Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Gesunde Pflanzen 1/2022

Open Access 10.11.2021 | Original Article / Originalbeitrag

Effect of Phosphorus and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) Inoculation on Growth and Productivity of Maize (Zea mays L.) in a Tropical Ferralsol

verfasst von: Audry Tshibangu Kazadi, Jonas Lwalaba wa Lwalaba, Bibich Kirika Ansey, Judith Mavungu Muzulukwau, Gabriella Manda Katabe, Martine Iband Karul, Geert Baert, Geert Haesaert, Robert-Prince Mukobo Mundende

Erschienen in: Journal of Crop Health | Ausgabe 1/2022

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Soil fertility in the Lubumbashi region often proves to be limiting factor for crop production due to their low nutrient reserves. The objective of this work was to evaluate the impact of arbuscular mycorrhizae on phosphorus uptake by maize on Ferralsol. The trial was conducted in pots with 30 kg or 60 kg of P2O5 ha−1 and a control. These three levels of phosphorus were combined or not with arbuscular mycorrhizae. The combinations of 30 kg or 60 kg of phosphorus with the inoculum led to a male flowering of maize at 63 days after semi. Maize treated with 60 kg of phosphorus ha−1 formed very few or almost no blisters in the roots. Cob weight, length, diameter, number of rows and kernel weight varied significantly with phosphorus on both inoculated and uninoculated pots. The inoculated plants had high averages for these yield parameters. Due to the lack of phosphate fertilizer, inoculum alone can be an alternative to phosphorus provided that nitrogen and potassium are added, resulting in small but seed-filled ears compared to the phosphorus-free control without mycorrhizae, which resulted in empty ears. Yield varied significantly with the addition of phosphorus (0.3 to 6.1 tons ha−1) and less significantly with inoculum (3 to 3.7 t ha−1). The combination of treatments showed a significant difference in favour of the 60 kg of phosphorus or 60 kg of phosphorus associated with the inoculum. The highest phosphorus content was obtained on the inoculum treatment alone, which provided 1.4 mg phosphorus g−1 maize compared to other treatments, which provided 0.69 to 0.71 mg phosphorus g−1 maize.
Hinweise
The original online version of this article was revised due to a retrospective Open Access cancellation.
An erratum to this article is available online at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10343-022-00670-x.

Introduction

Phosphorus (P) is an essential nutrient which is important for plant growth and many physiological processes such as metabolic energy transfers and nucleic acid metabolism (Chang et al. 2008; Eppendorfer and Eggum 1994; Grant et al. 2014; Martin-Prével and Montagut 1966). In tropical soils, the P concentration in the soil solution generally ranges between 0.1 and 10 µM (0.003 to 0.3 ppm) and is much lower than the adequate concentration for optimal growth of many crops (Liu et al. 2016). The orthophosphates, H2PO4 and HPO42−, are the primary forms of phosphorus taken up by plants. However, these two forms are often in low concentration, mostly in highly weathered tropical soils. In general, the pH range of 6–6.5 is considered optimal for phosphorus uptake by the plant. In acidic soils (pH < 5.5), aluminium cations (Al3+) are dominant in soil solution and they can immobilize P to form the poorly soluble AlPO4 which can limit plant root growth. In basic soils, Ca2+ and Mg2+ dominate the cationic exchange capacity and the P immobilization becomes more important (Enita 2000; Oteino et al. 2015). The role of phosphorus (P) is yet crucial in plant production and it can be supplied as chemical fertilizers, but this is not generally possible for smallholder’s farmers in tropics because of their low income. It is then useful to improve phosphorus (P) availability and one opportunity is provided by the inoculation of crops with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). The AMF make symbiosis with root plants and are able to secret phosphatase, which catalyze and release P for the benefit of plants (Grant et al. 2004; Tshibangu et al. 2020a). They also confer robustness to plants and they improve crop yields (Beaudin et al. 2008; Grant et al. 2014; Jan et al. 2014; Tshibangu et al. 2020b). AMF thus improves uptake of immobilized plant nutrients, especially P (Erdinc et al. 2017). The aim of this study was to assess the effects of AMF inoculum on P assimilation by maize and its impact on maize growth and productivity on an acidic and deficient in available phosphorus Ferralsols.

