nach oben

Erschienen in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

19. Inputs Optimization to Reduce the Undesirable Outputs by Environmental Hazards: A DEA Model with Data of PM_2.5 in China

verfasst von : Prof. Xianhua Wu, Prof. Ji Guo

Erschienen in: Economic Impacts and Emergency Management of Disasters in China

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Currently, the hazy weather in China is increasingly serious. It is urgent for China to reduce haze emissions in environmental governance. A feasible way is to control haze emissions by optimizing the input sources. This paper proposed an innovative method in which the haze emission is controlled by readjusting input indicators. The output efficiency of input indicators in 29 provinces in China is calculated through 7 input indicators (namely, SO₂ emissions, NO_X emissions, soot emissions, coal consumption, car ownership, capital, and labor force) as well as GDP (desirable output) and PM_2.5 emissions (undesirable output). The results showed that, the input indicators are excessive in redundancy on condition that PM_2.5 emissions and GDP are equal. The input indicators are high in redundancy rate except labor force. The redundancy rates of soot emissions, SO₂ emissions and coal consumption are relatively high and respectively are 78%, 67.18%, and 61.14%. Moreover, all the provinces are redundant in inputs except Beijing, Tianjin, and Shanghai which are optimal in input–output efficiency. The redundancy of middle and western provinces, such as Ningxia, Guizhou, and Shanxi, is relatively large. The ideas and methods proposed in this paper can provide a reference for the future researches that aim to reduce the input indicators of undesirable output and the empirical results can provide empirical support for the PM_2.5 abatement in China.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Study of Haze Emission Efficiency Based on New Co-opetition DEA

Nächstes Kapitel A Study of Allocative Efficiency of PM2.5 Emission Rights Based on a Zero Sum Gains Data Envelopment Model

Comprehensive technical efficiency is composed of two parts. Comprehensive technical efficiency = pure technical efficiency × scale efficiency. Pure technical efficiency refers to the production efficiency which is influenced by the management and technology of enterprise. Scale efficiency refers to the production efficiency which is influenced by the scale of enterprise.

According to formula (1), the reason for the difference of DEA efficiency can be divided into three aspects: (1) From the perspective of input. The denominators of formula (1) are the input indicators. From the calculation results of the input indicators, except Beijing, Tianjin and Shanghai, the decision making units of other provinces have one or more input indicators that are more than DEA effective input, resulting in DEA efficiency value less than 1. Take Hebei Province for example, the redundancy rates of SO₂ emissions, NO_X emissions, soot emissions, coal consumption, car ownership, capital and labor force are 964686.041, 1157308.897, 1093714.577, 22252.012, 712.265, 8418.193 and 0 respectively, indicating that the amount of input must be reduced to achieve effective DEA. (2) From the perspective of output. It can be seen from the molecular part of GDP (desirable output) and PM_2.5(undesirable output) (see Table 19.2) that the provinces with relatively low efficiency values are Gansu, Qinghai and other provinces that are relatively backward in economic development. The desirable output GDP of these provinces is quite low and the undesirable output PM_2.5 is relatively high, which is one of the reasons why DEA is not effective. However, since this paper focuses on the improvement of the DEA efficiency of each evaluation unit by reducing the input indicator, how to raise the desirable output (GDP) and reduce the undesirable output (PM_2.5) are not yet considered. Of course, this is the next step that needs to be studied. (3) Emission efficiency values are relative values. The DEA efficiency values of the DMUs obtained in Table 19.3 and the redundancies of the input indicators of DMUs obtained in Table 19.4 are relative values compared with other “leading” DMUs. As mentioned in this paper, the three DMUs in Beijing, Tianjin and Shanghai are on the frontier whose efficiency value is 1 and the efficiency values of other DMUs and the redundancies of their input indicators are relative to these DMUs on frontier.

Abas, M. R. Bin, Rahman, N. A., Omar, N. Y. M. J., Maah, M. J., Samah, A. A., Oros, D. R., Otto, A., & Simoneit, B. R. T. (2004). Organic composition of aerosol particulate matter during a haze episode in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Atmospheric Environment, 38(25), 4223–4241.

Asian Development Bank (2012). Toward an Environmentally Sustainable Future: Country Environmental Analysis of the People’s Republic of China.

Ahmad, M., Cheng, S., Yu, Q., Qin, W., & Chen, J. (2019). Chemical and source characterization of PM_2.5 in summertime in severely polluted Lahore, Pakistan. Atmospheric Research, 234, 104715.

Bevilacqua, M., & Braglia, M. (2012). Environmental efficiency analysis for ENI oil refineries. Journal of Cleaner Production,10(1), 85–92.CrossRef

Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science,30(9), 1078–1092.CrossRef

Bian, Y. W. (2006). Research on environmental efficiency evaluation method based on DEA theory. University of Science and Technology of China.

Cai, W. G., & Ye, P. Y. (2019). A more scientific allocation scheme of carbon dioxide emissions allowances: The case from China. Journal of Cleaner Production,215, 903–912.CrossRef

Cecchini, L., Venanzi, S., Pierri, A., & Chiorri, M. (2018). Environmental efficiency analysis and estimation of CO₂ abatement costs in dairy cattle farms in Umbria (Italy): An SBM-DEA model with undesirable output. Journal of Cleaner Production,197, 895–907.CrossRef

Cesari, D., De Benedetto, G. E., Bonasoni, P., Busetto, M., Dinoi, A., Merico, E., et al. (2018). Seasonal variability of PM_2.5 and PM₁₀ composition and sources in an urban background site in Southern Italy. Science of the Total Environment,612, 202–213.CrossRef

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research,2(6), 429–444.CrossRef

Chen, L., He, F., & Wang, J. (2018). Allocative efficiency of carbon emission allowances among sectors in china. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies,27(2), 557–563.CrossRef

Chen, K., Yin, Y., Wei, Y. X., & Yang, W. F. (2010). Characteristics of carbonaceous aerosols in PM_2.5 in Nanjing. China Environmental Science, 30(8), 1015–1020.

Cheng, Y., Zhang, R. J., Lee, S. C., Gu, Z. L., Ho, K. F., Zhang, Y. W., et al. (2015). PM_2.5 and PM_10-2.5 chemical composition and source apportionment near a Hong Kong roadway. Particuology, (18), 96–104.

Chinese Academy of Sciences. (2014). Research group think that motor vehicles contribute 10–50% of PM_2.5, Reports for: https://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2014-01/02/content_2559005.htm.

Cucchiella, F., D"Adamo, I., Gastaldi, M., & Miliacca, M. (2018). Efficiency and allocation of emission allowances and energy consumption over more sustainable European economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 805–817.

Deng, L. (2015). An analysis of the factors in Harbin during winter. Northeast Forestry University.

Deng, J., Zhang, Y., Qiu, Y., Zhang, H., Du, W., Xu, L., et al. (2018). Source apportionment of PM_2.5 at the Lin’an regional background site in china with three receptor models. Atmospheric Research,202, 23–32.

Duan, L. Y., Bian, J., & Zhu, Z. W. (2008). Chemistry and society. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press.

Dyckho, H., & Allen, K. (2001). Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA). European Journal of Operational Research,132(2), 312–325.CrossRef

Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1996). Intertemporal production frontiers: With dynamic DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society,48(6), 9–45.

Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2004). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: Comment. European Journal of Operational Research,157(1), 242–245.CrossRef

Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Tyteca, D. (1996). An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms-application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities. Ecological Economics,18(8), 161–175.

Fang, K., Zhang, Q., Long, Y., Yoshida, Y., Sun, L., Zhang, H., et al. (2019). How can china achieve its intended nationally determined contributions by 2030? A multi-criteria allocation of China’s carbon emission allowance. Applied Energy,241, 380–389.CrossRef

Fleishman, R., Alexander, R., Bretschneider, S., & Popp, D. (2009). Does regulation stimulate productivity? The effect of air quality policies on the efficiency of US power plants. Energy Policy,37(11), 4574–4582.CrossRef

Gieré, R., Blackford, M., & Smith, K. (2006). TEM study of PM_2.5 emitted from coal and tire combustion in a thermal power station. Environmental Science & Technology, 40(20), 6235–6240.

