Introduction
Goals | Outputs | Related publications |
---|---|---|
Research, application, and evaluation of established and new biomarker techniques with special focus on biological effects of selected important chemical compound groups in Baltic Sea key species in the laboratory and under field conditions | 14 sampling campaigns covering five areas (Belt Sea, Gulf of Gdansk, G. of Riga, G. of Finland, and G. of Bothnia); a total of 20 different biological effects methods tested on 16 species (when feasible); specific laboratory exposure experiments and sediment bioassays | |
Scientifically based recommendations for the set-up of an integrated chemical–biological effects monitoring of hazardous substances in the whole Baltic Sea area, based on subregional assessments for future integrated assessments of Baltic Sea ecosystem health | See above (subregional assessments; collaboration with ICES SGEH and HELCOM) | |
Generation of baseline data for regions in the Baltic Sea where few or no biological effects data existed and updating of data in other subregions | See above; BonusHAZ database (jointly with BALCOFISH project) with 60 different parameters for fish (flounder, eelpout, and herring) and invertebrates (Mytilus sp., Macoma balthica, amphipods, and gastropods) | |
Identification of relevant target species for the highly variable Baltic Sea subregions | Testing of local native organisms for assessing the suitability of biological effects methods | Subregional assessment articles 2014, in prep.; Barda et al. (2013) |
Determination of subregional reference/target/effect levels and collection of data for whole-region assessment of biological effects | Selection of CORESET biological effects indicators for hazardous substances (lysosomal membrane stability in fish, bivalves, or amphipods; induction of micronuclei in fish, bivalves, or amphipods; embryo aberrations in fish [eelpout] or amphipods; Fish Disease Index; imposex in marine gastropods (TBT indicator); PAH metabolites in fish [PAH indicator]); Numeric Assessment Criteria for Baltic Sea organisms to assess biological effects; overview of Core and selected Candidate Indicators to assess the effects of hazardous substances at different biological levels; ICES SGEH Biological Effects methods’ Background Documents for the Baltic Sea region (9 methods) | |
Linking early effects and higher level effects by relating responses directly to changes in growth, reproductive output, or energy utilization | Experimental and field studies with mussels (Mytilus trossulus) and amphipods (Monoporeia affinis) | Turja et al. (in press) and Löf et al. (in prep.) |
Subregional health assessments by the application of techniques representing various biological processes at different levels of biological organization in combination with contaminant measurements in different subregions of the Baltic Sea | See above; analysis of PAHs, trace metals, organotins, and organochlorine compounds in sediments, clams, and fish from different subregions | |
Testing and validation of integrated monitoring approaches, indices, and expert systems with regard to their applicability for the Baltic Sea, taking into account the specific biotic and abiotic characteristics of the different subregions and different contaminant burdens | See above; mussel caging studies in G. of Gdansk and G. of Bothnia; testing of integrated indices (IBR, IBAS) in fish (herring and eelpout); testing of an expert system on amphipods (Monoporeia affinis); application of the Fish Disease Index | |
Cooperation with the expert groups of ICES and HELCOM for providing recommendations to the ongoing revision of HELCOM monitoring programs, and implementation of the BSAP and MSFD | Close collaboration with HELCOM CORESET; exchange of information between relevant ICES expert groups; support to BSAP and MSFD at national levels | |
An integrated multilevel toolbox consisting of established and novel biomarkers as sensitive diagnostic tools to identify how hazardous substances affect the Baltic Sea ecosystem, also in the context of stress due to varying environmental conditions and climate change | See above (subregional assessments, selection of methods, and determination of assessment criteria); experimental studies on mussels and fish | |
