nach oben

International Journal of Material Forming

Erschienen in:

01.01.2023 | Developments in modelling and simulation..Japan, South Korea and China

Genetic effects of dynamic recrystallization on ductile fracture at elevated temperature for AA7075 alloy with various stress states: modeling and simulation

verfasst von: Bingtao Tang, Mian Li, Ning Guo, Qianchi Li, Lu Han, Zhongguo Zhang

Erschienen in: International Journal of Material Forming | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Temperature and strain rate related dynamic recrystallization (DRX) and its inherited effects on ductile fracture have become an urgent issue which impede accurate prediction of fracture strain and restrict formability for 7075 aluminum alloy in hot deformation process. In order to precisely elaborate the ductile fracture behavior of 7075 aluminum alloy during hot forming process and accurately predict the initiation of ductile fracture, an extended ductile fracture criterion (DFC) at elevated temperature was established considering DRX effects and various stress states. The relationship between fracture strain and Z parameter is revealed in DRX and DRX-free region, respectively. It is noted that fracture strain decreases with the increasing Z parameter in DRX region, while Z parameter has little effect on the fracture behavior in DRX-free region. Consequently, the Z parameter embedded DRX model is introduced into the modified Mohr–Coulomb (MMC) DFC under distinct stress states at elevated temperatures for 7075 aluminum alloy. Based on the Abaqus/Explicit platform, the proposed ductile fracture model is implemented in finite element simulation via VUMAT. Hot forming of T-shaped parts is carried out, and the predicted fracture scenarios including damage evolution, volume fraction of DRX are validated by experimental results.

Vorheriger Artikel Prediction for cryogenic formability of AA2219 alloy cylindrical parts with friction stir weld

Nächster Artikel Accuracy evolution and path compensation in 3D laser cutting process for advanced high strength steel parts: numerical analysis and experimental investigation

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Cao TS, Gachet JM, Montmitonnet P et al (2014) A Lode-dependent enhanced Lemaitre model for ductile fracture prediction at low stress triaxiality. Eng Fract Mech 124–125:80–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.03.021CrossRef

Bonora N, Testa G, Ruggiero A et al (2020) Continuum damage mechanics modelling incorporating stress triaxiality effect on ductile damage initiation. Fatigue Eng Mater Struct 43:13220. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.13220CrossRef

Mohr D, Marcadet SJ (2015) Micromechanically-motivated phenomenological Hosford-Coulomb model for predicting ductile fracture initiation at low stress triaxialities. Int J Solids Struct 67–68:40–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.02.024CrossRef

Ma H, Xu W, Jin BC et al (2015) Damage evaluation in tube spinnability test with ductile fracture criteria. Int J Mech Sci 100:99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.06.005CrossRef

Cockcroft MG, Latham DJ (1968) Ductility and the workability of metals. J of Metals 96:2444

Rice JR, Tracey DM (1969) On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. J Mech Phys Solids 17:201–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7CrossRef

Xue L (2007) Damage accumulation and fracture initiation in uncracked ductile solids subject to triaxial loading. Int J Solids Struct 44:5163–5181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.12.026CrossRefMATH

Bai Y, Wierzbicki T (2008) A new model of metal plasticity and fracture with pressure and Lode dependence. Int J Plast 24:1071–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.004CrossRefMATH

Lou Y, Huh H (2013) Extension of a shear-controlled ductile fracture model considering the stress triaxiality and the Lode parameter. Int J Solids Struct 50:447–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.10.007CrossRef

10.

Lou Y, Huh H, Lim S et al (2012) New ductile fracture criterion for prediction of fracture forming limit diagrams of sheet metals. Int J Solids Struct 49:3605–3615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.016CrossRef

11.

Lou Y, Yoon JW, Huh H (2014) Modeling of shear ductile fracture considering a changeable cut-off value for stress triaxiality. Int J Plasticity 54:56–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.08.006CrossRef

12.

Lou Y, Chen L, Clausmeyer T et al (2017) Modeling of ductile fracture from shear to balanced biaxial tension for sheet metals. Int J Solids Struct 112:169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.11.034CrossRef

13.

Bai Y, Wierzbicki T (2010) Application of extended Mohr-Coulomb criterion to ductile fracture. Int J Fract 161:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-009-9422-8CrossRefMATH

14.

Jia Y, Bai Y (2016) Ductile fracture prediction for metal sheets using all-strain-based anisotropic eMMC model. Int J Mech Sci 115–116:516–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.07.022CrossRef

15.

