Skip to main content

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Integrated Reliability and Risk Assessments of Nuclear Facilities

verfasst von : Vanderley de Vasconcelos, Graiciany de Paula Barros, Antônio Carlos Lopes da Costa, Wellington Antonio Soares

Erschienen in: Reliability and Maintainability Assessment of Industrial Systems

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Reliability is the probability that a system will perform its intended function satisfactorily during its lifetime under specified environmental and operating conditions. Risk can be measured by assessing the probability of an undesired event (e.g., a system failure) and the magnitude of its consequences. Therefore, risk and reliability are complementary variables. Licensing of nuclear facilities requires safety and risk assessment. Probability risk assessment implies carrying out a quantitative assessment of the reliability of items important to safety (IISs). In addition, reliability assessments are required during all lifetime phases for optimizing plant performance, maintainability and safety. Thus, the outcomes of reliability and risk assessments are interchangeable and complementary. This chapter proposes a framework for integrating reliability and risk assessments of IISs of nuclear facilities using tools of reliability engineering, as Markov models, fault tree analysis, event tree analysis, reliability block diagrams and life data analysis. Based on frequency-dose limits to the public, risk acceptance criteria are also suggested in the scope of the framework. A case study demonstrating the advantages of using the integrated approach applied to a preliminary plant design phase of a nuclear fuel fabrication, to meet risk acceptance criteria and licensing requirements, is presented.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen F, Andersen O, Duijm J (2003) Risk terminology: a platform for common understanding and better communication. J Hazard Mater 103:181–203CrossRef Christensen F, Andersen O, Duijm J (2003) Risk terminology: a platform for common understanding and better communication. J Hazard Mater 103:181–203CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat International Atomic Energy Agency (2001) Reliability assurance programme guidebook for advanced light water reactors. IAEA-TECDOC-1264. IAEA, Vienna International Atomic Energy Agency (2001) Reliability assurance programme guidebook for advanced light water reactors. IAEA-TECDOC-1264. IAEA, Vienna
3.
Zurück zum Zitat International Atomic Energy Agency (2002) Procedures for conducting probabilistic safety assessment for non-reactor nuclear facilities. IAEA-TECDOC-1267. IAEA, Vienna International Atomic Energy Agency (2002) Procedures for conducting probabilistic safety assessment for non-reactor nuclear facilities. IAEA-TECDOC-1267. IAEA, Vienna
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Winteringham F, Peter W (1992) Energy use and the environment. Lewis Publishers Inc, London Winteringham F, Peter W (1992) Energy use and the environment. Lewis Publishers Inc, London
5.
Zurück zum Zitat International Atomic Energy Agency (2018) IAEA safety glossary terminology used in nuclear safety and radiation protection. 2018th edn. Vienna International Atomic Energy Agency (2018) IAEA safety glossary terminology used in nuclear safety and radiation protection. 2018th edn. Vienna
6.
Zurück zum Zitat International Atomic Energy Agency (2020) Safety analysis and licensing documentation for nuclear fuel cycle facilities. Safety Reports Series No. 102 IAEA, Vienna International Atomic Energy Agency (2020) Safety analysis and licensing documentation for nuclear fuel cycle facilities. Safety Reports Series No. 102 IAEA, Vienna
7.
Zurück zum Zitat International Atomic Energy Agency (2017) Safety of nuclear fuel cycle facilities. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSR-4, IAEA, Vienna International Atomic Energy Agency (2017) Safety of nuclear fuel cycle facilities. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSR-4, IAEA, Vienna
8.
Zurück zum Zitat International Atomic Energy Agency (2010) Licensing process of nuclear installations. Specific Safety Guide No. SSG-12 IAEA, Vienna International Atomic Energy Agency (2010) Licensing process of nuclear installations. Specific Safety Guide No. SSG-12 IAEA, Vienna
9.
Zurück zum Zitat International Atomic Energy Agency (2016) Safety of nuclear power plants: design, specific safety requirements. SSR-2/1 (Rev. 1), IAEA, Vienna International Atomic Energy Agency (2016) Safety of nuclear power plants: design, specific safety requirements. SSR-2/1 (Rev. 1), IAEA, Vienna
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Vasconcelos V, Soares W, Costa A et al (2019) Deterministic and probabilistic safety analyses. In: Advances in system reliability engineering. Elsevier, London Vasconcelos V, Soares W, Costa A et al (2019) Deterministic and probabilistic safety analyses. In: Advances in system reliability engineering. Elsevier, London
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Reliasoft Corporation (2015) System analysis reference: reliability, availability and optimization. ReliaSoft, Tucson Reliasoft Corporation (2015) System analysis reference: reliability, availability and optimization. ReliaSoft, Tucson
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Reliasoft Corporation (2015) Life data analysis reference. ReliaSoft, Tucson Reliasoft Corporation (2015) Life data analysis reference. ReliaSoft, Tucson
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Stamatelatos M (2002) Probabilistic risk assessment procedures guide for NASA managers and practitioners: Version 1.1. NASA, Washington DC Stamatelatos M (2002) Probabilistic risk assessment procedures guide for NASA managers and practitioners: Version 1.1. NASA, Washington DC
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleming K (2004) Markov models for evaluating risk-informed in-service inspection strategies for nuclear power plant piping systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 83:27–45CrossRef Fleming K (2004) Markov models for evaluating risk-informed in-service inspection strategies for nuclear power plant piping systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 83:27–45CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2004) The SPAR-H human reliability analysis method. NUREG/CR 6883. USNRC, Washington DC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2004) The SPAR-H human reliability analysis method. NUREG/CR 6883. USNRC, Washington DC
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Park J, Jung W, Kim J (2020) Inter-relationships between performance shaping factors for human reliability analysis of nuclear power plants. Nucl Eng Technol 52:87–100CrossRef Park J, Jung W, Kim J (2020) Inter-relationships between performance shaping factors for human reliability analysis of nuclear power plants. Nucl Eng Technol 52:87–100CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1975) WASH-1400: reactor safety study, NUREG 75/014. USNRC, Washington DC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1975) WASH-1400: reactor safety study, NUREG 75/014. USNRC, Washington DC
18.
Zurück zum Zitat International Organization for Standardization (2009) Risk management: principles and guidelines. ISO 31000, 1st edn. ISO/IEC, Geneva International Organization for Standardization (2009) Risk management: principles and guidelines. ISO 31000, 1st edn. ISO/IEC, Geneva
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Calixto E (2013) Gas and oil reliability engineering, modeling and analysis. Elsevier, Amsterdam Calixto E (2013) Gas and oil reliability engineering, modeling and analysis. Elsevier, Amsterdam
21.
Zurück zum Zitat International Atomic Energy Agency (2001) Applications of probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) for nuclear power plants. TECDOC-1200, IAEA, Vienna International Atomic Energy Agency (2001) Applications of probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) for nuclear power plants. TECDOC-1200, IAEA, Vienna
22.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2007) Feasibility study for a risk-informed and performance based regulatory structure for future plant licensing. NUREG 1860, v. 1, USNRC, Washington DC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2007) Feasibility study for a risk-informed and performance based regulatory structure for future plant licensing. NUREG 1860, v. 1, USNRC, Washington DC
23.
Zurück zum Zitat International Commission on Radiological Protection (1993) ICRP publication 64: protection from potential exposure: a conceptual framework. Ann ICRP 23(1). Ottawa International Commission on Radiological Protection (1993) ICRP publication 64: protection from potential exposure: a conceptual framework. Ann ICRP 23(1). Ottawa
24.
Zurück zum Zitat International Atomic Energy Agency (2014) Criticality safety in the handling of fissile material. Specific Safety Guide No. SSG-27, IAEA, Vienna International Atomic Energy Agency (2014) Criticality safety in the handling of fissile material. Specific Safety Guide No. SSG-27, IAEA, Vienna
25.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1979) Regulatory guide 3.34. Revision 1. Assumptions used for evaluating the potential radiological consequences of accidental nuclear criticality in a uranium fuel fabrication plant, Washington, DC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1979) Regulatory guide 3.34. Revision 1. Assumptions used for evaluating the potential radiological consequences of accidental nuclear criticality in a uranium fuel fabrication plant, Washington, DC
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Laboratory Los Alamos National (2000) LA-13638. A review of criticality accidents (2000) Revision. Los Alamos, New Mexico Laboratory Los Alamos National (2000) LA-13638. A review of criticality accidents (2000) Revision. Los Alamos, New Mexico
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (2018) REGDOC-2.4.3. Nuclear criticality safety. Ottawa, Ontario Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (2018) REGDOC-2.4.3. Nuclear criticality safety. Ottawa, Ontario
Metadaten
Titel
Integrated Reliability and Risk Assessments of Nuclear Facilities
verfasst von
Vanderley de Vasconcelos
Graiciany de Paula Barros
Antônio Carlos Lopes da Costa
Wellington Antonio Soares
Copyright-Jahr
2022
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93623-5_2

Premium Partner