nach oben

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Erschienen in:

12.05.2020 | LCA FOR ENERGY SYSTEMS AND FOOD PRODUCTS

Fishmeal partial substitution within aquafeed formulations: life cycle assessment of four alternative protein sources

verfasst von: Silvia Maiolo, Giuliana Parisi, Natascia Biondi, Fernando Lunelli, Emilio Tibaldi, Roberto Pastres

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 8/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

Fed aquaculture has long been based on fishmeal (FM) as the main protein source for carnivorous species, but when its demand and price began increasing, both researchers and the industry started to search for alternative protein sources to meet the challenge of securing aquafeed. Consequently, this study has recourse to life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology to identify any critical points and improvement strategies in the current production of four partial substitutes for FM namely dried microalgae biomass from Tetraselmis suecica (DMB_TETRA) and Tisochrysis lutea (DMB_TISO); insect meal (IM) from Hermetia illucens larvae; and poultry by-product meal (PBM).

Methods

System boundaries are from the cradle to the mill gate, thus including the production phase (and the related upstream activities) and the subsequent biomass processing into unpackaged dried meal. One tonne of protein content was chosen as functional unit. The inventory was based on foreground data provided by the industry and complemented by background data sourced from the Ecoinvent v 3.4 and Agribalyse® v 1.3 LCI databases. The environmental effects were assessed considering five impacts namely global warming (kg CO₂ eq.), acidification (kg SO₂ eq.) and eutrophication (kg PO₄³⁻ eq.) estimated via the CML-IA method, plus cumulative energy use (MJ) and water use (m³ m⁻² month⁻¹). Two alternative scenarios per production chain were considered in order to increase the robustness of the results.

Results and discussion

The performance-based ranking indicated the PBM and IM scenarios as the most sustainable options. Both microalgal systems scored the worst performances in four impacts out of five, with eutrophication impact as the only exception. The nutrients provided to poultry and insects (i.e. the feed) as well as to microalgae (the carbon source and the fertilizers) were the main contributors to impacts, together with energy consumption. Despite being cultivated with identical technologies, the two microalgae showed different performances due to their different annual yields and to different consumable goods, water and energy consumptions.

Conclusions

The results provided a ranking of these four partial FM substitutes and allowed to make useful considerations on how to improve their environmental sustainability. To this regard, the impacts of IM and DMB production could be reduced by improving nutrient efficiency and reducing energy needs. On the other hand, PBM production is already optimized and is not expected to change substantially in the future years.

Vorheriger Artikel Addressing the use and end-of-life phase of pharmaceutical products in life cycle assessment

Nächster Artikel Regionalized environmental impacts of construction machinery

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Aubin J (2013) Life cycle assessment as applied to environmental choices regarding farmed or wild-caught fish. CAB Rev Perspect Agric Vet Sci Nutr Nat Resour 8:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR20138011CrossRef

Barry T (2004) Evaluation of the economic, social, and biological feasibility of bioconverting food wastes with the black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens). University of North Texas

Basto-Silva C, Valente LMP, Matos E et al (2018) Life cycle assessment of aquafeed ingredients. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:995–1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1414-8CrossRef

Basto-Silva C, Guerreiro I, Oliva-Teles A, Neto B (2019) Life cycle assessment of diets for gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) with different protein/carbohydrate ratios and fishmeal or plant feedstuffs as main protein sources. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24:2023–2034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01625-7CrossRef

Batista AP, Niccolai A, Fradinho P, Fragoso S, Bursic I, Rodolfi L, Biondi N, Tredici MR, Sousa I, Raymundo A (2017) Microalgae biomass as an alternative ingredient in cookies: Sensory, physical and chemical properties, antioxidant activity and in vitro digestibility. Algal Research 26:161–171

Boissy J, Aubin J, Drissi A, van der Werf HMG, Bell GJ, Kaushik SJ (2011) Environmental impacts of plant-based salmonid diets at feed and farm scales. Aquaculture 321:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.08.033CrossRef

Bosch G, van Zanten HHE, Zamprogna A, Veenenbos M, Meijer NP, van der Fels-Klerx HJ, van Loon JJA (2019) Conversion of organic resources by black soldier fly larvae: legislation, efficiency and environmental impact. J Clean Prod 222:355–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.270CrossRef

Boulay A-M, Bare J, Benini L, Berger M, Lathuillière MJ, Manzardo A, Margni M, Motoshita M, Núñez M, Pastor AV, Ridoutt B, Oki T, Worbe S, Pfister S (2018) The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE). Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:368–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1333-8CrossRef