Capacity building and strengthening of networking and quality assurance among Baltic Sea institutions via workshops to exchange, harmonize, and intercalibrate methodologies; development of technical guidelines and Standard operation procedures as well as appropriate training | Intercalibration and workshops; draft Standard operation procedures, training; networking activities | Kammann et al. (2013) and Standard operation procedures (2014, in prep.) |
Basic Research: Development of New Methods and Testing of Potential Target Species in Different Subregions of the Baltic Sea
Method name | Short study description | Species | Study areas | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Oxidative capacity in amphipods | Antioxidant status in amphipods from contaminated sediments using the oxygen radical capacity (ORAC) assay was tested for different ontogenetic stages (embryos, juveniles, and gravid females) and applied for several amphipod species. For validation, ORAC was measured together with the antioxidant defense enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) in M. affinis exposed to contaminated sediment and hypoxia |
Monoporeia affinis,
Gammarus
tigrinus, and Gammarus zaddachi
| G. of Bothnia, G. of Riga, and G. of Gdansk | Löf et al. (in prep.) |
Acetylcholinesterase activity in amphipods | Neurotoxic effects were studied with the biomarker acetylcholinesterase activity in amphipods |
Monoporeia affinis,
Gammarus
tigrinus, and Gammarus zaddachi
| G. of Bothnia, G. of Riga, and G. of Gdansk | Löf et al. (in prep.) |
Lysosomal membrane stability in amphipods | Lysosomal membrane stability using the fluorescent dye acridine orange (AO) as a subcellular biomarker indicating general health status of organism was studied in amphipods |
Monoporeia affinis
| G. of Bothnia | Broeg et al. (in prep.) |
Intersex in amphipods | Intersex, an indicator of endocrine disruption because of the presence of both female and male sex characteristics (i.e., male-like penile papillae and female-like oostegites without setae) in the same individual was studied in two genera of amphipods from the Belt Sea. |
Gammarus sp, Corophium volutator
| Belt Sea | Fisher and Strand (unpublished) |
Reproductive success in amphipods | Embryo aberrations as a general biomarker for pollution effects were studied in amphipods from coastal zones by adjusting the method for reproduction success developed earlier for M. affinis (Sundelin et al. 2008) |
Gammarus
tigrinus, Gammarus zaddachi, Corophium volutator
| G. of Bothnia, G. of Finland, G. of Riga, G. of Gdansk, Belt Sea | Sundelin et al. (unpublished) and Fisher and Strand (unpublished) |
Cardiac activity in crabs and mussels | Recovery time of heart rate after standardized test-stimulus, i.e., experimentally lowered salinity or temperature, was used as an integrated physiological biomarker of general health in organisms for studying pollution effects |
Carcinus maenas, Mytilus edulis
| Belt Sea | Kholodkevich et al. (in prep.) |
Oxidative stress in clams | Activity of the antioxidant defense enzyme glutathione reductase (GR) was studied in combination with other biomarkers in soft-bottom clams collected from most of the BEAST subregions, with additional studies on seasonal variation |
Macoma balthica
| G. of Bothnia, G. of Finland, G. of Riga, and G. of Gdansk, Belt Sea | Barda et al. (2013) |
Cellular immune responses in mussels | Biomarkers for immune responses (i.e., total and differential haemocyte count, phagocytic activity and apoptosis) were studied in mussels from areas characterized by variable salinities and different contaminant profiles |
Mytilus edulis
| Belt Sea | Höher et al. (2012) |
Micronuclei frequency in amphipods and fish | Micronuclei and other nuclear abnormalities related to geno- and cytotoxic effects were studied in amphipods, eelpout and herring |
Gammarus locusta, Zoarces viviparus, Clupea harengus
| G. of Finland, G. of Bothnia, G. of Riga, and G. of Gdansk, Belt Sea | Baršienė et al. (2012) and Baršienė et al. (unpublished) |
Oil-degrading bacteria in the intestinal tract in bivalves and fish | The presence of oil-degrading bacteria in the intestinal tract was studied in bivalves and fish as a new method for in situ assessment of petroleum hydrocarbon pollution in marine and estuarine environments |
Mytilus trossulus, Macoma balthica, Zoarces viviparus, Platichthys flesus, Clupea harengus
| Different subregions of the Baltic Sea | Baršienė et al. (unpublished; in press) |
Liver histopathology in fish |
Zoarces viviparus, and Clupea harengus
| G. of Finland, G. of Bothnia, G. of Riga, and G. of Gdansk Belt Sea | ||
