Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

14. Governance for Inclusive Development in South and East Asia: A Comparison of India and China

verfasst von : Bill Chou, Ahmed Shafiqul Huque

Erschienen in: Inclusive Governance in South Asia

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

China and India are two major political systems in the regions of. East and South Asia, and a comparison of their approaches in promoting inclusive development is illustrative. This chapter is grounded on the fact that the population of the two most populous countries accounts for more than one-third of the global population. Therefore, the plans and practices designed for inclusiveness have significance for improving the well-being of mankind throughout the world, and allow for lessons to be drawn by other countries in the two regions. A comparison of the initiatives in China and India provides a useful insight into explaining the extent of their effectiveness in achieving inclusive development and public engagement. This will also provide an opportunity to examine the validity of the important doctrine of inclusive development. This chapter finds that democracy and participation are important in many other respects, but they may or may not contribute to the goal of inclusive development. It also emphasizes that China’s economic success is not necessarily resulting in inclusive development. It is the institutions that produce smart social policies targeting development goals that matter more.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Democracy, Inclusive Governance and Social Accountability in South Asia
Fußnoten
1
Three other strategies included enhancing equity, confronting environmental challenges, and managing demographic changes.
 
2
The other two principles are: changing the mentality of “having more” into “having enough” and pursuing cultural, spiritual, and esthetic maturation.
 
3
Some examples of these indices include the human development index, gender inequality index, gender development index, and multi-dimensional poverty index.
 
4
This table, developed by UNDP, is aimed at evaluating the state capacity to translate wealth into human development. The higher the indicator, the more competent the state is in accumulating and translating wealth into human development. The higher the score, the better the region has performed in promoting human development.
 
Literatur
Banisar, D. (2006). Freedom of Information Around the World 2006: A Global Survey of Access to Government Information Laws. London: Privacy International.
Bennett, C. J. (1997). Understanding Ripple Effects: The Cross-national Adoption of Policy Instruments for Bureaucratic Accountability. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 10(3), 213–233.CrossRef
Blecher, M., & Shue, V. (2001). Into Leather: State-Led Development and the Private Sector in Xinji. China Quarterly, 166, 368–393.CrossRef
Brown, D. S., & Mobarak, A. M. (2009). The Transforming Power of Democracy: Regime Type and the Distribution of Electricity. American Political Science Review, 103(May), 193–214.CrossRef
Chan, K. W. (2009). The Chinese Hukou System at 50. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 50(2), 197–221.CrossRef
Chibber, V. (2006). Locked in Place: State-Building and Late Industrialization in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chou, B. K. P. (2009). Government and Policymaking Reform in China: The Implications of Governing Capacity. London/New York: Routledge.
Clark, R. (1991). Contrasting Perspectives on Women’s Access to Prestigious Occupations: A Cross-National Investigation. Social Science Quarterly, 72(1), 20–32.
Das, G. M. (1987). Selective Discrimination Against Female Children in Rural Punjab, India. Population and Development Review, 13(1), 77–100.CrossRef
Drèze, J., & Sen, A. (2002). India: Development and Participation (p. 125). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Drèze, J., & Sen, A. (2013). An Uncertain Glory: India and Its Contradictions. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Eastin, J., & Prakash, A. (2013). Economic Development and Gender Equality: Is There a Gender Kuznets Curve? World Politics, 65(1), 156–186.CrossRef
Edin, M. (2003). State Capacity and Local Agent Control in China: CCP Cadre Management from a Township Perspective. The China Quarterly, 173, 35–52.CrossRef
Evans, P. (1995). Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Forsythe, N., Korzeniewicz, R. P., & Durrant, V. (2000). Gender Inequalities and Economic Growth: A Longitudinal Evaluation. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48(3), 573–617.CrossRef
Gauri, V., & Khaleghian, P. (2002). Immunization in Developing Countries: Its Political and Organizational Determinants. World Development, 30(December), 2109–2132.CrossRef
Gerring, J., Thacker, S. C., & Alfaro, R. (2012). Democracy and Human Development. The Journal of Politics, 74(1), 1–17.CrossRef
Ghobarah, H., Adam, P. H., & Russett, B. (2004). Comparative Public Health: The Political Economy of Human Misery and Well-Being. International Studies Quarterly, 48(1), 73–94.CrossRef
Goulet, D. (1978). The Cruel Choice: A New Concept in the Theory of Development. New York: Atheneum.
Hira, A., Huxtable, H., & Leger, A. (2005). Deregulation and Participation: An International Survey of Participation in Electricity Regulation. Governance, 18(1), 53–88.CrossRef
Huang, Y. (2008). Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics: Entrepreneurship and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Hung, H. (2015). The China Boom: Why China Will Not Rule the World. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRef
Iversen, T., & Rosenbluth, F. (2005). Gender Socialization: How Bargaining Power Shapes Social Norms and Political Attitudes (Working Paper, No. 2008-0064). Cambridge, MA: Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University.
Lal, D. (1995). India and China: Contrasts in Economic Liberalization? World Development, 23(9), 1475–1494.CrossRef
Lee, C. K. (1999). From Organized Dependence to Disorganized Despotism: Changing Labor Regimes in Chinese Factories. China Quarterly, 157, 44–71.CrossRef
Li, S., & Luo, C. (2008). Growth Pattern, Employment, and Income Inequality: What the Experience of Republic of Korea and Taipei, China Reveals to the People’s Republic of China. Asian Development Review, 25(1 & 2), 100–118.
Lin, Y. J., & Liu, P. (2008). Inclusive Growth Toward a Harmonious Society in the People’s Republic of China: Policy Implications. Asian Development Review, 25(1 & 2), 22–33.
Lin, Y. J., Zhuang, J., Tang, M., & Lin, T. (2008). Inclusive Growth Toward a Harmonious Society in the People’s Republic of China: An Overview. Asian Development Review, 25(1 & 2), 1–14.
Malenbaum, W. (1982). Modern Economic Growth in India and China: The Comparison Revisited, 1950–1980. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 31(1), 45–84.CrossRef
Manion, M. (2008). When Communist Party Candidates Can Lose, Who Wins? Assessing the Role of Local People’s Congresses in the Selection of Leaders in China. The China Quarterly, 195, 607–630.CrossRef
O’Brien, K. J. (1990). Reform Without Liberalization: China’s National People’s Congress and the Politics of Institutional Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
OECD. (2001). Citizens as Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-Making. Paris: OECD.
Oi, J. C. (1999). Rural China Takes Off: Institutional Foundations of Economic Reform. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Perry, E., & Goldman, M. (Eds.). (2007). Grassroots Political Reform in Contemporary China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Read, B. L. (2000). Revitalizing the State’s Urban “Nerve Tips”. The China Quarterly, 163, 806–820.CrossRef
Richards, D. L., & Gelleny, R. (2007). Women’s Status and Economic Globalization. International Studies Quarterly, 51(4), 855–876.CrossRef
Roberts, A. (2006). Blacked Out: Government Secrecy in the Information Age. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Ross, M. (2006). Is Democracy Good for the Poor? American Journal of Political Science, 50, 860–874.CrossRef
Rothstein, B. (2015). The Chinese Paradox of High Growth and Low Quality of Government: The Cadre Organization Meets Max Weber. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 28(4), 533–548.CrossRef
Saich, T. (2015). Governance and Politics of China. Houndmills/Basingstoke/Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Seers, D. (1979). The Meaning of Development. In D. Lehmann (Ed.), Development Theory: Four Critical Studies (pp. 9–30). London: Frank Cass.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.
Shirk, S. L. (1993). The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Tandon, A., & Zhuang, Z. (2007). Inclusiveness of Economic Growth in the People’s Republic of China: What Do Population Health Outcomes Tell Us? (ERD Policy Brief Series No.47). Manila: Economics and Research Department, Asian Development Bank.
Trebilcock, M. J., & Prado, M. M. (2011). What Makes Poor Countries Poor? Institutional Determinants of Development. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.CrossRef
UNDP. (2013). Human Development Report 2013: The Rise of the South: Human Progress in a Diverse World. New York: UNDP.CrossRef
Unger, J. (1981). Education Under Mao: Class and Competition in Canton Schools, 1960–1980. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wade, R. (1990). Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Walder, A. G. (1989). Social Change in Post-Revolution China. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 405–424.CrossRef
Wang, S., & Hu, A. (1999). The Political Economy of Uneven Development: The Case of China. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
Xia, M. (2008). The People’s Congresses and Governance in China: Toward a Network Mode of Governance. London/New York: Routledge.
Xiao, W. (2013). Freedom of Information Reform in China: Information Flow Analysis. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(4), 790–808.CrossRef
Yang, K., & Callahan, K. (2007). Citizen Involvement Efforts and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Participatory Values, Stakeholder Pressures, and Administrative Practicality. Public Administration Review, 67(2), 249–264.CrossRef
Yuan, Z. (2012). The Failure of China’s “Democratic” Reforms. New York: Lexington.
Zafarullah, H., & Huque, A. S. (2012). Managing Development in a Globalized World: Concepts, Processes, Institutions. Boca Raton/London/New York: CRC Press.
Metadaten
Titel
Governance for Inclusive Development in South and East Asia: A Comparison of India and China
verfasst von
Bill Chou
Ahmed Shafiqul Huque
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Inclusive Governance in South Asia

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60903-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-60904-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60904-1_14