Skip to main content

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

George Stigler, the First Apostle of the “Coase Theorem”

verfasst von : Elodie Bertrand

Erschienen in: George Stigler

Verlag: Palgrave Macmillan UK

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

George Stigler coined the name “the Coase theorem” to refer to the idea proposed by Ronald Coase in “The Problem of Social Cost” (Coase in Journal of Law and Economics 3:1–44, 1960) of a negotiated solution to externalities. But the name contained two errors: it was not a theorem, and it was not Coase’s message, which insisted rather on the role of transaction costs. In microeconomics, the unidentified object named “the Coase theorem”, however, became central. Stigler, initially unconvinced by Coase’s criticism of the Pigovian analysis of externalities (Coase in Journal of Law and Economics 2:1–40, 1959), was converted in one night according to his 1988 autobiography. He stated the “Coase theorem” in the third edition of his Theory of Price, but made it rest only on examples. This chapter examines the meaning of his “Coase theorem”, both from an analytical perspective and as regards its theoretical implications.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Arrow, K. J. (1969). “The organization of economic activity: Issues pertinent to the choice of market versus non market allocation”, in Joint Economic Committee (ed.), The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditures: The PPB System, vol. 1, Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 47–64. Repr. in Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, vol. 2: General Equilibrium, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1983, 133–55. Arrow, K. J. (1969). “The organization of economic activity: Issues pertinent to the choice of market versus non market allocation”, in Joint Economic Committee (ed.), The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditures: The PPB System, vol. 1, Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 47–64. Repr. in Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, vol. 2: General Equilibrium, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1983, 133–55.
Zurück zum Zitat Arrow, K. J. (1979). “The property rights doctrine and demand revelation under incomplete information”, in M. J. Boskin (ed.), Economics and Human Welfare: Essays in Honour of Tibor Scitovski, New York, Academic Press, 23–39.CrossRef Arrow, K. J. (1979). “The property rights doctrine and demand revelation under incomplete information”, in M. J. Boskin (ed.), Economics and Human Welfare: Essays in Honour of Tibor Scitovski, New York, Academic Press, 23–39.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Berta, N., and Bertrand, E. (2014). “Market internalization of externalities: What is failing?” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 36(3), 331–57.CrossRef Berta, N., and Bertrand, E. (2014). “Market internalization of externalities: What is failing?” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 36(3), 331–57.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bertrand, E. (2010). “The three roles of the ‘Coase theorem’ in Coase’s works”, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17(4), 975–1000.CrossRef Bertrand, E. (2010). “The three roles of the ‘Coase theorem’ in Coase’s works”, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17(4), 975–1000.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bertrand, E. (2015a). “An underrated originality of ‘The Problem of Social Cost’: The LSE source”, History of Economic Ideas, 23(3), 19–43. Bertrand, E. (2015a). “An underrated originality of ‘The Problem of Social Cost’: The LSE source”, History of Economic Ideas, 23(3), 19–43.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertrand, E. (2015b). “From the firm to economic policy: The problem of Coase’s cost”, History of Political Economy, 47(3), 481–510.CrossRef Bertrand, E. (2015b). “From the firm to economic policy: The problem of Coase’s cost”, History of Political Economy, 47(3), 481–510.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bertrand, E. (2019). “Much ado about nothing? The controversy over the validity of the Coase theorem”, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 26(3), 502–36.CrossRef Bertrand, E. (2019). “Much ado about nothing? The controversy over the validity of the Coase theorem”, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 26(3), 502–36.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Buchanan, J. M., and Stubblebine, W. C. (1962). “Externality”, Economica, 29(116), 371–84.CrossRef Buchanan, J. M., and Stubblebine, W. C. (1962). “Externality”, Economica, 29(116), 371–84.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Calabresi, G. (1965). “The decision for accidents: An approach to nonfault allocation of costs”, Harvard Law Review, 78(4), 713–45.CrossRef Calabresi, G. (1965). “The decision for accidents: An approach to nonfault allocation of costs”, Harvard Law Review, 78(4), 713–45.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Calabresi, G. (1968). “Transaction costs, resource allocation and liability rules—A comment”, Journal of Law and Economics, 11(1), 67–73.CrossRef Calabresi, G. (1968). “Transaction costs, resource allocation and liability rules—A comment”, Journal of Law and Economics, 11(1), 67–73.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Coase, R. H. (1959). “The federal communications commission”, Journal of Law and Economics, 2(Oct.), 1–40.CrossRef Coase, R. H. (1959). “The federal communications commission”, Journal of Law and Economics, 2(Oct.), 1–40.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Coase, R. H. (1960). “The problem of social cost”, Journal of Law and Economics, 3(Oct.), 1–44. Coase, R. H. (1960). “The problem of social cost”, Journal of Law and Economics, 3(Oct.), 1–44.
Zurück zum Zitat Coase, R. H. (1981). “The Coase theorem and the empty core: A comment”, Journal of Law and Economics, 24(1), 183–7.CrossRef Coase, R. H. (1981). “The Coase theorem and the empty core: A comment”, Journal of Law and Economics, 24(1), 183–7.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Coase, R. H. (1982). “How should economists choose?” G. Warren Nutter Lecture in Political Economy, Washington, DC, The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. Coase, R. H. (1982). “How should economists choose?” G. Warren Nutter Lecture in Political Economy, Washington, DC, The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Zurück zum Zitat Coase, R. H. (1988). The Firm, the Market and the Law, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Coase, R. H. (1988). The Firm, the Market and the Law, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Coase, R. H. (1992). “The institutional structure of production”, The American Economic Review, 82(4), 713–9. Coase, R. H. (1992). “The institutional structure of production”, The American Economic Review, 82(4), 713–9.
Zurück zum Zitat Coase, R. H. (1993). “Law and economics at Chicago”, Journal of Law and Economics, 36(1), 239–54.CrossRef Coase, R. H. (1993). “Law and economics at Chicago”, Journal of Law and Economics, 36(1), 239–54.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Coase, R. H. (1996). “Law and economics and A. W. Brian Simpson”, The Journal of Legal Studies, 25(1), 103–19.CrossRef Coase, R. H. (1996). “Law and economics and A. W. Brian Simpson”, The Journal of Legal Studies, 25(1), 103–19.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Coleman, J. L. (1984). “Economics and the law: A critical review of the foundations of the economic approach to law”, Ethics, 94(4), 649–79.CrossRef Coleman, J. L. (1984). “Economics and the law: A critical review of the foundations of the economic approach to law”, Ethics, 94(4), 649–79.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cooter, R. D. (1982). “The cost of Coase”, The Journal of Legal Studies, 11(1), 1–33.CrossRef Cooter, R. D. (1982). “The cost of Coase”, The Journal of Legal Studies, 11(1), 1–33.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dahlman, C. J. (1979). “The problem of externality”, Journal of Law and Economics, 22(1), 141–62.CrossRef Dahlman, C. J. (1979). “The problem of externality”, Journal of Law and Economics, 22(1), 141–62.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Demsetz, H. (1964). “The exchange and enforcement of property rights”, Journal of Law and Economics, 7(Oct.), 11–26.CrossRef Demsetz, H. (1964). “The exchange and enforcement of property rights”, Journal of Law and Economics, 7(Oct.), 11–26.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dolbear, F. T. (1967). “On the theory of optimum externality”, The American Economic Review, 57(1), 90–103. Dolbear, F. T. (1967). “On the theory of optimum externality”, The American Economic Review, 57(1), 90–103.
Zurück zum Zitat Freedman, C. (2016). “Marching to a different drummer: Sam Peltzman reflects on George Stigler”, in C. Freedman (ed.), In Search of the Two-Handed Economist, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 375–409.CrossRef Freedman, C. (2016). “Marching to a different drummer: Sam Peltzman reflects on George Stigler”, in C. Freedman (ed.), In Search of the Two-Handed Economist, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 375–409.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Friedland C. (1993). “On Stigler and Stiglerisms”, Journal of Political Economy, 101(5), 780–783.CrossRef Friedland C. (1993). “On Stigler and Stiglerisms”, Journal of Political Economy, 101(5), 780–783.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kitch, E. W. (ed.). (1983). “The fire of truth: A remembrance of law and economics at Chicago, 1932–1970”, Journal of Law and Economics, 26(1), 163–234. Kitch, E. W. (ed.). (1983). “The fire of truth: A remembrance of law and economics at Chicago, 1932–1970”, Journal of Law and Economics, 26(1), 163–234.
Zurück zum Zitat Marciano, A. (2018). “Why is ‘Stigler’s Coase Theorem’ Stiglerian? A methodological explanation”, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 36A, 127–55. Marciano, A. (2018). “Why is ‘Stigler’s Coase Theorem’ Stiglerian? A methodological explanation”, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 36A, 127–55.
Zurück zum Zitat Medema, S. G. (1994). “The myth of two Coases: What Coase is really saying”, Journal of Economic Issues, 28(1), 208–17.CrossRef Medema, S. G. (1994). “The myth of two Coases: What Coase is really saying”, Journal of Economic Issues, 28(1), 208–17.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Medema, S. G. (1998). “Wandering the road from pluralism to Posner: The transformation of law and economics in the twentieth century”, History of Political Economy, Suppl. 30, 202–224.CrossRef Medema, S. G. (1998). “Wandering the road from pluralism to Posner: The transformation of law and economics in the twentieth century”, History of Political Economy, Suppl. 30, 202–224.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Medema, S. G. (2011). “A case of mistaken identity: George Stigler, ‘The problem of social cost,’ and the Coase theorem”, European Journal of Law and Economics, 31(1), 11–38.CrossRef Medema, S. G. (2011). “A case of mistaken identity: George Stigler, ‘The problem of social cost,’ and the Coase theorem”, European Journal of Law and Economics, 31(1), 11–38.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Medema, S. G. (2014). “The curious treatment of the Coase theorem in the environmental economic literature, 1960–1979”, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 8(1), 39–57.CrossRef Medema, S. G. (2014). “The curious treatment of the Coase theorem in the environmental economic literature, 1960–1979”, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 8(1), 39–57.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Medema, S. G. (2019, forthcoming). “‘Exceptional and unimportant’? The rise, fall, and rebirth of externalities in economic analysis”, History of Political Economy. Medema, S. G. (2019, forthcoming). “‘Exceptional and unimportant’? The rise, fall, and rebirth of externalities in economic analysis”, History of Political Economy.
Zurück zum Zitat Mishan, E. J. (1967). “Pareto optimality and the law”, Oxford Economic Papers, 19(3), 255–87.CrossRef Mishan, E. J. (1967). “Pareto optimality and the law”, Oxford Economic Papers, 19(3), 255–87.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pigou, A. C. (1932). The Economics of Welfare, 4th ed., London, Macmillan, 1948. Pigou, A. C. (1932). The Economics of Welfare, 4th ed., London, Macmillan, 1948.
Zurück zum Zitat Regan, D. H. (1972). “The problem of social cost revisited”, Journal of Law and Economics, 15(2), 427–37.CrossRef Regan, D. H. (1972). “The problem of social cost revisited”, Journal of Law and Economics, 15(2), 427–37.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Samuelson, P. A. (1947). Foundations of Economic Analysis, Cambridge, Harvard University Press. Samuelson, P. A. (1947). Foundations of Economic Analysis, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Samuelson, P. A. (1967). “The monopolistic competition revolution”, in R. E. Kuenne (ed.), Monopolistic Competition Theory: Studies in Impact; Essays in Honour of Edward H. Chamberlin, New York, Wiley. Repr. in R. C. Merton (ed.), The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, vol. 3, Cambridge, MIT Press, 1972, 18–51. Samuelson, P. A. (1967). “The monopolistic competition revolution”, in R. E. Kuenne (ed.), Monopolistic Competition Theory: Studies in Impact; Essays in Honour of Edward H. Chamberlin, New York, Wiley. Repr. in R. C. Merton (ed.), The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, vol. 3, Cambridge, MIT Press, 1972, 18–51.
Zurück zum Zitat Samuelson, W. (1985). “A comment on the Coase theorem”, in A. E. Roth (ed.), Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 599–611. Samuelson, W. (1985). “A comment on the Coase theorem”, in A. E. Roth (ed.), Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 599–611.
Zurück zum Zitat Stigler, G. J. (1952). The Theory of Price, 2nd ed., New York, Macmillan. Stigler, G. J. (1952). The Theory of Price, 2nd ed., New York, Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Stigler, G. J. (1966). The Theory of Price, 3rd ed., New York, Macmillan. Stigler, G. J. (1966). The Theory of Price, 3rd ed., New York, Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Stigler, G. J. (1972). “The law and economics of public policy: A plea to the scholars”, Journal of Legal Studies, 1(1), 1–12.CrossRef Stigler, G. J. (1972). “The law and economics of public policy: A plea to the scholars”, Journal of Legal Studies, 1(1), 1–12.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stigler, G. J. (1982). “The process and progress of economics”, in K.-G. Mäler, Nobel Lectures in Economic Sciences (1981–1990), 1992, publ. for the Nobel Foundation by World Scientific Publishing, 57–76. Stigler, G. J. (1982). “The process and progress of economics”, in K.-G. Mäler, Nobel Lectures in Economic Sciences (1981–1990), 1992, publ. for the Nobel Foundation by World Scientific Publishing, 57–76.
Zurück zum Zitat Stigler, G. J. (1984). “The imperial science?” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 86(3), 301–13.CrossRef Stigler, G. J. (1984). “The imperial science?” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 86(3), 301–13.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stigler, G. J. (1987). The Theory of Price, 4th ed., New York, Macmillan. Stigler, G. J. (1987). The Theory of Price, 4th ed., New York, Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Stigler, G. J. (1988). Memoirs of an Unregulated Economist, New York, Basic Books. Stigler, G. J. (1988). Memoirs of an Unregulated Economist, New York, Basic Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Stigler, G. J. (1989). “Two notes on the Coase theorem”, The Yale Law Journal, 99(3), 631–3.CrossRef Stigler, G. J. (1989). “Two notes on the Coase theorem”, The Yale Law Journal, 99(3), 631–3.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stigler, G. J. (1992). “Law or economics?” Journal of Law and Economics, 35(2), 455–68.CrossRef Stigler, G. J. (1992). “Law or economics?” Journal of Law and Economics, 35(2), 455–68.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Turvey, R. (1963). “On divergences between social cost and private cost”, Economica, 30(119), 309–13.CrossRef Turvey, R. (1963). “On divergences between social cost and private cost”, Economica, 30(119), 309–13.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Veljanovski, C. G. (1982). “The Coase theorems and the economic theory of markets and law”, Kyklos, 35(1), 53–74.CrossRef Veljanovski, C. G. (1982). “The Coase theorems and the economic theory of markets and law”, Kyklos, 35(1), 53–74.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
George Stigler, the First Apostle of the “Coase Theorem”
verfasst von
Elodie Bertrand
Copyright-Jahr
2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56815-1_15