Bribián IZ, Capilla AV, Usón AA (2011) Life cycle assessment of building materials: comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Build Environ 46:1133–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.12.002CrossRef

Bruni L, Pastorelli R, Viti C, Gasco L, Parisi G (2018) Characterisation of the intestinal microbial communities of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fed with Hermetia illucens (black soldier fly) partially defatted larva meal as partial dietary protein source. Aquaculture 487:56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.01.006CrossRef

Cao L, Diana JS, Keoleian GA (2013) Role of life cycle assessment in sustainable aquaculture. Rev Aquac 5:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-5131.2012.01080.xCrossRef

Cardinaletti G, Messina M, Bruno M, Tulli F, Poli BM, Giorgi G, Chini-Zittelli G, Tredici M, Tibaldi E (2018) Effects of graded levels of a blend of Tisochrysis lutea and Tetraselmis suecica dried biomass on growth and muscle tissue composition of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) fed diets low in fish meal and oil. Aquaculture 485:173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AQUACULTURE.2017.11.049CrossRef

Cesari V, Zucali M, Sandrucci A, Tamburini A, Bava L, Toschi I (2017) Environmental impact assessment of an Italian vertically integrated broiler system through a life cycle approach. J Clean Prod 143:904–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.030CrossRef

Čičková H, Newton GL, Lacy RC, Kozánek M (2015) The use of fly larvae for organic waste treatment. Waste Manag 35:68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.026CrossRef

Collotta M, Champagne P, Mabee W, Tomasoni G (2018) Wastewater and waste CO2 for sustainable biofuels from microalgae. Algal Res 29:12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ALGAL.2017.11.013CrossRef

Commission Regulation (EU) No 56/2013 (2013) amending Annexes I and IV to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies

Commission Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 (2013) on the Catalogue of feed materials

Commission Regulation (EU) No 893/2017 (2017) amending Annexes I and IV to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Annexes X, XIV and XV to Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 as regards the provisions on processed animal protein

Couture JL, Geyer R, Hansen JØ, Kuczenski B, Øverland M, Palazzo J, Sahlmann C, Lenihan H (2019) Environmental benefits of novel nonhuman food inputs to salmon feeds. Environ Sci Technol 53:1967–1975. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03832CrossRef

da Silva VP, van der Werf HMG, Soares SR, Corson MS (2014) Environmental impacts of French and Brazilian broiler chicken production scenarios: an LCA approach. J Environ Manag 133:222–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.12.011CrossRef

Davies SJ, Laporte J, Gouveia A, Salim HS, Woodgate SM, Hassaan MS, el-Haroun ER (2019) Validation of processed animal proteins (mono-PAPS) in experimental diets for juvenile gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) as primary fish meal replacers within a European perspective. Aquac Nutr 25:225–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12846CrossRef

dos Santos SKA, Schorer M, de Souza Moura G et al (2019) Evaluation of growth and fatty acid profile of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed with Schizochytrium sp. Aquac Res 50:1068–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13979CrossRef

Dossey AT, Morales-Ramos JA, Guadalupe Rojas M (eds) (2016) Insects as sustainable food ingredients: production, processing and food applications. Elsevier

Draganovic V, Jorgensen SE, Boom R et al (2013) Sustainability assessment of salmonid feed using energy, classical exergy and eco-exergy analysis. Ecol Indic 34:277–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.05.017CrossRef

Ecoinvent (2017) Ecoinvent 3.4 Database. Released October 4th 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.ecoinvent.org/database/older-versions/ecoinvent-34/ecoinvent-34.html

Enzing C, Ploeg M, Barbosa M, Sijtsma L (2014) Microalgae-based products for the food and feed sector: an outlook for Europe. Report EUR 26255. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

FAO (2018) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2018. Meeting the sustainable development goals. Rome, Italy

FAO (2019) Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Global production by production source 1950–2017 (FishstatJ). FAO Fish. Aquac. Dep. [online]. Rome. Updat. 2019. www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en

Fréon P, Durand H, Avadí A, Huaranca S, Orozco Moreyra R (2017) Life cycle assessment of three Peruvian fishmeal plants: toward a cleaner production. J Clean Prod 145:50–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.036CrossRef

Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus HJ, et al (2007) Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods: data v2.0. Ecoinvent report no. 3

Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B et al (2013) Tackling climate change through livestock – a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome

Gong Y, Bandara T, Huntley M, Johnson ZI, Dias J, Dahle D, Sørensen M, Kiron V (2019) Microalgae Scenedesmus sp. as a potential ingredient in low fishmeal diets for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Aquaculture 501:455–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.11.049CrossRef

