nach oben

Erschienen in:

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

9. From Integration to Interpretation: Translating ForSTI into Strategies

verfasst von : Ian Miles, Ozcan Saritas, Alexander Sokolov

Erschienen in: Foresight for Science, Technology and Innovation

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

One of the key features of ForSTI is that it is a policy and action-oriented activity. Therefore, the process does not simply end with the description of preferable futures, but goes to the next levels on the ways of formulating and implementing strategies and policies, and planning and allocating resources for successful implementation.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Integration: Modelling

Nächstes Kapitel Intervention and Impact: Outcomes, Action and Evaluation

Recall that we do not see exploratory and divergent, or normative and convergent, approaches as inextricably bound together. However, the loose association within each of these “couplets” holds up fairly well as a description of different steps of the ForSTI process.

For a set of resources on using cost-benefit analysis, with worked examples, see the “Green Book” website at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-green-book-appraisal-and-evaluation-in-central-governent (accessed 10/12/2014).

The literature on these topics is vast. For an introduction to behavioural economics, see Kahneman (2003); one of many efforts to assess and explain public perceptions of emerging technologies is Kahan et al. (2007); efforts to explicate key risk issues for policymakers is Annual Report of the Government Chief Scientific Adviser (2014) and Williamson and Weyman (2005). Foresight Programme commissioned an excellent “Science Review Summary: Public Perception of Risk” (by J.R. Eiser, dated 2004); this is still accessible online from other repositories, such as http://web-archive-net.com/page/789210/2012-11-29/http://www.bis.gov.uk/files/file15017.pdf

Some similar approaches in ForSTI work are reviewed in Lee et al. (2008); see also Martin and Daim (2012) for application in a roadmapping context.

Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/technology-and-innovation-futures-uk-growth-opportunities-for-the-2020s (Accessed on: 02.11.2015).

France has had earlier rounds of “Key Technology” exercises in the 1990s and at the turn of the century—see Barré (2008). For the recent exercise, see Ministere de l’Economie, de Finance et de l’Industrie (2015).

This scheme was also used in the Czech ForSTI exercise, which will be mentioned briefly below.

http://www.tubitak.gov.tr/en/about-us/policies/content-vision-2023 (Accessed on 03.11.2015).

Figures 1, 2 and 4 are based on (Phaal et al. 2001).

See Miles and Keenan (2002) for uses of SWOT in the ForSTI process.

Ackerman, F. (2008). Critique of cost-benefit analysis, and alternative approaches to decision-making. A report to Friends of the Earth England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Retrieved December 10, 2014, from http://www.foe.co.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/policy_appraisal.pdf; http://www.ase.tufts.edu/gdae/Pubs/rp/Ack_UK_CBAcritique.pdf

Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press.

Barré, R. (2008). Foresight in France. In L. Georghiou et al. (Eds.), The handbook of technology foresight. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Bimber, B., & Popper, S. (1994). What is a critical technology? RAND paper DRU-605-CTI, Santa Monica.

BMBF. (2003). Eine Erste Bilanz. Futur: Der deutsche Forschungsdialog. Bonn: BMBF.

Bray, O. H., & Garcia, M. L. (1997). Technology roadmapping: The integration of strategic and technology planning for competitiveness. Innovation in Technology Management—The Key to Global Leadership, PICMET ’97: Portland International Conference on Management and Technology, IEEE, 25–28.

Department for Communities and Local Government. (2009). Multi-criteria analysis: A manual. Wetherby, West Yorkshire: Communities and Local Government Publications. Retrieved December 10, 2014, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/7612/1132618.pdf

Galvin, R. (1998). Science roadmap. Science, 280(5365), 5803.CrossRef

Gough, C., & Shackley, S. (2006). Towards a multi-criteria methodology for assessment of geological carbon storage options. Climatic Change, 74(1–3), 141–174.CrossRef

Government Chief Scientific Adviser. (2014). Innovation: Managing risk, not avoiding it. Evidence and case studies (Annual report). London: The Government Office for Science. Retrieved December 12, 2014, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/381906/14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence.pdf

IEA. (2014). Energy technology roadmaps: A guide to development and implementation. Paris: International Energy Agency. Retrieved October 10, 2015, from http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/TechnologyRoadmapAguidetodevelopmentandimplementation.pdf

Kahan, D. M., Slovic, P., Braman, D., Gastil, J., & Cohen, G. (2007). Nanotechnology risk perceptions—The influence of affect and values. Woodrow Wilson’s Nanotechnology Project, Cultural Cognition Project at Yale Law School. Retrieved December 12, 2014, from http://www.nanotechproject.org/process/assets/files/2710/164_nanotechriskperceptions_dankahan.pdf

Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475.CrossRef

Kelman, S. (1981). Cost-benefit analysis: An ethical critique. AEI Journal on Government and Society Regulation, 5(1), 33–40. Retrieved December 10, 2014, from http://www2.bren.ucsb.edu/~kolstad/secure/KelmanCostBeneCritiqu.pdf

Klusacek, K. (2003). Selection of research priorities—Method of critical technologies. Prague: Technology Centre ASCR. Retrieved October 16, 2015, from https://www.tc.cz/en/publications/publications/publications-list/selection-of-research-priorities-method-of-critical-technologies

Lee, H., Lee, C., Seol, H., & Park, Y. (2008). On the R&D priority setting in technology foresight: A DEA and ANP approach. International Journal of Innovation Technology Management, 5(2), 201–219.CrossRef

Linstone, H. (1973). On discounting the future. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 4(2), 335–338.CrossRef

Louvet, J. P. (2000). Les principaux résultats de l’étude “Technologies clés 2005. Paris: Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie.

Martin, H., & Daim, T. U. (2012). Technology roadmap development process (TRDP) for the service sector: A conceptual framework. Technology in Society, 34(1), 94–102.CrossRef

Miles, I., & Keenan, M. (Eds.). (2002). Practical guide to regional foresight in the United Kingdom. Luxembourg: European Commission. EUR 20478. ISBN 92 894 4682 (versions of this report were prepared for every EU15 country except Luxembourg). Retrieved January 14, 2016, from http://cordis.europa.eu/foresight/cgrf.htm

Miller, E. S. (2007). Bankrupting the enemy: The U.S. financial siege of Japan before Pearl Harbor. Annapolis, MD: United States Naval Institute.

Ministere de l’Economie, de Finance et de l’Industrie. (2015). Remise de l’étude TECHNOLOGIES CLES, Paris, p. 12.

Phaal, R. (2003). Fast-start technology roadmapping: A presentation given at the UNIDO Technology foresight course for practitioners. October 9, 2003, Prague. Accessed July 25, 2016, from http://ictt.by/Library/07.TechnologyRoadmaps.ppt

Phaal, R. (2015). Roadmapping for industrial emergence. A keynote presentation at the kick-off workshop on System Innovation for Transformation, OECD TIP Steering Group meeting on System Innovation (01.05.2015). London: UK Department for Business Innovation & Skills.

Phaal, R., Farrukh, C., & Probert, D. (2001). Technology roadmapping: Linking technology resources to business objectives. Cambridge: University of Cambridge. Accessed July 25, 2016, from https://www.sopheon.com/wp-content/uploads/Article-TechnologyRoadmapping.pdf

Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J. P., & Probert, D. R. (2004). Technology roadmapping—A planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 46(7–8), 1071–1080.

Rosenhead, J., & Thunhurst, C. (1979). Operations research and cost-benefit analysis: Whose science? In J. Evans, J. Irvine, & I. Miles (Eds.), Demystifying social statistics. London: Pluto Press.

Saritas, O., & Aylen, J. (2010). Using scenarios for roadmapping: The case of clean production. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77(7), 1061–1075.CrossRef

Saritas, O., & Oner, M. A. (2004). Systemic analysis of UK foresight results: Joint application of integrated management model and roadmapping. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 71(1–2), 27–65.CrossRef

Steering Group of the Technology Foresight Programme. (1995). Progress through partnership. London: HMSO.

Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29.CrossRef

Williamson, J., & Weyman, A. (2005). Review of the public perception of risk, and stakeholder engagement. Buxton: Health and Safety Laboratory. Retrieved December 12, 2014, from http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/hsl_pdf/2005/hsl0516.pdf

Zurcher, R., & Kostoff, R. N. (1997). Modelling technology roadmaps. Journal of Technology Transfer, 22(3), 73–80.CrossRef

Titel: From Integration to Interpretation: Translating ForSTI into Strategies
verfasst von: Ian Miles
Ozcan Saritas
Alexander Sokolov
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Foresight for Science, Technology and Innovation
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32572-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-32574-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32574-3_9

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten