nach oben

Erschienen in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. Democratic Peace as a Horizon of Expectation: Liberalism and Pluralism Revisited

verfasst von : Leonie Holthaus

Erschienen in: Perspectives on International Political Theory in Europe

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In this chapter, I approach international political theory (IPT) as democratic theory via the pluralist tradition. I begin by observing a severe mismatch: while practice-driven observations prompted the (re-)introduction of IPT, the theory’s internal logics continue to favour theory-driven arguments, as evident in cosmopolitan democratic theory. Against this backdrop, I make an historical and theoretical argument to further engaged democratic theorizing within IPT. Historically, I revisit British twentieth-century pluralism vis-à-vis liberalism to reveal the long but forgotten history of IPT and the potential of a practice-driven IPT. This historical weaving bears the argument that we best define pluralism on the basis of opposition to oligarchy, criticism of representative democracy and concern with peace-promoting civil society activism. By implication, pluralists, rather than liberals, contributed to democratic peace’s emergence into a modern horizon of expectation. Then, I posit that three trends, or theoretical ruptures, lead to the marginalization of emancipatory perspectives on democratic peace theory: the respective rises of positivism and quantitative liberal democratic peace theory, and declining trust in democratization. Still, there are promising trends such as the newfound consideration of civil society activism as a necessary ingredient of democratic peace.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Aesthetic Approaches to International Political Theory

Nächstes Kapitel Practice Approaches in International Political Theory

Albert, M. (2016). A theory of world politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Archibugi, D. (1992). Models of international organization in perpetual peace projects. Review of International Studies, 18(4), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.2307/20097308.CrossRef

Bell, D. (2007). The idea of greater Britain: Empire and the future of world order, 1860–1900. Princeton University Press.CrossRef

Bell, D. (2014a). Before the democratic peace: Racial utopianism, empire and the abolition of war. European Journal of International Relations, 20(3), 647–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113497491.CrossRef

Bell, D. (2014b). What is liberalism? Political Theory, 42(6), 682–715.CrossRef

Berman, S. (2017). Against illiberal democracy. Journal of Democracy, 28(3), 29–38.CrossRef

Bernhard, M., Hicken, A., Reenock, C., & Lindberg, S. I. (2020). Parties, civil society, and the deterrence of democratic defection. Studies in Comparative International Development, 55(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-019-09295-0.CrossRef

Bevir, M. (2012). A history of modern pluralism. In M. Bevir (Ed.), Modern pluralism (pp. 1–20). Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Brown, W. (2005). Edgework: Critical essays on knowledge and politics. Princeton University Press.

Caranti, L. (2018). How cosmopolitanism reduces conflict: A broad reading of Kant’s third ingredient for peace. Journal of International Political Theory, 14(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088217702528.CrossRef

Carothers, T. (2009). Democracy assistence: Political vs. developmental. Journal of Democracy, 20(1), 5–19.

Carothers, T., & Ottaway, M. (2000). The burgeoning world of civil society aid. Funding virtue: Civil society aid and democracy promotion (pp. 3–20). Carnegie Endowment.

Cerny, P. G. (2010). Rethinking world politics. Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Cole, G. D. H. (1918). Labour in the commonwealth: A book for the younger generation. Headley Bros.

Cole, G. D. H. (1920). Social theory. Methuen. https://www.archive.org/details/socialtheo00coleiala/page/102/mode/2up.

Cole, G. D. H. (1922). “Slave virtues” and other virtues. The New Statesman and Nation, 18(457), 412–414.

Cole, G. D. H. (1934). Studies in world economics. MacMillan.

Cole, G. D. H. (1945). This word democracy, and its relation to Europe. G.D.H. Cole Papers (A1/34/14/1–14).

Cole, G. D. H. (1962). Essays in social theory. London: Olbourne.

Cole, G. D. H. (1972). Self-government in industry. Hutchinson Educational Ltd.

Cole, M. (1971). The life of G.D.H. Cole. MacMillan.

Connolly, W. E. (1991). Democracy and territoriality. Millennium—Journal of International Studies, 20, 463–484.

Connolly, W. E. (1995). The ethos of pluralization. University of Minnesota Press.

Czempiel, E.-O. (1996). Kants theorem. Oder: Warum sind die Demokratien (noch immer) nicht friedlich? Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 3(1), 79–101. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/40844132.

Dahl, R. A. (1985). A preface to economic democracy. Polity Press.CrossRef

Deitelhoff, N., & Daase, C. (2015). Herrschaftszeiten: Internationale Politische Theorie als Gesellschaftstheorie der internationalen Beziehungen. Zpth, 2, 141–158.

Eisfeld, R. (1972). Pluralismus zwischen Liberalismus und Sozialismus. Stuttgart Verlag W.

Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361.

