nach oben

Social Justice Research

Erschienen in:

01.12.2014

Doing Good to Self and Others: Some Ideas About the Antecedents, Processes, and Consequences of Fair Resource Allocation

verfasst von: Riel Vermunt

Erschienen in: Social Justice Research | Ausgabe 4/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Drawing on multidisciplinary findings and ideas, I discuss in this paper fair allocation of social resources, such as goods, services, and information. It is held that the allocation event, featuring actor, recipient, and observer, as well as the social resources to be allocated by an actor, can function as a guideline for the essentials of fair behavior. The role of the essential features of allocation behavior: motivation, cognition, and emotion, as well as morality and reactions to perceived unfairness are examined. I give explanations as to why, how, and to what extent, people, in an effort to attain justice, allocate social resources between self and others and among others. I explore the conditions under which an actor may deviate from a just division of social resources, thus, instigating a reaction from recipients and observers.

Vorheriger Artikel Financial Returns Versus Moral Concerns: Laypeople’s Willingness to Engage in Fair Investments

Nächster Artikel Social Justice and the Ethics of Resistance: A Review Essay

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Love is an expression of affectionate regard, warmth, or comfort. Status indicates an evaluative judgment that conveys prestige, regard, or esteem. Services involve activities that affect the body or belongings of a person and that often constitute labor for another. Information includes advice, opinions, instruction, or enlightenment but excludes those behaviors that could be classified as love or status. Money is any coin, currency, or token that has some standard unit of exchange value. Goods are tangible products, objects, or materials.

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity and poverty. New York: Crown Publishers.

Ambrose, M. L., & Arnaud, A. (2005). Are procedural justice and distributive justice conceptually different? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 59–84). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

Barber, B. (2013). If mayors ruled the world: Dysfunctional nations, rising cities. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewecki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1988). Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural justice judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 676–685.CrossRef

Chadwick, R.A., & Trafimov, D. (2005). Reasons in Social Reasoning: The Effect of justification on trait attribution for immoral behavior (in preparation).

Clayton, S. (2000). Models of justice in the environmental debate. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 459–474.CrossRef

Darley, J., & Batson, C. (1973). From Jerusalem to Jericho: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 100–118.CrossRef

Elias, N. (1969). Über den Prozess der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und Psychogenetische Untersuchungen. Bern: Francke Verlag.

Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2011). Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just world beliefs. Psychological Science, 22, 34–38.PubMedCrossRef

Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24, 56–62.PubMedCrossRef

Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, ILL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.

Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of ‘voice’ and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108–119.CrossRef

Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2007). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In P. Carruthers, S. Lawrence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind (pp. 367–392). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.CrossRef

Kameda, T., Takezawa, M., & Hastie, R. (2003). The logic of social sharing: An evolutionary game analysis of adaptive norm development. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(1), 2–19.CrossRef

Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange. Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum Press.

Moll, J., Zahn, R., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2005). The neural basis of human moral cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 799–809.PubMedCrossRef

Müller, M., & Clayton, S. (2013). Introduction to “Environmental Justice”. Social Justice Research, 26(3), 227–230.CrossRef

Paavola, J., & Adger, W. N. (2006). Fair adaptation to climate change. Ecological Economics, 56(4), 594–609.CrossRef

Piketty, Th. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Boston: Harvard University Press.

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. London: Oxford University Press.

Rousseau, J.-J. (1992). Discourse on the origin of inequality. (D. A. Cress, Trans.). introduced by James. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub.Co.

Skitka, L. J., & Houston, D. (2001). When due process is of no consequence: Moral mandates and presumed defendant guilt or innocence. Social Justice research, 14, 305–326.CrossRef

Sole, K., Marton, J., & Hornstein, H. A. (1975). Opinion similarity and helping: Three field experiments investigating the bases of promotive tension. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 1–13.CrossRef

Stiglitz, J. E. (2013). The prize of inequality: How todays divided society endangers our future. New York: Norton & Company.

Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.CrossRef

Törnblom, K., & Vermunt, R. (2007). Towards integrating distributive justice, procedural justice, and social resource theories. In K. Törnblom, R. Vermunt, & G. Jasso (Eds.), Theory integration in social justice research (Vol. 20, pp. 222–235). New York: Springer.

Turner, J. C. (1981). The experimental social psychology of intergroup behavior. In J. C. Turner & H. Giles (Eds.), Intergroup behavior (pp. 66–102). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Vermunt, R. (2014). The Good, the bad, and the just. How modern men shape their world. London: Ashgate.

Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allan Lane.

Wojcik, A., & Cislak, A. (2013). When appreciating nature makes one care less for human beings: The role of belief in just nature in helping victims of natural disasters. Social Justice Research, 26(3), 253–271.CrossRef

Wolters, G., & Vermunt, R. (in prep.). The neural basis of moral judgment and decision making. Leiden University: Internal paper.

Titel: Doing Good to Self and Others: Some Ideas About the Antecedents, Processes, and Consequences of Fair Resource Allocation
verfasst von: Riel Vermunt
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2014
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Social Justice Research / Ausgabe 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0885-7466
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6725
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0224-4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2014

Beliefs in a Just World, Subjective Well-Being and Attitudes Towards Refugees Among Refugee Workers

Financial Returns Versus Moral Concerns: Laypeople’s Willingness to Engage in Fair Investments

Another Look at Moral Foundations Theory: Do Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Explain Liberal-Conservative Differences in “Moral” Intuitions?

Incidental Disgust Increases Adherence to Left-Wing Economic Attitudes

Social Justice and the Ethics of Resistance: A Review Essay

Balance Without Equality: Just World Beliefs, the Gay Affluence Myth, and Support for Gay Rights

Premium Partner