Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Nanoparticle Research 9/2013

01.09.2013 | Perspectives

Global nanotechnology development from 1991 to 2012: patents, scientific publications, and effect of NSF funding

verfasst von: Hsinchun Chen, Mihail C. Roco, Jaebong Son, Shan Jiang, Catherine A. Larson, Qiang Gao

Erschienen in: Journal of Nanoparticle Research | Ausgabe 9/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In a relatively short interval for an emerging technology, nanotechnology has made a significant economic impact in numerous sectors including semiconductor manufacturing, catalysts, medicine, agriculture, and energy production. A part of the United States (US) government investment in basic research has been realized in the last two decades through the National Science Foundation (NSF), beginning with the nanoparticle research initiative in 1991 and continuing with support from the National Nanotechnology Initiative after fiscal year 2001. This paper has two main goals: (a) present a longitudinal analysis of the global nanotechnology development as reflected in the United States Patent and Trade Office (USPTO) patents and Web of Science (WoS) publications in nanoscale science and engineering (NSE) for the interval 1991–2012; and (b) identify the effect of basic research funded by NSF on both indicators. The interval has been separated into three parts for comparison purposes: 1991–2000, 2001–2010, and 2011–2012. The global trends of patents and scientific publications are presented. Bibliometric analysis, topic analysis, and citation network analysis methods are used to rank countries, institutions, technology subfields, and inventors contributing to nanotechnology development. We then, examined how these entities were affected by NSF funding and how they evolved over the past two decades. Results show that dedicated NSF funding used to support nanotechnology R&D was followed by an increased number of relevant patents and scientific publications, a greater diversity of technology topics, and a significant increase of citations. The NSF played important roles in the inventor community and served as a major contributor to numerous nanotechnology subfields.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
We use here the National Nanotechnology Initiative definition (http://​www.​nano.​gov).
 
2
US Patent and Trademark Office, “Performance and Accountability Report, fiscal year 2012.” Accessed 14 February 2013 at http://​www.​uspto.​gov/​about/​stratplan/​ar/​USPTOFY2012PAR.​pdf.
 
3
US Patent and Trademark Office, “All Technologies Report, January 1, 1987 – December 31, 2011,” March 2012. Accessed 14 February 2013 at http://​www.​uspto.​gov/​web/​offices/​ac/​ido/​oeip/​taf/​all_​tech.​pdf.
 
