Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Asia Pacific Journal of Management
Erschienen in: Asia Pacific Journal of Management 4/2012

01.12.2012

Does family business excel in firm performance? An institution-based view

verfasst von: Weiping Liu, Haibin Yang, Guangxi Zhang

Erschienen in: Asia Pacific Journal of Management | Ausgabe 4/2012

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We offer an institution-based view to the classic inquiry on the relationship between family business and firm performance, which has been dominated by traditional theories such as agency theory and the resource-based view. Specifically, we argue that institutions define family business characteristics such as ownership concentration and family management, and also affect the performance of family business. Our research contributes to a reconciliation of prior inconsistent findings and calls further attention to the embedded nature of family business in institutions.

Vorheriger Artikel Corruption and subsidiary profitability: US MNC subsidiaries in the Asia Pacific region
Nächster Artikel The R&D value-chain efficiency measurement for high-tech industries in China

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1

The comparison excludes state-owned firms since their governance structure and market activities are subject heavily to government intervention.

 
Literatur
  1. Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. 2008. An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3): 475–492.View Article
  2. Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. 2003. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 447–465.
  3. Anderson, R., Mansi, S., & Reeb, D. 2003. Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 68: 263–285.View Article
  4. Anderson, R., & Reeb, D. 2003a. Founding-family ownership, corporate diversification, and firm leverage. Journal of Law and Economics, 46: 653–684.View Article
  5. Anderson, R., & Reeb, D. 2003b. Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3): 1301–1328.View Article
  6. Anderson, R., & Reeb, D. 2004. Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2): 209–237.
  7. Andersson, T., Carlsen, J., & Getz, D. 2002. Family business goals in the tourism and hospitality sector: A cross-case analysis from Australia, Canada and Sweden. Family Business Review, 15(2): 89–106.View Article
  8. Aoki, M. 2001. Toward a comparative institutional analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  9. Aronoff, C. E., & Ward, J. L. 1995. Family-owned businesses: A thing of the past or the model for the future. Family Business Review, 8(2): 121–130.View Article
  10. Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. 2007. The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1): 73–95.View Article
  11. Barontini, R., & Caprio, L. 2006. The effect of family control on firm value and performance: Evidence from Continental Europe. European Financial Management, 12(5): 689–723.View Article
  12. Barth, E., Gulbrandsen, T., & Schone, P. 2005. Family ownership and productivity: The role of owner-management. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11: 107–127.View Article
  13. Baysinger, B. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. 1990. The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects on corporate strategy. Academy of Management Review, 15(1): 72–87.
  14. Bhagat, R. S., McDevitt, A. S., & McDevitt, I. 2010. On improving the robustness of Asian management theories: Theoretical anchors in the era of globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(2): 179–192.View Article
  15. Becht, M., & Roel, A. 1999. Blockholding in Europe: An international comparison. European Economic Review, 43: 1049–1056.View Article
  16. Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. 1932. The modern corporation and property. New York: Harcourt.
  17. Boyd, B. 1990. Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model. Strategic Management Journal, 11(6): 419–430.View Article
  18. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Wan, J. C. 2003. Turnaround in East Asian firms: Evidence from ethnic overseas Chinese communities. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 519–540.View Article
  19. Burkart, M., Panunzi, F., & Shleifer, A. 2003. Family firms. Journal of Finance, 58(5): 2167–2201.View Article
  20. Carney, M., & Gedajlovic, E. 2002. The coupling of ownership and control and the allocation of financial resources: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Management Studies, 39: 123–146.View Article
  21. Carney, M., Gedajlovic, E., & Yang, X. 2009. Varieties of Asian capitalism: Toward an institutional theory of Asian enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3): 361–380.View Article
  22. Chandler, A. 1990. Scale and scope. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  23. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. 2005. Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29: 555–575.View Article
  24. Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. 1999. Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4): 19–39.
  25. Chung, C., & Luo, X. 2008. Institutional logics or agency costs: The influence of corporate governance models on business group restructuring in emerging economies. Organization Science, 19(5): 766–784.View Article
  26. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, P. H., & Lang, H. P. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 62(6): 2741–2771.View Article
  27. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, H. P. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58: 81–112.View Article
  28. Cochran, P. L., Wood, R. A., & Jones, T. B. 1985. The composition of boards of directors and incidence of golden parachutes. Academy of Management Journal, 28: 664–671.View Article
  29. Crouch, C. 2005. Capitalist diversity and change: Recombinant governance and institutional entrepreneurs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  30. Daily, C. 1995. The relationship between board composition and leadership structure and bankruptcy reorganization outcomes. Journal of Management, 21: 1041–1056.View Article
  31. Daily, C., & Dalton, D. 1994a. Bankruptcy and corporate governance: The impact of board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1603–1617.View Article
  32. Daily, C., & Dalton, D. 1994b. Corporate governance and the bankrupt firm: An empirical assessment. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 643–654.View Article
  33. Dalton, D., Daily, C., Johnson, J., & Ellstrand, A. 1999. Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 674–686.View Article
  34. Davis, G. 2005. New directions in corporate governance. Annual Review of Sociology, 31(1): 143–162.View Article
  35. DeAngelo, H., & DeAngelo, L. 2000. Controlling stockholders and the disciplinary role of corporate payout policy: A study of the Times Mirror company. Journal of Financial Economics, 56(2): 153–207.View Article
  36. Demsetz, H., & Villalonga, B. 2001. Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(3): 209–233.View Article
  37. Dharwadkar, R., George, G., & Brandes, P. 2000. Privatization in emerging economies: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25: 650–669.
  38. Dreux, D. R. 1990. Financing family businesses: Alternatives to selling out or going public. Family Business Review, 3: 225–243.View Article
  39. Dunn, B., & Hughes, M. 1995. Family businesses in the United Kingdom. Family Business Review, 8(4): 267–291.View Article
  40. Durand, R., & Vargas, V. 2003. Ownership, organization, and private firms’ efficient use of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 667–675.View Article
  41. Dyer, W. G. 2006. Examining the “family effect” on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19(4): 253–273.View Article
  42. Faccio, M., & Lang, H. P. 2002. The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65: 365–395.View Article
  43. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 301–325.View Article
  44. Ford, R. H. 1988. Outside directors and the privately-owned firm: Are they necessary?. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(1): 49–57.
  45. Gallo, M. A., & Vilaseca, A. 1996. Finance in family business. Family Business Review, 9: 387–402.View Article
  46. Gedajlovic, E. R., Lubatkin, M. H., & Schulze, W. S. 2004. Crossing the threshold from founder management to professional management: A governance perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41: 988–1012.View Article
  47. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Larraza-Kintana, M., & Makri, M. 2003. The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2): 226–241.View Article
  48. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Nunez-Nickel, M., & Gutierrez, I. 2001. The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1): 81–95.View Article
  49. Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M. L., & MacMillan, I. 2003. A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4): 451–465.View Article
  50. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. 2001. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  51. Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., van Essen, M., & van Oosterhout, J. 2009. Meta-analyzing ownership concentration and firm performance in Asia: Towards a more fine-grained understanding. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3): 481–512.View Article
  52. Hill, C. W. L. 1995. National institutional structures, transaction cost economizing and competitive advantage: The case of Japan. Organization Science, 6: 119–1131.View Article
  53. Hillman, A., & Dalziel, T. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 28(3): 383–396.
  54. Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 249–267.View Article
  55. Jayaraman, N., Khorana, A., Nelling, E., & Covin, J. 2000. CEO founder status and firm financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 21(12): 1215–1224.View Article
  56. Jensen, M. C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48: 831–880.View Article
  57. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–360.View Article
  58. Jiang, Y., & Peng, M. W. 2010. Principal-principal conflicts during crisis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:10.​1007/​s10490-009-9186-8.
  59. Johnson, J., Daily, C., & Ellstrand, A. 1996. Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22: 409–438.View Article
  60. Kesner, I. F. 1987. Directors’ stock ownership and organizational performance: An investigation of Fortune 500 companies. Journal of Management, 13(3): 499–507.View Article
  61. Klapper, L. F., & Love, I. 2004. Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(5): 703–728.View Article
  62. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2): 471–517.View Article
  63. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106: 1113–1155.View Article
  64. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 2002. Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance, 57: 1147–1170.View Article
  65. Lee, D. S., Lim, G. H., & Lim, W. S. 2003. Family business succession: Appropriation risk and choice of successor. Academy of Management Review, 28(4): 657–666.
  66. Lee, K., Peng, M. W., & Lee, K. 2008. From diversification premium to diversification discount during institutional transitions. Journal of World Business, 43(1): 47–65.View Article
  67. Lee, S.-H., Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. W., & Barney, J. B. 2011. How do bankruptcy laws affect entrepreneurship development around the world? Journal of Business Venturing, Forthcoming.
  68. Li, H. X., Wang, Z. J., & Deng, X. L. 2008. Ownership, independent directors, agency costs and financial distress: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Corporate Governance, 8(5): 622–636.View Article
  69. Lins, K. V. 2003. Equity ownership and firm value in emerging markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38: 159–184.View Article
  70. Litz, R. A. 1995. The family business: Toward definitional clarity. Family Business Review, 8: 71–81.View Article
  71. Lyman, A. R. 1991. Customer service: Does family ownership make a difference?. Family Business Review, 4(3): 303–324.View Article
  72. Maury, B. 2006. Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Western European corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2): 321–341.View Article
  73. McConaughy, D. L. 2000. Family CEO vs. non-family CEOs in the family-controlled firm: An examination of the level and sensitivity of pay to performance. Family Business Review, 13(2): 121–131.View Article
  74. McConaughy, D. L., Walker, M. C., Henderson, G. V., & Mishra, C. S. 1998. Founding family controlled firms: Efficiency and value. Review of Financial Economics, 7: 1–19.View Article
  75. Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S., & Peng, M. W. 2009. Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1): 61–80.View Article
  76. Meyer, K. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: Transactions, resources, and institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6): 600–621.View Article
  77. Miller, D., & Shamsie, J. 1996. The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936–1965. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 519–543.View Article
  78. Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 293–316.View Article