González-García S, Gomez-Fernández Z, Dias AC, Feijoo G, Moreira MT, Arroja L (2014) Life cycle assessment of broiler chicken production: a Portuguese case study. J Clean Prod 74:125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.067CrossRef

Grierson S, Strezov V, Bengtsson J (2013) Life cycle assessment of a microalgae biomass cultivation, bio-oil extraction and pyrolysis processing regime. Algal Res 2:299–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2013.04.004CrossRef

Guinée J, Gorrée M, Heijungs R et al (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment. Operational guide to the ISO standards, vol 1, 2a, 2b and 3. Springer, Netherlands

Halloran A, Roos N, Eilenberg J, Cerutti A, Bruun S (2016) Life cycle assessment of edible insects for food protein: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 36:57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0392-8CrossRef

Hannon M, Gimpel J, Tran M, Rasala B, Mayfield S (2010) Biofuels from algae: challenges and potential. Biofuels 1:763–784. https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.10.44CrossRef

Hekmatpour F, Kochanian P, Marammazi JG, Zakeri M, Mousavi SM (2018) Inclusion of poultry by-product meal in the diet of Sparidentex hasta: effects on production performance, digestibility and nutrient retention. Anim Feed Sci Technol 241:173–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.02.010CrossRef

Henriksson PJG, Guinée JB, Kleijn R, De Snoo GR (2012) Life cycle assessment of aquaculture systems - a review of methodologies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:304–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0369-4CrossRef

Henriksson PJG, Mohan CV, Phillips MJ (2017) Evaluation of different aquaculture feed ingredients in Indonesia using life cycle assessment. Indones J Life Cycle Assess Sustain 1:13–21

Henry MA, Gai F, Enes P, Peréz-Jiménez A, Gasco L (2018a) Effect of partial dietary replacement of fishmeal by yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) larvae meal on the innate immune response and intestinal antioxidant enzymes of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Fish Shellfish Immunol 83:308–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2018.09.040CrossRef

Henry MA, Gasco L, Chatzifotis S, Piccolo G (2018b) Does dietary insect meal affect the fish immune system? The case of mealworm, Tenebrio molitor on European sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax. Dev Comp Immunol 81:204–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2017.12.002CrossRef

Herrero M, Gerber P, Vellinga T, Garnett T, Leip A, Opio C, Westhoek HJ, Thornton PK, Olesen J, Hutchings N, Montgomery H, Soussana JF, Steinfeld H, McAllister TA (2011) Livestock and greenhouse gas emissions: the importance of getting the numbers right. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166–167:779–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.083CrossRef

ISO (2006a) ISO 14044: environmental management - life cycle assessment - life cycle impact assessment. Geneva, Switzerland

ISO (2006b) ISO 14040: environmental management - life cycle assessment - principles and framework. Paris, France

Jain KK (2007) Feed ingredients in aqua feeds. In: CAS Training Manual on “Nutritional strategies and feeding management in finfish and shellfish.” Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, pp 6–15

Karapanagiotidis IT, Psofakis P, Mente E, Malandrakis E, Golomazou E (2019) Effect of fishmeal replacement by poultry by-product meal on growth performance, proximate composition, digestive enzyme activity, haematological parameters and gene expression of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Aquac Nutr 25:3–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12824CrossRef

Khan MI, Shin JH, Kim JD (2018) The promising future of microalgae: current status, challenges, and optimization of a sustainable and renewable industry for biofuels, feed, and other products. Microb Cell Factories 17:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-018-0879-xCrossRef

Koch P, Salou T (2016) AGRIBALYSE®: Rapport Méthodologique – Version 1.3. November 2016. Angers. France

Kumaraguru vasagam KP, Ramesh S, Balasubramanian T (2005) Dietary value of different vegetable oil in black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon in the presence and absence of soy lecithin supplementation: effect on growth, nutrient digestibility and body composition. Aquaculture 250:317–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.035CrossRef

Leinonen I, Williams AG, Wiseman J, Guy J, Kyriazakis I (2012) Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the United Kingdom through a life cycle assessment: broiler production systems. Poult Sci 91:8–25. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01634CrossRef

Leite GB, Abdelaziz AEM, Hallenbeck PC (2013) Algal biofuels: challenges and opportunities. Bioresour Technol 145:134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.007CrossRef

Macombe C, Le Feon S, Aubin J, Maillard F (2019) Marketing and social effects of industrial scale insect value chains in Europe: case of mealworm for feed in France. J Insects Food Feed 5:215–224. https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2018.0047CrossRef

Mata TM, Cameira M, Marques F et al (2018) Carbon footprint of microalgae production in photobioreactor. In: Energy Procedia. pp 432–437

Medeiros D, Sales E, Kiperstok A (2015) Energy production from microalgae biomass: carbon footprint and energy balance. J Clean Prod 96:493–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.038CrossRef

Meeker DL, Hamilton CR (2006) An overview of the rendering industry. In: Meeker DL (ed) Essential rendering. National Renderers Association

Mente E, Pierce GJ, Santos MB, Neofitou C (2006) Effect of feed and feeding in the culture of salmonids on the marine aquatic environment: a synthesis for European aquaculture. Aquac Int 14:499–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-006-9051-4CrossRef

Messina M, Bulfon C, Beraldo P, Tibaldi E, Cardinaletti G (2019) Intestinal morpho-physiology and innate immune status of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in response to diets including a blend of two marine microalgae, Tisochrysis lutea and Tetraselmis suecica. Aquaculture 500:660–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.09.054CrossRef

Naylor RL, Goldburg RJ, Primavera JH, Kautsky N, Beveridge MCM, Clay J, Folke C, Lubchenco J, Mooney H, Troell M (2000) Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405:1017–1024. https://doi.org/10.1038/35016500CrossRef

Naylor RL, Hardy RW, Bureau DP, Chiu A, Elliott M, Farrell AP, Forster I, Gatlin DM, Goldburg RJ, Hua K, Nichols PD (2009) Feeding aquaculture in an era of finite resources. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:15103–15110. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905235106CrossRef

Oonincx DGAB, Van Itterbeeck J, Heetkamp MJW et al (2010) An exploration on greenhouse gas and ammonia production by insect species suitable for animal or human consumption. PLoS One 5:e14445. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014445CrossRef

Pelletier N (2008) Environmental performance in the US broiler poultry sector: life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas, ozone depleting, acidifying and eutrophying emissions. Agric Syst 98:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2008.03.007CrossRef

Pelletier N, Tyedmers P (2007) Feeding farmed salmon: is organic better? Aquaculture 272:399–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.06.024CrossRef

Pelletier N, Tyedmers P, Sonesson U, Scholz A, Ziegler F, Flysjo A, Kruse S, Cancino B, Silverman H (2009) Not all salmon are created equal: life cycle assessment (LCA) of global salmon farming systems. Environ Sci Technol 43:8730–8736. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9010114CrossRef

PRé (2012) SimaPro by PRé consultants. Amersfoort, The Netherlands

Rana KJ, Siriwardena S, Hasan MR (2009) Impact of rising feed ingredient prices on aquafeeds and aquaculture production. Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. No. 541. FAO, Rome, Italy

Renaud SM, Thinh L-V, Lambrinidis G, Parry DL (2002) Effect of temperature on growth, chemical composition and fatty acid composition of tropical Australian microalgae grown in batch cultures. Aquaculture 211(1-4):195–214

Salomone R, Saija G, Mondello G, Giannetto A, Fasulo S, Savastano D (2017) Environmental impact of food waste bioconversion by insects: Application of Life Cycle Assessment to process using Hermetia illucens. Journal of Cleaner Production 140:890–905

Samuel-Fitwi B, Meyer S, Reckmann K, Schroeder JP, Schulz C (2013) Aspiring for environmentally conscious aquafeed: comparative LCA of aquafeed manufacturing using different protein sources. J Clean Prod 52:225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.031CrossRef

Schrijvers DL, Loubet P, Sonnemann G (2016) Developing a systematic framework for consistent allocation in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:976–993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1063-3CrossRef

Secci G, Mancini S, Iaconisi V, Gasco L, Basto A, Parisi G (2019) Can the inclusion of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) in diet affect the flesh quality/nutritional traits of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) after freezing and cooking? Int J Food Sci Nutr 70:161–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2018.1489529CrossRef

Sevigné-Itoiz E, Fuentes-Grünewald C, Gasol CM et al (2012) Energy balance and environmental impact analysis of marine microalgal biomass production for biodiesel generation in a photobioreactor pilot plant. Biomass Bioenergy 39:324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2012.01.026CrossRef

Shah MR, Lutzu GA, Alam A, Sarker P, Kabir Chowdhury MA, Parsaeimehr A, Liang Y, Daroch M (2018) Microalgae in aquafeeds for a sustainable aquaculture industry. J Appl Phycol 30:197–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-017-1234-zCrossRef

Skunca D, Tomasevic I, Nastasijevic I, Tomovic V, Djekic I (2018) Life cycle assessment of the chicken meat chain. J Clean Prod 184:440–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.02.274CrossRef

Smetana S, Mathys A, Knoch A, Heinz V (2015) Meat alternatives: life cycle assessment of most known meat substitutes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1254–1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0931-6CrossRef

Smetana S, Palanisamy M, Mathys A, Heinz V (2016) Sustainability of insect use for feed and food: life cycle assessment perspective. J Clean Prod 137:741–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.07.148CrossRef

Smetana S, Schmitt E, Mathys A (2019) Sustainable use of Hermetia illucens insect biomass for feed and food: Attributional and consequential life cycle assessment. Resour Conserv Recycl 144:285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.042CrossRef

Strazza C, Magrassi F, Gallo M, Del Borghi A (2015) Life cycle assessment from food to food: a case study of circular economy from cruise ships to aquaculture. Sustain Prod Consum 2:40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2015.06.004CrossRef

Tacon AGJ (2020) Trends in global aquaculture and aquafeed production: 2000–2017. Rev Fish Sci Aquac 28:43–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2019.1649634CrossRef

Tacon AGJ, Metian M (2008) Global overview on the use of fish meal and fish oil in industrially compounded aquafeeds: trends and future prospects. Aquaculture 285:146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.08.015CrossRef

Thévenot A, Rivera JL, Wilfart A, Maillard F, Hassouna M, Senga-Kiesse T, le Féon S, Aubin J (2018) Mealworm meal for animal feed: environmental assessment and sensitivity analysis to guide future prospects. J Clean Prod 170:1260–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.09.054CrossRef

Tillman A-M (2000) Significance of decision-making for LCA methodology. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20:113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(99)00035-9CrossRef

Tredici MR, Bassi N, Prussi M, Biondi N, Rodolfi L, Chini Zittelli G, Sampietro G (2015) Energy balance of algal biomass production in a 1-ha “Green Wall panel” plant: how to produce algal biomass in a closed reactor achieving a high net energy ratio. Appl Energy 154:1103–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2015.01.086CrossRef

Tredici MR, Rodolfi L, Biondi N, Bassi N, Sampietro G (2016) Techno-economic analysis of microalgal biomass production in a 1-ha Green Wall Panel (GWP®) plant. Algal Res 19:253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ALGAL.2016.09.005CrossRef

Van Huis A, Van Itterbeeck J, Klunder H et al (2013) Edible insects. Future prospects for food and feed security. FAO, Rome

van Zanten HHE, Mollenhorst H, Oonincx DGAB, Bikker P, Meerburg BG, de Boer IJM (2015) From environmental nuisance to environmental opportunity: housefly larvae convert waste to livestock feed. J Clean Prod 102:362–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.106CrossRef

Venero JA, Davis D, Lim CE (2008) Use of plant protein sources in crustacean diets. In: Lim CE, Webster CD, Lee CS (eds) Alternative protein sources in aquaculture diets. Haworth Press, New York, pp 163–203

Wu YB, Ren X, Chai XJ, Li P, Wang Y (2018) Replacing fish meal with a blend of poultry by-product meal and feather meal in diets for giant croaker (Nibea japonica). Aquac Nutr 24:1085–1091. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12647CrossRef

Yaakob Z, Ali E, Zainal A, Mohamad M, Takriff M (2014) An overview: biomolecules from microalgae for animal feed and aquaculture. J Biol Res 21:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/2241-5793-21-6CrossRef

Zarantoniello M, Bruni L, Randazzo B, Vargas A, Gioacchini G, Truzzi C, Annibaldi A, Riolo P, Parisi G, Cardinaletti G, Tulli F, Olivotto I (2018) Partial dietary inclusion of Hermetia illucens (black soldier fly) full-fat prepupae in Zebrafish feed: biometric, histological, biochemical, and molecular implications. Zebrafish 15:519–532. https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2018.1596CrossRef

Titel: Fishmeal partial substitution within aquafeed formulations: life cycle assessment of four alternative protein sources
verfasst von: Silvia Maiolo
Giuliana Parisi
Natascia Biondi
Fernando Lunelli
Emilio Tibaldi
Roberto Pastres
Publikationsdatum: 12.05.2020
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 8/2020
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01759-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results and discussion

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2020

A longitudinal literature review of life cycle costing applied to urban agriculture

Addressing the use and end-of-life phase of pharmaceutical products in life cycle assessment

An agile approach for evaluating the environmental-economic performance of cropping systems at experimental stage: the case of Brazilian mango

Environmental impacts associated with the production, use, and end-of-life of a woollen garment

Allocation in life cycle assessment of lignin

Regionalized environmental impacts of construction machinery