Material and Methods

Experimental Soil and Plant Material

The experimental soil was collected on an old maize farm located in the Luano area, Lubumbashi, DR Congo (−11,60233°S; 27,50897°E to −11,60234°S; 27,50908°E, altitude 1200 m asl). It is a red and deep sandy clay loam soil whose available laboratory data are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1
Experimental chemical soil properties
pH(water)
Total nitrogen (%)
Organic carbon (%)
Available phosphorus (µg/g soil)
ECC (cmol (+) kg−1 soil)
Exchanges cations contents
(cmol (+) kg−1 soil)
Calcium
Potash
Magnesium
6.3
0.09
0.97
10.3
0.43
6.38
0.52
1.9
ECC exchange cationic capacity, cmol centimol
Spores were extracted from a 100 g sample of soil by using the standard wet sieving and decantation method (45 µm and 1 mm mesh) followed by counting using an Olympus SZ61 stereo microscope according to Walker et al. (2006). AMF morpho-species identification was done under microscope of 40 and 100 X on three to five spores of similar morphology, assembled on a strip in the polyvinyl lacto-glycerol. Spore shapes, their colors and sizes, occurrence or not of pedicels, number of spore wall layers and wall surface ornamentation were main criteria used for identification (Oehl et al. 2011a; Trappe 1992). The mean density was of 150 spores 100 g−1 soil with predominance of genus belonging to Gigaspora, Acaulospora and Archaeospora. The maize variety “Katanga” was used as test crop in the experiment. This local variety blooms from 60 to 65 days after sowing and presents a maximal height of 191 cm depending on growing conditions. Grains are white and have a weight nearing 168 ± 25 g cob−1, i.e. 380 g per 1000 grains. Before sowing, the grains were disinfected with sodium hypochlorite (1%) during 5 min, then with the alcohol (75%) and rinsed with tap water afterwards.

AMF Inoculum Production

The inoculum was obtained from red Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare L.) cultivated in pots, to have high AMF spore density and root colonization; as described by Mukerji et al. (2002), and Selvaraj and Chellappan (2006). The pots had 28 cm diameter (0.4396 m2) and depth 28 cm. Sorghum was sown in a litter substrate at 25 to 30 plants per pot. At 3.5 months later, root and AMF spores from Sorghum crop were extracted and used as inoculum. The litter substrate was collected from Miombo woodland dominated by Brachystegia and Julbernardia. The choice of this substrate is justified by its high porosity. This is a reasonable method of AMF inoculum production contrary to the high cost of commercial inoculum and their scarcity in the Lubumbashi region. The inoculum produced had a spore mean density of 250. 100 g−1 of substrate and 10 g of colonized roots at the frequency of 70 to 80%. Acaulospora and Ambispora were the most dominant genera.

Chemical Fertilizers

Di-ammonium phosphate (DAP—18-46-0) and potassium chloride (KCl—60% K2O) were used as basal fertilizers and urea (46% N) was added as top fertilizer to cover the N crop demand. The K and N were maintained constant while P was added as DAP in 3 doses: 60 kg P2O5 ha−1, which is the normal dose, recommended for maize in tropical conditions (Raemaekers 2001), 30 kg P2O5 ha−1 as the half of recommended dose and 0 kg P2O5 ha−1 as the control.

Experimental Design

The experiment was conducted in pots of 28 cm diameter and 28 cm depth in a factorial design 2 × 3 with 5 replications. Two levels of AMF inoculation and 3 levels of phosphorus application were used as treatments:
  • Control: unfertilized and un-inoculated
  • 30 kg of P2O5 ha−1, without AMF inoculum
  • 60 kg of P2O5 ha−1, without AMF inoculum
  • 100 g AMF inoculum
  • 30 kg of P2O5 ha−1, 100 g AMF inoculum
  • 60 kg of P2O5 ha−1, 100 g AMF inoculum.
The maize plants were watered during the 3 first months (September to November 2017), every 2 days with 1 liter of tap water per pot having 1 plant each. The experiment took place in a shade house from September 2017 to January 2018. The last two months (December 2017 and January 2018) of experiment were rainy. During the experimental period, the prevailing temperature varied between 15 to 32 °C and a mean relative humidity of 79% and 12 h sunshine.

Measurements and Data Analysis

The plant height, the height at the insertion of panicle, days to the flowering, the number of leaves, the leaves chlorophyll content, the cob length, the cob diameter, the cob rows number, the seed weight per cob, the yield and the total P assimilated in grains were measured. The data were statistically evaluated by factorial analysis of variance with mycorrhizal inoculation and P application levels as factors. Means and standard errors were calculated for five replicate value. Means were compared by ANOVA and the Tukey-HSD test at significance level P < 0.05. The Minitab 16 software was used for the statistical analysis.

