nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Interpretation and Application of the New York Convention in Turkey

verfasst von : Ergun Özsunay, Murat R. Özsunay

Erschienen in: Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Despite some difficulties in its application, the New York Convention is still the most successful convention in Turkish arbitration practice. This chapter, while indicating the principal problems and controversies surrounding the application of the New York Convention in light of judicial precedents, also provides a picture regarding its implementation in Turkey and the ongoing developments on Turkey’s way to becoming an arbitration-friendly country.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Interpretation and Application of the New York Convention in Taiwan

Nächstes Kapitel Interpretation and Application of the New York Convention in United Kingdom

See Baki Kuru, İstinaf Sistemine Göre Yazılmış Medeni Usul Hukuku (Istanbul, 2016) 931. In his opinion, not only domestic arbitral awards but also international arbitral awards are “Turkish arbitral awards” if they are made in Turkey; see also Özsunay, Ergun/Özsunay, Murat R., Arbitration in Turkey: An Analysis of Turkish Arbitration Legislation in Light of the UNCITRAL Model Law, ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Vol. 22/No. 2–2011, pp. 15–30.

Ibid at 6157.

Turgut Kalpsüz, Türkiye’de Milletlerarası Tahkim (Ankara, 2010) at 182–183.

Ziya Akıncı, Milletlerarasl Tahkim (Istanbul, 2013) at 321–329; Court of Cassation Decisions: YHGK, 7 November 1951, T-126-109, Y. TD. 18 February 1954, 487–530, Y. TD. 23 December 1955, 7745–8401, Y. 15th Civil Chamber, 20 June 1996, 2781/3533).

See the decision of the United Chambers of the Court of Cassation dated 9 June 1999, E. 999/19-467, K. 999/489 in Turgut Kalpsüz, 231.

Ergin Nomer and Cemal Şanlı, Devletler Hususi Hukuku 17^th edn (Istanbul, 2009) at 520.

Ziya Akıncı, Milletlerarası Tahkim 3^rd edn (Istanbul, 2013) 320–321.

For contrary opinion which also includes “the principle of procedural law”, see Turgut Kalpsüz, Türkiye’de Milletlerarası Tahkim 2^nd ed (Ankara, 2010) 197 et seq.

13th Civil Chamber of Court Appeals, file no. 8778, decision no. 4492, date: 25 April 1991.

15th Civil Chamber of Court Appeals, file no. 2032, decision no. 1554, date: 17 March 1994.

19th Civil Chamber of Court Appeals, file no. 7171, decision no. 7602, date: 9 November 2000 in Akıncı, at 356 fn. 638; 19^th Civil Chamber of Court Appeals, file no. 2007/380, decision no. 2007/5114, date: 21 May 2007.

15th Civil Chamber of Court Appeals, file no. 2008/262, decision no. 2008/2138, date: 3 April 2008.

11th Civil Chamber of Court Appeals, file no. 2009/3257, decision no. 2011/1675, date: 11 February 2011.

General Assembly of Court Appeals, file no. 19/467–489, date: 6 September 1999 in Turgut Kalpsüz 196.

See decision of 15^th Civil Chamber of Court Appeals, file no. 1979/1195, decision no. 1979/1330 date: 31 May 1979 denying enforcement of an award relating to rights in rem; Turgut Kalpsüz 29–31.

Turgut Kalpsüz, Türkiye’de Milletlerarası Tahkim 2^nd edn (Ankara, 2010) at 147.

Ziya Akıncı, Milletlerarası Tahkim 3^rd edn (Istanbul, 2013) 340–341.

See UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 with amendments as adopted in 2006 Part Three 39–40.

19^th Civil Chamber of Court Appeals, file no. 1998/6099, decision no. 1999/7735, date: 17 December 1998.

Nuray Ekşi, Enforcement of Annulled Arbitral Awards under the New York Convention, Seminar on International Arbitration (Ankara, 2009)

Ziya Akıncı, Method of Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, Seminar on International Arbitration (Ankara, 2008)

Ziya Akıncı, Milletlerarası Tahkim 3^rd edn (Istanbul, 2013)

Titel: Interpretation and Application of the New York Convention in Turkey
verfasst von: Ergun Özsunay
Murat R. Özsunay
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50913-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-50915-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50915-0_40