Skip to main content

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

7. From Marxism to Ontology: Maurice Merleau-Ponty

verfasst von : Dick Howard

Erschienen in: The Marxian Legacy

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The name of Maurice Merleau-Ponty conjures a multitude of images, refracting against one another in ways that continually surprise. There is first of all the phenomenologist. Under his pen, phenomenology becomes less than a method to be applied and more than an attitude: the phenomenological analyses emerge on their own from the materials in which they were embedded, those of science, of culture, and of the everyday. His studies of expression in art and literature are of a piece with the sure hand that guides his interpretations of the so-called hard sciences. The philosopher was part of a generation that lived through war, occupation, and the unanswered challenges of creating a post-war. The same manner of cleaving to the world is present in his political choices and critical analyses. He seemed to accept the reality of Cold War political dualism (in Humanism and Terror) before challenging its apparent common sense in a denunciation of what he called ‘Sartre’s Ultra-Bolshevism’ in his study of the Adventures of the Dialectic. The speculative moment of his phenomenology reappears in the unfinished ontology in The Visible and the Invisible where the reader has a sense that a poetic layer of mystery overlain with Heideggerian echoes weighs down the articulation of his philosophical lucidity. Each rereading, particularly in light of the fact that his work was cut short prematurely, offers new possibilities of interpretation, poses new questions, even at times suggests new practical political-historical understandings.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
In the text, all citations from Merleau-Ponty are indicated with a reference-sign and page number in parenthesis. All citations are from the French editions and are rendered in my own translation. The sources cited are Phénomenologie de la perception (Paris: Gallimard, 1945), indicated as PhP; Humanisme et terreur (Paris: Gallimard, 1947), indicated as HT; Sens et non-sens (Paris: Nagel, 6th ed., 1966), indicated as SNS; Eloge de la philosophie et autres essais (Paris: Gallimard, 1953, 1960), indicated as Eloge; Les aventures de la dialectique (Paris: Gallimard, 1955), indicated as AD; Signes (Paris: Gallimard, 1960), indicated as S; L’oeil et l’Esprit (Paris: Gallimard, 1964), indicated as OE; Le visible et l’invisible (Paris: Gallimard, 1964), indicated as VI; Résumés de cours (Paris: Gallimard, 1968), indicated as Résumés; and La prose du monde (Paris: Gallimard, 1969), indicated as Prose.
 
2
The point was in fact made in Sartre’s ‘Merleau-Ponty vivant’, in Les Temps Modernes, Oct 1961 (reprinted in Sartre, Situations IV (Paris: Gallimard, 1964), p. 243), but with reference to Merleau-Ponty’s influence in an earlier period.
 
3
James Edie, ‘Introduction’, in The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays (Northwestern University Press: Evanston, 111, 1964), p. xiv. Since this statement was made, both volumes have been translated, though Humanism and Terror was not admitted to the philosophically consecrated series directed by Mr. Edie. I suppose that, in the end, we have to thank the ‘blind forces of the market’ for doing what the philosopher could not!
 
4
Dick Howard, ‘Ambiguous Radicalism: Merleau-Ponty’s Interrogation of Political Thought’, in Garth Gillan, ed., The Horizons of the Flesh (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1973).
 
5
Claude Lefort, ‘La politique et la pensée de la politique’, in Lettres Nouvelles, lie année, nouvelle série, no. 32, p. 58.
 
6
Compare the statement in HT: ‘The decline of proletarian humanism is not a critical experiment which would annul Marxism entirely. As a critique of the existing world and of the other humanisms, it remains valid. At least in this sense, it cannot be surpassed’ (p. 165), with the statement printed over a decade later (but written in 1955, at the time of AD): ‘The decadence of Russian communism does not mean that the class struggle is a myth, that “free enterprise” is either possible or desirable, nor in general that the Marxist critique is void’ (S, p. 338).
 
7
In an earlier formulation (PhP, p. 456), Merleau-Ponty writes: ‘To say with Marx that man poses only those problems that he can resolve is to renew the theological optimism and to postulate the explosion of the world’.
 
8
Compare the following passage on Trotsky: ‘On the plane of the individual, this type of person is sublime. But we must ask whether they are the type who make history. They believe so strongly in the rationality of history that, if for a time history ceases to be rational, they throw themselves toward the wished-for future rather than pass any compromises with the incoherent present’ (HT, p. 85).
 
9
As I did in op. cit.
 
10
Mésaventures de l’anti-Marxisme, Les Malheurs de M. Merleau-Ponty (Paris: Editions Sociales, 1956), p. 102. This collective volume published by the political-theoretical ‘heavies’ of and in the orbit of the French Communist Party shows how threatening Merleau-Ponty’s critique was felt to be the dominant intellectual tradition of the left at the time. The volume is interesting as an antiquity; from the point of view of theory, it is strictly and simply empty and vain verbiage.
 
11
Insofar as the theory of the proletariat is interpreted as an account of the praxis of a plural subject, the dilemma posed is replaced by its inverse opposite: the proletariat is treated as an absolute subject constituting the world. The transcendental subjectivity rejected by Marx is now situated in an object within the world. The result is a justification of the voluntarism of the Party, or a mystical view of praxis as the achieved unity of subject and object. Merleau-Ponty’s critique of Sartre in AD showed clearly that these are two sides of the same coin.
 
12
As previously mentioned, Lefort had been a student of Merleau-Ponty and was the editor of his posthumous manuscripts; he was also the co-founder with Castoriadis of Socialisme ou Barbarie. Some indications of Castoriadis’ encounter with Merleau-Ponty are given in Chap. 9, note 10, along with a reference to his contribution to a special issue of l’Arc edited by Lefort.
 
Metadaten
Titel
From Marxism to Ontology: Maurice Merleau-Ponty
verfasst von
Dick Howard
Copyright-Jahr
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04411-4_7