nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

9. Embedding Innovation: Bricolage and the Case of the Phnom Penh Water Supply Authority

verfasst von : Yishu Zhou, Leong Ching

Erschienen in: Institutional Entrepreneurship and Policy Change

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The explanatory capacity of dominant accounts of institutional theory is primarily focused on theories of institutional homogeneity and stability, and the persistence of institutions, which are “sticky” and resistant to modification (Pierson, 2000; see also Bakir & Jarvis in this volume). In part developed as a response to “prevailing conceptions of organizations as bounded, relatively autonomous, rational actors” (Scott & Meyer, 1994, p. 1), institutionalism provided a foil to what was perceived as the over-individualization of modern society by instead emphasizing the concept of agency as generated through collective action, sustained by shared understandings and associations, and dependent upon common underlying institutional processes (Frank & Meyer, 2002).

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel The Effects of Institutional Change on Austrian Integration Policy and the Contexts that Matter

Nächstes Kapitel Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Mission Creep of the National Bank of Hungary

Bakir, C. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and institutional change: Multilevel governance of central banking reform. Governance, 22(4), 571–598.CrossRef

Bakir, C. (2013). Bank behaviour and resilience: The effects of structures, institutions and agents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Ball, W. (1995). A pragmatic framework for the evaluation of policy arguments. Policy Studies Review, 14(1–2), 3–24.CrossRef

Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069701800106

Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2012). From there to here: Punctuated equilibrium to the general punctuation thesis to a theory of government information processing. Policy Studies Journal, 40(1), 1–19.CrossRef

Beckert, J. (1999). Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change: The role of strategic choice and institutionalized practices in organizations. Organization Studies, 20(5), 777–799.CrossRef

Bennett, W. L., & Feldman, M. S. (1982). Reconstructing reality in the courtroom. London: Tavistock Publications.

Berg, S. (2010). Water utility benchmarking: Measurement, methodologies, and performance incentives. London: IWA Publishing.

Biswas, A. K., & Tortajada, C. (2010). Water supply of Phnom Penh: An example of good governance. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 26(22), 157–172.CrossRef

Blyth, M. (2002). Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Campbell, J. L. (1997). Mechanisms of evolutionary change in economic governance: Interaction, interpretation and bricolage. In L. Magnusson & J. Ottoson (Eds.), Evolutionary economics and path dependence (pp. 10–32). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Campbell, J. L., & Pederson, O. K. (2001). The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Chan, E. S. (2009). Bring safe water to Phnom Penh’s city. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 25(4), 597–609.CrossRef

Cleaver, F. (2002). Reinventing institutions: Bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management. The European Journal of Development Research, 14(2), 11–30.CrossRef

Colomy, P. (1998). Neofunctionalism and neoinstitutionalism: Human agency and interest in institutional change. Sociological Forum, 13(2), 265–300.CrossRef

Colomy, P., & Rhoades, G. (1994). Toward a micro corrective of structural differentiation theory. Sociological Perspectives, 37(4), 547–583.CrossRef

Das, B., Chan, E. S., Visoth, C., Pangare, G., & Simpson, R. (2010). Sharing the reform process: Learning from the Phnom Penh Water Supply Authority (PPWSA). Bangkok: International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN).

DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3–22). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Press.

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (Vol. 17). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management, 14(4), 532–550.

Fligstein, N. (1997). Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 397–405.CrossRef

Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105–125.CrossRef

Frank, D. J., & Meyer, J. W. (2002). The profusion of individual roles and identities in the postwar period. Sociological Theory, 20(1), 86–105.CrossRef

Garud, R., Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28(7), 957–969.CrossRef

George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2004). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Gioia, D. A., & Chittipedi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448.

Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27–48.CrossRef

Greif, A., & Laitin, D. D. (2004). A theory of endogenous institutional change. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 633–652.CrossRef

Hay, C. (2001). The crisis of Keynesianism and the rise of neoliberalism in Britain: An ideational institutionalist approach. In J. L. Campbell & O. K. Pederson (Eds.), The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis (pp. 193–218). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Hay, C. (2006). Understanding regime change in British industrial relations. Labour History Symposium, 47(2), 227–235.

Holm, P. (1995). The dynamics of institutionalization: Transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 398–422.CrossRef

Hughes, C. (2013). Friction, good governance and the poor: Cases from Cambodia. International Peacekeeping, 20(2), 144–158.CrossRef

Kaplan, T. J. (1986). The narrative structure of policy analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 5(4), 761–778.CrossRef

Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, W. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–254). London: Sage Publications.CrossRef

Leca, B., Battilana, J., & Boxenbaum, E. (2008). Agency and institutions: A review of institutional entrepreneurship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.

Lejano, R. P., & Leong, C. (2012). A hermeneutic approach to explaining and understanding public controversies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 793–814.CrossRef

Leong, C. (2009). Ek Sonn Chan and the transformation of the Phnom Penh Water Supply Authority. Singapore: Institute of Water Policy.

Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (Eds.). (2009). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Merrey, D. J., & Cook, S. (2012). Fostering institutional creativity at multiple levels: Towards facilitated institutional bricolage. Water Alternatives, 5(1), 1–19.

Meyer, R. E. (2006). Visiting relatives: Current development in the sociology of knowledge. Organization, 13(5), 725–738.CrossRef

Mukhtarov, F. (2013). Translating water policy innovations into Kazakhstan: The importance of context. In V. de Kruijf et al. (Eds.), Water governance, policy and knowledge transfer: International studies on contextual water management. London: Earthscan.

Mukhtarov, F., Fox, S., Mukhamedova, N., & Wegerich, K. (2015). Institutional design in the face of contextual relevance: Water user groups in Turkey, Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan. Environmental Science & Policy, 53, 206–214.CrossRef

Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organizational Science, 1(3), 267–292.CrossRef

Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.CrossRef

Powell, W. W. (1991). Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 183–203). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Prokopy, L. S. (2005). The relationship between participation and project outcomes: Evidence from rural water supply projects in India. World Development, 3(11), 1801–1819.CrossRef

Rao, H. (2007). Caveat emptor: The construction of nonprofit consumer watchdog organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 912–961.CrossRef

Renzetti, S., & Dupont, D. (2003). The performance of municipal water utilities: The evidence on the role of ownership. Journal of Toxicology & Environmental Health, 67, 1861–1878.CrossRef

Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Political Science, 11(1), 303–326.CrossRef

Scott, R. W. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.) ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

Scott, R., & Meyer, J. (1994). Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

Seo, M., & Creed, W. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247.

Sewell, W. H., Jr. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.CrossRef

Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. A. (2005). Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35–67.CrossRef

Turner, J. H. (1986). Review essay: The theory of structuration. American Journal of Sociology, 91(4), 969–977.CrossRef

Wahid, F., & Sein, M. K. (2013). Institutional entrepreneurs: The driving force in institutionalization of public systems in developing countries. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 7(1), 76–92.CrossRef

Walgenbach, P., & Meyer, R. E. (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship and the structuring of organizations and markets. In A. Ebner & N. Beck (Eds.), The institutions of the market: Organizations, social systems, and governance (pp. 180–201). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Wilder, M., & Howlett, M. P. (2014). The politics of policy anomalies: Bricolage and the hermeneutics of paradigms. Critical Policy Studies, 8(2), 183–202.CrossRef

Zilber, T. B. (2006). The work of the symbolic in institutional processes: Translations of rational myths in Israeli hi-tech. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 281–303.CrossRef

Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13(1), 443–464.CrossRef

Titel: Embedding Innovation: Bricolage and the Case of the Phnom Penh Water Supply Authority
verfasst von: Yishu Zhou
Leong Ching
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Institutional Entrepreneurship and Policy Change
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70349-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-70350-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70350-3_9