4
National Science Foundation, “About Awards.” Accessed 21 February 2013 at http://​www.​nsf.​gov/​awards/​about.​jsp.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Adams JD, Griliches Z (1998) Research productivity in a system of universities. Ann Econ Stat 49(50):127–162 Adams JD, Griliches Z (1998) Research productivity in a system of universities. Ann Econ Stat 49(50):127–162
Zurück zum Zitat Beise M, Stahl H (1999) Public research and industrial innovations in Germany. Res Policy 28(4):397–422CrossRef Beise M, Stahl H (1999) Public research and industrial innovations in Germany. Res Policy 28(4):397–422CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brin S, Page L (1998) The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Comput Netw ISDN Syst 30(1):107–117CrossRef Brin S, Page L (1998) The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Comput Netw ISDN Syst 30(1):107–117CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen H, Roco MC, Son J (2013) Nanotechnology public funding and impact analysis: a tale of two decades (1991–2010). IEEE Nanotechnol 7(1):9–14 Chen H, Roco MC, Son J (2013) Nanotechnology public funding and impact analysis: a tale of two decades (1991–2010). IEEE Nanotechnol 7(1):9–14
Zurück zum Zitat Criscuolo P (2006) The home advantage effect and patent families. A comparison of OECD triadic patents, the USPTO and the EPO. Scientometrics 66(1):123–141 Criscuolo P (2006) The home advantage effect and patent families. A comparison of OECD triadic patents, the USPTO and the EPO. Scientometrics 66(1):123–141
Zurück zum Zitat Dang Y, Chen H, Zhang Y, Roco MC (2009) Knowledge sharing and diffusion patterns. IEEE Nanotechnol Mag 3(3):16–21 Dang Y, Chen H, Zhang Y, Roco MC (2009) Knowledge sharing and diffusion patterns. IEEE Nanotechnol Mag 3(3):16–21
Zurück zum Zitat Fazayeli F, Wang L, Mandziuk J (2008) Feature selection based on the rough set theory and expectation–maximization clustering algorithm. Rough sets and current trends in computing. In: 6th International conference, RSCTC 2008, Akron, OH, USA, 23–25 Oct 2008. Springer, Berlin Fazayeli F, Wang L, Mandziuk J (2008) Feature selection based on the rough set theory and expectation–maximization clustering algorithm. Rough sets and current trends in computing. In: 6th International conference, RSCTC 2008, Akron, OH, USA, 23–25 Oct 2008. Springer, Berlin
Zurück zum Zitat Huang Z, Chen H, Yan L, Roco MC (2005) Longitudinal nanotechnology development (1991–2002): national science foundation funding and its impact on patents. J Nanopart Res 7(4):343–376 Huang Z, Chen H, Yan L, Roco MC (2005) Longitudinal nanotechnology development (1991–2002): national science foundation funding and its impact on patents. J Nanopart Res 7(4):343–376
Zurück zum Zitat Igami M, Okazaki T (2007) Capturing nanotechnology’s current state of development via analysis of patents. OECD science, technology and industry working papers, 2007/4. OECD Publishing, Paris Cedex Igami M, Okazaki T (2007) Capturing nanotechnology’s current state of development via analysis of patents. OECD science, technology and industry working papers, 2007/4. OECD Publishing, Paris Cedex
Zurück zum Zitat King J (1987) A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation. J Inf Sci 13(5):261–276CrossRef King J (1987) A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation. J Inf Sci 13(5):261–276CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kulkarni AV, Aziz B, Shams I, Busse JW (2009) Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA 302(10):1092–1096 Kulkarni AV, Aziz B, Shams I, Busse JW (2009) Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA 302(10):1092–1096
Zurück zum Zitat Li X, Lin Y, Chen H, Roco MC (2007) Worldwide nanotechnology development: a comparative study of USPTO, EPO, and JPO patents (1976–2004). J Nanopart Res 9(6):977–1002 Li X, Lin Y, Chen H, Roco MC (2007) Worldwide nanotechnology development: a comparative study of USPTO, EPO, and JPO patents (1976–2004). J Nanopart Res 9(6):977–1002
Zurück zum Zitat Liu T, Liu S, Chen Z, Ma W (2003) An evaluation on feature selection for text clustering. In: Proceedings of the international conference on machine learning, Atlanta Liu T, Liu S, Chen Z, Ma W (2003) An evaluation on feature selection for text clustering. In: Proceedings of the international conference on machine learning, Atlanta
Zurück zum Zitat Narin F (1998) Patents and publicly funded research. Assessing the value of research in the chemical sciences. National Academy Press, Washington, DC Narin F (1998) Patents and publicly funded research. Assessing the value of research in the chemical sciences. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Zurück zum Zitat Ordonez C, Cereghini P (2000) SQLEM: fast clustering in SQL using the EM algorithm. ACM SIGMOD Record. ACM, Dallas Ordonez C, Cereghini P (2000) SQLEM: fast clustering in SQL using the EM algorithm. ACM SIGMOD Record. ACM, Dallas
Zurück zum Zitat Payne AA, Siow A (2003) Does federal research funding increase university research output? Adv Econ Anal Policy 3(1): Article 1 Payne AA, Siow A (2003) Does federal research funding increase university research output? Adv Econ Anal Policy 3(1): Article 1
Zurück zum Zitat Piekkola H (2007) Public funding of R&D and growth: firm-level evidence from Finland. Econ Innov New Technol 16(3):195–210CrossRef Piekkola H (2007) Public funding of R&D and growth: firm-level evidence from Finland. Econ Innov New Technol 16(3):195–210CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sastry K, Rashmi H, Rao N (2010) Nanotechnology patents as R&D indicators for disease management strategies in agriculture. J Intellect Prop Rights 15:197–205 Sastry K, Rashmi H, Rao N (2010) Nanotechnology patents as R&D indicators for disease management strategies in agriculture. J Intellect Prop Rights 15:197–205
Zurück zum Zitat Surdeanu M, Turmo J, Ageno A (2005) A hybrid unsupervised approach for document clustering. Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery in data mining. ACM, Paris Surdeanu M, Turmo J, Ageno A (2005) A hybrid unsupervised approach for document clustering. Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery in data mining. ACM, Paris
Zurück zum Zitat Toole AA (2012) The impact of public basic research on industrial innovation: evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Res Policy 41(1):1–12CrossRef Toole AA (2012) The impact of public basic research on industrial innovation: evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Res Policy 41(1):1–12CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang J, Shapira P (2011) Funding acknowledgement analysis: an enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: the case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics 87(3):563–586CrossRef Wang J, Shapira P (2011) Funding acknowledgement analysis: an enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: the case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics 87(3):563–586CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Global nanotechnology development from 1991 to 2012: patents, scientific publications, and effect of NSF funding
verfasst von
Hsinchun Chen
Mihail C. Roco
Jaebong Son
Shan Jiang
Catherine A. Larson
Qiang Gao
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2013
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Nanoparticle Research / Ausgabe 9/2013
Print ISSN: 1388-0764
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-896X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1951-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2013

Journal of Nanoparticle Research 9/2013 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.