Results

Vegetative Growth Parameters and Root Colonization by AMF

The effect of inoculation and P application on maize was significant for the number of days before flowering. Plants that were inoculated with AMF flowered earlier than non-inoculated plants (Table 2). The combination of inoculation with P application increased maize flowering precocity while control plants were the latest to flowering. The effect of inoculation was not significant for plant height, number of leaves and chlorophyll content while, P application significantly increased the number of leaves per plant and leaves chlorophyll content. The effect of AMF inoculation and P application was significant on maize root colonization. Root colonization was more important on inoculated plants than on plants that were not inoculated. For non-inoculated plants, increasing P application proportionally increased their ability to be colonized by soil indigenous mycorrhiza. However, for inoculated plants, the maize which did not receive any P showed the highest rate of root colonization, followed by those that received 60 kg P2O5 ha−1 and the one that received 30 kg P2O5 ha−1 had the lower rate of colonization.
Table 2
Growth parameters and root colonization frequency (%) by AMF. SPAD units: soil plant analysis development. The means that do not share any letters in a group in each column are significantly different after ANOVA and the Tukey multiple comparison test (P < 0.05)
Treatments
Days before flowering
Final plant height (cm)
60 days after sowing
Number of leaves plant−1
Leaves chlorophyll content (SPAD units)
Root colonization frequency (%)
Mycorrhizal inoculum (AMF)
Without AMF
73 ± 14 a
149 ± 43 a
10 ± 2 a
41 ± 10 a
40 ± 20 b
With AMF
70 ± 13 a
158 ± 44 a
10 ± 2 a
43 ± 8 a
57 ± 25 a
Phosphorus (kg P2O5)
0 kg P2O5 ha−1
91 ± 3 A
102 ± 15 C
7 ± 1 B
31 ± 5 B
49 ± 27 AB
30 kg P2O5 ha−1
63 ± 1 B
169 ± 22 B
11 ± 1 A
47 ± 4 A
31 ± 18 B
60 kg P2O5 ha−1
61 ± 2 B
191 ± 21 A
11 ± 1 A
47 ± 4 A
65 ± 11 A
AMF×Phosphorus
Without AMF 0 kg P2O5 ha−1
93 ± 0 a
105 ± 3 b
7 ± 0 b
28 ± 3 b
25 ± 11 b
Without AMF30 kg P2O5 ha−1
63 ± 0 b
171 ± 27 a
11 ± 1 a
46 ± 3 a
32 ± 13 b
Without AMF 60 kg P2O5 ha−1
63 ± 0 b
197 ± 19 a
12 ± 1 a
46 ± 4 a
63 ± 8 a
With AMF 0 kg P2O5 ha−1
88 ± 0 a
98 ± 21 b
7 ± 1 b
34 ± 5 b
73 ± 8 a
With AMF 30 kg P2O5 ha−1
62 ± 0 b
166 ± 20 a
12 ± 1 a
47 ± 5 a
30 ± 23 b
With AMF 60 kg P2O5 ha−1
59 ± 0 b
184 ± 23 a
11 ± 1 a
47 ± 5 a
68 ± 13 a
At 60 days after sowing, the most common mycorrhizae structures on all treatments were intra or extra-radical hyphae. Vesicles were found only on inoculated plants on which there was no P application and those that received 30 kg P2O5 ha−1. In the same way, arbuscles were found only on plants that were inoculated and did not receive any P application (Table 3).
Table 3
AMF structures in root. AMF structures are present on 25% of root samples (+); mycorrhizae structures are present on 50% of root samples (++); mycorrhizae structures are present on 100% of root samples (++++); mycorrhizae structures are not present (−)
Treatments
AMF structures
Hyphae
Vesicles
Arbuscles
Without AMF 0 kg P2O5 ha−1
++
Without AMF30 kg P2O5 ha−1
++++
Without AMF 60 kg P2O5 ha−1
++++
With AMF 0 kg P2O5 ha−1
++++
+
+
With AMF 30 kg P2O5 ha−1
++++
+
With AMF 60 kg P2O5 ha−1
++++

Yield Parameters

Yield results (Table 4) shows that the AMF treatments had a significant effect on yield parameters, except cob height insertion and cob length, which varied more with P treatments than with AMF inoculum. The height at the cob insertion, cob weight, cob length, cob diameter and the number of seed rows varied more with P than with AMF inoculum applied. Obtained averages under P influence were double or threefold higher than the control and AMF treatment alone. Cobs were then inserted between 73 and 103 cm height for 30 or 60 kg P2O5 ha−1, whereas without P cob insertion was observed between 30 cm (for the control) and 40 cm (for inocula alone). The highest cob weight was obtained on treatments with 60 kg P2O5 ha−1 with or without inocula, i.e. 145 to 146 g. The length of these cobs measured on average 15 cm. A fertilization with 30 kg P2O5 ha−1 gave cobs weighing 79 to 107 g with a length of 12 to 13 cm. The lowest cob weight was obtained on inocula alone and the control, respectively 4 to 13 g, and a cob length of 6 to 7 cm. The cob diameter was the same for 30 kg and 60 kg P2O5 ha−1, being 42 to 45 mm. The AMF only treatment had 24 mm of cob diameter, double compared to the control. Cobs from the 30 and 60 kg P2O5 ha−1 treatments without inoculum contained 13 seed rows, whereas they were empty for the control treatment. AMF combined to 60 kg P ha−1 had 13 seed rows followed by AMF combined with 30 kg P2O5 ha−1 with 11 seed rows, cobs from the AMF only treatment had 7 rows. The comparison of the treatments 30 kg P2O5 ha−1 with AMF and 30 kg P2O5 ha−1 without AMF considering grain weight, grain yield and grain phosphorus content parameters shows better the influence of AMF on P uptake. The addition of 30 kg P2O5 ha−1 produced 59 g of grains per cob, the AMF inoculation offer 12 g of grains per cob, whereas the control treatment had cobs without grains. The results found indicate that the AMF treatments had a highly significant effect on P uptake. The P treatments and their interaction with AMF also had a strong effect. Grains from inoculated plants had a double content of phosphorus in comparison with un-inoculated plants. The highest phosphorus content in maize grains was 1.41 mg phosphorus g−1 obtained on AMF inoculation alone followed by inoculum +60 kg of P2O5 ha−1 and inoculum +30 kg of P2O5 ha−1.
Table 4
Yield parameters and phosphorus content in maize grains. The means that do not share any letters in a group in each column are significantly different after ANOVA and the Tukey multiple comparison test (P < 0.05)
Treatments
Cob insertion height (cm)
Cob weight (g)
Cob length (cm)
Cob diameter (mm)
Seed raw number
Grain weight (g)
Yield of grains tons/hectare
Grain phosphorus content (mg of phosphorus g−1)
Mycorrhizal inoculum
Without AMF
70 ± 35a
76 ± 82a
11 ± 4a
33 ± 15a
13 ± 1a
86 ± 33a
3.0 ± 2.6a
0.70 ± 0a
With AMF
67 ± 27a
89 ± 60a
11 ± 4a
36 ± 11a
10 ± 3b
71 ± 48a
3.7 ± 2.5a
0.97 ± 0a
Phosphorus (kg P2O5)
0 kg P2O5 ha−1
35 ± 13C
9 ± 6C
6 ± 1C
18 ± 9B
7 ± 0B
12 ± 1C
0.3 ± 0.3C
0.71 ± 0A
30 kg P2O5 ha−1
76 ± 19B
93 ± 23B
12 ± 2B
41 ± 3A
12 ± 3A
71 ± 21B
3.7 ± 1.1B
0.72 ± 0A
60 kg P2O5 ha−1
96 ± 18A
146 ± 22A
15 ± 3A
45 ± 2A
13 ± 1A
116 ± 17A
6.1 ± 0.9A
0.73 ± 0A
AMF×Phosphorus
Without AMF 0 kg P2O5 ha−1
30 ± 3b
4 ± 2c
6 ± 1b
12 ± 4c
Without AMF30 kg P2O5 ha−1
78 ± 26a
79 ± 22b
13 ± 2a
42 ± 2a
13 ± 1a
59 ± 20b
3.1 ± 1.0b
0.69 ± 0b
Without AMF 60 kg P2O5 ha−1
103 ± 12a
145 ± 19a
15 ± 2a
44 ± 2a
13 ± 1a
114 ± 15a
6.0 ± 0.7a
0.71 ± 0b
With AMF 0 kg P2O5 ha−1
40 ± 17b
13 ± 6c
7 ± 1b
24 ± 8b
7 ± 0b
12 ± 1c
0.6 ± 0.0c
1.42 ± 0a
With AMF 30 kg P2O5 ha−1
73 ± 12a
107 ± 16b
12 ± 1a
40 ± 4a
11 ± 4a
83 ± 15b
4.4 ± 0.8b
0.74 ± 1b
With AMF 60 kg P2O5 ha−1
89 ± 23a
146 ± 26a
15 ± 3a
45 ± 3a
13 ± 1a
118 ± 20a
6.2 ± 1.0a
0.75 ± 0b

Discussion

Vegetative Growth Parameters

Plaxton and Tran (2011) and Stigter and Plaxton (2015) have shown the phosphorus implication in plant physiology already which lead to the amine acid and protein constitution; and its deficiency in the soil can reduce severely the grain’s production. AMF contribution to maize growth was strongly observed on male precocity on the plants inoculated and fertilized (59 and 62 days after sowing) in comparison to the control (93 days after sowing). Inoculating crops conferred an advance of 30 days duration at flowering, which is explained by P acquiring which is the first benefit of the symbiosis. Oehl et al. (2011b) demonstrated that for plants inoculated with AMF and fertilized, flowering occurred earlier compared to those that were not inoculated. The same average was obtained for plant height, leaves number and chlorophyll rate in leaves especially on treatments inoculated and fertilized with 30 or 60 kg P2O5 ha−1. This joins the allegations of Davies and Linderman (1990) and Aguegue et al. (2017) showing that the only micro-doses of chemical fertilizers (half of the crop demand) are sufficient to promote plant growth when AMF have been applied. Munir et al. (2003) also showed that the addition of phosphorus decreases the mycorrhizal symbiosis because the plant’s growth depends on the chemical fertilizer.

Phosphorus Fertilizer Effect on Root Colonization

Root colonization was very intense (73%) on inoculated plants without P addition and less intense (25%) on control plants, the difference being 48%. The inoculated plants were more colonized (57%) than un-inoculated plants, which had a mean of 40% root colonization rate. This root colonization rate can be explained by AMF previously existing in the experimental soil. As shown in the methodology, the experimental soil harboured 150 mycorrhizae spores per 100 g soil, a spore density sufficient to colonize the roots of a given crop. This is sufficiently proving the ubiquist character of AMF in soils as underlined by Liu et al. (2016), Cozzolino et al. (2013) and Ambrosini et al. (2015). Although most soils contain AMF, inoculation is still very important because it provides new AMF propagules capable of colonizing the newly established crop as quickly as possible. While assessing the root colonization, fungal hyphae as primary structure of symbiosis were present in all treatments. However, vesicles were only found in treatments with inoculum alone or combined to the small dose of 30 kg P2O5 ha−1. The dose of 60 kg P2O5 ha−1 seemed to compromise the vesicle formation on roots. The highest dose of P2O5 (60 kg ha−1) reduces fungi activity in the root and compromises arbuscles or vesicles formation, as was also observed by Braunberger et al. (1991).

Yield Parameters and Grains Phosphorus Content

The height at the cob insertion, the weight of cobs, their length and diameter were not directly influenced by AMF inoculum but rather by phosphorus applications. Fertilization with 30 kg P2O5 ha−1 seemed to be sufficient to improve the nutritional status of the Ferralsol used as substrate for this experiment, compared to the dose of 60 kg P2O5 ha−1 which is low cost effectiveness. These results are nearing those found by Aguegue et al. (2017) in Ferralsol in southern Benin, indicating that Glomus cubens species combined to a half dose of chemical fertilizers of NPK (7.5 P2O5 kg ha−1) allow to get an equivalent production of maize to that obtained using the recommended dose of NPK (15 P2O5 kg ha−1) alone. The AMF inoculum alone given cobs well filled with grains, thus much better than plants of the control (without phosphorus neither AMF inoculum) given cobs without grains. The AMF showed P efficiency in the experimental soil; this induced the fruition. Several researchers such as Pandey et al. (2005) and Huang et al. (2017) have demonstrated the mycorrhiza efficiency in plant production. Grain P concentration increased with both inoculation and P fertilization. The highest P concentration was obtained with the treatment of inocula alone. This proves that mycorrhizae can be used as biofertilizers as confirmed by Miransari (2011) and Zhang et al. (2017), and that these fungi enhance chemical P uptake through fungal hyphae. Results of this study showed that the grain P concentration was 2 to 3 times lower than the standard P concentration (210 mg 100 g−1) contained in maize grains (Messiaen and Fakorede 2006). This gap could be explained by root concentration in the pot experiment culture that uptakes only mineral fertilizers than field experiments which benefit also the soil minerals.

Conclusions

The results of this research have shown that the use of 30 kg P2O5 ha−1 (i.e. half of the recommended dose of 60 kg P2O5 ha−1) in the tropical soil like Lubumbashi’s Ferralsols, combined with AMF was sufficient to obtain a good maize production. The combination of AMF with a low dose of P fertilizers (30 kg P2O5 ha−1) or the recommended dose of 60 kg P2O5 ha−1 were the best treatments making the flowering duration short, but also allowing to obtain sturdy plants and a production of cobs with a considerable length and diameter. However, economically, it would be recommendable to use the dose of 30 kg P2O5 ha−1. AMF used alone appeared to be an alternative to the lack of P in poor soils, provided that N and K were preliminary added to the soil.

Acknowledgements

We address our sincere gratitude to VLIR UOS for its support and research financing during this study, for field and laboratory work.

Conflict of interest

A. Tshibangu Kazadi, J. Lwalaba Wa Lwalaba, B. Kirika Ansey, J. Mavungu Muzulukwau, G. Manda Katabe, M. Iband Karul, G. Baert, G. Haesaert and R.-P. Mukobo Mundende declare that they have no competing interests.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aguegue M, Noumavo P, Dagbenonbakin G, Agbodjato NA, Assogba S, Koda AD, Adjanohoum A, Rivera R, Blanca M (2017) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fertilization of corn (Zea mays L.) cultivated on ferrous soil in southern Benin. JAS 5:99–115CrossRef Aguegue M, Noumavo P, Dagbenonbakin G, Agbodjato NA, Assogba S, Koda AD, Adjanohoum A, Rivera R, Blanca M (2017) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fertilization of corn (Zea mays L.) cultivated on ferrous soil in southern Benin. JAS 5:99–115CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ambrosini GV, Voges GJ, Canton L, Couto RR, Ferreira EAP, Comin JJ, Melo GWB, Brunetto G, Sores CRFS (2015) Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on young vines copper-contaminated soil. Braz J Microbiol 46:1045–1052CrossRef Ambrosini GV, Voges GJ, Canton L, Couto RR, Ferreira EAP, Comin JJ, Melo GWB, Brunetto G, Sores CRFS (2015) Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on young vines copper-contaminated soil. Braz J Microbiol 46:1045–1052CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beaudin I, Giroux M, Michaud A, Martin Y, Pellerin A, Bochove E, Beaudet P (2008) Les sources, les formes et la gestion du Phosphore en milieu agricole. Fiche technique n°2. Centre de référence en agriculture et agroalimentaire du Québec, , p 16 Beaudin I, Giroux M, Michaud A, Martin Y, Pellerin A, Bochove E, Beaudet P (2008) Les sources, les formes et la gestion du Phosphore en milieu agricole. Fiche technique n°2. Centre de référence en agriculture et agroalimentaire du Québec, , p 16
Zurück zum Zitat Braunberger PG, Miller MH, Peterson RL (1991) Effect of phosphorus nutrition on morphological characteristics of vesicular mycorrhizal colonization of maize. New Phytol 119:107–113CrossRef Braunberger PG, Miller MH, Peterson RL (1991) Effect of phosphorus nutrition on morphological characteristics of vesicular mycorrhizal colonization of maize. New Phytol 119:107–113CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chang E‑H, Zhang S‑F, Wang Z‑Q, Wang W‑M, Yang J‑C (2008) Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on the amino acids in root exudates and grains of rice during grain filling. Acta Agron Sinica 34:612–618 Chang E‑H, Zhang S‑F, Wang Z‑Q, Wang W‑M, Yang J‑C (2008) Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on the amino acids in root exudates and grains of rice during grain filling. Acta Agron Sinica 34:612–618
Zurück zum Zitat Cozzolino V, Meo DV, Piccolo A (2013) Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi applications on maize production and soil phosphorus availability. J Geochem Explor 129:40–44CrossRef Cozzolino V, Meo DV, Piccolo A (2013) Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi applications on maize production and soil phosphorus availability. J Geochem Explor 129:40–44CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Davies FT, Linderman RG (1990) Short term effects of phosphorus and VA-mycorrhizal fungi on nutrition, growth and development of Capsicum annuum L. Sci Hortic 45:333–338CrossRef Davies FT, Linderman RG (1990) Short term effects of phosphorus and VA-mycorrhizal fungi on nutrition, growth and development of Capsicum annuum L. Sci Hortic 45:333–338CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Enita B (2000) Agronomie des bases aux nouvelles orientations. Editions Synthèses Agricoles. ISBN 2‑910340-32‑5 Enita B (2000) Agronomie des bases aux nouvelles orientations. Editions Synthèses Agricoles. ISBN 2‑910340-32‑5
Zurück zum Zitat Eppendorfer WH, Eggum BO (1994) Effects of sulphur, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and water stress on dietary fibre fractions, strarch, amino acids and on the biological value of patoto protein. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 45:299–313CrossRef Eppendorfer WH, Eggum BO (1994) Effects of sulphur, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and water stress on dietary fibre fractions, strarch, amino acids and on the biological value of patoto protein. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 45:299–313CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Erdinc C, Dukar DE, Ekincialp A, Sensoy S, Demir S (2017) Variation in response of determinate common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation. Turk J Agric For 41:1–9CrossRef Erdinc C, Dukar DE, Ekincialp A, Sensoy S, Demir S (2017) Variation in response of determinate common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation. Turk J Agric For 41:1–9CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grant CA, Bittman S, Montreal M, Plenchette C, Morel C (2004) Soil and fertilizer phosphorous: effects on plant P supply and mycorrhizal development. Can J Plant Sci 10:1–14 Grant CA, Bittman S, Montreal M, Plenchette C, Morel C (2004) Soil and fertilizer phosphorous: effects on plant P supply and mycorrhizal development. Can J Plant Sci 10:1–14
Zurück zum Zitat Grant CA, Flaten DN, Tomasiewiez DJ, Sheppartd SC (2014) Importance of early season phosphorus nutrition. Can J Plant Sci 85:18–23 Grant CA, Flaten DN, Tomasiewiez DJ, Sheppartd SC (2014) Importance of early season phosphorus nutrition. Can J Plant Sci 85:18–23
Zurück zum Zitat Huang L, He Y, Guo Y (2017) The efficiency of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in promoting alfalfa growth in acid soils. JAS 9:186–204CrossRef Huang L, He Y, Guo Y (2017) The efficiency of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in promoting alfalfa growth in acid soils. JAS 9:186–204CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jan B, Sharif M, Khan F, Bakht J (2014) Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza fungal inoculation with compost on yield and P uptake of wheat in alkaline calcareous soil. AJPS 5:1995–2004CrossRef Jan B, Sharif M, Khan F, Bakht J (2014) Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza fungal inoculation with compost on yield and P uptake of wheat in alkaline calcareous soil. AJPS 5:1995–2004CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Liu W, Zhang Y, Jiang S, Yan D, Christie P, Murray PJ, Li X, Zhang J (2016) Arbuscular mycorhizal fungi in soil and roots respond differently to phosphorus inputs in an intensively managed calcareous agricultural soil. Nature Sci Rep 6:24902 Liu W, Zhang Y, Jiang S, Yan D, Christie P, Murray PJ, Li X, Zhang J (2016) Arbuscular mycorhizal fungi in soil and roots respond differently to phosphorus inputs in an intensively managed calcareous agricultural soil. Nature Sci Rep 6:24902
Zurück zum Zitat Martin-Prével P, Montagut G (1966) Fonctions des divers organes dans l’assimilation de P, K, Ca, Mg. Essais sol-Plante sur Bananiers vol 21. Institut Français de Recherche Fruitières Outre-Mer (I.F.A.C.), , pp 395–416 Martin-Prével P, Montagut G (1966) Fonctions des divers organes dans l’assimilation de P, K, Ca, Mg. Essais sol-Plante sur Bananiers vol 21. Institut Français de Recherche Fruitières Outre-Mer (I.F.A.C.), , pp 395–416
Zurück zum Zitat Messiaen CM, Fakorede MAB (2006) Zea mays L. In: Brink M, Belay G (eds) PROTA 1 : Cereals and pulses/Céréales et légumes secs. PROTA, Wageningen (CD-Rom) Messiaen CM, Fakorede MAB (2006) Zea mays L. In: Brink M, Belay G (eds) PROTA 1 : Cereals and pulses/Céréales et légumes secs. PROTA, Wageningen (CD-Rom)
Zurück zum Zitat Miransari M (2011) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and nitrogen uptake. Arch Mycrobiology 193:77–81CrossRef Miransari M (2011) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and nitrogen uptake. Arch Mycrobiology 193:77–81CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mukerji KG, Manoharachary C, Chamola BP (2002) Techniques in Mycorrhizal studies. In: soil Microbes. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–13 Mukerji KG, Manoharachary C, Chamola BP (2002) Techniques in Mycorrhizal studies. In: soil Microbes. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–13
Zurück zum Zitat Munir MJ, Malkawi HI, Shibli R (2003) Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi and phosphorus fertilization on growth and nutrient uptake of barley grown on soils with different levels of salts. J Plant Nutr 26:125–137CrossRef Munir MJ, Malkawi HI, Shibli R (2003) Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi and phosphorus fertilization on growth and nutrient uptake of barley grown on soils with different levels of salts. J Plant Nutr 26:125–137CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oehl F, Jansa J, Ineichen K, Mäder P, Van der Heijden M (2011a) Champignons mycorhiziens arbusculaires bioindicateurs dans les sols agricoles suisses. Recherche Agron Sviesuisse 2:304–311 Oehl F, Jansa J, Ineichen K, Mäder P, Van der Heijden M (2011a) Champignons mycorhiziens arbusculaires bioindicateurs dans les sols agricoles suisses. Recherche Agron Sviesuisse 2:304–311
