nach oben

Demography

Erschienen in:

01.08.2013

Examining the Antecedents of U.S. Nonmarital Fatherhood

verfasst von: Marcia J. Carlson, Alicia G. VanOrman, Natasha V. Pilkauskas

Erschienen in: Demography | Ausgabe 4/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Despite the dramatic rise in U.S. nonmarital childbearing in recent decades, limited attention has been paid to factors affecting nonmarital fatherhood (beyond studies of young fathers). In this article, we use data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth and the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 cohort to examine the antecedents of nonmarital fatherhood, as compared to marital fatherhood. Overall, we find the strongest support across both data sets for education and race/ethnicity as key predictors of having a nonmarital first birth, consistent with prior literature about women’s nonmarital childbearing and about men’s early/teenage fatherhood. Education is inversely related to the risk of nonmarital fatherhood, and minority (especially black) men are much more likely to have a child outside of marriage than white men. We find little evidence that employment predicts nonmarital fertility, although it does strongly (and positively) predict marital fertility. High predicted earnings are also associated with a greater likelihood of marital childbearing but with a lower likelihood of nonmarital childbearing. Given the socioeconomic disadvantage associated with nonmarital fatherhood, this research suggests that nonmarital fatherhood may be an important aspect of growing U.S. inequality and stratification both within and across generations.

Vorheriger Artikel Educational Differences in Completed Fertility: A Behavioral Genetic Study of Finnish Male and Female Twins

Nächster Artikel Growing Parental Economic Power in Parent–Adult Child Households: Coresidence and Financial Dependency in the United States, 1960–2010

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

We use the term “father” throughout this article to indicate biological fatherhood. The social role of fathers in family life is also an important topic, but we do not address it here.

Nonmarital childbearing is closely related to unintended childbearing (Musick 2002); we focus on nonmarital births because we are substantively interested in the marital context of childbearing and because data on intendedness in the NSFG and NLSY are not available for all men.

The NSFG suggests weighting regressions but says it is acceptable to estimate unweighted regressions. The NLSY recommends not weighting regressions. To be consistent, we estimate unweighted regressions for both.

The NLSY excluded institutionalized individuals at the time of sampling but follows respondents if they become incarcerated or enter the military.

Similar attitudinal measures are available in the NSFG but only at the time of interview. We do not use such measures because they could be endogenous to having become a father.

Wu and Martin (2013) noted the importance of separately considering factors that affect age of sexual onset and that affect the risk of a premarital birth given onset—though they found that variability in the former has a much smaller influence on premarital birth probabilities than differences in the latter. Because our focus here is to provide a descriptive portrait of the factors related to nonmarital fatherhood (rather than to evaluate the mechanisms), we include all men and use control variables to represent the timing of sexual initiation.

The NLSY dropped the age of sexual initiation question after 1985, but very few of the men had not had sex by that time.

In additional analyses (not shown), we estimated models using data only through 1994—hence, not imputing the 1994–2006 odd-numbered years. The results were nearly identical to our main results through 2006, so we present results for the full 1979–2006 period in order to capture a greater proportion of births to this cohort.

We present results using the imputed data in our tables, but we also estimated models using complete cases only, and the results were nearly identical.

We do not censor at marriage because we are interested in the outcome of first nonmarital birth. Although it is not common, men could be married and divorced and then have a nonmarital birth.

Differences discussed in this section about Tables 1 and 2 are all statistically significant based on multiple-comparison tests or t tests (p < .05).

We also estimated models using respondents’ actual earnings (lagged by one year) instead of predicted earnings (results not shown); none of the actual earnings variables were significantly related to nonmarital births (although the direction was also negative), but high actual earnings were similarly significantly and positively related to marital births.

Our results for the age 14–16 NLSY subsample (not shown) are mostly similar to the total NLSY sample, suggesting that left-censoring is not a major source of bias in our analyses; some coefficients in the subsample do not reach statistical significance, although the magnitudes are similar. The most notable substantive difference is that ever being incarcerated is associated with a diminished chance of a marital birth only in the subsample.