Fraenkel, E. (1991). Deutschland und die westlichen Demokratien. Suhrkamp.

Gadamer, H.-G. (1960). Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. J.C.B. Mohr.

Geis, A. (2001). Diagnose: Doppelbefund—Ursache: ungeklärt? Die Kontroversen um den „demokratischen Frieden“. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 42(2), 282–298. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/24199246.

Grigorescu, A. (2015). Democratic intergovernmental organisations? Normative pressures and decision-making rules. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Guzzini, S. (2000). A reconstruction of constructivism in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 6(2), 147–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006002001.CrossRef

Hall, I., & Bevir, M. (2014). Traditions of British international thought. The International History Review, 36(5), 823–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2014.951951.CrossRef

Hirst, P. (1993). Associational democracy. In K. U. David Held (Ed.), Prospects for Democracy (pp. 112–135). Polity Press.

Hobhouse, L. T. (1921). Democracy and civilization. Sociological Review, XIII(3), 125–135.CrossRef

Hobhouse, L. T. (1922). Social evolution and political theory. Columbia University Press.

Hobhouse, L. T. (1945). Liberalism. Oxford University Press.

Hobhouse, L. T. (1972). Democracy and reaction (1st ed.). The Harvester Press.

Hobson, C. (2017). Democratic peace: Progress and crisis. Perspectives on Politics, 15(3), 697–710. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717000913.CrossRef

Hobson, C., Smith, T., Owen, J. M., Geis, A., Hobson, C., & Ish-Shalom, P. (2011). Between the theory and practice of democratic peace. International Relations, 25(2), 147–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117811404449.

Hollis, M. (1990). Explaining and understanding international relations. Clarendon Press.

Holthaus, L. (2014a). G.D.H. Cole’s international thought: The dilemmas of justifying socialism in the twentieth century. The International History Review, 36(5), 858–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2014.900813.

Holthaus, L. (2014b). L.T. Hobhouse and the transformation of liberal internationalism. Review of International Studies, 40(4), 705–727. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210513000478.

Holthaus, L. (2018). Pluralist democracy in international relations. L.T. Hobhouse, G.D.H. Cole and David Mitrany. Palgrave.

Holthaus, L. (2019). Furthering pluralism? The German Foundations in Transitional Tunisia. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(6), 1284–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-00074-4.

Holthaus, L., & Noetzel, T. (2012). Demokratischer Pluralismus versus despotische Herrschaft. Zur Theorie liberaler Rechtsstaatlichkeit (Ernst Fraenkel, Norberto Bobbio, Robert A. Dahl). In O. W. Lembcke, C. Ritzi, & G. S. Schaal (Eds.), Zeitgenössische Demokratietheorie. Normative Demokratietheorien (Vol. 1, pp. 33–62). Springer.

Holthaus, L., & Stockmann, N. (2020). Who makes the world? Academics and (un)cancelling the future. New Perspectives, 28(3), 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825x20935246.CrossRef

Kelly, P. (2011). Rescuing political theory from the tyranny of history. In J. Floyd & M. Stears (Eds.), Political philosophy versus history? Contextualism and real politics in contemporary political thought (pp. 13–37). Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Kosselleck, R. (1989). Linguistic change and the history of events. The Journal of Modern History, 61(4), 650–666. https://doi.org/10.2307/1881462.CrossRef

Kreide, R. (2020). Replik: Selbsterkenntnis des Wissenschaftssystems. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 763–765.

Kurki, M. (2013). Democratic futures: Revisioning democracy promotion. Routledge.CrossRef

Laborde, C. (2000). Pluralist thought and the state in Britain and France, 1900–25. MacMillan.CrossRef

Lamb, P. (2004). Harold Laski: Problems of democracy, the sovereign state, and international society. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Lane, M. (2012). Doing our own thinking for ourselves: On Quentin Skinner’s genealogical turn. Journal of the History of Ideas, 73(1), 71–82.CrossRef

Lawson, B. B. a. G. (2015). The global transformation: History, modernity and the making of international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Lindsay, A. D. (1914). The state in recent political theory. Political Quaterly, 1, 128–145.

Little, R. (1996). The growing relevance of pluralism? In S. Smith, K. Booth, & M. Zalewski (Eds.), International theory: Positivism and beyond (pp. 66–86). Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Long, D., & Schmidt, B. C. (2005). Introduction. In D. Long & B. C. Schmidt (Eds.), Imperialism and internationalism in the discipline of international relations (pp. 1–22). State University of New York Press.

Macdonald, K., & Macdonald, T. (2010). Democracy in a pluralist global order: Corporate power and stakeholder representation. Ethics & International Affairs, 24(1), 19.CrossRef

Mansfield, E. D., & Snyder, J. (1995). Democratization and the danger of war. International Security, 20(1), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539213.CrossRef

MacMillan, J. (1998). On liberal peace: Democracy, war and the international order. I.B. Tauris. https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/on-liberal-peace-9781860640100/.

Mitrany, D. (1947). Human rights and international organization. India Quaterly, 3, 115–127.

Mitrany, D. (1949). Mental health. Mitrany papers. London School of Economics.

Mitrany, D. (1954). Food and freedom. The Batchworth Press.

Mitrany, D. (1955a). Parliamentary democracy and poll democracy. Parliamentary Affairs, 9(1), 13–24.

Mitrany, D. (1955b). The problem of equality. Mitrany Papers. London School of Economics.

Mitrany, D. (1956). Marxismus und Bauerntum. Isar Verlag.

Mitrany, D. (1975). The making of the functional theory: A memoir. In D. Mitrany (Ed.), The functional theory of politics (pp. 3–82). LSE and Martin Robertson.

Morefield, J. (2013). A democratic critique of the state: G. Lowes Dickinson’s The European anarchy. In C. S. Henrik Bliddal, & P. Wilson (Ed.), Classics in international relations: Essays in criticism and appreciation (pp. 24–35). Routledge.

Müller, T. B. (2014). Nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg. Lebensversuche moderner Demokratien. Buneszentrale für politische Bildung.

Neyer, J. (2013). Globale Demokratie. Eine zeitgemäße Einführung in die Internationalen Beziehungen. Nomos.

Niederberger, A. (2016). Demokratie: Selbstbestimmung im globalen System. In R. Kreide & A. Niederberge (Eds.), Internationale Politische Theorie: Umrisse und Perspektiven eines neuen Forschungsfeldes (pp. 109–122). J.B. Metzöer.CrossRef

Niesen, P. (2010). Internationale Politische Theorie: Eine disziplingeschichtliche Einordnung. Zeitschrift Für Internationale Beziehungen, 17(2), 267–277.CrossRef

Nye, J. S., & Keohane, R. O. (1971). Transnational relations and world politics: An introduction. International Organization, 25(3), 329–349. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706043.

O’Donnell, G. (2007). Perpetual crisis of democracy. Journal of Democracy, 18(1), 5–11.CrossRef

Oneal, J. R., Russett, B., & Berbaum, M. L. (2003). Causes of peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations, 1885–1992. International Studies Quarterly, 47(3), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2478.4703004.CrossRef

Porta, D. d. (2016). Where did the revolution go? Contentious politics and the quality of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Recchia, S. (2018). Should humanitarian interveners promote democracy after genocide? International Theory, 10(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971917000173.CrossRef

Risse, T., Jetschke, A., & Schmitz, H. P. (2012). Internationale Normen, kommunikatives Handeln und innenpolitischer Wandel. In T. Risse, A. Jetschke, & H. P. Schmitz (Eds.), Die Macht der Menschenrechte. Internationale Normen, kommunikatives Handeln und innenpolitischer Wandel in den Ländern des Südens (pp. 11–48). Nomos.

Root, E. (1917). The effect of democracy on international law. In A. A. f. I. Conciliation (Ed.).

Russett, B. (1993). Grasping the democratic peace: Principles for a post-War World. Princeton University Press.

Saward, M. (2011). Slow theory: Taking time over transnational democratic representation. Ethics & Global Politics, 4(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v4i1.6416.CrossRef

Smith, H. (2000). Why is there no international democratic theory? In H. Smith (Ed.), Democracy and international relations: Critical theories, problematic practices (pp. 1–30). Palgrave.

Sylvest, C. (2007). Beyond the state? Pluralism and internationalism in early twentieth-century Britain. International Relations, 21(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117807073768.CrossRef

Theuns, T. (2019). The legitimacy of free trade agreements as tools of EU democracy promotion. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1552247.CrossRef

Tilly, C. (2007). Democracy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Toqueville, A. (1998 [1835/1840]). Democracy in America. Herdsfordshire: Wordsworth.

Wallace, W. (1996). Truth and power, monks and technocrats: Theory and practice in international relations. Review of International Studies, 22(3), 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021050011856X.CrossRef

Winters, J. A., & Page, B. I. (2009). Oligarchy in the United States? Perspectives on Politics, 7(4), 731–751. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40407076.

Woolf, L. (1933). What is Democracy? In M. Adams (Ed.), The Modern State (pp. 15–27). Kennikat Press.

Zundel, M., & Kokkalis, P. (2010). Theorizing as engaged practice. Organization Studies, 31(9–10), 1209–1227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610374405.CrossRef

Titel: Democratic Peace as a Horizon of Expectation: Liberalism and Pluralism Revisited
verfasst von: Leonie Holthaus
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Perspectives on International Political Theory in Europe
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77273-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-77274-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77274-1_5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner