Skip to main content

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

13. Economic and Behavioral Factors in an Individual’s Decision to Take the Influenza Vaccination in Japan

verfasst von : Yoshiro Tsutsui, Uri Benzion, Shosh Shahrabani

Erschienen in: Behavioral Economics of Preferences, Choices, and Happiness

Verlag: Springer Japan

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this chapter, we investigate what people in Japan consider when deciding to take the influenza vaccination. We develop an economic model to explain the mechanism by which people decide to take the influenza vaccination. Using our model and the data obtained from a large-scale survey we conducted in Japan, we demonstrated that people make rational decisions about vaccinations after considering its cost and benefits. People consider the probability of infection, severity of the disease, and the vaccination’s effectiveness and side effects. The time discount rate is another consideration because the timing of costs and benefits of the vaccination differ. Risk aversion (fearing the contraction of the flu and vaccination’s side effects) also affects the decision. People also deviate from rationality—altruism and status quo bias play important roles in the decision-making. Overconfidence indirectly affects the decision via perception variables such as the subjective probability of infection and assessment of influenza’s severity. The decision also depends on attributes such as gender, age, and marital status. If the general perception of flu and vaccination is inaccurate, supplying accurate information regarding those may increase or decrease the vaccination rate, depending on whether this perception is, respectively, higher or lower than the objective rates. Thus, we examine whether the general perception is biased. Our survey suggests that disseminating information on the vaccination’s effectiveness may increase the rate of vaccination, whereas that on the probability of infection may have the opposite effect.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
2
Out of 237 people who chose 1 (“Yes, certainly”), 223 (94.1 %) actually received vaccinations. Out of 327 people who chose 2 (“Yes, probably”), 227 (69.4 %) actually received vaccinations. Out of 480 people who chose 3 (“I have not decided yet”), 122 (25.4 %) actually received vaccinations. Out of 687 people who chose 4 (“No, probably not”) 107 (15.6 %) actually received vaccinations. Out of 304 people who chose 5 (“No, certainly not”), 27 (8.9 %) actually received vaccinations.
 
3
We tried to estimate the magnitude of the effect of PROB on WTVACCIN by correcting the endogeneity. However, an appropriate instrumental variable was difficult to find.
 
4
This is partly due to the inclusion of experience of vaccination, EXVACCIN.
 
5
However, neither is significant when both terms are included at the same time.
 
6
However, since previous studies, such as Steiner et al. (2002), found that monetary cost has an impact on the decision to take a vaccination, our results should be examined further from various aspects.
 
7
In the USA, only 24 % are not altruistic based on our survey results.
 
8
Yet, it could be that this number reflects also “flu-like” symptoms which are sometimes wrongly attributed to the influenza illness, suggesting that the true rate is lower than 5 %.
 
9
One may argue that the flu rate varies substantially from year to year, so that we should not compare the subjective probability of 2005 with experienced probability for the past 2 years. According to the statistics reported by the National Infectious Disease Surveillance Center, the number of influenza infections reported by the hospitals designated to report the infection in 2005 was almost double the number reported in 2004, and 1.3 times the number reported in 2003. Thus, the actual rate of infection is probably larger than 5 %. Yet, there is no reason to believe that this rate exceeds 10 %.
 
10
The confidence of “never be robbed” may exist for good reasons for some people. They might be too poor to be robbed. Or they might have taken the most foolproof measures for security. Or they live in safer places. In order to adjust these elements, we regress OVERCON over financial wealth of respondents and variables representing size of city where respondents live and 10 regions of Japan and define OVERCON2 as the constant term plus estimated residuals. However, no explanatory variables of the regression were significant and the regression as a whole was insignificant by F-test (p-value was 0.8). Thus, we report only the results with OVERCON.
 
11
This addendum has been newly written for this book chapter.
 
12
The following findings are based on the paper titled “A Policy to Promote Influenza Vaccination: A Behavioral Economic Approach” by Tsutsui et al. 2010.
 
13
ALTRUISM is not included as a regressor in the case of the U.S.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Barsky RB, Juster FT, Kimball MS, Shapiro MD (1997) Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: an experimental approach in the health and retirement study. Q J Econ 112:537–579CrossRef Barsky RB, Juster FT, Kimball MS, Shapiro MD (1997) Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: an experimental approach in the health and retirement study. Q J Econ 112:537–579CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blue CL, Valley JM (2002) Predictors of influenza vaccine: acceptance among healthy adult workers. AAOHN J 50:227–235 Blue CL, Valley JM (2002) Predictors of influenza vaccine: acceptance among healthy adult workers. AAOHN J 50:227–235
Zurück zum Zitat Brito DL, Sheshinski E, Intriligator MD (1991) Externalities and compulsory vaccinations. J Public Econ 45:69–90CrossRef Brito DL, Sheshinski E, Intriligator MD (1991) Externalities and compulsory vaccinations. J Public Econ 45:69–90CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chapman GB, Coups EJ (1999) Predictors of influenza vaccine acceptance among healthy adults. Prev Med 29:249–262CrossRef Chapman GB, Coups EJ (1999) Predictors of influenza vaccine acceptance among healthy adults. Prev Med 29:249–262CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen JY, Fox SA, Cantrell CH, Stockdale SE, Kagawa-Singer M (2007) Health disparities and prevention: racial/ethnic barriers to flu vaccinations. J Community Health 32:5–20CrossRef Chen JY, Fox SA, Cantrell CH, Stockdale SE, Kagawa-Singer M (2007) Health disparities and prevention: racial/ethnic barriers to flu vaccinations. J Community Health 32:5–20CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Knetsch JL, Sinden JA (1984) Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value. Q J Econ 99:507–521CrossRef Knetsch JL, Sinden JA (1984) Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value. Q J Econ 99:507–521CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lau J, Kim J, Yang X, Tsui HY (2008) Cross-sectional and longitudinal factors predicting influenza vaccination in Hong Kong Chinese elderly aged 65 and above. J Infect 56:460–468CrossRef Lau J, Kim J, Yang X, Tsui HY (2008) Cross-sectional and longitudinal factors predicting influenza vaccination in Hong Kong Chinese elderly aged 65 and above. J Infect 56:460–468CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mullahy J (1999) It’ll only hurt a second? Microeconomic determinants of who gets flu shots. Health Econ 8:9–24CrossRef Mullahy J (1999) It’ll only hurt a second? Microeconomic determinants of who gets flu shots. Health Econ 8:9–24CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenstock LM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH (1988) Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q 15:175–183CrossRef Rosenstock LM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH (1988) Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q 15:175–183CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shahrabani S, Gafni A, Benzion U (2008) Low flu shot rates puzzle – some plausible behavioral explanations. Am Econ 52:66–72 Shahrabani S, Gafni A, Benzion U (2008) Low flu shot rates puzzle – some plausible behavioral explanations. Am Econ 52:66–72
Zurück zum Zitat Shahrabani S, Benzion U, Yom DG (2009) Factors affecting nurses’ decision to get the flu vaccine. Eur J Health Econ 10:227–231CrossRef Shahrabani S, Benzion U, Yom DG (2009) Factors affecting nurses’ decision to get the flu vaccine. Eur J Health Econ 10:227–231CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Steiner M, Vermeulen LC, Mullahy J, Hayney MS (2002) Factors influencing decisions regarding influenza vaccination and treatment: a survey of healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 23:625–627CrossRef Steiner M, Vermeulen LC, Mullahy J, Hayney MS (2002) Factors influencing decisions regarding influenza vaccination and treatment: a survey of healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 23:625–627CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tsutsui Y, Benzion U, Shahrabani S, Yom DG (2010) A policy to promote influenza vaccination: a behavioral economic approach. Health Policy 97:238–249CrossRef Tsutsui Y, Benzion U, Shahrabani S, Yom DG (2010) A policy to promote influenza vaccination: a behavioral economic approach. Health Policy 97:238–249CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tsutsui Y, Benzion U, Shahrabani S (2012) Economic and behavioral factors in an individual’s decision to take the influenza vaccination in Japan. J Socio-Econ 41:594–602CrossRef Tsutsui Y, Benzion U, Shahrabani S (2012) Economic and behavioral factors in an individual’s decision to take the influenza vaccination in Japan. J Socio-Econ 41:594–602CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Economic and Behavioral Factors in an Individual’s Decision to Take the Influenza Vaccination in Japan
verfasst von
Yoshiro Tsutsui
Uri Benzion
Shosh Shahrabani
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Verlag
Springer Japan
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55402-8_13

Premium Partner