Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

6. Evaluation of Social Capital in LEADER: What’s In and What’s Out?

verfasst von : Elena Pisani, Asimina Christoforou

Erschienen in: Social Capital and Local Development

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The European Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF) determines the different types of common indicators for the evaluation of the two pillars of the Common Agricultural Policy, inclusive of LEADER. Moreover, the European Evaluation Network on Rural Development, under the responsibility of the EC Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, proposes guidelines for enabling evaluation practices at different European, national, regional as well as local levels. This chapter reveals some of the shortcomings in the conceptualisation and operationalisation of social capital in LEADER and consequently it raises critical questions relating to the current evaluation system proposed for LEADER. This points to the need to propose an innovative evaluation method, which explicitly operationalises social capital and rural governance in LEADER initiatives, by thoughtfully considering the requirements set by the EU regulations.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The intervention logic is the logical link between the problem that needs to be tackled (or the objective that needs to be pursued), the underlying drivers of the problem and the available policy options (or the EU actions actually taken) to address the problem or achieve the objective. This intervention logic is used in both prospective Impact Assessments and retrospective evaluations (European Commission, 2015b, p. 72).
 
2
Within the framework of European rural development policy, the basic unit of programme management, consisting of a set of similar projects and disposing of a precisely defined budget. Each measure has a particular management apparatus. Measures generally consist of projects. Many measures are implemented through a process of Calls for Proposals and subsequent appraisal (European Commission, 2015b, p. 72).
 
3
Expenditure realised: total amount of expenditure (EAFRD + other public) made by the Member States (it should not necessarily have been declared to the Commission) for completed operations in the reporting year and previous years of the programming period (European Commission, 2015c).
 
4
See Annex E of the CMEF Handbook describing the proposed evaluation method for specifications regarding each measure of the programme.
 
5
Regulation EC No. 1698/2005 Art. 62(1)(a) and Art 63(a).
 
6
Regulation EC No. 1698/2005 Art. 63(a) and (b).
 
7
Regulation EC No. 1698/2005 Art. 59 – ex Art. 63 (c).
 
8
THEME 1 – Relevance and community added value; THEME 2 – The Actions of LEADER+ (Action 1: Integrated territorial rural development strategies of pilot nature, Action 2: Support for cooperation between rural territories, Action 3: Networking); THEME 3 – Implementation of the LEADER method; THEME 4 – Impacts; THEME 5 – Governance and rural citizenship; THEME 6 – Managing, controlling and financing systems; THEME 7 – Monitoring and evaluation; and THEME 8 – Rural activity and excellence clusters.
 
9
Better Regulation means designing EU policies and laws so that they achieve their objectives at minimum cost. Better Regulation is not about regulating or deregulating. It is a way of working to ensure that political decisions are prepared in an open, transparent manner, informed by the best available evidence and backed by the comprehensive involvement of stakeholders. This is necessary to ensure that the Union’s interventions respect the overarching principles of subsidiary and proportionality, i.e., acting only where necessary and in a way that does not go beyond what is needed to resolve the problem (European Commission, 2015a, p. 5).
 
10
Pillar I instruments are composed of (1) direct payment instruments, (2) single market organisation instruments and (3) horizontal and other instruments. The first group of instruments includes Basic Payment Scheme/Single Area Payment Scheme; Re-distributive Payment; Greening; Payment for Young Farmers; Small Farmers Scheme; Voluntary Coupled Support; Payment for Areas with Natural Constraints. The second group includes Market Measures, Producer Organisations; School Milk and Fruit Scheme; Wine Sector. The final group includes Cross compliance; Quality policy; Organic Farming; Promotion policy; Farm Advisory System. The final group applies to both Pillar I and Pillar II. Pillar II measures correspond to the six priorities of the Pillar II: (1) fostering knowledge transfer and innovation in agriculture, forestry and rural areas; (2) enhancing farm viability and competitiveness of all types of agriculture in all regions and promoting innovative farm technologies and sustainable management of forests; (3) promoting food chain organisation, including processing and marketing of agricultural products, animal welfare and risk management in agriculture; (4) restoring, preserving and enhancing ecosystems related to agriculture and forestry; (5) promoting resource efficiency and supporting the shift towards a low carbon and climate resilient economy in agriculture, food and forestry sectors; and (6) promoting social inclusion, poverty reduction and economic development in rural areas. The different priorities are subdivided into focus areas. Within priority 6, the focus area B is devoted to promoting social inclusion and economic development by fostering local development in rural areas. All the measures of the Rural Development Programme are specified in Title III, Chapter 1 of the Regulation EU No. 1305/2013 Art. 13 to Art. 44.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Birolo, L., Secco, L., Da Re, R., & Cesaro, L. (2012). Multi-system governance within the EU rural development policy: a proposal for LAGs self-evaluation in the Leader program. International Agricultural Policy, 4, 39–55. Birolo, L., Secco, L., Da Re, R., & Cesaro, L. (2012). Multi-system governance within the EU rural development policy: a proposal for LAGs self-evaluation in the Leader program. International Agricultural Policy, 4, 39–55.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosworth, G., Rizzo, F., Marquardt, D., Strijker, D., Haartsen, T., & Aagaard Thuesen, A. (2016). Identifying social innovations in European local rural development initiatives. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29(4), 442–461. Bosworth, G., Rizzo, F., Marquardt, D., Strijker, D., Haartsen, T., & Aagaard Thuesen, A. (2016). Identifying social innovations in European local rural development initiatives. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29(4), 442–461.
Zurück zum Zitat Farrell, G., & Thirion, S. (2005). Social capital and rural development: from win-lose to win-win with the LEADER initiative. In D. Schmied (Ed.), Winning and Losing: The Changing Geography of Europe’s Rural Areas, (pp. 281–298). Aldershot, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate. Farrell, G., & Thirion, S. (2005). Social capital and rural development: from win-lose to win-win with the LEADER initiative. In D. Schmied (Ed.), Winning and Losing: The Changing Geography of Europe’s Rural Areas, (pp. 281–298). Aldershot, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Zurück zum Zitat Grieve, J., & Weinspach, U. (2010). Working paper on Capturing impacts of LEADER and of measures to improve Quality of Life in rural areas (Findings of a Thematic Working Group established and coordinated by the European Evaluation Network for Rural Development). Grieve, J., & Weinspach, U. (2010). Working paper on Capturing impacts of LEADER and of measures to improve Quality of Life in rural areas (Findings of a Thematic Working Group established and coordinated by the European Evaluation Network for Rural Development).
Zurück zum Zitat Kinsella, J., Goetz, S. J., Partridge, M. D., Deller, S. C., & Fleming, D. (2010). Evaluating rural development policies for social and human capital development. EuroChoices, 9(1), 42–47.CrossRef Kinsella, J., Goetz, S. J., Partridge, M. D., Deller, S. C., & Fleming, D. (2010). Evaluating rural development policies for social and human capital development. EuroChoices, 9(1), 42–47.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lopolito, A., Sisto, R., Barbuto, A., & Da Re, R. (2015). What is the impact of LEADER on the local social resources? Some insights on Local Action Group’s aggregative role. Rivista di Economia Agraria, LXX(1), 55–75. Lopolito, A., Sisto, R., Barbuto, A., & Da Re, R. (2015). What is the impact of LEADER on the local social resources? Some insights on Local Action Group’s aggregative role. Rivista di Economia Agraria, LXX(1), 55–75.
Zurück zum Zitat Morras Imas, L. G., & Rist, R. C. (2009). The Road to Results: Designing and Conducting Effective Development Evaluations. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRef Morras Imas, L. G., & Rist, R. C. (2009). The Road to Results: Designing and Conducting Effective Development Evaluations. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nardone, G., Sisto, R., & Lopolito, A. (2010). Social capital in the LEADER Initiative: a methodological approach. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(1), 63–72.CrossRef Nardone, G., Sisto, R., & Lopolito, A. (2010). Social capital in the LEADER Initiative: a methodological approach. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(1), 63–72.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Papadopoulou, E., Hasanagas, N., & Harvey, D. (2011). Analysis of rural development policy networks in Greece: Is LEADER really different? Land Use Policy, 28(4), 663–673.CrossRef Papadopoulou, E., Hasanagas, N., & Harvey, D. (2011). Analysis of rural development policy networks in Greece: Is LEADER really different? Land Use Policy, 28(4), 663–673.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Papadopoulou, E., Papalexiou, C., & Hasaganas, N. (2012). Participatory evaluation of rural development programmes: a qualitative approach in the case of modernisation of agricultural holdings in Greece. Regional Science Inquiry Journal, IV(1), 81–94. Papadopoulou, E., Papalexiou, C., & Hasaganas, N. (2012). Participatory evaluation of rural development programmes: a qualitative approach in the case of modernisation of agricultural holdings in Greece. Regional Science Inquiry Journal, IV(1), 81–94.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisani, E. (2014). La misurazione del capitale sociale nei territori rurali. Padova: CLEUP. Pisani, E. (2014). La misurazione del capitale sociale nei territori rurali. Padova: CLEUP.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisani, E., & Burighel, L. (2014). Structures and dynamics of transnational cooperation networks: evidence based on Local Action Groups in the Veneto region, Italy. Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 3(3), 249–269. Pisani, E., & Burighel, L. (2014). Structures and dynamics of transnational cooperation networks: evidence based on Local Action Groups in the Veneto region, Italy. Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 3(3), 249–269.
Zurück zum Zitat Regulation EU No. 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013R1303&from=EN. Accessed 1 August 2016. Regulation EU No. 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. http://​eur-lex.​europa.​eu/​legal-content/​EN/​TXT/​PDF/​?​uri=​CELEX:​32013R1303&​from=​EN. Accessed 1 August 2016.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutherland, L.-A., & Burton, R.J.F. (2011). Good farmers, good neighbours? The role of cultural capital in social capital development in a Scottish farming community. Sociologia Ruralis, 51(3), 238–255.CrossRef Sutherland, L.-A., & Burton, R.J.F. (2011). Good farmers, good neighbours? The role of cultural capital in social capital development in a Scottish farming community. Sociologia Ruralis, 51(3), 238–255.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Teilmann, K. (2012). Measuring social capital accumulation in rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 28(4), 458–465.CrossRef Teilmann, K. (2012). Measuring social capital accumulation in rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 28(4), 458–465.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation of Social Capital in LEADER: What’s In and What’s Out?
verfasst von
Elena Pisani
Asimina Christoforou
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54277-5_6