Macrophage aggregates in fish | Macrophage aggregates were quantitatively studied in fish liver and spleen |
Zoarces viviparus, and Platichthys flesus
| G. of Finland, G. of Bothnia, G. of Riga, and G. of Gdansk Belt Sea | |
Intersex in fish | Intersex, regarded as the consequence of an endocrine disruption effects in gonads of male fish, was studied by histological analysis |
Zoarces viviparus, and Platichthys flesus
| G. of Finland, G. of Bothnia, G. of Riga, G. of Gdansk, and Belt Sea | Gercken et al. (in prep.) |
PAH metabolites in fish urine | PAH metabolites in fish urine as a biomarker of PAH-exposure was studied in addition to PAH metabolites in bile fluid |
Zoarces viviparus, and Platichthys flesus
| G. of Riga, Belt Sea | |
Oxidative stress in macroalgae | Oxidative stress biomarkers were studied by measuring GST and GR in bladder wrack from different areas influenced by riverine input and pollution |
Fucus vesiculosus
| G. of Riga, different subregions of the Baltic Sea | Boikova (unpublished) |
Development of Monitoring: Database, Selection of Endpoints, and Integrated Assessment
Database
Core Methods and Assessment Criteria
-
General stress caused by a range of contaminants (“early warning”): lysosomal membrane stability in fish, bivalves, or amphipods;
-
Effects caused by genotoxic contaminants (“early warning”): induction of micronuclei in fish, bivalves, or amphipods;
-
Reproductive success impairments caused by a range of contaminants: embryo aberrations in fish (eelpout) or amphipods;
-
General health status: Fish Disease Index based on externally visible fish diseases, macroscopic liver neoplasms, and liver histopathology.
Testing of Integrated Approaches
Operational and Practical Issues in Ecosystem Health Assessments: Sampling, Intercalibration, and Quality Assurance
Guidelines and Standard Operating Procedures
Indicator type | Title of SOP | Authors |
---|---|---|
General | Sampling for monitoring biological effects of contaminants in the Baltic Sea | Lang T., Lehtonen K., Sundelin B., and Schiedek D. |
CORESET Core Indicator (Bioeffects) | Reproductive success in fish | Strand J. and Gercken J. |
Reproductive success in amphipods | Sundelin, B. | |
Micronucleus test in fish and bivalves | Baršienė J. | |
Lysosomal membrane stability | Broeg K., Schatz S., Strand J., and Lehtonen K. | |
Fish disease monitoring in the Baltic Sea. Part A: Externally visible diseases | Lang T., Rodjuk G., and Fricke N. | |
Fish disease monitoring in the Baltic Sea. Part B: Macroscopic liver neoplasms | Lang T., Fricke N., Rodjuk G., and Dabrowska H. | |
Fish disease monitoring in the Baltic Sea. Part C: Liver histopathology | Lang T., Fricke N., Rodjuk G., and Dabrowska H. | |
CORESET Core Indicator (PAH) | Determination of PAH metabolites in fish bile | Kammann U. |
CORESET Core Indicator (TBT) | Imposex in marine snails | Strand J. and Gercken J. |
CORESET Candidate Indicator (Bioeffects) | Intersex (ovotestis) measurement in eelpout (Zoarces viviparus) | Gercken J. |
Measurement of vitellogenin in the blood plasma of fish | Fricke N. | |
Determination of acetylcholinesterase activity in fish and bivalves | Lehtonen K. and Gercken J. | |
Determination of EROD activity in fish | Vuorinen P., Tuvikene A., Dabrowska H., and Lang T. |
Training and Intercalibration
Title of activity/objectives | BEAST Lead Laboratory | Venue | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Training in analyses of methods in amphipod reproduction, embryo aberrations, sperm count, and intersex | University of Stockholm, ITM (SE) | Stockholm University Marine Science Center, Askö Laboratory (SE) | Methods for the analysis of reproductive disorders in amphipods were presented and trained |
Intercalibration on imposex and intersex in marine gastropods | QUASIMEME | Samples sent for analysis | Satisfactory Z-scores between −0.6 and 0.4 were achieved for the reported three parameters by the participating BEAST laboratory |
Training and intercalibration of field sampling for integrated studies on contaminants and biological effects | TI Institute of Fisheries Ecology (DE); SYKE (FI) | Onboard RVs “Walther Herwig III” (DE) and “Aranda” (FI) | Strategies and concepts for integrated monitoring and assessment of hazardous substances were presented, and various methods relevant for the BEAST project and for integrated monitoring (chemistry, biomarkers, and bioassays) in the Baltic Sea in general were demonstrated by instructors and trained by the participants |
Joint BALCOFISH/BEAST practical workshop on eelpout sampling and examinations | Aarhus University, NERI (DK) | Søminestationen, Holbæk (DK) | A practical workshop with 13 BALCOFISH and five BEAST partners. Issues addressed included standardization of methodologies for sampling and dissection eelpout, assessing reproductive success, and reporting of data to the common databank BonusHAZ |
Workshop on measurement of enzymatic biomarkers in bivalves | SYKE (FI) | SYKE, Marine Research Laboratory, Helsinki (FI) | Dissemination of biomarker methods to Latvian partners and intercalibration of methods |
Training and intercalibration exercise of the histochemical method for the assessment of lysosomal membrane stability | AWI (DE) | Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven (DE) | LMS in herring samples was successfully analyzed and assessed at TI. Intercalibration showed a very high correspondence of results |
PAH metabolite intercalibration exercise | TI Institute of Fisheries Ecology (DE) | Samples were distributed to participating labs | The relation of the five concentration levels of 1-hydroxypyrene could be detected by all labs except one. So, all methods are in general suitable for screening purposes. HPLC-F and GC–MS produced quite similar results in absolute concentration. SF results were treated with a conversion factor and tended to be higher than HPLC-F and GC–MS but were not significantly different. The concentrations determined with FWF were not comparable to those from the other methods and were in addition inhomogeneous within the method (more than 10-fold difference) |
Biomarkers – effects of hazardous substances in aquatic ecosystems (seminar) | SYKE (FI) | SYKE, Helsinki (FI) | The event was the first large seminar arranged in Finland focusing on the use of biological effects methods in marine monitoring and assessment of hazardous substances. More than two-thirds of the seminar audience consisted of representatives of national and municipal environmental monitoring authorities, industry, SMEs, NGOs, and educational institutes, with the rest being researchers and students |
Liver histopathology in eelpout | TI Institute of Fisheries Ecology (DE) | TI Institute of Fisheries Ecology, Cuxhaven (DE) | Liver histopathology in eelpout was presented, and methods relevant for the BEAST project were demonstrated by the instructors and were trained by the participants |
Conclusions and Future Challenges
-
Some biological effects techniques regarded as promising (e.g., the candidate indicators above) still need to be further developed and validated.
-
A stronger linkage between measurements of contaminants and biological effects at various levels of biological organization needs to be achieved to facilitate integrated monitoring and assessment. This will require new approaches, addressing, e.g., source identification, means of discharge to the sea, chemical behavior in the environment, biotic pathways and responses (biological degradation, biomagnification, bioaccumulation, and toxicity), and fate (chemical degradation, deposition).
-
An improvement of current assessment concepts and criteria is required to be able to tackle ecologically relevant problems such as toxicity of chemical mixtures, multiple stress, and multilevel effects. This can be reached by applying and evaluating new methods and model approaches (e.g., passive sampling, integrated biological effects methods, distribution and fate models, decision trees, substance flow analyses, etc.) and establishing cause–effect links between different levels of biological organization by dedicated laboratory and field studies with ecologically relevant target species. Integrated indicators and indices as well as AC should still be developed.
-
The assessment and prediction of ecological and socioeconomic consequence of hazardous substances should be improved. Databases and models from BEAST and earlier projects can be exploited to create scenarios for biological effects. These will supply important information for socioeconomic analyses of changes, e.g., in fish populations, remediation measures of contaminated sediment and waste water-treatment plant effluents, and relevance for human food quality. Evaluations of the cost–efficiency of different monitoring and assessment methods, and the benefits of policy implementation and abatement strategies, as well as exploration of the efficiency of reduction measures with regard to impacts observed in the marine environment are urgent tasks.