Gomes, E. G., & Lins, M. P. E. (2008). Modelling undesirable outputs with zero gains DEA models. Journal of the Operational Research Society,59(5), 615–623.CrossRef

Goto, M., & Tsutsui, M. (1998). Comparison of productive and cost efficiencies among Japanese and US electric utilities. Omega,26(2), 177–194.CrossRef

Griffith, S. M., Huang, X. H. H., Louie, P. K. K., & Yu, J. Z. (2015). Characterizing the thermodynamic and chemical composition factors controlling PM_2.5 nitrate: Insights gained from two years of online measurements in Hong Kong. Atmospheric Environment, 122, 864–875.

Guo, J., Liu, H., Wu, X. H., & Wang, Y. Y. (2015a, 2015b, 2015c). Allocation of air pollutants emission rights based on zero-sum gains data envelopment analysis. China Soft Science, (11), 176–185.

Han, Y., Long, C., Geng, Z., & Zhang, K. (2018). Carbon emission analysis and evaluation of industrial departments in China: An improved environmental DEA cross model based on information entropy. Journal of Environmental Management, 205, 298–307.

He, Q., Han, J., Guan, D. B., Mi, Z. F., Zhao, H. Y., & Zhang, Q. (2018a). The comprehensive environmental efficiency of socioeconomic sectors in China: An analysis based on a non-separable bad output SBM. Journal of Cleaner Production,176(3), 1091–1110.

He, W., Yang, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhu, J. (2018b). Estimation and allocation of cost savings from collaborative CO₂ abatement in china. Energy Economics,72, 62–74.

Hosseini, H. M., & Kaneko, S. (2013). Can environmental quality spread through institutions? Energy Policy, 56, 312–321.

Hu, J. L., & Kao, C. H. (2007). Efficient energy-saving targets for APEC economies. Energy Policy,35(1), 373–382.CrossRef

Hu, J. L., & Wang, S. C. (2006). Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energy Policy,34(17), 3206–3217.CrossRef

Huang, H. J., Liu, H. N., Jiang, W. M., Huang, S. H., & Zhang, Y. Y. (2006). Physical and chemical characteristics and source apportionment of PM_2.5 in Nanjing. Climatic and Environmental Research, 11(6), 713–722.

Huang, Z. S., Xiu, G. L., Zhu, M. Y., Tao, J., & Yu, J. Z. (2014). Characteristics and sources of carbonaceous species in PM_2.5 in summer and winter in Shanghai. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(4), 124–129.

Huo, J. J. (2009). A brief analysis to control automobile exhaust pollution. China Science and Technology Information, (3), 23–27.

Jiang, N., Yin, S., Guo, Y., Li, J., Kang, P., Zhang, R., et al. (2018). Characteristics of mass concentration, chemical composition, source apportionment of PM_2.5 and PM₁₀ and health risk assessment in the emerging megacity in china. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 9(2), 309–321.

Korhonen, P. J., & Luptacik, M. (2004). Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: An extension of data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research,154(2), 437–446.CrossRef

Kumar, S. (2006). Environmentally sensitive productivity growth: A global analysis using Malmquist-Luenberger index. Ecological Economics,56(2), 280–293.CrossRef

Kumar, P., Pirjola, L., Ketzel, M., & Harrison, R. M. (2013). Nanoparticle emissions from 11 non-vehicle exhaustsources—A review. Atmospheric Environment,67(2), 252–277.CrossRef

Lei, D., Chen, Z. H., & Deng, J. Q. (2014). Simplification of quasi-Cobb-Douglas production function and the optimization of resources distribution for circular economy. System Engineering Theory and Practice,34(3), 683–690.

Li, Y. S. (2005). Controlling technical guidelines for environmental capacity in cities. Beijing: China Environmental Science.

Li, Y., Chiu, Y. H., Lu, L. C., & Chiu, C. R. (2018). Evaluation of energy efficiency and air pollutant emissions in Chinese provinces. Energy Efficiency,12(4), 963–977.CrossRef

Li, F., Emrouznejad, A., Yang, G. L., & Li, Y. J. (2020). Carbon emission abatement quota allocation in Chinese manufacturing industries: An integrated cooperative game data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(8), 1259-1288.

Liang, L., Wu, D., & Hua, Z. (2004). MES-DEA modelling for analyzing anti-industrial pollution efficiency and its application in Anhui Province of China. International Journal of Global Energy Issues,22(2–4), 88–98.CrossRef

Long, X. L., Wu, C., Zhang, J. J., & Zhang, J. (2018). Environmental efficiency for 192 thermal power plants in the Yangtze River Delta considering heterogeneity: A meta-frontier directional slacks-based measure approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,82, 3962–3971.CrossRef

Luo, Y. (2012). DEA-based research on indicator selection and environmental performance measurement. University of Science and Technology of China.

Ma, D., He, F., Li, G., & Chen, L. (2018). Estimation and comparative analysis of environmental efficiency in china, with and without consideration of haze. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies,27(1), 201–211.CrossRef

Miao, Z., Zhou, P., Wang, Y., & Sun, Z. R. (2013). Energy-saving, “Minus Haze” and assignment of atmospheric pollutant emissions. China Industrial Economy, (6), 31–43.

Ni, Y. (2013). The PM_2.5pollution prevention countermeasures study in Harbin. Northeast Forestry University.

Olatubi, W. O., & Dismukes, D. E. (2000). A data envelopment analysis of the levels and determinants of coal-fired electric power generation performance. Utilities Policy,9(2), 47–59.CrossRef

Oude Lansink, A., & Silva, E. (2003). CO₂ and energy efficiency of different heating technologies in the Dutch glasshouse industry. Environmental and Resource Economics,24(4), 395–407.CrossRef

Pasurka, C. A., Jr. (2006). Decomposing electric power plant emissions within a joint production framework. Energy Economics,28(1), 26–43.CrossRef

People’s Republic of China State Council. (2013). Air pollution prevention action plan (10).

Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., Reig-Martínez, E., & Hernández-Sancho, F. (2006). Directional distance functions and environmental regulation. Resource and Energy Economics,27(2), 131–142.CrossRef

Qiao, T., Xiu, G., Zheng, Y., Yang, J., Wang, L., Yang, J., et al. (2015). Preliminary investigation of PM₁, PM_2.5, PM₁₀, and its metal elemental composition in tunnels at a subway station in Shanghai, China. Transportation Research Part D, (41), 136–146.

Qiu, X. H., Duan, L., Gao, J., Wang, S. L., Chai, F. H., Hu, J., et al. (2016). Chemical composition and source apportionment of PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 in different functional areas of Lanzhou, China. Journal of Environmental Science, (40), 75–83.

Ramanathan, R. (2002). Combining indicators of energy consumption and CO₂ emissions: A cross-country comparison. International Journal of Global Energy Issues,17(3), 214–227.CrossRef

Ryou, H. G., Heo, J., & Kim, S. Y. (2018). Source apportionment of PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 air pollution, and possible impacts of study characteristics in South Korea. Environmental Pollution,240, 963–972.CrossRef

Sheng, T. (2014). Research on characteristics of ratio and source of PM_2.5and PM₁₀in Kun Ming. Kunming University of Science and Technology.

Shi, F. G. (2012). Research on technical efficiency in China based on non-radial and super-efficiency DEA model. Statistics and Decision, (14), 90–93.

Soloveitchik, D., Ben-Aderet, N., Grinman, M., & Lotov, A. (2002). Multiobjective optimization and marginal pollution abatement cost in the electricity sector—An Israeli case study. European Journal of Operational Research,140(3), 571–583.CrossRef

Sueyoshi, T., & Goto, M. (2001). Slack-adjusted DEA for time series analysis: Performance measurement of Japanese electric power generation industry in 1984–1993. European Journal of Operational Research,133(2), 232–259.

Sueyoshi, T., & Goto, M. (2012) Returns to scale and damages to scale on U.S. Fossil fuel power plants: Radial and non-radial approaches for DEA environmental assessment. Energy Economics, 34(6), 2240–2259.

Sun, G. Q., Yang, H. N., Liu, X. C., Tao, Y., & Cheng, J. H. (2015). Distribution characteristics and sources analysis of water-soluble inorganic ions in PM₁₀ in Duyun City. The Administration and Technique of Environmental Monitoring, 27(6).

Sun, J., Shen, Z., Zhang, L., Lei, Y., Gong, X., Zhang, Q., et al. (2019). Chemical source profiles of urban fugitive dust PM_2.5 samples from 21 cities across china. The Science of the Total Environment,649, 1045–1053.CrossRef

Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research,130(3), 498–509.CrossRef

Tyteca, D. (1997). Linear programming models for the measurement of environmental performance of firms—Concepts and empirical results. Journal of Productivity Analysis,8(2), 183–197.CrossRef

Vehicle Emission Control Center of MEP. (2014). “China vehicle emission control annual report in 2013” has been issued by MEP. Environment and Sustainable Development,39(1), 9–10.

Wu, X.H., Chen, Y.F., Guo, J. et al. (2017a) Spatial Concentration, Impact Factors and Prevention Control Measures of PM_2.5 Pollution in China. Natural Hazards, 86(1), 393–410.

Wu, X. H., Xue, P. P., Guo, J., et al. (2017b). On the amount of counterpart assistance to be provided after natural disasters: From the perspective of indirect economic loss assessment. Environmental Hazards,16(1), 1–21.

Wu, T. H., Chen, Y. S., Shang, W., & Wu, J. T. (2018). Measuring energy use and CO₂ emission performances for APEC economies. Journal of Cleaner Production,183, 590–601.CrossRef

Wu, J., Li, M. J., Zhu, Q. Y., Zhou, Z. X., & Liang, L. (2019). Energy and environmental efficiency measurement of China’s industrial sectors: A DEA model with non-homogeneous inputs and outputs. Energy Economics,78, 468–480.CrossRef

Wang, S., & Ma, Y. (2018). Influencing factors and regional discrepancies of the efficiency of carbon dioxide emissions in Jiangsu, China. Ecological Indicators,90, 460–468.

Wang, H., Tian, M., Chen, Y., Shi, G., Liu, Y., Yang, F., et al. (2018a). Seasonal characteristics, formation mechanisms and source origins of PM_2.5 in two megacities in Sichuan basin, China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18(2), 865–881.

Wang, K., Wei, Y. M., & Huang, Z. M. (2018b). Environmental efficiency and abatement efficiency measurements of China’s thermal power industry: A data envelopment analysis based materials balance approach. European Journal of Operational Research,269(1), 35–50.

Wang, W., Yu, J., Cui, Y., He, J., Xue, P., Cao, W., et al. (2018c). Characteristics of fine particulate matter and its sources in an industrialized coastal city, Ningbo, Yangtze River Delta, China. Atmospheric Research,203, 105–117.

Wang, K., Wu, M., Sun, Y., Shi, X., Sun, A., & Zhang, P. (2019a). Resource abundance, industrial structure, and regional carbon emissions efficiency in China. Resources Policy,60, 203–214.

Wang, M. M., Zheng, Y. J., Jing, T., Tian, J. Z., Chen, P. S., Dong, M. Y., et al. (2019b). Component determination and their formation of PM_2.5. Science of Advanced Materials, 11(5), 756–763.

Wei, Z., Wang, L.-T., Chen, M.-Z., Zheng, Y., et al. (2014). The 2013 Severe Haze over the Southern Hebei, China: PM_2.5 composition and source apportionment. Atmospheric Pollution Research, (5), 759–769.

Xu, P., & Sun, Y. H. (2014). Efficiency measure of undesirable outputs in DEA. Journal of Quantitative Economics,31(1), 90–93.

Xie, Q. W., Hu, P., Jiang, A., Li, Y. J. (2019). Carbon emissions allocation based on satisfaction perspective and data envelopment analysis. Energy Policy, 132, 254–264.

Xing, Z. C., Wang, J. G., & Zhang, J. (2018). Expansion of environmental impact assessment for eco-efficiency evaluation of China’s economic sectors: An economic input-output based frontier approach. Science of the Total Environment,635, 284–293.CrossRef

Xue, W. B., Wang, J. N., Yang, J. T., Lei, Y., Wang, Y. M., & Chen, X. (2013). Domestic and foreign research progress of air quality model. Environment and Sustainable Development, 38(3), 14–20.

Xue, W. B., Fu, F., Wang, J. N., He, K. B., & Hang, B. P. (2014a). Modeling study on atmospheric environmental capacity of major pollutants constrained by PM_2.5 compliance of chinese cities. China Environmental Science, 34(10), 2490–2496.

Xue, W. B., Fu, F., Wang, J. N., Tang, G. Q., Lei, Yu., Yang, J., et al. (2014b). Numerical study on the characteristics of regional transport of PM_2.5 in China. China Environmental Science, 06, 1361–1368.

Yang, H. N., Chen, J., Wen, J. J., Tian, H. Z., & Liu, X. G. (2015). Composition and sources of PM_2.5 around the heating periods of 2013 and 2014 in Beijing: Implications for efficient mitigation measures. Atmospheric Environment, (124), 378–386.

Yang, M., An, Q., Ding, T., Yin, P., & Liang, L. (2019a). Carbon emission allocation in China based on gradually efficiency improvement and emission reduction planning principle. Annals of Operations Research,278(1–2), 123–139.

Yang, J., Tang, L., Mi, Z., Liu, S., Li, L., & Zheng, J. (2019b). Carbon emissions performance in logistics at the city level. Journal of Cleaner Production,231, 1258–1266.

Yang, J., Cheng, J. X., & Huang, S. J. (2020). CO₂ emissions performance and reduction potential in China’s manufacturing industry: A multi-hierarchy meta-frontier approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255.

Zhang, Y., & Bartels, B. (1998). The effect of sample size on the mean efficiency in DEA with an application to electricity distribution in Australia, Sweden and New Zealand. Journal of Productivity Analysis,9(3), 187–204.

Zhang, C., Liu, H., Bressers, H. T. A., & Buchanan, K. S. (2011). Productivity growth and environmental regulations—Accounting for undesirable outputs: Analysis of China’s thirty provincial regions using the Malmquist-Luenberger index. Ecological Economics, (70), 2369–2379.

Zhang, C. M., Lu, S. C., Song, Z. F., & Wang, Q. (2014). Research on motor vehicle ownership under the control of PM_2.5. Highways & Automotive Applications, (5), 30–32.

Zhang, Y., Huang, W., Cai, T., Fang, D., Wang, Y., & Song, J. (2016). Concentrations and chemical compositions of fine particles (PM_2.5) during haze and non-haze days in Beijing. Atmospheric Research, (174), 174–175, 62–69.

Zhang, Y., Lang, J., Cheng, S., Li, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, D., et al. (2018a). Chemical composition and sources of PM₁ and PM_2.5 in Beijing in autumn. Science of the Total Environment,630, 72–82.

Zhang, Y. J., Sun, Y. F., & Huang, J. (2018b). Energy efficiency, carbon emission performance, and technology gaps: Evidence from CDM project investment. Energy Policy,115, 119–130.

Zhao, M., Qiao, T., Huang, Z., Zhu, M., Wei, X., Xiu, G., et al. (2015). Comparison of ionic and carbonaceous compositions of PM_2.5 in 2009 and 2012 in Shanghai, China. Science of the Total Environment, (536), 695–703.

Zhao, X., Wang, X., Ding, X., He, Q., Zhang, Z., Liu, T., et al. (2014). Compositions and sources of organic acids in fine particles (PM_2.5) over the Pearl river delta region, South China. Journal of Environmental Sciences,26, 110–121.CrossRef

Zheng, P. N., Chen, H. B., Chen, X. G., Zhou, D. B., & Zhang, B. Y. (2007). Study on distribution of reduction targets based on DEA model. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,11(1), 133–139.

Zhou, Z., Liu, C., Zeng, X., Jiang, Y., & Liu, W. (2018). Carbon emission performance evaluation and allocation in Chinese cities. Journal of Cleaner Production,172, 1254–1272.CrossRef

Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2006a). Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: An update. Energy,31(14), 2604–2622.

Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2006b). Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance. Ecological Economics,60(1), 111–118.

Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2008). Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies. Energy Economics,30(1), 1–14.CrossRef

Zhu, Y., Huang, L., Li, J., Ying, Q., Zhang, H., Liu, X., et al. (2018). Sources of particulate matter in china: Insights from source apportionment studies published in 1987–2017. Environment International,115, 343–357.CrossRef

Titel: Inputs Optimization to Reduce the Undesirable Outputs by Environmental Hazards: A DEA Model with Data of PM2.5 in China
verfasst von: Prof. Xianhua Wu
Prof. Ji Guo
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Buch: Economic Impacts and Emergency Management of Disasters in China
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-1318-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-16-1319-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1319-7_19

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Premium Partner