Skip to main content

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Food Security and Safety

verfasst von : Debra M. Strauss

Erschienen in: Socio-Economic Considerations in Biotechnology Regulation

Verlag: Springer New York

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Times have changed since the days of royal tasters. As our concerns extend to the rest of the kingdom and beyond national borders, we face the critical need to develop increasingly complex policies to ensure the safety of the mainstream food supply. Incidents involving food contamination, particularly salmonella and E. coli in eggs, peanuts, and produce have been numerous and widespread. Tainted foods have caused illnesses and deaths that perhaps could have been prevented by more rigorous and proactive policies. Recognition has emerged that consumers need greater protection before these outbreaks occur, through more stringent requirements and better enforcement of food safety standards, including inspections. Moreover, traceability and recall mechanisms are necessary to resolve the problems that do arise. Food safety is important for all foods, regardless of the process to produce them. These concerns are heightened in the area of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), where scientific uncertainty compounds the issues in the effort to determine and evaluate the risks of harm to human health and the environment as essential elements in developing food safety regulation.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The journal PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Science) published a volume in 2001 (http://​www.​pnas.​org/​content/​98/​21.​toc) containing 6 articles that refute Losey’s study. These studies posit that the conditions created by Losey in the laboratory would never be created in nature.
 
2
The Royal Society in the UK released a report that found that there was no evidence of adverse effects from feeding GM potatoes to rats as reported by Pusztai. See: http://​royalsociety.​org/​uploadedFiles/​Royal_​Society_​Content/​policy/​publications/​1999/​10092.​pdf.​
 
3
The FDA asks the industry to compare the compositions of GM and non-GM crops; when they are not significantly different the two are regarded as ‘substantially equivalent’, and no additional labeling or animal testing is required. This concept has been disfavored in Europe where the capability to classify a novel food as being substantially equivalent no longer justifies a lack of safety assessments.
 
4
On the other hand, as an international organization Codex has been successful in openly including relevant stakeholders in its process and thereby achieving consensus. See Post 2006.
 