Zurück zum Zitat Oehl F, Sieverding E, Palenzuela J, Ineichen K, Da Silva GA (2011b) Advances in Glomeromycota taxonomy and classification. IMA Fungus 2:191–199CrossRef Oehl F, Sieverding E, Palenzuela J, Ineichen K, Da Silva GA (2011b) Advances in Glomeromycota taxonomy and classification. IMA Fungus 2:191–199CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oteino N, Lally RD, Kiwanuka S, Lioyd A, Ryan D, Kieran JG, Dowling DN (2015) Plant growth promotion induced by phosphate solubilizing endophytic Pseudomonas isolates. Front Microbiol 6:1–9CrossRef Oteino N, Lally RD, Kiwanuka S, Lioyd A, Ryan D, Kieran JG, Dowling DN (2015) Plant growth promotion induced by phosphate solubilizing endophytic Pseudomonas isolates. Front Microbiol 6:1–9CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pandey R, Singh B, Nair TVR (2005) Impact of Arbuscular-Mycorhizal fungi on phosphorus efficiency of wheat, rye, and triticale. J of Plant Nutrition 28:1867–1876CrossRef Pandey R, Singh B, Nair TVR (2005) Impact of Arbuscular-Mycorhizal fungi on phosphorus efficiency of wheat, rye, and triticale. J of Plant Nutrition 28:1867–1876CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Plaxton WC, Tran HT (2011) Metabolic adaptations of phosphate-starved plants. Plant Physiol 156:1006–1015CrossRef Plaxton WC, Tran HT (2011) Metabolic adaptations of phosphate-starved plants. Plant Physiol 156:1006–1015CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Raemaekers RH (2001) Agriculture en Afrique tropicale. Press académique royale, Bruxelles, pp 337–355 Raemaekers RH (2001) Agriculture en Afrique tropicale. Press académique royale, Bruxelles, pp 337–355
Zurück zum Zitat Selvaraj T, Chellappan P (2006) Arbuscular mycorrhizae: a diverse personality. J Cent Agric 7:349–358 Selvaraj T, Chellappan P (2006) Arbuscular mycorrhizae: a diverse personality. J Cent Agric 7:349–358
Zurück zum Zitat Stigter KA, Plaxton WC (2015) Molecular mechanisms of phosphorus metabolism and transport during leaf senescence. Plants 4:773–798CrossRef Stigter KA, Plaxton WC (2015) Molecular mechanisms of phosphorus metabolism and transport during leaf senescence. Plants 4:773–798CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Trappe JM (1992) Synoptic key to the genera and species of Zygomycetous Mycorrhizal fungi. Symposium on Mycorrhizae and Plant Disease Research, p 7 Trappe JM (1992) Synoptic key to the genera and species of Zygomycetous Mycorrhizal fungi. Symposium on Mycorrhizae and Plant Disease Research, p 7
Zurück zum Zitat Tshibangu AK, Shutcha MN, Baert G, Haesaert G, Mukobo R‑RM (2020a) Effect of soil properties on Arbuscular Mycorrhizae fungi (AMF) activity and assessment of some methods of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) inoculation in Lubumbashi region (DR. Congo). Sch Bull 6(8):198–207CrossRef Tshibangu AK, Shutcha MN, Baert G, Haesaert G, Mukobo R‑RM (2020a) Effect of soil properties on Arbuscular Mycorrhizae fungi (AMF) activity and assessment of some methods of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) inoculation in Lubumbashi region (DR. Congo). Sch Bull 6(8):198–207CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Walker C, Mize CW, Mc. Nabb HS Jr. (2006) Populations of endogoneous fungi at two locations in central Iowa. Can J Bot 60:2518–2529CrossRef Walker C, Mize CW, Mc. Nabb HS Jr. (2006) Populations of endogoneous fungi at two locations in central Iowa. Can J Bot 60:2518–2529CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang H, Wei S, Hu W, Xiao L, Tang M (2017) Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus Rhizophagus irregularis Increased Potassium Content and Expression of Genes Encoding Potassium Channels in Lycium barbarum. Front Plant Sci 8:1–11 Zhang H, Wei S, Hu W, Xiao L, Tang M (2017) Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus Rhizophagus irregularis Increased Potassium Content and Expression of Genes Encoding Potassium Channels in Lycium barbarum. Front Plant Sci 8:1–11
Metadaten
Titel
Effect of Phosphorus and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) Inoculation on Growth and Productivity of Maize (Zea mays L.) in a Tropical Ferralsol
verfasst von
Audry Tshibangu Kazadi
Jonas Lwalaba wa Lwalaba
Bibich Kirika Ansey
Judith Mavungu Muzulukwau
Gabriella Manda Katabe
Martine Iband Karul
Geert Baert
Geert Haesaert
Robert-Prince Mukobo Mundende
Publikationsdatum
10.11.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Journal of Crop Health / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 2948-264X
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-2658
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-021-00598-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

Gesunde Pflanzen 1/2022 Zur Ausgabe