nach oben

Erschienen in:

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. Energy Storage, Carbon Sequestration, and Geoengineering

verfasst von : Antoine Bret

Erschienen in: The Energy-Climate Continuum

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Each winter, when you are cold, everyone in southern Spain thinks the same: If only we could store just a little of the summer heat for the winter! For sure, we would not have to use any radiator.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel ABC of Climate Science

Nächstes Kapitel Non-fossil Energy Sources

This is the reason why besieged soldiers would throw boiling oil instead of water on their assaulters. You cannot throw 200 \(^{\circ }\)C water, because it is vapor. But you can do so with liquid oil.

This relative weakness of gravity is one of the greatest enigmas of contemporary theoretical physics. See the Wikipedia article on the “hierarchy problem”.

\(7.2\times 10^{-19}=0.0\)...16 zeros...072.

Closely related to what chemists call “enthalpy of combustion.”

Something may help though: The efficiency of an electric motor is far better than the one of a gasoline engine (about 90 vs. 25 %; see Wikipedia page on “Internal combustion engine”). The former gets the most out of the batteries energy content, while the latter wastes most of the gasoline energy.

See the April 11, 2013, press release on www.ifpenergiesnouvelles.fr, or [5].

Le Monde, Pierre le Hir, April 12th, 2013.

Fluorinated gases, used in aerosols, and banned in 1987 because of their effect on this ozone cap. Their usage has steadily decreased since then.

When drilling for oil, you frequently get gas as well. In case you do not want it, you just burn it. Yes, this is a complete waste of energy [9].

See www.fao.org.

The word here refers to a chemical mixture, not to a fix.

M. Dietenberger, Update for combustion properties of wood components. Fire Mater. 26(6), 255–267 (2002)

B. Dunn, H. Kamath, J.-M. Tarascon, Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices. Science 334(6058), 928–935 (2011)CrossRef

A. Züttel, Hydrogen storage methods. Naturwissenschaften 91, 157–172 (2004)CrossRef

R.M. Coveney, E.D. Goebel, E.J. Zeller, G. Dreschhoff, E.E. Angino, Serpentinization and the origin of hydrogen gas in Kansas. AAPG Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. 71(1), 39–48 (1987)

V. Beaumont, C. Vacquand, E. Deville, A. Prinzhofer, Hydrogen generation during serpentinisation in ophiolite complexes: a comparison of H2-rich gases from Oman, Philippines and Turkey. Geophys. Res. Abstr. 15, EGU2013–5553 (2013)

Richard Van Noorden, Carbon sequestration: buried trouble. Nat. News 463(7283), 871–873 (2010)CrossRef

R. Stuart, Haszeldine. Carbon capture and storage: how green can black be? Science 325(5948), 1647–1652 (2009)CrossRef

B. Metz and IPCC Working Group III, in Climate Change 2007 - Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group III Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Climate Change 2007 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007)

Jeff Tollefson, Oil boom raises burning issues. Nature 495(7441), 290 (2013)CrossRef

10.

Heather Keith, Brendan G. Mackey, David B. Lindenmayer, Re-evaluation of forest biomass carbon stocks and lessons from the world’s most carbon-dense forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106(28), 11635–11640 (2009)CrossRef

11.

D.O. Hall, K.K. Rao, Photosynthesis, Studies in Biology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)

12.

B. Husch, T.W. Beers, J. John, A. Kershaw, Forest Mensuration. Ecology (Wiley, New York, 2002)

13.

N.E. Vaughan, T.M. Lenton, A review of climate geoengineering proposals. Clim. Change 109, 745–790 (2011)CrossRef

14.

IPCC, Climate Change 2013—The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the 5th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014)

15.

J.M. Haywood, A. Jones, N. Bellouin, D. Stephenson, Asymmetric forcing from stratospheric aerosols impacts sahelian rainfall. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 660–665 (2013)CrossRef

16.

James Lovelock, A geophysiologist’s thoughts on geoengineering. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. A 366(1882), 3883–3890 (2008)CrossRef

17.

D. Keith, A Case for Climate Engineering, Boston Review Books (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2013)

18.

E. Kintisch, Dr. Cool. Science 342(6156), 307–309 (2013)

Titel: Energy Storage, Carbon Sequestration, and Geoengineering
verfasst von: Antoine Bret
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: The Energy-Climate Continuum
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07919-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-07920-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07920-2_5