Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Intermittently Aerated MBR for Nutrients Removal and Phosphorus Recovery

verfasst von : Yunkun Wang

Erschienen in: Development of Novel Bioelectrochemical Membrane Separation Technologies for Wastewater Treatment and Resource Recovery

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Recovering nutrients, especially phosphate resource, from wastewater have attracted increasing interest recently. Herein, an intermittently aerated membrane bioreactor with a mesh filter was developed for simultaneous organics, nitrogen and phosphorous removal, followed by phosphorus recovery from the phosphorus-rich sludge. This integrated system showed enhanced performances in nitrification and denitrification and phosphorous removal without excess sludge discharged. The removal of chemical oxygen demand, total nitrogen and total phosphorus in a modified membrane bioreactor were averaged at 94.4 ± 2.5%, 94.2 ± 5.7% and 53.3 ± 29.7%, respectively. The removed TP was stored in biomass, and 68.7% of the stored phosphorous in the sludge could be recovered as concentrated phosphate solution with a concentration of phosphate above 350 mg/L. The sludge after phosphorus release could be returned back to the MBR for phosphorus uptake, and 83.8% of its capacity could be recovered.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Research Background and Literature Review
Nächstes Kapitel Development of an Energy-Saving Anaerobic Hybrid Membrane Bioreactors for 2-Chlorophenol-Contained Wastewater Treatment
Literatur
1.
Wang Z, Wu Z, Yu G, Liu J, Zhou Z (2006) Relationship between sludge characteristics and membrane flux determination in submerged membrane bioreactors. J Membr Sci 284(1–2):87–94CrossRef
2.
Ren X, Shon HK, Jang N, Lee YG, Bae M, Lee J, Cho K, Kim IS (2010) Novel membrane bioreactor (MBR) coupled with a nonwoven fabric filter for household wastewater treatment. Water Res 44(3):751–760CrossRef
3.
Kimura K, Nishisako R, Miyoshi T, Shimada R, Watanabe Y (2008) Baffled membrane bioreactor (BMBR) for efficient nutrient removal from municipal wastewater. Water Res 42(3):625–632CrossRef
4.
Okamura D, Mori Y, Hashimoto T, Hori K (2010) Effects of microbial degradation of biofoulants on microfiltration membrane performance in a membrane bioreactor. Environ Sci Technol 44(22):8644–8648CrossRef
5.
Srebnik S (2003) Polymer adsorption on multicomponent surfaces with relevance to membrane fouling. Chem Eng Sci 58(23–24):5291–5298CrossRef
6.
Marazioti C, Kornaros M, Lyberatos G (2003) Kinetic modeling of a mixed culture of Pseudomonas denitrificans and Bacillus subtilis under aerobic and anoxic operating conditions. Water Res 37(6):1239–1251CrossRef
7.
Deshmukh SARK, Heinrich S, Mörl L, van Sint Annaland M, Kuipers JAM (2007) Membrane assisted fluidized bed reactors: potentials and hurdles. Chem Eng Sci 62(1–2):416–436CrossRef
8.
Phattaranawik J, Leiknes T (2009) Double-deck aerated biofilm membrane bioreactor with sludge control for municipal wastewater treatment. AlChE J 55(5):1291–1297CrossRef
9.
Liang Z, Das A, Beerman D, Hu Z (2010) Biomass characteristics of two types of submerged membrane bioreactors for nitrogen removal from wastewater. Water Res 44(11):3313–3320CrossRef
10.
Curko J, Matosic M, Jakopovic HK, Mijatovic I (2010) Nitrogen removal in submerged MBR with intermittent aeration. Des. Water Treat 24(1–3):7–19CrossRef
11.
Hong SH, Lee WN, Oh HS, Yeon KM, Hwang BK, Lee CH, Chang IS, Lee S (2007) The effects of intermittent aeration on the characteristics of bio-cake layers in a membrane bioreactor. Environ Sci Technol 41(17):6270–6276CrossRef
12.
Kiso Y, Jung YJ, Ichinari T, Park M, Kitao T, Nishimura K, Min KS (2000) Wastewater treatment performance of a filtration bio-reactor equipped with a mesh as a filter material. Water Res 34(17):4143–4150CrossRef
13.
Amand L, Carlsson B (2012) Optimal aeration control in a nitrifying activated sludge process. Water Res 46(7):2101–2110CrossRef
14.
Kaelin D, Manser R, Rieger L, Eugster J, Rottermann K, Siegrist H (2009) Extension of ASM3 for two-step nitrification and denitrification and its calibration and validation with batch tests and pilot scale data. Water Res 43(6):1680–1692CrossRef
15.
Kostoglou M, Karabelas AJ (2011) On population balance modeling of membrane bioreactor operation with periodic back-washing. AlChE J 57(8):2274–2281CrossRef
16.
Phattaranawik J, Fane AG, Pasquier ACS, Bing W (2007) Membrane bioreactor with bubble-size transformer: design and fouling control. AlChE J 53(1):243–248CrossRef
17.
Fan F, Zhou H (2007) Interrelated effects of aeration and mixed liquor fractions on membrane fouling for submerged membrane bioreactor processes in wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 41(7):2523–2528CrossRef
18.
Fan B, Huang X (2002) Characteristics of a self-forming dynamic membrane coupled with a bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 36(23):5245–5251CrossRef
19.
Kimura K, Naruse T, Watanabe Y (2009) Changes in characteristics of soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactors associated with different solid retention times: relation to membrane fouling. Water Res 43(4):1033–1039CrossRef
20.
APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
21.
Surmacz-Gorska J, Gernaey K, Demuynck C, Vanrolleghem P, Verstraete W (1996) Nitrification monitoring in activated sludge by oxygen uptake rate (OUR) measurements. Water Res 30(5):1228–1236CrossRef
22.
Vocks M, Adam C, Lesjean B, Gnirss R, Kraume M (2005) Enhanced post-denitrification without addition of an external carbon source in membrane bioreactors. Water Res 39(14):3360–3368CrossRef
23.
Henze M, Gujer W, Mino T, Loosdrecht M (2000) Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d, and ASM3. IWA scientific and technical report no. 9. IWA Publishing, London
24.
Gujer W, Henze M, Mino T, van Loosdrecht M (1999) Activated sludge model no. 3. Water Sci Technol 39(1):183–193
25.
de Kreuk MK, Picioreanu C, Hosseini M, Xavier JB, van Loosdrecht MCM (2007) Kinetic model of a granular sludge SBR: influences on nutrient removal. Biotechnol Bioeng 97(4):801–815CrossRef
26.
Oh J, Silverstein J (1999) Acetate limitation and nitrite accumulation during denitrification. J Environ Eng ASCE 125(3):234–242CrossRef
27.
Sozen S, Orhon D (1999) The effect of nitrite correction on the evaluation of the rate of nitrate utilization under anoxic conditions. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 74(8):790–800CrossRef
28.
Thomsen JK, Geest T, Cox RP (1994) Mass-spectrometric studies of the effect of pH on the accumulation of intermediates in denitrification by Paracoccus denitrificans. Appl Environ Microbiol 60(2):536–541CrossRef
29.
Reichert P (1998) Aquasim 2.0-user manual, computer program for the identification and simulation of aquatic systems. EAWAG, Dübendorf. ISBN 3-906484-16-5
30.
Siegrist H, Vogt D, Garcia-Heras JL, Gujer W (2002) Mathematical model for meso- and thermophilic anaerobic sewage sludge digestion. Environ Sci Technol 36(5):1113–1123CrossRef
31.
Li WW, Sheng GP, Wang YK, Liu XW, Xu J, Yu HQ (2011) Filtration behaviors and biocake formation mechanism of mesh filters used in membrane bioreactors. Sep Purif Technol 81(3):472–479CrossRef
32.
Zarragoitia-Gonzalez A, Schetrite S, Alliet M, Jauregui-Haza U, Albasi C (2008) Modelling of submerged membrane bioreactor: conceptual study about link between activated slugde biokinetics, aeration and fouling process. J Membr Sci 325(2):612–624CrossRef
33.
Lee J, Ahn WY, Lee CH (2001) Comparison of the filtration characteristics between attached and suspended growth microorganisms in submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res 35(10):2435–2445CrossRef
34.
Shin HS, Kang ST (2003) Characteristics and fates of soluble microbial products in ceramic membrane bioreactor at various sludge retention times. Water Res 37(1):121–127CrossRef
35.
Guglielmi G, Saroj DP, Chiarani D, Andreottola G (2007) Sub-critical fouling in a membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment: experimental investigation and mathematical modelling. Water Res 41(17):3903–3914CrossRef
36.
Wu J, He C (2012) Effect of cyclic aeration on fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment. Water Res 46(11):3507–3515CrossRef
37.
Ersu CB, Ong SK, Arslankaya E, Brown P (2008) Comparison of recirculation configurations for biological nutrient removal in a membrane bioreactor. Water Res 42(6–7):1651–1663CrossRef
38.
Ueda T, Hata K, Kikuoka Y, Seino O (1997) Effects of aeration on suction pressure in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res 31(3):489–494CrossRef
39.
Canziani R, Emondi V, Garavaglia M, Malpei F, Pasinetti E, Buttliglieri G (2006) Effect of oxygen concentration on biological nitrification and microbial kinetics in a cross-flow membrane bioreactor (MBR) and moving-bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) treating old landfill leachate. J Membr Sci 286(1–2):202–212CrossRef
40.
Hocaoglu SM, Insel G, Cokgor EU, Orhon D (2011) Effect of low dissolved oxygen on simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in a membrane bioreactor treating black water. Bioresour Technol 102(6):4333–4340CrossRef
41.
Lim JJ, Lee YL, Ataei A, Yoo CK (2011) Exploration of dual optimal conditions for COD and nitrogen removal in an MBR. Asia Pac J Chem Eng 6(3):433–440
42.
Wyffels S, Van Hulle SWH, Boeckx P, Volcke EIP, Van Cleemput O, Vanrolleghem PA, Verstraete W (2004) Modeling and simulation of oxygen-limited partial nitritation in a membrane-assisted bioreactor (MBR). Biotechnol Bioeng 86(5):531–542CrossRef
43.
Yeom IT, Nah YM, Ahn KH (1999) Treatment of household wastewater using an intermittently aerated membrane bioreactor. Desalination 124(1–3):193–203CrossRef
44.
Yilmaz G, Lemaire R, Keller J, Yuan Z (2007) Effectiveness of an alternating aerobics, anoxic/anaerobic strategy for maintaining biomass activity of BNR sludge during long-term starvation. Water Res 41(12):2590–2598CrossRef
45.
Kraume M, Bracklow U, Vocks M, Drews A (2005) Nutrients removal in MBRs for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 51(6–7):391–402CrossRef
46.
Sakai Y, Fukase T, Yasui H, Shibata M (1997) An activated sludge process without excess sludge production. Water Sci. Technol. 36(11):163–170CrossRef
47.
Ghyoot W, Verstraete W (2000) Reduced sludge production in a two-stage membrane-assisted bioreactor. Water Res 34(1):205–215CrossRef
48.
Muller A, Wentzel MC, Loewenthal RE, Ekama GA (2003) Heterotroph anoxic yield in anoxic aerobic activated sludge systems treating municipal wastewater. Water Res 37(10):2435–2441CrossRef
49.
Cornel P, Wagner M, Krause S (2003) Investigation of oxygen transfer rates in full scale membrane bioreactors. Water Sci Technol 47(11):313–319CrossRef
50.
Conley DJ, Paerl HW, Howarth RW, Boesch DF, Seitzinger SP, Havens KE, Lancelot C, Likens GE (2009) Controlling eutrophication: nitrogen and phosphorus. Science 323(5917):1014–1015CrossRef
51.
Carey RO, Migliaccio KW (2009) Contribution of wastewater treatment plant effluents to nutrient dynamics in aquatic systems: a review. Environ Manage 44(2):205–217CrossRef
52.
Gilbert N (2009) Environment: the disappearing nutrient. Nature 461(7265):716–718CrossRef
53.
Elser J, Bennett E (2011) Phosphorus cycle: a broken biogeochemical cycle. Nature 478(7367):29–31CrossRef
54.
Huang H, Xiao D, Liu J, Hou L, Ding L (2015) Recovery and removal of nutrients from swine wastewater by using a novel integrated reactor for struvite decomposition and recycling. Sci Rep 5, 10183
55.
Hao X, Wang C, van Loosdrecht MC, Hu Y (2013) Looking beyond struvite for P-recovery. Environ Sci Technol 47(10):4965–4966CrossRef
56.
Le Corre KS, Valsami-Jones E, Hobbs P, Parsons SA (2009) Phosphorus recovery from wastewater by struvite crystallization: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 39(6):433–477CrossRef
57.
Ahmed Z, Lim BR, Cho J, Song KG, Kim KP, Ahn KH (2008) Biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal and changes in microbial community structure in a membrane bioreactor: effect of different carbon sources. Water Res 42(1–2):198–210CrossRef
58.
Hano T, Matsumoto M, Kuribayashi K, Hatate Y (1992) Biological nitrogen removal in a bubble column with a draught tube. Chem Eng Sci 47(13–14):3737–3744CrossRef
59.
Martin HG, Ivanova N, Kunin V, Warnecke F, Barry KW, McHardy AC, Yeates C, He S, Salamov AA, Szeto E, Dalin E, Putnam NH, Shapiro HJ, Pangilinan JL, Rigoutsos I, Kyrpides NC, Blackall LL, McMahon KD, Hugenholtz P (2006) Metagenomic analysis of two enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) sludge communities. Nat Biotechnol 24(10):1263–1269CrossRef
60.
Fu ZM, Yang FL, An YY, Xue Y (2009) Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification coupled with phosphorus removal in an modified anoxic/oxic-membrane bioreactor (A/O-MBR). Biochem Eng J 43(2):191–196CrossRef
61.
Lesjean B, Gnirss R, Adam C (2002) Process configurations adapted to membrane bioreactors for enhanced biological phosphorous and nitrogen removal. Desalination 149(1–3):217–224CrossRef
62.
Posadas E, García-Encina P-A, Soltau A, Domínguez A, Díaz I, Muñoz R (2013) Carbon and nutrient removal from centrates and domestic wastewater using algal–bacterial biofilm bioreactors. Bioresour Technol 139:50–58CrossRef
63.
Huang J, Wang Z, Zhang J, Zhang X, Ma J, Wu Z (2015) A novel composite conductive microfiltration membrane and its anti-fouling performance with an external electric field in membrane bioreactors. Sci Rep 5, 9268
64.
Skouteris G, Hermosilla D, Lopez P, Negro C, Blanco A (2012) Anaerobic membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: a review. Chem Eng J 198:138–148CrossRef
65.
Brown P, Ong SK, Lee YW (2011) Influence of anoxic and anaerobic hydraulic retention time on biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal in a membrane bioreactor. Desalination 270(1–3):227–232CrossRef
66.
Liu HB, Yang CZ, Pu WH, Zhang JD (2008) Removal of nitrogen from wastewater for reusing to boiler feed-water by an anaerobic/aerobic/membrane bioreactor. Chem Eng J 140(1–3):122–129CrossRef
67.
Yuan ZH, Yang XY, Hu AY, Yu CP (2015) Long-term impacts of silver nanoparticles in an anaerobic–anoxic–oxic membrane bioreactor system. Chem Eng J 276:83–90CrossRef
68.
Guglielmi G, Andreottola G (2011) Alternate anoxic/aerobic operation for nitrogen removal in a membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 64(8):1730–1735CrossRef
69.
Judd S, Alvarez-Vazquez H, Jefferson B (2006) The impact of intermittent aeration on the operation of air-lift tubular membrane bioreactors under sub-critical conditions. Sep Sci Technol 41(7):1293–1302CrossRef
70.
Wang YK, Sheng GP, Ni BJ, Li WW, Zeng RJ, Wang YQ, Shi BJ, Yu HQ (2013) Simultaneous carbon and nitrogen removals in membrane bioreactor with mesh filter: an experimental and modeling approach. Chem Eng Sci 95(24):78–84CrossRef
71.
Kodera H, Hatamoto M, Abe K, Kindaichi T, Ozaki N, Ohashi A (2013) Phosphate recovery as concentrated solution from treated wastewater by a PAO-enriched biofilm reactor. Water Res 47(6):2025–2032CrossRef
72.
Wong PY, Cheng KY, Kaksonen AH, Sutton DC, Ginige MP (2013) A novel post denitrification configuration for phosphorus recovery using polyphosphate accumulating organisms. Water Res 47(17):6488–6495CrossRef
73.
Mañas A, Biscans B, Spérandio M (2011) Biologically induced phosphorus precipitation in aerobic granular sludge process. Water Res 45(12):3776–3786CrossRef
74.
Gieseke A, Purkhold U, Wagner M, Amann R, Schramm A (2001) Community structure and activity dynamics of nitrifying bacteria in a phosphate-removing biofilm. Appl Environ Microbiol 67(3):1351–1362CrossRef
75.
Daims H, Brühl A, Amann R, Schleifer KH, Wagner M (1999) The domain-specific probe EUB338 is insufficient for the detection of all bacteria: development and evaluation of a more comprehensive probe set. Syst Appl Microbiol 22(3):434–444CrossRef
76.
Wang JF, Zhao QL, Jin WB, You SJ, Zhang JN (2008) Performance of biological phosphorus removal and characteristics of microbial community in the oxic-settling-anaerobic process by FISH analysis. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 9(7):1004–1010CrossRef
77.
Saidou H, Korchef A, Ben Moussa S, Ben Amor M (2009) Struvite precipitation by the dissolved CO2 degasification technique: impact of the airflow rate and pH. Chemosphere 74(2):338–343CrossRef
78.
Wang YY, Guo G, Wang H, Stephenson T, Guo JH, Ye L (2013) Long-term impact of anaerobic reaction time on the performance and granular characteristics of granular denitrifying biological phosphorus removal systems. Water Res 47(14):5326–5337CrossRef
79.
Ahn J, Daidou T, Tsuneda S, Hirata A (2002) Characterization of denitrifying phosphate-accumulating organisms cultivated under different electron acceptor conditions using polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis assay. Water Res 36(2):403–412CrossRef
80.
Kuba T, van Loosdrecht MCM, Heijnen JJ (1996) Phosphorus and nitrogen removal with minimal COD requirement by integration of denitrifying dephosphatation and nitrification in a two-sludge system. Water Res 30(7):1702–1710CrossRef
81.
Mulkerrins D, Dobson ADW, Colleran E (2004) Parameters affecting biological phosphate removal from wastewaters. Environ Int 30(2):249–259CrossRef
82.
Sibag M, Kim HS (2012) Nitrification denitrification enhanced biological phosphorous removal (NDEBPR) occurs in a lab-scale alternating hypoxic/oxic membrane bioreactor. Bioresour Technol 104:173–180CrossRef
83.
Zeng RJ, Saunders AM, Yuan Z, Blackall LL, Keller J (2003) Identification and comparison of aerobic and denitrifying polyphosphate-accumulating organisms. Biotechnol Bioeng 83(2):140–148CrossRef
84.
Wang Y-Z, Wang Y-K, He C-S, Yang H-Y, Sheng G-P, Shen J-Y, Mu Y, Yu H-Q (2015) Hydrodynamics of an electrochemical membrane bioreactor. Sci Rep 5:10387CrossRef
85.
Wang YK, Sheng GP, Shi BJ, Li WW, Yu HQ (2013) A novel electrochemical membrane bioreactor as a potential net energy producer for sustainable wastewater treatment. Sci Rep 3:1864CrossRef
86.
Zhang JS, Zhou JT, Liu Y, Fane AG (2010) A comparison of membrane fouling under constant and variable organic loadings in submerge membrane bioreactors. Water Res 44(18):5407–5413CrossRef
87.
Cornel P, Schaum C (2009) Phosphorus recovery from wastewater: needs, technologies and costs. Water Sci Technol 59(6):1069–1076CrossRef
88.
Jaffer Y, Clark TA, Pearce P, Parsons SA (2002) Potential phosphorus recovery by struvite formation. Water Res 36(7):1834–1842CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Intermittently Aerated MBR for Nutrients Removal and Phosphorus Recovery
verfasst von
Yunkun Wang
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Development of Novel Bioelectrochemical Membrane Separation Technologies for Wastewater Treatment and Resource Recovery

Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3077-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-15-3078-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3078-4_3