5
Over 100 countries signed the FAO Undertaking, but the USA did not.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Angelo MJ (2007) Regulating evolution for sale: an evolutionary biology model for regulating the unnatural selection of genetically modified organisms. Wake Forest L Rev 42:93–165 Angelo MJ (2007) Regulating evolution for sale: an evolutionary biology model for regulating the unnatural selection of genetically modified organisms. Wake Forest L Rev 42:93–165
Zurück zum Zitat Aoki K (2011) Food forethought: intergenerational equity and global food supply—past, present, and future. Wis L Rev 2011:399–478 Aoki K (2011) Food forethought: intergenerational equity and global food supply—past, present, and future. Wis L Rev 2011:399–478
Zurück zum Zitat Aziz A, Leblanc S (2011) Maternal and fetal exposure to pesticides associated to genetically modified foods in eastern townships of Quebec, Canada. Repro Toxicol 41:528–533 Aziz A, Leblanc S (2011) Maternal and fetal exposure to pesticides associated to genetically modified foods in eastern townships of Quebec, Canada. Repro Toxicol 41:528–533
Zurück zum Zitat Benson SM (2010) Guidance for improving the federal response to foodborne illness outbreaks associated with fresh produce. Food & Drug LJ 65:503–524 Benson SM (2010) Guidance for improving the federal response to foodborne illness outbreaks associated with fresh produce. Food & Drug LJ 65:503–524
Zurück zum Zitat Bobo JA (2007) The role of international agreements in achieving food security: how many lawyers does it take to feed a village? Vand J Transnat’l L 40:937–947 Bobo JA (2007) The role of international agreements in achieving food security: how many lawyers does it take to feed a village? Vand J Transnat’l L 40:937–947
Zurück zum Zitat Bratspies RM (2003) Myths of voluntary compliance: lessons from the starlink corn fiasco. Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol’y Rev 27:593–649 Bratspies RM (2003) Myths of voluntary compliance: lessons from the starlink corn fiasco. Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol’y Rev 27:593–649
Zurück zum Zitat Codex Alimentarius Commission FAO & World Health Organization (WHO) (2006) Report of the 34th session of the Codex Committee on Food Labelling, Ottawa, Canada, 1–5 May Codex Alimentarius Commission FAO & World Health Organization (WHO) (2006) Report of the 34th session of the Codex Committee on Food Labelling, Ottawa, Canada, 1–5 May
Zurück zum Zitat EC-Biotech Reports (2006) WTO, Reports of the Panel, European Communities—measures affecting the approval and marketing of biotech products, WT/DS291, WT/DS292 and WT/DS293 (29 September) EC-Biotech Reports (2006) WTO, Reports of the Panel, European Communities—measures affecting the approval and marketing of biotech products, WT/DS291, WT/DS292 and WT/DS293 (29 September)
Zurück zum Zitat EC Regulation No 1829/2003 (2003) of the European Parliament and Council on Genetically Modified Food and Feed enacted 22 September 22 2003 and implemented 18 April 2004, 2003 OJ (L268) 25 EC Regulation No 1829/2003 (2003) of the European Parliament and Council on Genetically Modified Food and Feed enacted 22 September 22 2003 and implemented 18 April 2004, 2003 OJ (L268) 25
Zurück zum Zitat EC Regulation No 1830/2003 (2003) of the European Parliament and Council on the Traceability and Labeling of Genetically Modified Organisms enacted 22 September 22 2003 and implemented 18 April 2004, 2003 OJ (L268) 24 EC Regulation No 1830/2003 (2003) of the European Parliament and Council on the Traceability and Labeling of Genetically Modified Organisms enacted 22 September 22 2003 and implemented 18 April 2004, 2003 OJ (L268) 24
Zurück zum Zitat Falkner R (2007) The global biotech food fight: why the United States got it so wrong. Brown J World Aff 14:99–110 Falkner R (2007) The global biotech food fight: why the United States got it so wrong. Brown J World Aff 14:99–110
Zurück zum Zitat FAO (1983) Res. 8/83 (FAO Undertaking) International Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources, UN Food and Agriculture Organization, 22nd Sess., Annex 1, Agenda Item 16, U.N. Doc. C/83/REP (1983) FAO (1983) Res. 8/83 (FAO Undertaking) International Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources, UN Food and Agriculture Organization, 22nd Sess., Annex 1, Agenda Item 16, U.N. Doc. C/83/REP (1983)
Zurück zum Zitat International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGR), art. 12.3(d), Nov. 3, 2001. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2013 International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGR), art. 12.3(d), Nov. 3, 2001. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2013
Zurück zum Zitat Lee-Muramoto MR (2012) Reforming the “Uncoordinated” framework for regulation of biotechnology. Drake J Agr L 17:311–367 Lee-Muramoto MR (2012) Reforming the “Uncoordinated” framework for regulation of biotechnology. Drake J Agr L 17:311–367
Zurück zum Zitat Lin CF (2012) SPS-PLUS and bilateral treaty network: a “Global” solution to the global food-safety problem? Wis Int’l LJ 29:694–734 Lin CF (2012) SPS-PLUS and bilateral treaty network: a “Global” solution to the global food-safety problem? Wis Int’l LJ 29:694–734
Zurück zum Zitat Losey JE et al (1999) Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature 399:214CrossRef Losey JE et al (1999) Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature 399:214CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Notes (2007) Reforming the food safety system: what if consolidation isn’t enough? Harvard L Rev 120:1345–1366 Notes (2007) Reforming the food safety system: what if consolidation isn’t enough? Harvard L Rev 120:1345–1366
