Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Individual People as Champions in Building an Emerging Software Ecosystem Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Generating Win-Win Strategies for Software Businesses Under Coopetition: A Strategic Modeling Approach

verfasst von : Vik Pant, Eric Yu

Erschienen in: Software Business

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Interorganizational coopetition describes a phenomenon in which businesses cooperate and compete simultaneously. Such behavior is commonplace among software firms wherein vendors concomitantly deal with each other both as partners and as rivals. Sustainable coopetitive relationships are predicated on the logic of win-win strategies. Conversely, win-lose or lose-lose strategies do not lead to durable coopetitive relationships. This aspect of coopetition requires decision-makers in coopeting software businesses to generate and analyze win-win strategies. This paper proposes a strategic modeling approach to systematically search for alternatives and generate win-win strategies. This approach synergistically combines i* goal-modeling to analyze the distributed intentional structures of actors and Game Tree decision-modeling to reason about the moves and countermoves of actors. An illustrative example of a published case study is presented to demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of this methodology.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Continuous Software Portfolio Performance Management
Nächstes Kapitel Exploring Business Model Changes in Software-as-a-Service Firms
Literatur
1.
Chesbrough, H.: Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, pp. 0–19, 400 p. (2006)
2.
Jansen, S., Finkelstein, A., Brinkkemper, S.: A sense of community: a research agenda for software ecosystems. In: 31st International Conference on Software Engineering Companion Volume, pp. 187–190. IEEE, May 2009
3.
Brandenburger, A.M., Nalebuff, B.J.: Co-opetition. Doubleday, New York (1996)
4.
5.
Coutinho, E.F., Viana, D., dos Santos, R.P.: An exploratory study on the need for modeling software ecosystems: the case of SOLAR SECO. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Modelling in Software Engineering, pp. 47–53. IEEE Press, May 2017
6.
Rausch, A., Bartelt, C., Herold, S., Klus, H., Niebuhr, D.: From software systems to complex software ecosystems: model- and constraint-based engineering of ecosystems. In: Münch, J., Schmid, K. (eds.) Perspectives on the Future of Software Engineering, pp. 61–80. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-642-37395-4_​5CrossRef
7.
Boucharas, V., Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S.: Formalizing software ecosystem modeling. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Open Component Ecosystems, pp. 41–50. ACM, August 2009
8.
Handoyo, E., Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S.: Software ecosystem modeling: the value chains. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital Ecosystems, pp. 17–24. ACM, October 2013
9.
10.
11.
Yu, E., Deng, S.: Understanding software ecosystems: a strategic modeling approach. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Software Ecosystems, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 65–76, June 2011
12.
Pant, V., Yu, E.: Understanding strategic moves and reciprocity on software ecosystems: a strategic modeling approach. In: 9th International Workshop on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO 2017) (2017)
13.
Padula, G., Dagnino, G.B.: Untangling the rise of coopetition: the intrusion of competition in a cooperative game structure. Int. Stud. Manag. Organ. 37(2), 32–52 (2007)
14.
Brandenburger, A.M., Nalebuff, B.J.: The Right Game: Use Game Theory to Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review, pp. 57–71 (1995)
15.
Dixit, A.K., Nalebuff, B.: The Art of Strategy: A Game Theorist’s Guide to Success in Business & Life. WW Norton & Company, New York (2008)
16.
17.
Barbanel, J.B., Brams, S.J., Stromquist, W.: Cutting a pie is not a piece of cake. Am. Math. Mon. 116(6), 496–514 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRef
18.
Chen, Y., Lai, J.K., Parkes, D.C., Procaccia, A.D.: Truth, justice, and cake cutting. Games Econ. Behav. 77(1), 284–297 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRef
19.
Deng, X., Qi, Q., Saberi, A.: Algorithmic solutions for envy-free cake cutting. Oper. Res. 60(6), 1461–1476 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRef
20.
Aziz, H., Mackenzie, S.: A discrete and bounded envy-free cake cutting protocol for any number of agents. In: 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 416–427. IEEE, October 2016
21.
Dall’Aglio, M., Hill, T.P.: Maximin share and minimax envy in fair-division problems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 281(1), 346–361 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRef
22.
Yu, E., Giorgini, P., Maiden, N., Mylopoulos, J.: Social Modeling for Requirements Engineering. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)
23.
Ghazawneh, A., Henfridsson, O.: Governing third-party development through platform boundary resources. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference of Information Systems (ICIS), St. Louis (2010)
24.
Ghazawneh, A., Henfridsson, O.: Micro-strategizing in platform ecosystems: a multiple case study. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) 2011, Shanghai, China (2011)
25.
Eaton, B., Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Sorensen, C., Yoo, Y.: Distributed tuning of boundary resources: the case of Apple’s iOS service system. MIS Q.: Manag. Inf. Syst. 39(1), 217–243 (2015)CrossRef
26.
Prince, J.D.: HTML5: not just a substitute for flash. J. Electron. Resour. Med. Libr. 10(2), 108–112 (2013)CrossRef
27.
Elaluf-Calderwood, S.M., Eaton, B.D., Sørensen, C., Yoo, Y.: Control as a strategy for the development of generativity in business models for mobile platforms. In: 15th International Conference on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks (ICIN), pp. 271–276. IEEE, October 2011
28.
Nalebuff, B.J., Brandenburger, A.M.: Co-opetition: competitive and cooperative business strategies for the digital economy. Strategy Leadersh. 25(6), 28–33 (1997)CrossRef
29.
Brandenburger, A.M., Stuart, H.W.: Value-based business strategy. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 5(1), 5–24 (1996)CrossRef
30.
Brandenburger, A., Stuart, H.: Biform games. Manage. Sci. 53(4), 537–549 (2007)CrossRef
31.
Fricker, S.: Specification and analysis of requirements negotiation strategy in software ecosystems. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Software Ecosystems (2009)
32.
Jansen, S., Handoyo, E., Alves, C.: Scientists’ needs in software ecosystem modeling. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Ecosystems (2015)
33.
Santos, G.A.V.: A theory of power in software ecosystems formed by small-to-medium enterprises. Ph.D. thesis (2016)
34.
Boudreau, K.J.: Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5), 1409–1427 (2012)CrossRef
35.
Koller, D., Megiddo, N.: The complexity of two-person zero-sum games in extensive form. Games Econ. Behav. 4(4), 528–552 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Generating Win-Win Strategies for Software Businesses Under Coopetition: A Strategic Modeling Approach
verfasst von
Vik Pant
Eric Yu
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Software Business

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04839-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-04840-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04840-2_7

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise