nach oben

Erschienen in:

2008 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Integrating Concepts: Demonstration of a Multilevel Model for Exploring the Rise of Mutualism Value Orientations in Post-industrial Society

verfasst von : Michael J Manfredo

Erschienen in: Who Cares About Wildlife?

Verlag: Springer US

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Excerpt

In the early 1990s, I conducted a survey of public values toward wildlife for the Colorado Division of Wildlife. The purpose of the study was to inform statewide wildlife planning. The planning was being conducted, in part, to identify new agency directions and embrace new stakeholders for wildlife in Colorado. The survey we conducted was one of our first uses of the concept of wildlife value orientations (see Bright, Manfredo, & Fulton, 2000; Fulton, Manfredo, & Lipscomb, 1996). After completion of the study, I was invited to report the findings at a formal meeting of the Colorado Wildlife Commission, the group with regulatory authority over wildlife in the state. That small group of people, appointed by the governor, is charged with representing the interests of the public in making decisions about wildlife in Colorado. Our findings showed that about three in ten Coloradoans held pro-animal-rights and antihunting beliefs. These results surprised members of the commission. After listening to my presentation, the chair of the Commission proceeded to deride the study findings. “I know the Colorado public,” he exhorted in a loud, angry voice, “and this is not what they are like. People in Colorado hunt and love hunting.” There were others who, in a more subdued fashion, acknowledged the significance of the findings. The display at that meeting, for me, is representative of a pervasive tension in North American wildlife management today. Professionals are uncertain about how to deal with growing societal opposition to the techniques and traditions of wildlife management. Controversy is most obvious on issues of hunting. For some professionals, the decline of hunting participation and the perceived rise of antihunting sentiment prompt responses of denial (such as I received), the urge to “fight back” against those who oppose hunting (e.g., passage of hunter rights bills – see Jacobson, 2006), and efforts directed at turning the trend of declining numbers of hunters (e.g., there is a proliferation of state agency hunter recruitment and retention efforts). At the same time, there are those within the wildlife profession who believe we must better understand and adapt to changing societal expectations about wildlife management. The case study reported here was commissioned by the Western Association of Fish in Wildlife Agencies in the spirit of learning and understanding. The purpose of the study was to examine the possibility of wildlife value shift among publics in the western United States, its causes, and its effects on the future of wildlife management. …

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Cultural Perspectives on Human–Wildlife Relationships

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRef

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.CrossRef

Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.

Bright, A., Manfredo, M. J., & Fulton, D. (2000). Segmenting the public: An application of value orientations to wildlife planning in Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28(1), 218–226.

Brown, T. L., Connelly, N. A., & Decker, D. J. (2006). Participation in and orientation of wildlife professionals toward consumptive wildlife use: A resurvey. HDRU Series Report No. 06-1. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit.

Buttel, F. H., & Humphrey, C. R. (2002). Sociological theory and the natural environment. In R. E. Dunlap, & W. Michelson (Eds.), Handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 33–69). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Catton, W. R. Jr., & Dunlap, R. (1980). A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 24, 15–47.CrossRef

Cochrane, W. W. (1993). The Development of American Agriculture: A Historical Analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Dayer, A. A., Stinchfield, H. M., & Manfredo, M. J. (2007). Stories about wildlife: Developing an instrument for identifying wildlife value orientations cross-culturally. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 307–315.

Dillman, D.A., & Tremblay, K. R. (1977). The quality of life in rural America. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 429, 115–129.CrossRef

Dizard, J. E. (2003). Mortal stakes: Hunters and hunting in contemporary America. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

Douglas, M. (1990). The pangolin revisited: A new approach to animal symbolism. In R. G. Willis (Ed.), Signifying Animals: Human Meaning in the Natural World (pp. 25–36). London: Unwin Hyman.

Dunlap, R. E. (2002). An enduring concern: Light stays green for environmental protection. Policy Perspective, September/October, 13(5), 10–14.

Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689–723.CrossRef

Fulton, D. C., Manfredo, M. J., & Lipscomb, J. (1996). Wildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approach. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1(2), 24–47.CrossRef

Hand, C. M., & Van Liere, K. D. (1984). Religion, mastery-over-nature, and environmental concern. Social Forces, 63, 555–570.

Heberlein, T. A. (1991). Changing attitudes and funding for wildlife: Preserving the sporthunter. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 19, 528–534.

Herman, D. J. (2003). The hunter’s aim: The cultural politics of American sport hunters, 1880–1910. Journal of Leisure Research, 35, 455–474.

Hofstede, G. (2002). The pitfalls of cross-national survey research: A reply to the article by Spector et al. on the psychometric properties of the Hofstede Values Survey Module 1994. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 170–173.

Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1988). A structural equation test of the Value-Attitude-Behavior Hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 638–646.CrossRef

Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial societies. Princeton University Press.

Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51.CrossRef

Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and Democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ingold, T. (1994). From trust to domination: An alternative history of human-animal relations. In A. Manning, & J. Serpell (Eds.), Animals and human society: Changing perspectives (pp. 1–22). New York: Routledge.

Jacobs, M. H. (2007). Wildlife value orientations in the Netherlands. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 359–365.

Jacobson, L. (2006). Ballot measure wrap-up. The Rothenberg Political Report. Retrieved Tuesday, November 21, 2006 from http://rothenbergpoliticalreport.blogspot.com/2006/11/ballot-measure-wrap-up.html.

Kaczensky, P. (2007). Wildlife value orientations of rural Mongolians. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 317–329.

Katcher, A., & Wilkins, G. (1993). Dialogue with animals: Its nature and culture. In S. R. Kellert, & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The Biophilia Hypothesis (pp. 173–200). Washington, DC: Island Press.

Kellert, S. R. (1976). Perceptions of animals in American society. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 41, 533–546.

Kluckholn, C. (1951). Values and value orientations in the Theory of Action. In T. Parsons, & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general Theory of Action (pp. 388–433). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Kluckholn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston: Row, Peterson, & Co.

Maio, G. R., Olson, J. M., Bernard, M. M., & Luke, M. A. (2003). Ideologies, values, and behavior. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 283–308). London: Springer.

Manfredo, M. J., & Zinn, H. C. (1996). Population change and its implications for wildlife management in the new west: A case study of Colorado. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1, 62–74.CrossRef

Manfredo, M. J., Teel, T. L., & Bright, A. D. (2004). Application of the concepts of values and attitudes in human dimensions of natural resources research. In M. J. Manfredo, J. J. Vaske, D. Field, & P. J. Brown (Eds.), Society and Natural Resources: A summary of knowledge prepared for the 10th International Symposium on Society and Natural Resources (pp. 271–282). Jefferson, MO: Modern Litho.

Manfredo, M. J., Teel, T., & Henry, K. (2007). Modernization and the rise of mutualism in human-wildlife relationships. Unpublished manuscript.

Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.

Milton, K. (1996). Environmentalism and cultural theory: Exploring the role of Anthropology in environmental discourse. London: Routledge.CrossRef

Minnis, D. L. (1998). Wildlife policy-making by the electorate: An overview of citizen-sponsored ballot measures on hunting and trapping. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 26, 75–83.

Mithen, S. (1996). The prehistory of the mind. London: Thames & Hudson.

Muth, R. M., & Jamison, W. V. (2000). On the destiny of deer camps and duck blinds: The rise of the animal rights movement and the future of wildlife conservation. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28, 841–851.

Organ, J. F., & Fritzell, E. K. (2000). Trends in consumptive recreation and the wildlife profession. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28, 780–787.

Peyton, R. B. (2000). Wildlife management: Cropping to manage or managing to crop? Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28, 774–779.

Pratto, F. (1999). The puzzle of continuing group inequality: Piecing together psychological, social and cultural forces in social dominance theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 191–263.CrossRef

Raadik, J., & Cottrell, S. (2007). Wildlife value orientations: An Estonian case study. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 347–357.

Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, methods, and applications (Vol. 18, Cross Cultural Research and Methodology Series, pp. 85–119). London: Sage.

Schwartz, S. H. (2004). Basic human values: Their content and structure across cultures. In A. Tamayo, & J. Porto (Eds.), Vialores e Trabalho. Brazil: Editora Universidade de Brasilis.

Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5, 136–182.CrossRef

Serpell, J. A. (2003). Anthropomorphism and anthropomorphic selection – Beyond the ‘cute response’. Society and Animals, 11(1), 83–100.CrossRef

Sidanius, J. (1993). The psychology of group conflict and the dynamics of oppression: A social dominance perspective. In S. Iyengar, & W. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in Political Psychology (pp. 183–219). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., van Laar, C., & Levin, S. (2004). Social dominance theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology, 25, 845–880.CrossRef

Snijders, T. A., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Tanakanjana, N., & Saranet, S. (2007). Wildlife value orientations in Thailand: preliminary findings. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 339–345.

Teel, T. L., Dayer, A. A., Manfredo, M. J., & Bright, A. D. (2005). Regional results from the research project entitled “Wildlife Values in the West.” (Project Rep. No. 58). Project Report for the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University, Human Dimensions in Natural Resources Unit.

Teel, T. L., Manfredo, M. J., & Stinchfield, H. S. (2005). The need and theoretical basis for exploring wildlife value orientations cross-culturally. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 297–307.

Teel, T. L., & Manfredo, M. J. (2007a). Exploring the predictive validity of the wildlife value orientation concept across a diverse set of wildlife-related issues. Unpublished manuscript.

Teel, T. L. & Manfredo, M. J. (2007b). Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Unpublished manuscript.

Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (2007). 2006 National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife- associated recreation: National overview. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Vaske, J. J., Shelby, L. B., & Manfredo, M. J. (2006). Bibliometric reflections on the first decade of Human Dimensions of Wildlife. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 11(2), 79–87.CrossRef

Vining, J. (2003). The connection to other animals and caring for nature. Human Ecology Review, 10(2), 87–99.

Werner, C. M., Brown, B. B., & Altman, I. (1997). Environmental psychology. In J. Berry, M. H. Segal, & C. Kagitibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 3, Social Behavior and Applications, pp. 255–290). Boston: Allan and Bacon.

White, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science, 155, 1203–1207.CrossRef

Wildavsky, A. B. (1991). The rise of radical egalitarianism. Washington, DC: The American University Press.

Willis, R. (Ed.). (1990). Signifying animals: Human meaning in the natural world. London: Routledge.

Zinn, H. C., & Shen, X. S. (2007). Wildlife value orientations in China. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 331–338.

Titel: Integrating Concepts: Demonstration of a Multilevel Model for Exploring the Rise of Mutualism Value Orientations in Post-industrial Society
verfasst von: Michael J Manfredo
Verlag: Springer US
Buch: Who Cares About Wildlife?
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-77038-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-0-387-77040-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77040-6_8