Zurück zum Zitat Post DL (2006) The precautionary principle and risk assessment in international food safety: how the World Trade Organization influences standards. Risk Anal 26:1259–1273CrossRef Post DL (2006) The precautionary principle and risk assessment in international food safety: how the World Trade Organization influences standards. Risk Anal 26:1259–1273CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stamps J (2002) Trade in biotechnology food products. Int’l Econ Rev 5–14 Stamps J (2002) Trade in biotechnology food products. Int’l Econ Rev 5–14
Zurück zum Zitat Straub P (2006) Farmers in the IP Wrench—how patents on gene-modified crops violate the right to food in developing countries. Hastings Intl’l & Comp L Rev 29:187–213 Straub P (2006) Farmers in the IP Wrench—how patents on gene-modified crops violate the right to food in developing countries. Hastings Intl’l & Comp L Rev 29:187–213
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss DM (2006) The international regulation of genetically modified organisms: importing caution into the U.S. food supply. Food & Drug LJ 61:167–196 Strauss DM (2006) The international regulation of genetically modified organisms: importing caution into the U.S. food supply. Food & Drug LJ 61:167–196
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss DM (2008) Feast or famine: the impact of the WTO decision favoring the U.S. biotechnology industry in the EU ban of genetically modified foods. Am Bus LJ 45:775–826CrossRef Strauss DM (2008) Feast or famine: the impact of the WTO decision favoring the U.S. biotechnology industry in the EU ban of genetically modified foods. Am Bus LJ 45:775–826CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss DM (2009) The application of TRIPS to GMOs: international intellectual property rights and biotechnology. 45 Stan J Int’l L 45:287–320 Strauss DM (2009) The application of TRIPS to GMOs: international intellectual property rights and biotechnology. 45 Stan J Int’l L 45:287–320
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss DM (2010) We reap what we sow: the legal liability risks of genetically modified food. J Legal Stud Bus 16:149–177 Strauss DM (2010) We reap what we sow: the legal liability risks of genetically modified food. J Legal Stud Bus 16:149–177
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss DM (2011a) An analysis of the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act: protection for consumers and boon for business. Food & Drug LJ 66:353–376 Strauss DM (2011a) An analysis of the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act: protection for consumers and boon for business. Food & Drug LJ 66:353–376
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss DM (2011b) Achieving the food safety mandate: bringing the USDA to the table. Hamline J Pub L & Pol’y 33:1–47 Strauss DM (2011b) Achieving the food safety mandate: bringing the USDA to the table. Hamline J Pub L & Pol’y 33:1–47
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss DM (2012) The role of courts, agencies, and congress in GMOs: a multilateral approach to ensuring the safety of the food supply. Symposium edition: genetically modified organisms: trade and law in a global market. Idaho L Rev 48:267–319 Strauss DM (2012) The role of courts, agencies, and congress in GMOs: a multilateral approach to ensuring the safety of the food supply. Symposium edition: genetically modified organisms: trade and law in a global market. Idaho L Rev 48:267–319
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss DM, Strauss MC (2009) Globalization and national sovereignty: controlling the international food supply in the age of biotechnology. J Legal Stud Bus 15:75–94 Strauss DM, Strauss MC (2009) Globalization and national sovereignty: controlling the international food supply in the age of biotechnology. J Legal Stud Bus 15:75–94
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor MR (2004) Lead or react? A game plan for modernizing the food safety system in the United States. Food & Drug LJ 59:399–403 Taylor MR (2004) Lead or react? A game plan for modernizing the food safety system in the United States. Food & Drug LJ 59:399–403
Zurück zum Zitat UN Conference on Environment and Development (1992) June 3–14 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. 6 UN Doc A/CONF.151/26/Rev. 1 (1 Jan 1993) UN Conference on Environment and Development (1992) June 3–14 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. 6 UN Doc A/CONF.151/26/Rev. 1 (1 Jan 1993)
Zurück zum Zitat WHO Traditional Medicine Workshop (2000) Report of the Interregional Workshop on Intellectual Property Rights in the Context of Traditional Medicine. WHO/EDM/TRM/2001.1 (2000). Bangkok, Thailand, 6–8 December WHO Traditional Medicine Workshop (2000) Report of the Interregional Workshop on Intellectual Property Rights in the Context of Traditional Medicine. WHO/EDM/TRM/2001.1 (2000). Bangkok, Thailand, 6–8 December
Zurück zum Zitat Zurek L (2007) The European Communities biotech dispute: how the WTO fails to consider cultural factors in the genetically modified food debate. Tex Int’l LJ 42:345–368 Zurek L (2007) The European Communities biotech dispute: how the WTO fails to consider cultural factors in the genetically modified food debate. Tex Int’l LJ 42:345–368
Metadaten
Titel
Food Security and Safety
verfasst von
Debra M. Strauss
Copyright-Jahr
2014
Verlag
Springer New York
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9440-9_8