Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Smart Cities – Enabling Technologies for Future Living Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

14. Introduction to Architectural Design Optimization

verfasst von : Thomas Wortmann, Giacomo Nannicini

Erschienen in: City Networks

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter presents black-box (or derivative-free) optimization from the perspective of architectural design optimization. We introduce and compare single- and multi-objective optimization, discuss applications from architectural design and related fields, and survey the three main classes of black-box optimization algorithms: metaheuristics, direct search, and model-based methods. We also give an overview over optimization tools available to architectural designers and discuss criteria for choosing between different optimization algorithms. Finally, we survey recent benchmark results from both mathematical test problems and simulation-based problems from structural, building energy, and daylighting design. Based on these empirical results, we recommend the use of global direct search and model-based methods over metaheuristics such as genetic algorithms, especially when the budget of function evaluations is limited, for example, in the case of time-intensive simulations. When it is more important to understand the trade-off between performance criteria than to find good solutions and the budget of function evaluations is sufficient to approximate the Pareto front accurately, we recommend multi-objective, Pareto-based optimization algorithms.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Sustainable Urban Water Management
Literatur
1.
Asl, M.R., Stoupine, A., Zarrinmehr, S., Yan, W.: Optimo: a BIM-based multi-objective optimization tool. In: Martens, B., Wurzer, G., Grasl, T., et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 33rd eCAADe Conference. eCAADe and TU Wien, Vienna, AUT, pp. 673–682 (2015)
2.
Attia, S., Hamdy, M., O’Brien, W., Carlucci, S.: Assessing gaps and needs for integrating building performance optimization tools in net zero energy buildings design. Energ. Buildings. 60, 110–124 (2013)CrossRef
3.
Audet, C., Dennis, J.E.: Mesh adaptive direct search algorithms for constrained optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 17, 188–217 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
4.
Audet, C., Savard, G., Zghal, W.: A mesh adaptive direct search algorithm for multiobjective optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 204, 545–556 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
5.
Bader, J., Zitzler, E.: HypE: an Algorithm for Fast Hypervolume-Based Many-Objective Optimization. Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK). Department of Electrical Engineering Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich (2008)
6.
Besserud, K., Katz, N., Beghini, A.: Structural emergence: architectural and structural design collaboration at SOM. Archit. Des. 83, 48–55 (2013)
7.
8.
Binkley, C., Jeffries, P., Vola, M.: Design computation at Arup. In: Andia, A., Spiegelhalter, T. (eds.) Post-Parametric Automation in Design and Construction, pp. 113–119. Artech House, Boston/London (2014)
9.
Bradner, E., Iorio, F., Davis, M.: Parameters tell the design story: ideation and abstraction in design optimization. In: Proceedings of SimAUD. SCS, p. 26 (2014)
10.
Brownlee, A.E.I., Wright, J.A.: Constrained, mixed-integer and multi-objective optimisation of building designs by NSGA-II with fitness approximation. Appl. Soft Comput. 33, 114–126 (2015)CrossRef
11.
Chiandussi, G., Codegone, M., Ferrero, S., Varesio, F.E.: Comparison of multi-objective optimization methodologies for engineering applications. Comput. Math. Appl. 63, 912–942 (2012)
12.
Cichocka, J., Browne, W., Rodriguez, E.: Evolutionary optimization processes as design tools: implementation of a revolutionary swarm approach. In: Proceedings of 31th International PLEA Conference. Bologna, IT, (2015)
13.
Coello, C.A.C.: A comprehensive survey of evolutionary-based multiobjective optimization techniques. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 1, 269–308 (2013)CrossRef
14.
Conn, A., Scheinberg, K., Vicente, L.: Introduction to Derivative-Free Optimization. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2009)CrossRefMATH
15.
Conn, A.R., Gould, N.I.M., Toint, P.L.: Trust Region Methods. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, (2000)
16.
Costa, A., Nannicini, G.: RBFOpt: an Open-Source Library for Black-box Optimization with Costly Function Evaluations. Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore (2014)
17.
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6, 182–197 (2002)CrossRef
18.
19.
20.
Eisenhower, B., O’Neill, Z., Narayanan, S., et al.: A methodology for meta-model based optimization in building energy models. Energ. Buildings. 47, 292–301 (2012)CrossRef
21.
Emmerich, M.T.M., Hopfe, C.J., Marijt, R., et al: Evaluating optimization methodologies for future integration in building performance tools. In: Proceedings of the 8th Int. Conf. on Adaptive Computing in Design and Manufacture (ACDM). p. 7 (2008)
22.
Evins, R.: A review of computational optimisation methods applied to sustainable building design. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 22, 230–245 (2013)CrossRef
23.
Evins, R., Williams, C., Pointer, P., et al.: Multi-objective design optimisation: getting more for less. Proc. ICE – Civ. Eng. 165, 5–10 (2012)
24.
Gerber, D.J., Lin, S.-H.E.: Designing in complexity: simulation, integration, and multidisciplinary design optimization for architecture. Simulation. 90, 936–959 (2014)CrossRef
25.
Grasshopper®: Robert McNeel & Associates (2014)
26.
27.
Hamdy, M., Nguyen, A.-T., Hensen, J.L.M.: A performance comparison of multi-objective optimization algorithms for solving nearly-zero-energy-building design problems. Energ. Buildings. 121, 57–71 (2016)CrossRef
28.
Hansen, N., Ostermeier, A.: Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies. Evol. Comput. 9, 159–195 (2001)CrossRef
29.
Hansen, P., Mladenović, N.: Variable neighborhood search: principles and applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 130, 449–467 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
30.
Hare, W., Nutini, J., Tesfamariam, S.: A survey of non-gradient optimization methods in structural engineering. Adv. Eng. Softw. 59, 19–28 (2013)CrossRef
31.
Hasançebi, O., Çarbaş, S., Doğan, E., et al.: Performance evaluation of metaheuristic search techniques in the optimum design of real size pin jointed structures. Comput. Struct. 87, 284–302 (2009)CrossRef
32.
Heimrath, M.: ADO at Bollinger+Grohmann (2017)
33.
Hendrix, E.M.T., Tóth, B.G.: Introduction to Nonlinear and Global Optimization. Springer, New York (2010)CrossRefMATH
34.
Hladik, P., Lewis, C.J.: Singapore national stadium roof. Int. J. Archit. Comput. 8, 257–277 (2010)CrossRef
35.
36.
Holmström, K.: An adaptive radial basis algorithm (ARBF) for expensive black-box global optimization. J. Glob. Optim. 41, 447–464 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
37.
Hooke, R., Jeeves, T.A.: “Direct search” solution of numerical and statistical problems. J. ACM. 8, 212–229 (1961)CrossRefMATH
38.
39.
40.
Imbert, F., Frost, K.S., Fisher, A., et al.: Concurrent geometric, structural and environmental design: louvre Abu Dhabi. In: Hesselgren, L., Sharma, S., Wallner, J., et al. (eds.) Advances in Architectural Geometry 2012, pp. 77–90. Springer, Vienna (2013)CrossRef
41.
Johnson, S.G.: The NLopt nonlinear-optimization package. (2010)
42.
Jones, D.R., Perttunen, C.D., Stuckman, B.E.: Lipschitzian optimization without the Lipschitz constant. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 79, 157–181 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
43.
Jones, D.R., Schonlau, M., Welch, W.J.: Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J. Glob. Optim. 13, 455–492 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
44.
Kaelo, P., Ali, M.M.: Some variants of the controlled random search algorithm for global optimization. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 130, 253–264 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
45.
Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.: Particle swarm optimization. In: IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 1995. Proceedings. pp. 1942–1948 vol. 4 (1995)
46.
47.
Knowles, J.: ParEGO: a hybrid algorithm with on-line landscape approximation for expensive multiobjective optimization problems. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 10, 50–66 (2006)CrossRef
48.
Knowles, J., Nakayama, H.: Meta-modeling in multiobjective optimization. In: Branke, J., Deb, K., Miettinen, K., Słowiński, R. (eds.) Multiobjective Optimization, pp. 245–284. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2008)CrossRef
49.
Kolda, T., Lewis, R., Torczon, V.: Optimization by direct search: new perspectives on some classical and modern methods. SIAM Rev. 45, 385–482 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
50.
Koziel, S., Ciaurri, D.E., Leifsson, L.: Surrogate-based methods. In: Koziel, S., Yang, X.-S. (eds.) Computational Optimization, Methods and Algorithms, pp. 33–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRef
51.
52.
Luebkeman, C., Shea, K.: CDO: computational design + optimization in building practice. Arup J. 3, 17–21 (2005)
53.
Machairas, V., Tsangrassoulis, A., Axarli, K.: Algorithms for optimization of building design: a review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 31, 101–112 (2014)CrossRef
54.
Malkawi, A.: Performance simulation. In: Kolarevic, B., Malkawi, A. (eds.) Performative Architecture beyond Instrumentality, pp. 85–95. Taylor and Francis, Hoboken (2005)
55.
Marler, R.T., Arora, J.S.: Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 26, 369–395 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
56.
Miles, J.: Genetic algorithms for design. In: Waszczyszyn, Z. (ed.) Advances of Soft Computing in Engineering, pp. 1–56. Springer, Vienna (2010)
57.
Moré, J. J. and Wild, S. M.: 2009. Benchmarking derivative-free optimization algorithms. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 20 (1), 172–191
58.
Müller, J., Shoemaker, C.A.: Influence of ensemble surrogate models and sampling strategy on the solution quality of algorithms for computationally expensive black-box global optimization problems. J. Glob. Optim. 60, 123–144 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
59.
60.
Nguyen, A.-T., Reiter, S., Rigo, P.: A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis. Appl. Energy. 113, 1043–1058 (2014)CrossRef
61.
Palonen, M., Hamdy, M., Hasan, A.: MOBO a new software for multi-objective building performance optimization. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of the IBPSA. pp. 2567–2574 (2013)
62.
Pasternak, A., Kwiecinski, K.: High-rise Building Optimization: A Design Studio Curriculum. In: Proceedings of the 33rd eCAADe Conference. eCAADe and Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, TU Wien, Vienna, AUT, pp. 305–314 (2015)
63.
Powell, M.J.: A direct search optimization method that models the objective and constraint functions by linear interpolation. In: Gomez, S., Hennart, J.-P. (eds.) Advances in Optimization and Numerical Analysis, pp. 51–67. Springer, Dordrecht (1994)CrossRef
64.
Powell, M.J.: The BOBYQA Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization without Derivatives. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (2009)
65.
Regis, R.G., Shoemaker, C.A.: A stochastic radial basis function method for the global optimization of expensive functions. Inf. J. Comput. 19, 497–509 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
66.
Rios, L.M., Sahinidis, N.V.: Derivative-free optimization: a review of algorithms and comparison of software implementations. J. Glob. Optim. 56, 1247–1293 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
67.
Rowan, T.H.: Functional stability analysis of numerical algorithms. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas (1990)
68.
Rüdenauer, K., Dohmen, P.: Heuristic methods in architectural design optimization. In: 25th eCAADe Conference Proceedings, Frankfurt am Main, DE, pp. 507–614 (2007)
69.
70.
Scheurer, F.: Getting complexity organised. Autom. Constr. 16, 78–85 (2007)CrossRef
71.
Singh, S., Kensek, K.: Early design analysis using optimization techniques in design/practice. In: ASHRAE Conference Proceedings. ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, (2014)
72.
Steuer, R.E., Choo, E.-U.: An interactive weighted Tchebycheff procedure for multiple objective programming. Math. Program. 26, 326–344 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
73.
74.
Turrin, M., von Buelow, P., Stouffs, R.: Design explorations of performance driven geometry in architectural design using parametric modeling and genetic algorithms. Adv. Eng. Inform. 25, 656–675 (2011)CrossRef
75.
Vicente, L.N.: Worst case complexity of direct search. EURO. J. Comput. Optim. 1, 143–153 (2013)CrossRefMATH
76.
Vierlinger, R.: Multi objective design interface. Msc Thesis, Technische Universität Wien (2013)
77.
Wetter, M.: GenOpt–a generic optimization program. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International IBPSA Conference. Rio de Janeiro, BR, pp. 601–608 (2001)
78.
Wetter, M., Wright, J.: A comparison of deterministic and probabilistic optimization algorithms for nonsmooth simulation-based optimization. Build. Environ. 39, 989–999 (2004)CrossRef
79.
Wild, S.M., Regis, R.G., Shoemaker, C.A.: ORBIT: optimization by radial basis function interpolation in trust-regions. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 30, 3197–3219 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
80.
Woodbury, R.F.: Elements of Parametric Design. Routledge, London/New York (2010)
81.
Wortmann, T.: Opossum—a model-based optimization tool in grasshopper. In: Proceedings of the 22nd CAADRIA Conference, Hong Kong, CN, pp. 283–292 (2017)
82.
Wortmann, T., Costa, A., Nannicini, G., Schroepfer, T.: Advantages of surrogate models for architectural design optimization. AIEDAM. 29, 471–481 (2015)CrossRef
83.
Wortmann, T., Nannicini, G.: Black-box optimization for architectural design: An overview and quantitative comparison of metaheuristic, direct search, and model-based optimization methods. In: Chien, S.-F., Seungyeon, C., Schnabel, M.A., et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 21th CAADRIA Conference. CAADRIA, Hong Kong, pp. 177–186 (2016)
84.
Wortmann, T., Waibel, C., Nannicini, G., et al: Are genetic algorithms really the best choice in building energy optimization? In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Simulation for Architecture & Urban Design. Toronto, CA (2017)
85.
Yang, D., Sun, Y., Turrin, M., et al: Multi-objective and multidisciplinary design optimization of large sports building envelopes: a case study. In: Proceedings of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS) (2015)
86.
Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., Thiele, L.: SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm. Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK). Department of Electrical Engineering Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich (2001)
Metadaten
Titel
Introduction to Architectural Design Optimization
verfasst von
Thomas Wortmann
Giacomo Nannicini
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
City Networks

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65336-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-65338-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65338-9_14