  79. Morck, R., & Steier, L. 2005. The global history of corporate governance: An introduction. In R. Morck (Ed.). A history of corporate governance around the world: Family business groups to professional advisors: 1–64. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  80. Morck, R., Strangeland, D., & Yeung, B. 2000. Inherited wealth, corporate control, and economic growth. In R. Morck (Ed.). Concentrated corporate ownership. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  81. Morck, R., & Yeung, B. 2003. Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4): 367–382.View Article
  82. North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.View Article
  83. Oliver, C. 1997. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 679–713.View Article
  84. Peng, M. W., & Jiang, Y. 2006. Family ownership and control in large firms: The good, the bad, the irrelevant—and why. William Davidson Institute working paper no. 840, William Davidson Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  85. Peng, M. W., & Jiang, Y. 2010. Institutions behind family ownership and control in large firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47: 253–273.View Article
  86. Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. 2009. The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3): 63–81.View Article
  87. Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. 2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5): 920–936.View Article
  88. Perez-Gonzalez, F. 2006. Inherited control and firm performance. American Economic Review, 96(5): 1559–1588.View Article
  89. Pollak, R. 1985. A transaction cost approach to families and households. Journal of Economic Literature, 23: 581–608.
  90. Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. 2001. Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research?. Academy of Management Review, 26: 22–40.
  91. Rediker, K. J., & Seth, A. 1995. Boards of directors and substitution effects of alternative governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 85–99.View Article
  92. Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. 2003a. Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2): 179–194.View Article
  93. Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. 2003b. Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4): 473–490.View Article
  94. Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. 2001. Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12: 99–116.View Article
  95. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2): 737–783.View Article
  96. Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. 2003. Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4): 339–358.View Article
  97. Sraer, D., & Thesmar, D. 2007. Performance and behavior of family firms: Evidence from the French stock market. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(4): 709–751.View Article
  98. Steier, L. 2001. Next-generation entrepreneurs and succession: An exploratory study of modes and means of managing social capital. Family Business Review, 14: 259–276.View Article
  99. Steier, L. P. 2009. Familial capitalism in global institutional contexts: Implications for corporate governance and entrepreneurship in East Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3): 513–535.View Article
  100. Stein, J. 1989. Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: A model of myopic corporate behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(4): 655–669.View Article
  101. Suhomlinova, O. 2006. Towards a model of organizational co-evolution in transition economies. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 1537–1554.View Article
  102. Thomsen, S., & Pedersen, T. 2000. Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic Management Journal, 21(6): 689–705.View Article
  103. Vance, S. C. 1964. Board of directors: Structure and performance. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Press.
  104. Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. 2006. How do family ownership, management, and control affect firm value?. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2): 385–417.View Article
  105. Walsh, J. P., & Seward, J. K. 1990. On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 15(3): 421–458.
  106. Westhead, P., & Howorth, C. 2006. Ownership and management issues associated with family firm performance and company objectives. Family Business Review, 19(4): 301–316.View Article
  107. Willard, G. E., Krueger, D. A., & Feeser, H. R. 1992. In order to grow, must the founder go: A comparison of performance between founder and non-founder managed high-growth manufacturing firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 16: 181–194.View Article
  108. Williamson, O. E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
  109. Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 1–34.View Article
  110. Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. 2008. Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal-principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1): 196–220.View Article
  111. Zahra, S. A. 2003. International expansion of US manufacturing family businesses: The effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4): 495–512.View Article
  112. Zahra, S., Hayton, J., & Salvato, C. 2004. Entrepreneurship in family vs. non-family firms: A resource-based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28: 363–381.View Article
  113. Zhang, J., & Ma, H. 2009. Adoption of professional management in Chinese family business: A multilevel analysis of impetuses and impediments. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(1): 119–139.View Article
Metadaten
Titel
Does family business excel in firm performance? An institution-based view
verfasst von
Weiping Liu
Haibin Yang
Guangxi Zhang
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2012
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Asia Pacific Journal of Management / Ausgabe 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0217-4561
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9958
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-010-9216-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2012

Asia Pacific Journal of Management 4/2012 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Explaining factors affecting individual innovation: The case of producer group members in Thailand

OriginalPaper

Institution-based barriers to innovation in SMEs in China

OriginalPaper

Work status, gender, and organizational commitment among Korean workers: The mediating role of person-organization fit

OriginalPaper

The R&D value-chain efficiency measurement for high-tech industries in China

OriginalPaper

Developing business trust in government through resource exchange in China

OriginalPaper

Corporate boards and the performance of Asian firms: A meta-analysis

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise