Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Addressing the Challenges of COVID-19 Social Distancing Through Passive Wi-Fi and Ubiquitous Analytics: A Real World Deployment Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Effects of Interactivity and Presentation on Review-Based Explanations for Recommendations

verfasst von : Diana C. Hernandez-Bocanegra, Jürgen Ziegler

Erschienen in: Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

User reviews have become an important source for recommending and explaining products or services. Particularly, providing explanations based on user reviews may improve users’ perception of a recommender system (RS). However, little is known about how review-based explanations can be effectively and efficiently presented to users of RS. We investigate the potential of interactive explanations in review-based RS in the domain of hotels, and propose an explanation scheme inspired by dialogue models and formal argument structures. Additionally, we also address the combined effect of interactivity and different presentation styles (i.e. using only text, a bar chart or a table), as well as the influence that different user characteristics might have on users’ perception of the system and its explanations. To such effect, we implemented a review-based RS using a matrix factorization explanatory method, and conducted a user study. Our results show that providing more interactive explanations in review-based RS has a significant positive influence on the perception of explanation quality, effectiveness and trust in the system by users, and that user characteristics such as rational decision-making style and social awareness also have a significant influence on this perception.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel You Sound Relaxed Now – Measuring Restorative Effects from Speech Signals
Nächstes Kapitel Human-XAI Interaction: A Review and Design Principles for Explanation User Interfaces
Literatur
1.
Abdul, A., Vermeulen, J., Wang, D., Lim, B.Y., Kankanhalli, M.: Trends and trajectories for explainable, accountable and intelligible systems: an HCI research agenda. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2018, p. 1–18 (2018)
2.
3.
4.
Bauman, K., Liu, B., Tuzhilin, A.: Aspect based recommendations: recommending items with the most valuable aspects based on user reviews. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 717–725 (2017)
5.
Bentahar, J., Moulin, B., Belanger, M.: A taxonomy of argumentation models used for knowledge representation. Artif. Intell. Rev. 33(3), 211–259 (2010)CrossRef
6.
Berkovsky, S., Taib, R., Conway, D.: How to recommend?: user trust factors in movie recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 287–300 (2017)
7.
Blair, J.A.: The possibility and actuality of visual arguments. In: Tindale, C. (eds.) Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation, vol. 21, pp. 205–223 (2012)
8.
Carenini, G., Cheung, J.C.K., Pauls, A.: Multi document summarization of evaluative text. Comput. Intell. 29, 545–574 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRef
9.
Carenini, G., Moore, J.D.: Generating and evaluating evaluative arguments. Artif. Intell. 170, 925–952 (2006)CrossRef
10.
Casel: 2013 casel guide: Effective social and emotional learning programs - preschool and elementary school edition, collaborative for academic social and emotional learning (2013)
11.
Chen, C., Zhang, M., Liu, Y., Ma., S.: Neural attentional rating regression with review-level explanations. In: Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1583–1592. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (2018)
12.
Chen, L., Pu, P.: Critiquing-based recommenders: survey and emerging trends 22(1–2), 3085–3094 (2014)
13.
Cheng, H.F., et al.: Explaining decision-making algorithms through UI: strategies to help non-expert stakeholders. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–12 (2019)
14.
Costa, F., Ouyang, S., Dolog, P., Lawlor, A.: Automatic generation of natural language explanations. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion, pp. 57:1–57:2 (2018)
15.
Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:​1810.​04805 (2019)
16.
17.
Donkers, T., Kleemann, T., Ziegler, J.: Explaining recommendations by means of aspect-based transparent memories. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 166–176 (2020)
18.
Donkers, T., Ziegler, J.: Leveraging arguments in user reviews for generating and explaining recommendations. Datenbank-Spektrum 20(2), 181–187 (2020)CrossRef
19.
Driver, M.J., Brousseau, K.E., Hunsaker, P.L.: The dynamic decision maker (1990)
20.
Farkas, D.K., Farkas, J.B.: Guidelines for designing web navigation. Tech. Commun. 47(3), 341–358 (2000)
21.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G., Buchner, A.: G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 175–191 (2007)CrossRef
22.
Friedrich, G., Zanker, M.: A taxonomy for generating explanations in recommender systems. AI Mag. 32(3), 90–98 (2011)
23.
Habernal, I., Gurevych, I.: Argumentation mining in user-generated web discourse. Comput. Linguist. 43(1), 125–179 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRef
24.
Hamilton, K., Shih, S.I., Mohammed, S.: The development and validation of the rational and intuitive decision styles scale. J. Pers. Assess. 98(5), 523–535 (2016)CrossRef
25.
Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.: Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 241–250. ACM (2000)
26.
Hernandez-Bocanegra, D.C., Donkers, T., Ziegler, J.: Effects of argumentative explanation types on the perception of review-based recommendations. In: Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP 2020 Adjunct) (2020)
27.
Hilton, D.J.: Conversational processes and causal explanation. Physcol. Bull. 107(1), 65–81 (1990)
28.
Kirby, J.R., Moore, P.J., Schofield, N.J.: Verbal and visual learning styles. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 12(2), 169–184 (1988)CrossRef
29.
Klein, L.: Evaluating the potential of interactive media through a new lens: search versus experience goods. J. Bus. Res. 41, 195–203 (1998)CrossRef
30.
Knijnenburg, B.P., Willemsen, M.C., Gantner, Z., Soncu, H., Newell, C.: Explaining the user experience of recommender systems. In: User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, pp. 441–504 (2012)
31.
Kouki, P., Schaffer, J., Pujara, J., O’Donovan, J., Getoor, L.: Personalized explanations for hybrid recommender systems. In: Proceedings of 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI 19), pp. 379–390. ACM (2019)
32.
Krause, J., Perer, A., Ng, K.: Interacting with predictions: visual inspection of black-box machine learning models. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 5686–5697 (2016)
33.
Lamche, B., Adigüzel, U., Wörndl, W.: Interactive explanations in mobile shopping recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Personalization Approaches in Learning Environments (PALE 2014), held in conjunction with the 22nd International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP 2014), pp. 92–104 (2012)
34.
Lipton, P.: Contrastive explanation. Royal Inst. Philos. Suppl. 27, 247–266 (1990)CrossRef
35.
Liu, Y., Shrum, L.J.: What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. J. Advert. 31(4), 53–64 (2002)CrossRef
36.
Loepp, B., Herrmanny, K., Ziegler, J.: Blended recommending: integrating interactive information filtering and algorithmic recommender techniques. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2015, pp. 975–984 (2015)
37.
Loepp, B., Hussein, T., Ziegler, J.: Choice-based preference elicitation for collaborative filtering recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2014, pp. 3085–3094 (2014)
38.
Madumal, P., Miller, T., Sonenberg, L., Vetere, F.: A grounded interaction protocol for explainable artificial intelligence. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2019, pp. 1–9 (2019)
39.
McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V., Kacmar, C.: Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Inf. Syst. Res. 13, 334–359 (2002)CrossRef
40.
Miller, T.: Explanation in artificial intelligence: insights from the social sciences. Artif. Intell. 267, 1–38 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRef
41.
Muhammad, K.I., Lawlor, A., Smyth, B.: A live-user study of opinionated explanations for recommender systems. In: Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI 2016), vol. 2, pp. 256–260 (2016)
42.
43.
Nelson, P.: Information and consumer behavior. J. Polit. Econ. 78(2), 311–329 (1970)CrossRef
44.
Nunes, I., Jannach, D.: A systematic review and taxonomy of explanations in decision support and recommender systems. User Model User Adap. 27, 393–444 (2017)CrossRef
45.
46.