We include only births to age 40, given that few births occur after that age, and the estimates thereafter become unreliable because of small cell sizes.

Similar patterns are observed when the respondent’s father’s education is used instead of respondent’s education.

We thank an anonymous reviewer for suggesting these useful points.

Aassve, A. (2003). The impact of economic resources on premarital childbearing and subsequent marriage among young American women. Demography, 40, 105–126.CrossRef

Anderson, E. (1989). Sex codes and family life among poor inner-city youths. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 501, 59–78.CrossRef

Axinn, W. G., & Thornton, A. (2000). The transformation in the meaning of marriage. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind (pp. 147–165). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In National Bureau of Economic Research (Ed.), Demographic and economic change in developed countries (pp. 209–231). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Center for Human Resource Research. (2006). NLSY users guide: A guide to the 1979 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Columbus: Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University.

Center for Human Resource Research. (2008). NLSY users guide: A guide to the 1979–2006 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth Data. Columbus: Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University.

Cherlin, A. J., Cross-Barnet, C., Burton, L. M., & Garrett-Peters, R. (2008). Promises they can keep: Low-income women’s attitudes toward motherhood, marriage, and divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 919–933.CrossRef

Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Edin, K., England, P., Shafer, E. F., & Reed, J. (2007). Forming fragile families: Was the baby planned, unplanned, or in between? In P. England & K. Edin (Eds.), Unmarried couples with children (pp. 25–54). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Elo, I. T., King, R. B., & Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. (1999). Adolescent females: Their sexual partners and the fathers of their children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 74–84.CrossRef

Furstenberg, F. F., Jr., & Weiss, C. C. (2000). Intergenerational transmission of fathering roles in at risk families. Marriage and Family Review, 29(2/3), 181–201.CrossRef

Garfinkel, I., McLanahan, S. S., & Hanson, T. L. (1998). A patchwork portrait of nonresident fathers. In I. Garfinkel, S. S. McLanahan, D. R. Meyer, & J. A. Seltzer (Eds.), Fathers under fire: The revolution in child support enforcement (pp. 31–60). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Geronimus, A. T., & Korenman, S. (1992). The socioeconomic consequences of teen childbearing reconsidered. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 1187–1214.CrossRef

Gibson-Davis, C. (2009). Money, marriage, and children: Testing the financial expectations and family formations theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 146–160.CrossRef

Glick, J. E., Ruf, S. D., White, M. J., & Goldscheider, F. (2006). Educational engagement and early family formation: Differences by ethnicity and generation. Social Forces, 84, 1391–1415.CrossRef

Goldscheider, F. K., & Kaufman, G. (1996). Fertility and commitment: Bringing men back in. Population and Development Review, 22, 87–99.CrossRef

Greene, M. E., & Biddlecom, A. E. (2000). Absent and problematic men: Demographic accounts of male reproductive roles. Population and Development Review, 26, 81–115.CrossRef

Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., & Ventura, S. J. (2011). Births: Preliminary data for 2010 (National Vital Statistics Reports 60(2)). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

Hanson, S. L., Morrison, D. R., & Ginsburg, A. L. (1989). The antecedents of teenage fatherhood. Demography, 26, 579–596.CrossRef

Haveman, R., Wolfe, B., & Pence, K. (2001). Intergenerational effects of nonmarital and early childbearing. In L. L. Wu & B. Wolfe (Eds.), Out of wedlock: Causes and consequences of nonmarital fertility (pp. 390–402). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Hofferth, S. L., & Goldscheider, F. (2010). Family structure and the transition to early parenthood. Demography, 47, 415–437.CrossRef

Huebner, B. M. (2007). Racial and ethnic differences in the likelihood of marriage: The effect of incarceration. Justice Quarterly, 24, 156–183.CrossRef

Hynes, K., Joyner, K., Peters, H. E., & DeLeone, F. (2008). The transition to early fatherhood: National estimates based on multiple surveys. Demographic Research, 18(article 12), 337–376. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.18.12 CrossRef

Jemmott, J. B., Jemmott, L. S., & Fong, G. T. (2010). Efficacy of a theory-based abstinence-only intervention over 24 months: A randomized controlled trial with young adolescents. Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine, 164, 152–159.CrossRef

Joyner, K., Peters, H. E., Hynes, K., Sikora, A., Rubenstein, J., & Rendall, M. (2012). The quality of male fertility data in major U.S. surveys. Demography, 49, 101–124.CrossRef

Ku, L., Sonenstein, F. L., & Pleck, J. H. (1993). Neighborhood, family, and work: Influences on the premarital behaviors of adolescent males. Social Forces, 72, 479–503.

Lam, D. (1988). Marriage markets and assortative mating with household public goods: Theoretical results and empirical implications. The Journal of Human Resources, 23, 462–487.CrossRef

Lerman, R. I. (1993). A national profile of young unwed fathers. In R. I. Lerman & T. J. Ooms (Eds.), Young unwed fathers: Changing roles and emerging policies (pp. 27–51). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Lerman, R., & Sorenson, E. (2000). Father involvement with their nonmarital children: Patterns, determinants, and effects on their earnings. Marriage and Family Review, 29, 137–158.CrossRef

Lindberg, L. D., Sonenstein, F. L., Martinez, G., & Marcotte, J. (1998). Completeness of young fathers’ reports of fertility. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 24, 15–23.

Lopoo, L. M., & Western, B. (2005). Incarceration and the formation and stability of marital unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 721–734.CrossRef

Lundquist, J. H., & Smith, H. L. (2005). Family formation among women in the U.S. military: Evidence from the NLSY. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1–13.CrossRef

Marsiglio, W. (1987). Adolescent fathers in the United States: Their initial living arrangements, marital experience and educational outcomes. Family Planning Perspectives, 19, 240–251.CrossRef

Martinez, G. M., Chandra, A., Abma, J. C., Jones, J., & Mosher, W. D. (2006). Fertility, contraception, and fatherhood: Data on men and women from Cycle 6 (2002) of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (Vital and Health Statistics 23(26)). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

McLanahan, S. (2011). Family instability and complexity after a nonmarital birth: Outcomes for children in fragile families. In M. J. Carlson & P. England (Eds.), Social class and changing families in an unequal America (pp. 108–133). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Michael, R. T., & Tuma, N. B. (1985). Entry into marriage and parenthood by young men and women: The influence of family background. Demography, 22, 515–544.CrossRef

Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience and earnings. New York: Columbia University Press.

Mincy, R. B., & Pouncy, H. (1999). There must be 50 ways to start a family. In W. Horn, D. Blankenhorn, & M. B. Pearlstein (Eds.), The fatherhood movement: A call to action (pp. 83–104). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Mincy, R. B., & Pouncy, H. (2007). Baby fathers and American family formation: Low-income, never-married parents in Louisiana before Katrina. New York: Center for Marriage and Families, Institute for American Values.

Mott, F. L., & Gryn, T. A. (2001, March). Evaluating male fertility data: Who reports consistently and what are the analytical implications? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC.

Moynihan, D. P. (1965). The Negro family: The case for national action. Washington, DC: United States Department of Labor, Office of Policy Planning and Research.

Muller, C. (1995). Maternal employment, parent involvement, and mathematics achievement among adolescents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 85–100.CrossRef

Musick, K. (2002). Planned and unplanned childbearing among unmarried women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 915–929.CrossRef

Musick, K., England, P., Edgington, S., & Kangas, N. (2010). Education differences in intended and unintended fertility. Social Forces, 88, 543–572.CrossRef

National Center for Health Statistics. (2004). Public use data file documentation National Survey of Family Growth Cycle 6: 2002. User’s guide. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Nelson, T. J. (2004). Low-income fathers. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 427–451.CrossRef

Nock, S. L. (1998). The consequences of premarital fatherhood. American Sociological Review, 63, 259–263.CrossRef

Pears, K. C., Pierce, S. L., Kim, H. K., Capaldi, D. M., & Owen, L. D. (2005). The timing of entry into fatherhood in young, at-risk men. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 429–447.CrossRef

Rendall, M. S., Clarke, L., Peters, H. E., Ranjit, N., & Verropoulou, G. (1999). Incomplete reporting of men’s fertility in the United States and Britain: A research note. Demography, 36, 135–144.CrossRef

Royston, P. (2004). Multiple imputation of missing values. The Stata Journal, 4, 227–241.

Rubin, D. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: John Wiley.CrossRef

Ruhm, C. (2008). Maternal employment and adolescent development. Labour Economics, 15, 958–983.CrossRef

Tach, L., Mincy, R., & Edin, K. (2010). Parenting as a package deal: Relationships, fertility, and nonresident father involvement among unmarried parents. Demography, 47, 181–204.CrossRef

Teachman, J. (2007). Race, military service, and marital timing: Evidence from the NLSY-79. Demography, 44, 389–404.CrossRef

Thornberry, T. P., Smith, C. A., & Howard, G. J. (1997). Risk factors for teenage fatherhood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 505–522.CrossRef

Thornton, A., & Camburn, D. (1989). Religious participation and adolescent sexual behavior and attitudes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 641–653.CrossRef

Upchurch, D. M., Lillard, L. A., & Panis, C. W. A. (2002). Nonmarital childbearing: Influences of education, marriage, and fertility. Demography, 39, 311–329.CrossRef

Upchurch, D. M., & McCarthy, J. (1990). The timing of a first birth and high school completion. American Sociological Review, 55, 224–234.CrossRef

Ventura, S. J., & Bachrach, C. (2000). Nonmarital childbearing in the United States, 1949–99 (National Vital Statistics Reports 48(6)). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

Western, B. (2002). The impact of incarceration on wage mobility and inequality. American Sociological Review, 67, 526–546.CrossRef

Western, B., & Pettit, B. (2000). Incarceration and racial inequality in men’s employment. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 54, 3–16.CrossRef

Wilcox, W. B., & Wolfinger, N. H. (2007). Then comes marriage? Religion, race, and marriage in urban America. Social Science Research, 36, 569–589.CrossRef

Willis, R. J. (1999). A theory of out-of-wedlock childbearing. Journal of Political Economy, 107, S33–S64.CrossRef

Willis, R. J. (2000). The economics of fatherhood. The American Economic Review, 90, 378–382.CrossRef

Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Wu, L. L., & Martin, S. P. (2013). Sexual onset and premarital first births: Insights from a sequential hazard model. Unpublished manuscript, New York University.

Wu, L. L., & Wolfe, B. (Eds.). (2001). Out of wedlock: Causes and consequences of nonmarital fertility. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Xie, Y., Raymo, J., Goyette, K., & Thornton, A. (2003). Economic potential and entry into marriage and cohabitation. Demography, 40, 351–367.CrossRef

Zavodny, M. (1999). Do men’s characteristics affect whether a nonmarital pregnancy results in marriage? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 764–773.CrossRef

Titel: Examining the Antecedents of U.S. Nonmarital Fatherhood
verfasst von: Marcia J. Carlson
Alicia G. VanOrman
Natasha V. Pilkauskas
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2013
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Demography / Ausgabe 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0070-3370
Elektronische ISSN: 1533-7790
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0201-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2013

Educational Differences in Completed Fertility: A Behavioral Genetic Study of Finnish Male and Female Twins

Growing Parental Economic Power in Parent–Adult Child Households: Coresidence and Financial Dependency in the United States, 1960–2010

The Educational Gradient in Marriage: A Comparison of 25 European Countries

Erratum to: Multidimensional Life Table Estimation of the Total Fertility Rate and Its Components

Is Health of the Aging Improved by Conditional Cash Transfer Programs? Evidence From Mexico

Including the Smoking Epidemic in Internationally Coherent Mortality Projections