Jia Y, Bai Y (2016) Experimental study on the mechanical properties of AZ31B-H24 magnesium alloy sheets under various loading conditions. Int J Fract 197:25–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-015-0057-7CrossRef

16.

Qian L, Fang G, Zeng P (2017) Modeling of the ductile fracture during the sheet forming of aluminum alloy considering nonassociated constitutive characteristic. Int J Mech Sci 126:55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.03.013CrossRef

17.

Tang B, Wang Q, Guo N et al (2020) Modeling anisotropic ductile fracture behavior of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy for sheet forming applications at room temperature. Int J Solids Struct 207:178–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.10.011CrossRef

18.

Qian L, Paredes M, Wierzbicki T et al (2016) Experimental and numerical study on shear-punch test of 6060 T6 extruded aluminum profile. Int J Mech Sci 118:205–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.09.008CrossRef

19.

Cai W, Jiang J, Li G et al (2021) Fracture behavior of high-strength bolted steel connections at elevated temperatures. Eng Struct 245:112817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112817CrossRef

20.

Cai W, Jiang J, Li G (2021) Analysis and simulation on fracture of structural steel at elevated temperatures based on extended finite element method. Fire Saf J 120:103022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103022CrossRef

21.

Cai W, Jiang J, Wang Y et al (2020) Fracture behavior of high-strength steels at elevated temperatures. J Constr Steel Res 175:106385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106385CrossRef

22.

Kacem A, Laurent H, Thuillier S (2022) Experimental and numerical investigation of ductile fracture for AA6061-T6 sheets at room and elevated temperatures. Int J Mech Sci 222:107201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107201CrossRef

23.

Tian X, Guo J (2022) Dynamic mechanical properties and modification of fracture criteria of 6061–T651 aluminum alloy. Eng Fract Mech 262:108273. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGFRACMECH.2022.108273CrossRef

24.

Jia W, Ma L, Jiao M et al (2020) Fracture criterion for predicting edge-cracking in Hot rolling of twin-roll casted AZ31 Mg alloy. J Mater Res Technol 9:4773–4787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.02.103CrossRef

25.

Ning F, Zhou X, Le Q et al (2020) Fracture and deformation characteristics of AZ31 magnesium alloy plate during tension rolling. Mater Today Commun 24:101129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101129CrossRef

26.

Zhang X, Zeng W, Shu Y et al (2009) Fracture criterion for predicting surface cracking of Ti40 alloy in hot forming processes. T Nonferr Metal Soc 19:5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(08)60263-0CrossRef

27.

Hashemi SJ, Naeini HM, Liaghat GH et al (2015) Prediction of bulge height in warm hydroforming of aluminum tubes using ductile fracture criteria. Arch Civ Mech Eng 15:19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2014.08.003CrossRef

28.

Kim WJ, Kim WY, Kim HK (2010) Hot-air forming of Al-Mg-Cr alloy and prediction of failure based on Zener-Holloman parameter. Met Mater Int 16:895–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-010-1207-0CrossRef

29.

Shang X, Cui Z, Fu MW (2018) A ductile fracture model considering stress state and Zener-Hollomon parameter for hot deformation of metallic materials. Int J Mech Sci 144:800–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.06.030CrossRef

30.

Dehghan-Manshadi A, Barnett MR, Hodgson PD (2008) Hot deformation and recrystallization of austenitic stainless steel: Part I. Dynamic Recrystallization Metall Mater Trans 39:1359–1370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-008-9512-7CrossRef

31.

Zhang J, Li Z, Wen K et al (2019) Simulation of dynamic recrystallization for an Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy using cellular automaton. Prog Nat Sci: Mater Int 29:477–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2019.04.002CrossRef

32.

Wang S, Luo J, Hou L et al (2016) Physically based constitutive analysis and microstructural evolution of AA7050 aluminum alloy during hot compression. Mater Des 107:277–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.023CrossRef

33.

Xiao X, Mu Z, Pan H et al (2018) Effect of the Lode parameter in predicting shear cracking of 2024–T351 aluminum alloy Taylor rods. Int J Impact Eng 120:185–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.06.008CrossRef

34.

Xiao X, Wang Y, Vershinin VV et al (2019) Effect of Lode angle in predicting the ballistic resistance of Weldox 700 E steel plates struck by blunt projectiles. Int J Impact Eng 128:46–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.02.004CrossRef

35.

Wang X, Zhang Y, Ma X (2020) High temperature deformation and dynamic recrystallization behavior of AlCrCuFeNi high entropy alloy. Mater Res Express 778:139077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.139077CrossRef

36.

Liu J, Wang X, Liu J et al (2019) Hot deformation and dynamic recrystallization behavior of Cu-3Ti-3Ni-0.5Si alloy. J Alloys Compd 782:224–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.212CrossRef

37.

Ban Y, Zhang Y, Tian B et al (2020) EBSD analysis of hot deformation behavior of Cu-Ni-Co-Si-Cr alloy. Mater Charact 169:110656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2020.110656CrossRef

38.

Wu S, Liu Z, Huang X et al (2021) Process parameter optimization and EBSD analysis of Ni60A-25% WC laser cladding. Int J Refract Hard Met 101:105675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2021.105675CrossRef

39.

Dalai B, Moretti MA, Kerstrm P et al (2021) Mechanical behavior and microstructure evolution during deformation of AA7075-T651. Mater Sci Eng A 822:141615CrossRef

40.

Johnson GR, WH C (1983) A constitutive model and data for materials subjected to large strains, high strain rates, and high temperatures. Eng Fract Mech 541–547.

41.

Hu M, Sun Y, He J et al (2022) Hot deformation behaviour and microstructure evolution of Al-3%Mg2Si alloy. Mater Charact 183:111623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2021.111623CrossRef

42.

Huang W, Chen J, Zhang R et al (2022) Effect of deformation modes on continuous dynamic recrystallization of extruded AZ31 Mg alloy. J Alloys Compd 897:163086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163086CrossRef

43.

Lin X, Huang H, Yuan X et al (2022) Study on high-temperature deformation mechanical behavior and dynamic recrystallization kinetics model of Ti-47.5Al-2.5V-1.0Cr-0.2Zr alloy. J Alloys Compd 891:162105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162105CrossRef

44.

Fan H, Jiang H, Dong J et al (2019) An optimization method of upsetting process for homogenized, nickel-based superalloy Udimet 720Li ingot considering both cracking and recrystallization. J Mater Process Technol 269:52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.01.013CrossRef

45.

Mofarrehi M, Javidani M, Chen XG (2022) Effect of Mn content on the hot deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of Al–Mg–Mn 5xxx alloys. Mater Res Express 845:143217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.143217CrossRef

46.

Lou Y, Huh H (2013) Prediction of ductile fracture for advanced high strength steel with a new criterion: experiments and simulation. J Mater Process Technol 213:1284–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.03.001CrossRef

47.

Kacem A, Laurent H, Thuillier S (2021) Influence of experimental boundary conditions on the calibration of a ductile fracture criterion. Eng Fract Mech 248:107686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107686CrossRef

48.

Ebrahimi R, Najafizadeh A (2004) A new method for evaluation of friction in bulk metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 152:136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.03.029CrossRef

49.

Wan P, Kang T, Li F et al (2021) Dynamic recrystallization behavior and microstructure evolution of low-density high-strength Fe–Mn–Al–C steel. J Mater Res Technol 15:1059–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.08.079CrossRef

50.

Xu Y, Chen C, Zhang X et al (2018) Dynamic recrystallization kinetics and microstructure evolution of an AZ91D magnesium alloy during hot compression. Mater Charact 145:39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2018.08.028CrossRef

51.

Quan G, Mao Y, Li G et al (2012) A characterization for the dynamic recrystallization kinetics of as-extruded 7075 aluminum alloy based on true stress–strain curves. Comput Mater Sci 55:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.11.031CrossRef

52.

Tang B, Li H, Guo N et al (2021) Revealing ductile/quasi-cleavage fracture and DRX-affected grain size evolution of AA7075 alloy during hot stamping process. Int J Mech Sci 212:106243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106843CrossRef

Titel: Genetic effects of dynamic recrystallization on ductile fracture at elevated temperature for AA7075 alloy with various stress states: modeling and simulation
verfasst von: Bingtao Tang
Mian Li
Ning Guo
Qianchi Li
Lu Han
Zhongguo Zhang
Publikationsdatum: 01.01.2023
Verlag: Springer Paris
Erschienen in: International Journal of Material Forming / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1960-6206
Elektronische ISSN: 1960-6214
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-022-01730-3

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

An advanced resin reaction modeling using data-driven and digital twin techniques

Development of woven and quasi-unidirectional reinforcement fabrics with hemp fibers: study of mechanical and preforming behaviors

Large strain flow curve characterization considering strain rate and thermal effect for 5182-O aluminum alloy

A numerical study on the effects of DP steel microstructure on the yield locus and the stress–strain response under strain path change

Residual stresses and deformations of laser additive manufactured metal parts: a review

Void closure during open die forging of large size martensitic stainless-steel ingots: an experimental-analytical-numerical study

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten