173–189.CrossRef

Hawley, A. H. (1955). Rural fertility in Central Luzon. American Sociological Review, 20, 21–27.CrossRef

Hecht, S., & Cockburn, A. (1989). The fate of the forest. New York: Harper Collins.

Henriques, M. (1988). The colonization experience in Brazil. In: A. Oberai (Ed.), Land settlement policies and population redistribution in developing countries: Achievements, problems, & prospects (pp. 317–354). New York, Westport, and London: Praeger.

Hirschman, C., & Guest, P. (1990). Multilevel models of fertility determination in four Southeast Asian countries: 1970 and 1980. Demography, 27(3), 369–395.CrossRef

Hollos, M., & Larsen, U. (1992). Fertility differentials among the Ijo in southern Nigeria: Does urban residence make a difference? Social Science and Medicine, 35(9), 1199–1210.CrossRef

INEC (1992). V Censo de Población y vi de Vivienda; Resultados Definitivos. Quito: INEC.

INEC (2001). VI Censo de Población y vi de Vivienda; Resultados Definitivos. Quito: INEC.

Knodel, J., & Chamratrithirong, A., & Debavalya, N. (1987). Thailand’s reproductive revolution: Rapid fertility decline in a third-world setting. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Kravdal, O. (2000). A search for aggregate-level effects of education on fertility, using data from Zimbabwe. Demographic Research, 4(3), 35.

Lakshmanasamy, T. (1988). Economic utility and the demand for children: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Artha Vijnana, 304(4), 421–453.

Landale, N., & Hauan, S. (1996). Migration and premarital childbearing among Puerto Rican women. Demography, 33(4), 429–442.CrossRef

Lee, B., & Pol, L. (1993). The influence of rural-urban migration on migrants’ fertility in Korea, Mexico and Cameroon. Population Research and Policy Review, 12(1), 3–26.CrossRef

Lee, R. (2001). Externalities to childbearing. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (vol. 3, pp. 1686–1689). Oxford, U.K: Elsevier Science Ltd.

Lee, R., & Kramer, K. (2002). Children’s economic roles in the context of the Maya Family Life Cycle: Cain, Caldwell, and Chayanov revisited. Population and Development Review, 28(3), 475–499.CrossRef

Lerman, C. (1992). The effect of migration on contraceptive usage and service point choice in Indonesia. In: C. Goldscheider (Ed.), Fertility transitions, family structure, and population policy (pp. 137–154). Boulder, Colorado/Oxford, England: Westview Press.

Lesthaege, R., Shah, I. H., & Page, H. J. (Eds.) (1981). Compensating changes in intermediate fertility variables and the onset of marital fertility transition. Proceedings of the IUSSP World Conference in Manila, Philippines, 6–9 December 1981. Liege, Belgium: Ordina Press.

Marquette, C. (1995). Household demographic characteristics, consumption, labor and land use on the northeastern Ecuadorian Amazon frontier. Ph.D. dissertation. New York: Fordham University.

Martine, G. (1996). Brazil’s fertility decline, 1965–1995: A fresh look at key factors. Population and Development Review, 22(1), 47–75.CrossRef

Mc Devitt, T. (1996). Trends in adolescent fertility and contraceptive use in the developing world. IPC/95-1 (pp. 1–53). Washington, DC: US Bureau of the Census.

Mencarini, L. (2000). A note on landholding and fertility in rural South Africa. Genus, LVI(3–4), 109–119.

Merrick, T. W. (1978). Fertility and land availability in Brazil. Demography, 15, 321–336.CrossRef

Meyerson, F. (2002). Sidestepping population, environment, and reproductive health at Johannesburg. Environmental Change & Security Report. Issue No. 8 (pp. 13–15). Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

Molyneaux, J. (1986). Determinants of fertility in frontier Brazil: Measures of the values of children. Ann Arbor, Michigan, University Microfilms International, 1986. 164 p. Doctoral dissertation at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Moran, E. (1984). Colonization in Transamazonia and Rondonia. In: Schmink & Woods (Eds.), Frontier expansion in Amazonia. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press.

Murphy, L. L., & Marquette, C., Pichdn, F. J., & Bilsborrow, R. (1999). Land use, household composition, and economic status of settlers in Ecuador’s Amazon: A review and synthesis of research findings, 1990–1999. University of Florida, Center for Latin American Studies 48th Annual Conference: “Patterns and Processes of Land Use and Forest Change in the Amazon,” March 23–26, 1999, Gainesville, FL.

Myers, N. (1994). Tropical deforestation rates and patterns. In K. Brown & D. Pearce (Eds.), The causes of tropical deforestation (pp. 27–40). UCLP.

Myers, N. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403(6772), 853–858.CrossRef

Nagarajan, R., & Krishnamoorthy, S., (Eds.) (1992). Landholding and fertility relationships in a low-fertility agricultural community in Tamil Nadu. Population Transition in South Asia. Delhi: B.R. Publishing Corporation.

Newman, J. L. (1986). Fertility and transition. Focus Spring.

Pan, W., & Murphy, L., Sullivan, B., & Bilsborrow, R. E. (2001). Population and land use in Ecuador’s northern Amazon in 1999: Intensification and growth in the frontier. Washington, D.C.: Population Association of America annual meeting.

Pan, William K. Y., & Bilsborrow, R. E, (2005). “The use of a multilevel statistical model to analyze factors influencing land use: a study of the Ecuadorian Amazon”. Global and Planetary Change, 47, 232–252.CrossRef

Pan, W. K., Walsh, S. J., Bilsborrow, R. E., Frizzelle, B., Erlien, C., & Baquero, F. (2004). Farm-level models of spatial patterns of land use and land cover dynamics in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 101, 117–134.CrossRef

Pichón, F. J. (1997). Colonist land-allocation decisions, land use, and deforestation in the Ecuadorian Amazon frontier. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 707–744.

Pichón, F. J., & Bilsborrow, R. (1999). Land use systems, deforestation, and demographic factors in the humid tropics: Farm-level evidence from Ecuador. In: R. Bilsborrow, & D. Hogan (Eds.), Population and deforestation in the humid tropics (pp. 175–207). Liege, Belgium: IUSSP.

Pritchett, L. H. (1994). Desired fertility and the impact of population policies. Population and Development Review, 20(1), 1–55.CrossRef

Ross, J. A., & Mauldin, P. W. (1996). Family planning programs: Efforts and results, 1972–1994. Studies in Family Planning, 27(3), 137–147.CrossRef

Rundquist, F. M., & Brown, L. A. (1989). Migrant fertility differentials in Ecuador. Geografiska Annaler, Series B, 71(2), 109–123.CrossRef

Saha, R. K. (1993). The observed landholding–fertility relationship—is it monotonic? Journal of Development Studies, 29(2), 319–341.

Schutjer, W. A., & Stokes, C. S., & Cornwell, G. (1981). Relationships among land, tenancy, and fertility: A study of Philippine barrios. The Journal of Developing Areas, 15(October), 83–96.

Schutjer, W. A., Stokes, C. S., & Poindexter, J. R. (1983). Farm size, land ownership, and fertility in rural Egypt. Land Economics 59(54), 393–403.CrossRef

Singh, R. D. (1994). Fertility–mortality variations across LDCs: Women’s education, labor force participation, and contraceptive use. Kyklos, 47(2), 2,2209–229.

Singh, S., & Casterline, J. B., & Cleland, J. G. (1985). The proximate determinants of fertility: Sub-national variations. Population Studies, 39(1 March), 113–135.CrossRef

Stecklov, G. (1999). Evaluating the economic returns to childbearing in Cote d’Ivoire. Population Studies, 53(1), 1–17.CrossRef

Stewart, D. (1994). After the trees: living on the Transamazonian Highway. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Stokes, C. S., Schutjer, W. A., & Bulatao, R. A. (1986). Is the relationship between landholding and fertility spurious? A response to Cain. Population Studies, 40(2), 305–311.CrossRef

Teitelbaum, M. S. (1975). Relevance of demographic transition theory for developing countries. Science, 188, 420–425.CrossRef

Thomas, N. (1991). Land, fertility, and the population establishment. Population Studies, 45, 379–397.CrossRef

Tuladhar, J., Stoeckel, J., & Fisher, A. (1982). Differential fertility in rural Nepal. Population Studies 36(1), 305–311.CrossRef

Turke, P. (1989). Evolution and the demand for children. Population and Development Review, 15(1), 61–90.CrossRef

United Nations (1987). Fertility behavior in the context of development: Evidence from the World Fertility Survey. New York: UN.

United Nations (1995a). Education and Fertility: Theoretical Links. Women’s Education and Fertility Behavior. New York, United Nations. ST/ESA/SER.R/137: 21–26.

United Nations (1995b). Women’s education and fertility behaviour: Recent evidence from the Demographic and Health Surveys. New York, United Nations.

United Nations (1995c). The World’s Women 1995: Trends and Statistics. New York.

Van Landingham, M. & Hirschman, C. (1995). Adaptations to resource constraints during the pre-transitional era: fertility differentials arising from the peopling of the Thai Frontier. Seattle Population Research Center Working Paper No. 96–2, 11.

Walker, R., Perz, S., Caldas, M., & Teixeira Silva, L. G. (2002). Land use and land cover change in forest frontiers: The role of household life cycles. International Regional Science Review, 25(2), 169–199.

Warren, C. (1987). Fertility determinants in Puerto Rico. Studies in Family Planning, 18(1), 42–48.CrossRef

Weil, C. (1981). Health problems associated with agricultural colonization in Latin America. Social Science & Medicine, 15D, 449–461.

Weinberger, M. B. (1987). The relationship between women’s education and fertility: Selected findings from the World Fertility Surveys. International Family Planning Perspectives, 13(2 June), 35–46.CrossRef

Yadava, K., & Yadava, G. (1993). Estimation of fecundability of migrated couples in the process of rural out-migration in India. Janasamkhya, 11(1), 41–49.

Zeng, Y. (1996). Latent possibility for a change of the fertility behaviors of rural-urban migrants. China Population Today, 13(5–6), 16.

Titel: Declining fertility on the frontier: the Ecuadorian Amazon
verfasst von: David L. Carr
William K. Y. Pan
Richard E. Bilsborrow
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2006
Verlag: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Erschienen in: Population and Environment / Ausgabe 1/2006
Print ISSN: 0199-0039
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7810
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-007-0032-y