Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Unexpected Cracking in an RC Bridge Pier Cap—A Case Study Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Effect of Rigidity on Seismic Analysis of Structures

verfasst von : M. Dhileep, P. D. Arumairaj, G. Hemalatha, M. S. Sandeep

Erschienen in: Advances in Civil Engineering

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In response spectrum method, the modal seismic response is a combination of the damped periodic part and a rigid part. In high-frequency modes, the damped periodic part of the response is negligible and the response becomes rigid. The proposed methods and the current practices that have been used to account the effect of rigid part of the response into the seismic analysis of structures and their modal response combination methods are reviewed. Case studies on (i) a squat shear wall with an aspect ratio less than unity to show the behavior of a structure in high-frequency region of a spectrum and (ii) a building with a stiff base supporting a tower to show the effect of “missing mass” on the seismic analysis of structures with rigid modes are presented. The paper concludes with a set of methods for considering the effect of rigidity in earthquake analysis of irregular structures based on the latest developments in the field.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Properties of Coconut Shell Aggregate Concrete: A Review
Nächstes Kapitel Effect of pH on Compressibility Behaviour of Cement-Treated Soil
Literatur
1.
Dhileep M, Bose PR (2009) Seismic analysis of irregular buildings: “missing mass” effect. J Struct Eng SERC 35:359–365
2.
Gupta AK, Hassan T, Gupta A (1996) Correlation coefficients for modal response combination of non-classically damped systems. Nuclear Eng Des 165:67–80CrossRef
3.
Gupta AK (1992) Response spectrum method: in seismic analysis and design of structures. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston, Mass
4.
Chopra AK (2008) Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering. Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi
5.
Powel GH (1979) Missing mass correction in modal analysis of piping systems. In: Transaction of the 5th interntional conference on structural mechanics in Reactor Tech, vol k(b)
6.
Gupta AK, Jaw JW (1984) Modal combination in response spectrum analysis of piping systems. In: Seismic effects in PVP components. PVP. ASME, p 88
7.
Gupta A, Gupta AK (1998a) Missing mass effect in coupled analysis I: complex modal properties. J Struct Eng ASCE 124:490–495CrossRef
8.
Salmonte AJ (1982) Considerations on the residual contribution in modal analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 10:295–304CrossRef
9.
Geradin M, Rixen D (1997) Mechanical vibrations: theory and applications to structural dynamics. Wiley, Chichester, England
10.
Hure D, Morysse M (1976) Comparative methods for analysis of piping systems subjected to seismic motion. Nuclear Eng Des 38:511–525CrossRef
11.
Krause G (1979) Residual load method for modal analysis of piping systems subjected to seismic excitation. Nuclear Eng Des 55:315–322CrossRef
12.
Vashi KM (1981) Computation of seismic response from higher frequency modes. In: Transaction of ASME, Pressure Vessels and Piping, 03
13.
Cornwell RE, Craig RR, Johnson CP (1983) On the application of the mode acceleration method to structural dynamics problems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 11:679–688CrossRef
14.
Hadjian AH, Lin ST (1986) Higher modes contribution to total seismic response. In: Proceeding of U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol ll, Charleston S.C.
15.
Maldonado GO, Singh MP (1991a) An improved response spectrum method for calculating seismic design response: part 1 classically damped structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 20:621–635CrossRef
16.
Maldonado GO, Singh MP (1991b) An improved response spectrum method for calculating seismic design response: part 2 non-classically damped structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 20:637–649CrossRef
17.
Mitchell LD (1994) Modal test methods: quality, quantity and unobtainable. J Sound Vibr 28:10–17
18.
Gupta A, Gupta AK (1998b) Missing mass effect in coupled analysis II: residual response. J Struct Eng ASCE 124:496–500CrossRef
19.
Clough RW, Penzien J (1993) Dynamics of structures. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New YorkMATH
20.
Dickens JM, Nakagawa JM, Wittbrodt MJ (1997) A critique of mode acceleration and modal truncation augmentation methods for modal response analysis. Comput Struct 62:985–998CrossRef
21.
Dhileep M, Bose PR (2008) A comparative study of “missing mass” correction methods for response spectrum method of seismic analysis. Comput Struct 86:2087–2094CrossRef
22.
Zhao J, Gupta A (2002) Redundancy in residual vectors for missing mass effect in coupled modal synthesis. J Struct Eng ASCE 128:1231–1235CrossRef
23.
USNRC (2006) Combining modal responses and spatial components in seismic response analysis. Regulatory guide 1.92, Office of nuclear regulatory research, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission R2.
24.
Chopra AK (1996) Modal analysis of linear dynamic systems: physical interpretation. J Struct Eng ASCE 122:517–527CrossRef
25.
Dhileep M, Nair SS (2012) Effect of rigid content on modal response combination. In: Proceedings of the ICE—Structures and Buildings, vol 165, pp 287–297
26.
Morante R, Wang Y, Chokshi N, Kenneally R, Norris W (1999) Evaluation of modal combination methods for seismic response spectrum analysis. In: 15th international conference on structural mechanics in reactor technology, Seoul
27.
Saigal RK, Gupta A (2007) Combination of modal responses: a closed-form formulation for rigid response coefficient. Nuclear Eng Des 237:2075–2082CrossRef
28.
Paulay T, Priestley MJN, Singe AJ (1982) Ductility in earthquake resisting squat shear walls. ACI J 79(4):257–269
29.
Farrar CR, Baker WE (1993) Experimental assessment of low-aspect-ratio, reinforced concrete shear wall stiffness. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 22:373–387CrossRef
30.
Beko A, Rosko P, Wenzel H, Pegon P, Markovic D, Molina FJ (2015) RC shear walls: full-scale cyclic test, insights and derived analytical model. Eng Struct 102:120–131CrossRef
31.
32.
Brun M, Labbe P, Bertrand D, Courtois A (2011) Pseudo-dynamic tests on low-rise shear walls and simplified model based on the structural frequency drift. Eng Struct 33:796–812CrossRef
33.
Rama Rao GV, Gopalakrishnan N, Jaya KP, Muthumani K, Reddy GR, Parulekar YM (2014) Studies on nonlinear behavior of shear walls of medium aspect ratio under monotonic and cyclic loading. J Perform Constr Facil ASCE 30(1)
34.
Whyte CA, Stojadinovic B (2013) Effect of ground motion sequence on response of squat reinforced concrete shear walls. J Struct Eng ASCE
35.
DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943–541X.0000912
36.
Wilson EL, Der Kiureghian A, Bayot EP (1981) A replacement for the SRSS method in seismic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 9:187–194CrossRef
37.
Der Kiureghian A (1981) A response spectrum method for random vibration analysis of MDF systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 9:419–435CrossRef
38.
ASCE/SEI 7-10 (2010) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Virginia
39.
ASCE/SEI 4-16 (2017) Seismic analysis of safety-related nuclear structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Virginia
40.
IS 1893 (Part 1) (2016) Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, part 1 general provision and buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi
41.
International Association for Earthquake Engineering, Regulations for Seismic Design—A World List, 1996
42.
International Association for Earthquake Engineering, Regulations for Seismic Design–A World List 1996—Supplement, 2000
43.
UBC (1997) Structural design requirements. In: International conference of building officials, vol 2, California, USA
44.
Comite Europeen de Normalisation CEN (2004) Eurocode 8—Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part-1. General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
45.
Standards New Zealand (2004) NZS 1170–5 (S1): structural design actions—Part 5: earthquake actions—New Zealand. Wellington, NZ
46.
Standard No. 2800 (2007) Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings. BHRC Publication No. S-465, Tehran
47.
The Government of the Republic of Turkey (2007) Specification for buildings to be built in seismic Zzones. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Government of the Republic of Turkey
48.
SNI-02-1726-2002 (2002) Seismic resistance design standard for buildings. Ministry of Public Work, Indonesian National Standardization Agency
49.
Caltrans (2013) Caltrans seismic design criteria version 1.7. Sacramento. California Department of Transportation, CA
50.
Lopez OA, Cruz M (1996) Number of modes for the seismic design of buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25:837–855CrossRef
51.
Mehr M, Zaghi AE (2016) Seismic response of multi-frame bridges. Bull Earthq Eng 14(4):1219–1243CrossRef
52.
53.
Metadaten
Titel
Effect of Rigidity on Seismic Analysis of Structures
verfasst von
M. Dhileep
P. D. Arumairaj
G. Hemalatha
M. S. Sandeep
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Advances in Civil Engineering

Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5643-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-15-5644-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5644-9_62