Pu, P., Chen, L., Hu, R.: A user-centric evaluation framework for recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems - RecSys 2011, pp. 157–164 (2011)
47.
Rago, A., Cocarascu, O., Bechlivanidis, C., Toni, F.: Argumentation as a framework for interactive explanations for recommendations. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 805–815 (2020)
48.
Schein, A.I., Popescul, A., Ungar, L.H., Pennock, D.M.: Methods and metrics for cold-start recommendations. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2002, pp. 253–260 (2002)
49.
Schnotz, W.: Integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 2nd ed., pp. 72–103 (2014)
50.
Sniezek, J.A., Buckley, T.: Cueing and cognitive conflict in judge advisor decision making. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 62(2), 159–174 (1995)CrossRef
51.
Sokol, K., Flach, P.: LIMEtree: interactively customisable explanations based on local surrogate multi-output regression trees. arXiv preprint arXiv:​2005.​01427 (2020)
52.
Sokol, K., Flach, P.: One explanation does not fit all: the promise of interactive explanations for machine learning transparency 34(2), 235–250 (2020)
53.
Song, J.H., Zinkhan, G.M.: Determinants of perceived web site interactivity. J. Mark. 72(2), 99–113 (2008)CrossRef
54.
Steuer, J.: Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. J. Commun. 42(4), 73–93 (1992)CrossRef
55.
Tintarev, N.: Explanations of recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys 2007, pp. 203–206 (2007)
56.
Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: Evaluating the effectiveness of explanations for recommender systems. User Model. User Adapt. Interact. 22, 399–439 (2012)CrossRef
57.
Toulmin, S.E.: The uses of argument (1958)
58.
Vig, J., Sen, S., Riedl, J.: Tagsplanations: explaining recommendations using tags. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 47–56. ACM (2009)
59.
Wachsmuth, H., Trenkmann, M., Stein, B., Engels, G., Palakarska, T.: A review corpus for argumentation analysis. In: 15th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics, pp. 115–127 (2014)
60.
Walton, D.: The place of dialogue theory in logic. Comput. Sci. Commun. Stud. 123, 327–346 (2000)MATH
61.
Walton, D.: A new dialectical theory of explanation. Philos. Explor. 7(1), 71–89 (2004)CrossRef
62.
Walton, D.: A dialogue system specification for explanation. Synthese 182(3), 349–374 (2011)CrossRef
63.
Walton, D., Krabbe, E.C.W.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press, New York (1995)
64.
Wang, N., Wang, H., Jia, Y., Yin, Y.: Explainable recommendation via multi-task learning in opinionated text data. In: Proceedings of the 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2018, pp. 165–174 (2018)
65.
Weld, D.S., Bansal, G.: The challenge of crafting intelligible intelligence. Commun. ACM 62(6), 70–79 (2019)CrossRef
66.
Wu, Y., Ester, M.: Flame: a probabilistic model combining aspect based opinion mining and collaborative filtering. In: Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 153–162. ACM (2015)
67.
Xiao, B., Benbasat, I.: Ecommerce product recommendation agents: use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Q. 31(1), 137–209 (2007)CrossRef
68.
Yaniv, I., Milyavsky, M.: Using advice from multiple sources to revise and improve judgments. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 103, 104–120 (2007)CrossRef
69.
Zanker, M., Schoberegger, M.: An empirical study on the persuasiveness of fact-based explanations for recommender systems. In: Joint Workshop on Interfaces and Human Decision Making in Recommender Systems, pp. 33–36 (2014)
70.
Zhang, Y., Lai, G., Zhang, M., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Ma., S.: Explicit factor models for explainable recommendation based on phrase-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 83–92 (2014)
Metadaten
Titel
Effects of Interactivity and Presentation on Review-Based Explanations for Recommendations
verfasst von
Diana C. Hernandez-Bocanegra
Jürgen Ziegler
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Buch
Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85615-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-85616-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85616-8_35

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise