Skip to main content

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

12. Ensuring a Future for Indigenous Languages in Canada: Can ‘Consequentialist’ Multinational Federalism Provide an Answer?

verfasst von : Emmanuelle Richez, Tejas Pandya

Erschienen in: Federalism and National Diversity in the 21st Century

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter employs the concept of ‘consequentialist’ multinational federalism as a means to assess the current state of federal, provincial and territorial measures to protect Indigenous languages in Canada. In arriving at its assessment, this chapter first explores past practices aimed at assimilating Indigenous Peoples and recent calls for action in Indigenous language matters, and, in so doing, provides the contextual backdrop for this chapter’s discussion. Second, the chapter provides a summary of the breadth and limitations of existing Indigenous language rights protections at the federal, provincial and territorial, and treaty, levels. Third, and following from the previous point, the chapter offers preliminary insight into what ‘symbolic’, and more importantly, ‘consequentialist’ multinational solutions might look like in response to calls for action in Indigenous language matters and in redressing the limitations of existing federal, territorial and provincial Indigenous language rights protections. This chapter concludes that ‘consequentialist’ multinational solutions to protecting and preserving Indigenous languages would entail, as preconditions, strengthening Indigenous sovereignty through treaties and enshrining nation-to-nation negotiation but that, for a number of reasons, these solutions might be difficult to achieve.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Section 35(2) of the Constitution Act, 1982 identifies three categories of ‘aboriginal peoples’: Indian, Inuit and Métis.
 
2
Sources differ on how many Indigenous languages there are as it depends on how the languages are categorised.
 
3
Phil Fontaine, the Assembly of First Nations Leader at the time, was disappointed that the Pope did not give an official apology, but hoped that the Pope’s words would be enough ‘[to]‘close the book’ on the issue of apologies for residential school survivors’ (CBC News 2016). However, Fontaine later stated that his words had been taken out of context and that ‘[he] would never say anything to diminish what happened nine years ago, but I also call on the Catholic Church, and the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, to honour its commitment to reconciliation and healing’ (CBC 2018).
 
4
No further action on the bill has been taken as of January 2020 (time of writing).
 
5
Upon condition of their request being accepted.
 
6
Shannen was an Attawapiskat First Nation youth who petitioned the federal government to improve its funding for First Nations education. Shannen passed away at 15 before her dream was realised.
 
7
As of 2018, 26 modern treaties have been signed and more than 70 are currently under negotiation (Land Claims Agreements Coalition 2019) and, as Abele and Prince (2009, 576) contend, this is leading, slowly but surely, to the development of a third level of government in Canada. Within this emerging context, The Government of Canada’s Approach to Implementation of the Inherent Right and the Negotiation of Aboriginal Self-Government has underscored the importance of including linguistic rights in modern treaties (Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada 2010). However, only a few of the comprehensive land claim agreements that have been finalised have also included protections of linguistic rights (Leitch 2006, 115). This is because an interim comprehensive claims policy, Renewing the Comprehensive Land Claims Policy: Towards a Framework for Addressing Section 35 Rights (Aboriginal and Northern Affairs Canada 2014) does not mandate that language protections be included (Richez et al. 2019, 3).
 
8
For example, the Nisga’a Treaty specifies that ‘Nisga’a citizens have the right to practice the Nisga’a culture, and to use the Nisga’a language, in a manner consistent with t[he] Agreement’ (chapter 2 s 7).
 
9
An example in the category of police services delivery is found in the James Bay Agreement (1975, s 19.1.9), which states that the training for police candidates at the Quebec Police Institute ‘shall be conducted in both French and English, and in the Cree language where appropriate’. Additionally, books and other appropriate training material for police candidates at the Institute should be provided in Cree ‘when possible’ (James Bay Agreement 1975, s 19.1.9).
 
10
The Labrador Inuit Land Claim Agreement (2005) is the only treaty to include protections for Indigenous languages in the delivery of healthcare services. It states that the Nunatsiavut government may make laws that ensure translation and interpretation in Inuktitut for medical purposes (Labrador Inuit Land Claim Agreement 2005: s 17.13.1 (j)).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Abele, Frances, and Michael Prince. 2009. Four Pathways to Aboriginal Self-Government in Canada. American Review of Canadian Studies 36 (4): 568–595.CrossRef Abele, Frances, and Michael Prince. 2009. Four Pathways to Aboriginal Self-Government in Canada. American Review of Canadian Studies 36 (4): 568–595.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Affairs Canada. 2014. Renewing the Comprehensive Land Claims Policy: Towards a Framework for Addressing Section 35 Aboriginal Rights. Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Affairs Canada. 2014. Renewing the Comprehensive Land Claims Policy: Towards a Framework for Addressing Section 35 Aboriginal Rights.
Zurück zum Zitat Alcantara, Christopher. 2007. To Treaty or Not to Treaty? Aboriginal Peoples and Comprehensive Land Claims Negotiations in Canada. The Journal of Federalism 38 (Publius): 343–369.CrossRef Alcantara, Christopher. 2007. To Treaty or Not to Treaty? Aboriginal Peoples and Comprehensive Land Claims Negotiations in Canada. The Journal of Federalism 38 (Publius): 343–369.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bill C-33. An Act to Establish a Framework to Enable First Nations Control of Elementary and Secondary Education and to Provide for Related Funding and to Make Related Amendments to the Indian Act and Consequential Amendments to Other Acts. 2nd Session, 41st Parliament (First Reading 10 April, 2014). Bill C-33. An Act to Establish a Framework to Enable First Nations Control of Elementary and Secondary Education and to Provide for Related Funding and to Make Related Amendments to the Indian Act and Consequential Amendments to Other Acts. 2nd Session, 41st Parliament (First Reading 10 April, 2014).
Zurück zum Zitat Bill C-91. An Act Respecting Indigenous Languages. 1st Session, 42nd Parliament (First Reading 5 February, 2019). Bill C-91. An Act Respecting Indigenous Languages. 1st Session, 42nd Parliament (First Reading 5 February, 2019).
Zurück zum Zitat ———. An Act Respecting Indigenous Languages. 1st Session, 42nd Parliament (Third Reading 9 May, 2019). ———. An Act Respecting Indigenous Languages. 1st Session, 42nd Parliament (Third Reading 9 May, 2019).
Zurück zum Zitat Bill S-212. An Act for the Advancement of the Aboriginal Languages of Canada and to Recognize and Respect Aboriginal Language Rights. 1st Session, 42nd Parliament (First Reading 9 December, 2015). Bill S-212. An Act for the Advancement of the Aboriginal Languages of Canada and to Recognize and Respect Aboriginal Language Rights. 1st Session, 42nd Parliament (First Reading 9 December, 2015).
Zurück zum Zitat Bill S-22. An Act for the Advancement of the Aboriginal Languages of Canada and to Recognize and Respect Aboriginal Language Rights. 2nd Session, 41st Parliament (First Reading 9 June, 2015). Bill S-22. An Act for the Advancement of the Aboriginal Languages of Canada and to Recognize and Respect Aboriginal Language Rights. 2nd Session, 41st Parliament (First Reading 9 June, 2015).
Zurück zum Zitat Bill S-237. An Act for the Advancement of the Aboriginal Languages of Canada and to Recognize and Respect Aboriginal Language Rights. 2nd Session, 40th Parliament (First Reading 28 May, 2009). Bill S-237. An Act for the Advancement of the Aboriginal Languages of Canada and to Recognize and Respect Aboriginal Language Rights. 2nd Session, 40th Parliament (First Reading 28 May, 2009).
Zurück zum Zitat Canada, Parliament, Debates of the Senate, 42nd Parliament, 1st Session, Vol 150 (17 May, 2016) (Hon Nicole Eaton). Canada, Parliament, Debates of the Senate, 42nd Parliament, 1st Session, Vol 150 (17 May, 2016) (Hon Nicole Eaton).
Zurück zum Zitat Canada-Métis Nations Accord. 2017. The Government of Canada and The Métis Nation, April 13. Canada-Métis Nations Accord. 2017. The Government of Canada and The Métis Nation, April 13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cardinal, Linda. 2008. Introduction. In Le fédéralisme asymétrique et les minorités linguistiques et nationales, ed. Linda Cardinal, 7–30. Sudbury: Prise de parole. Cardinal, Linda. 2008. Introduction. In Le fédéralisme asymétrique et les minorités linguistiques et nationales, ed. Linda Cardinal, 7–30. Sudbury: Prise de parole.
Zurück zum Zitat Caron, Jean-François, and Guy Laforest. 2009. Canada and Multinational Federalism: From the Spirit of 1982 to Stephen Harper’s Open Federalism. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 15 (1): 27–55.CrossRef Caron, Jean-François, and Guy Laforest. 2009. Canada and Multinational Federalism: From the Spirit of 1982 to Stephen Harper’s Open Federalism. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 15 (1): 27–55.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Champagne and Aishihik First Nation Final Agreement. 1922. The Government of Canada, The Champagne and Aishihik First Nations, and the Government of the Yukon, June 19. Champagne and Aishihik First Nation Final Agreement. 1922. The Government of Canada, The Champagne and Aishihik First Nations, and the Government of the Yukon, June 19.
Zurück zum Zitat Constitution Act, 1867. 30 & 31 Victoria, c. 3 (U.K.). Constitution Act, 1867. 30 & 31 Victoria, c. 3 (U.K.).
Zurück zum Zitat Dementi-Leonard, Beth, and Perry Gilmore. 1999. Language Revitalization and Identity in Social Context: A Community-Based Athabaskan Language Preservation Project in Western Interior Alaska. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 30 (1): 37–55.CrossRef Dementi-Leonard, Beth, and Perry Gilmore. 1999. Language Revitalization and Identity in Social Context: A Community-Based Athabaskan Language Preservation Project in Western Interior Alaska. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 30 (1): 37–55.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gagnon, Alain-G. 2000. Canada: Unity and Diversity. Parliamentary Affairs 53 (1): 12–26.CrossRef Gagnon, Alain-G. 2000. Canada: Unity and Diversity. Parliamentary Affairs 53 (1): 12–26.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haida Nation v British Columbia, 2004 SCC 73 at para 25, [2004] SCR 73. Haida Nation v British Columbia, 2004 SCC 73 at para 25, [2004] SCR 73.
Zurück zum Zitat Harper, Stephen. 2008. Prime Minister Harper Offers Full Apology on Behalf of Canadians for the Indian Residential Schools System. Speech. Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada, June 11. Harper, Stephen. 2008. Prime Minister Harper Offers Full Apology on Behalf of Canadians for the Indian Residential Schools System. Speech. Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada, June 11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hermes, Mary, Megan Bang, and Ananda Marin. 2012. Designing Indigenous Language Revitalization. Harvard Educational Review 82 (3): 381–402.CrossRef Hermes, Mary, Megan Bang, and Ananda Marin. 2012. Designing Indigenous Language Revitalization. Harvard Educational Review 82 (3): 381–402.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat House of Commons. 2012. Journals, 1st Session, 41st Parliament, No. 84 (27 February). House of Commons. 2012. Journals, 1st Session, 41st Parliament, No. 84 (27 February).
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2018. Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, The Use of Indigenous Languages in Proceedings of the House of Commons and Committees (June) (Chair: Larry Bagnell). ———. 2018. Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, The Use of Indigenous Languages in Proceedings of the House of Commons and Committees (June) (Chair: Larry Bagnell).
Zurück zum Zitat James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement. The Government of Quebec, the James Bay Energy Corporation, the James Bay Development Corporation, Hydro-Québec, the Grand Council of the Crees of Quebec, the Northern Quebec Inuit Association, and the Government of Canada, 11 November, 1975. James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement. The Government of Quebec, the James Bay Energy Corporation, the James Bay Development Corporation, Hydro-Québec, the Grand Council of the Crees of Quebec, the Northern Quebec Inuit Association, and the Government of Canada, 11 November, 1975.
Zurück zum Zitat Kymlicka, Will. 2007. Ethnocultural Diversity in a Liberal State: Making Sense of the Canadian Model(s). In Belonging? Diversity, Recognition and Shared Citizenship in Canada, ed. Keith Banting, Thomas Courchene, and Leslie Seidle, 39–86. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy. Kymlicka, Will. 2007. Ethnocultural Diversity in a Liberal State: Making Sense of the Canadian Model(s). In Belonging? Diversity, Recognition and Shared Citizenship in Canada, ed. Keith Banting, Thomas Courchene, and Leslie Seidle, 39–86. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.
Zurück zum Zitat Ladner, Kiera. 2003. Treaty Federalism: An Indigenous Vision of Canadian Federalism. In New Trends in Canadian Federalism, ed. François Rocher and Myriam Smith, 2nd ed., 167–194. Peterborough: Broadview Press. Ladner, Kiera. 2003. Treaty Federalism: An Indigenous Vision of Canadian Federalism. In New Trends in Canadian Federalism, ed. François Rocher and Myriam Smith, 2nd ed., 167–194. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Leitch, David. 2006. Canada’s Native Languages: The Right to First Nations to Educate Their Children in Their Own Languages. Constitutional Forum 15 (3): 107–120. Leitch, David. 2006. Canada’s Native Languages: The Right to First Nations to Educate Their Children in Their Own Languages. Constitutional Forum 15 (3): 107–120.
Zurück zum Zitat Liddicoat, Anthony J. and Richard B. Baldauf Jr. 2008. Language Planning in Local Context: Agents, Context, and Interactions. In Language Planning and Policy: Language Planning in Local Contexts, eds. Anthony J. Liddicoat and Richard B. Baldauf Jr., 3–17. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Liddicoat, Anthony J. and Richard B. Baldauf Jr. 2008. Language Planning in Local Context: Agents, Context, and Interactions. In Language Planning and Policy: Language Planning in Local Contexts, eds. Anthony J. Liddicoat and Richard B. Baldauf Jr., 3–17. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Zurück zum Zitat Nisga’a Final Agreement. Nisga’a, the Government of Canada, and the Government of British Columbia, 27 May 1998. Nisga’a Final Agreement. Nisga’a, the Government of Canada, and the Government of British Columbia, 27 May 1998.
Zurück zum Zitat Northeastern Quebec Agreement. The Naskapi Band of Schefferville, the Government of Quebec, the James Bay Energy Corporation, the James Bay Development Corporation, Hydro-Québec, the Grand Council of the Crees of Quebec, the Northern Quebec Inuit Association, and the Government of Canada, 31 January, 1978. Northeastern Quebec Agreement. The Naskapi Band of Schefferville, the Government of Quebec, the James Bay Energy Corporation, the James Bay Development Corporation, Hydro-Québec, the Grand Council of the Crees of Quebec, the Northern Quebec Inuit Association, and the Government of Canada, 31 January, 1978.
Zurück zum Zitat Official Languages Act, RSC 1985 c 31. Official Languages Act, RSC 1985 c 31.
Zurück zum Zitat Orkin, J. Andrew. 2003. When the Law Breaks Down: Aboriginal Peoples in Canada and Governmental Defiance of the Rule of Law. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 41 (2–3): 445–463. Orkin, J. Andrew. 2003. When the Law Breaks Down: Aboriginal Peoples in Canada and Governmental Defiance of the Rule of Law. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 41 (2–3): 445–463.
Zurück zum Zitat Reyhner, Jon. 1999. Introduction: Some Basics of Indigenous Language Revitalization. In Revitalizing Indigenous Languages, ed. Jon Reyhner, Gina Cantoni, Robert N. St. Clair, and Evangeline Parsons Yazzie, v–xx. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University. Reyhner, Jon. 1999. Introduction: Some Basics of Indigenous Language Revitalization. In Revitalizing Indigenous Languages, ed. Jon Reyhner, Gina Cantoni, Robert N. St. Clair, and Evangeline Parsons Yazzie, v–xx. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University.
Zurück zum Zitat Richez, Emmanuelle, Rebecca Major, and Tejas Pandya. 2019. House of Commons Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage Regarding Bill C-91. Revitalizing and Promoting Indigenous Languages through Recognition, Self-Government, and Effective Consultations. Ottawa: House of Commons Committee on Canadian Heritage. Richez, Emmanuelle, Rebecca Major, and Tejas Pandya. 2019. House of Commons Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage Regarding Bill C-91. Revitalizing and Promoting Indigenous Languages through Recognition, Self-Government, and Effective Consultations. Ottawa: House of Commons Committee on Canadian Heritage.
Zurück zum Zitat Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. 1996a. Looking Forward Looking Back. Vol. 1. Communication Group: Ottawa. Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. 1996a. Looking Forward Looking Back. Vol. 1. Communication Group: Ottawa.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1996b. Renewal: A Twenty-Year Commitment. Vol. 5. Communication Group: Ottawa. ———. 1996b. Renewal: A Twenty-Year Commitment. Vol. 5. Communication Group: Ottawa.
Zurück zum Zitat Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. 2015. Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future: Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Ottawa: Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. 2015. Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future: Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Ottawa: Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada.
Zurück zum Zitat United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. 2007. GA Res. 61/295, UN GAOR, 107th Sess., Supp. 49, UN. Doc. A/61/49. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. 2007. GA Res. 61/295, UN GAOR, 107th Sess., Supp. 49, UN. Doc. A/61/49.
Zurück zum Zitat Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation Final Agreement. 1993. The Government of Canada, The Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation and the Government of the Yukon, 29 May. Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation Final Agreement. 1993. The Government of Canada, The Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation and the Government of the Yukon, 29 May.
Metadaten
Titel
Ensuring a Future for Indigenous Languages in Canada: Can ‘Consequentialist’ Multinational Federalism Provide an Answer?
verfasst von
Emmanuelle Richez
Tejas Pandya
Copyright-Jahr
2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38419-7_12