Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

1. Introduction

verfasst von : Kyriazis Pitilakis, Helen Crowley, Amir M. Kaynia

Erschienen in: SYNER-G: Typology Definition and Fragility Functions for Physical Elements at Seismic Risk

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter outlines the main components, parameters and methods to derive fragility functions, which can be used in seismic risk assessment of different engineering systems and components at urban and regional scale. It provides the means of understanding the main factors governing this topic, introducing the subjects that will be extensively described and discussed in the subsequent chapters, where the fragility curves for buildings and all important components of the systems and infrastructures will be described in detail.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Nächstes Kapitel Modeling and Propagation of Uncertainties
Fußnoten
1
The fragility function manager tool is provided with the present volume at http://​extras.​springer.​com.
 
Literatur
Alexander D (2000) Confronting catastrophe: new perspectives on natural disasters. Oxford University Press, New York, p 282
American Lifelines Alliance, ALA (2001) Seismic fragility formulations for water systems. Part 1 – Guidelines, ASCE-FEMA, p 104
Applied Technology Council, ATC (1985) Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Report No. ATC-13, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA
Applied Technology Council, ATC (1991) Seismic vulnerability and impact of disruption of life lines in the conterminous United States. Report No. ATC-25, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA
Argyroudis S, Kaynia AM, Pitilakis K (2013) Development of fragility functions for geotech-nical constructions: application to cantilever retaining walls. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 50:106–116CrossRef
ASPROGE (2007) Aseismic protection of bridges. Research project, General Secretariat for Research and Technology, Greece
Bommer JJ, Acevedo AB (2004) The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis. J Earthq Eng 8:43–91
Calvi GM, Pinho R, Magenes G, Bommer JJ, Restrepo-Velez LF, Crowley H (2006) Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years. J Earthq Technol 43(3):75–104
Cavalieri F, Franchin P, Gehl P, Khazai B (2012) Quantitative assessment of social losses based on physical damage and interaction with infrastructural systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41(11):1569–1589CrossRef
Corigliano M (2007) Seismic response of deep tunnels in near-fault conditions. Ph.D. dissertation, Politecnicodi Torino, Italy, p 222
Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Foutch DA (2002) Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC/FEMA steel moment frame guidelines. J Struct Eng 1284:26–533
fib (2007) Seismic bridge design and retrofit – structural solutions: State-of-art report, fib Bulletin No. 39, International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib). ISBN 978-2-88394-079-6, p 300
Franchin P (ed) (2013) Methodology for systemic seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings, infrastructures, networks and socio-economic impacts. SYNER-G Reference Report 1, Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN 978-92-79-28975-0
Hancilar U, Taucer F (eds) (2013) Guidelines for typology definition of European physical assets for earthquake risk assessment. SYNER-G Reference Report 2, Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN 978-92-79-28973-6
Iervolino I, Galasso C, Cosenza E (2010) REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis. Bull Earthq Eng 8:339–362CrossRef
Kappos AJ, Panagopoulos G, Penelis G (2006) A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4(4):391–413CrossRef
Kaynia AM (ed) (2013) Guidelines for deriving seismic fragility functions of elements at risk: buildings, lifelines, transportation networks and critical facilities. SYNER-G Reference Report 4, Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN 978-92-79-28966-8
Khazai B (ed) (2013) Guidelines for the consideration of socio-economic impacts in seismic risk analysis. SYNER-G Reference Report 5, Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN 978-92-79-28968-2
Kim SH, Shinozuka M (2004) Development of fragility curves of bridges retrofitted by column jacketing. Probab Eng Mech 19:105–112CrossRef
LessLoss (2007) Risk mitigation for earthquakes and landslides, Research project, European Commission, GOCE-CT-2003-505448
Mackie K, Stojadinovic B (2003) Seismic demands for performance-based design of bridges. PEER Report 2003/16, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA
Mackie K, Stojadinovic B (2005) Fragility basis for California highway overpass bridge seismic decision making. PEER Report 2005/12, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA
Maruyama Y, Yamazaki F, Mizuno K, Tsuchiya Y, Yogai H (2010) Fragility curves for ex-pressway embankments based on damage datasets after recent earthquakes in Japan. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:1158–1167CrossRef
McKay MD, Beckman RJ, Conover WJ (1979) A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21(2):239–245
Mehanny SSF (2009) A broad-range power-law form scalar-based seismic intensity measure. Eng Struct 31:1354–1368CrossRef
Mid-America Earthquake Center (2009) Impact of New Madrid seismic zone earthquakes on the central USA. MAE Center Report No. 09-03
Milutinovic ZV, Trendafiloski WS (2003) RISK-UE WP4: vulnerability of current buildings
National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) (2004) HAZUS-MH: users’s manual and technical manuals. Report prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC
O’Rourke TD, Jeon SS, Toprak S, Cubrinovski M, Jung JK (2012) Underground lifeline system performance during the Canterbury earthquake sequence. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon, Portugal
Padgett JE, Nielson BG, DesRoches R (2008) Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37:711–725CrossRef
Pitilakis K, Argroudis S (eds) (2013) Systemic seismic vulnerability and loss assessment: validation studies. SYNER-G Reference Report 6, Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN 978-92-79-30840-6
Pitilakis KD, Karapetrou ST, Fotopoulou SD (2013) Consideration of aging and SSI effects on seismic vulnerability assessment of RC buildings. Bull Earthq Eng (submitted)
Porter K, Kennedy R, Bachman R (2007) Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering. Earthquake Spectra 23(2):471–489CrossRef
RISK-UE (2004) An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns. Research project, European Commission, DG ΧΙI2001-2004, CEC: EVK4-CT-2000-00014
Rossetto T, Elnashai A (2003) Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Eng Struct 25:1241–1263CrossRef
Rossetto T, Ioannou I, Grant DN (2013) Existing empirical fragility and vulnerability relationships: compendium and guide for selection. GEM Technical Report 2013-X, GEM Foundation, Pavia, Italy, April 2013, p 62
Sabetta F, Goretti A, Lucantoni A (1998) Empirical fragility curves from damage surveys and estimated strong ground-motion. In: 11th European conference on earthquake engineering, Paris, France
Schäfer D, Bosi A (2013) Systemic seismic vulnerability assessment: software users manual. SYNER-G Reference Report 7, Publications Office of the European Union (in press)
Seyedi D, Gehl P, Douglas J, Davenne L, Mezher N, Ghavamian S (2010) Development of seismic fragility surfaces for reinforced concrete buildings by means of nonlinear time-history analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39(1):91–108
Shome N, Cornell CA (1999) Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures. RMS Report-35, Reliability of Marine Structures Group, Stanford University, Stanford
Singhal A, Kiremedjian AS (1998) Bayesian updating of fragilities with application to RC frames. J Struct Eng 124(8):922–929CrossRef
Smerzini C, Galasso C, Iervolino I, Paolucci R (2012) Engineering ground motion selection based on displacement-spectrum compatibility. In: Proceedings of 15WCEE, Lisboa, PT. Paper No. 2354
Spence RJS, Coburn AW, Pomonis A (1992) Correlation of ground motion with building damage: the definition of a new damage-based seismic intensity scale. In: Proceedings of 10th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Balkema, Rotterdam
SRMLIFE (2007) Development of a global methodology for the vulnerability assessment and risk management of lifelines, infrastructures and critical facilities. Application to the metropolitan area of Thessaloniki. Research project, General Secretariat for Research and Technology, Greece
SYNER-G (2013) Systemic seismic vulnerability and risk analysis for buildings, lifeline networks and infrastructures safety gain. Research project, European Commission, ENV-2009-1-244061
Towashiraporn P, Duenas-Osorio L, Craig JI, Goodno BJ (2008) An application of the response surface metamodel in building seismic fragility estimation. In: Proceeding of 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China
Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2002) Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31:491–514CrossRef
Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2004) Applied incremental dynamic analysis. Earhq Spectra 20(2):523–553CrossRef
Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2005) Developing efficient scalar and vector intensity measures for IDA capacity estimation by incorporating elastic spectral shape information. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(13):1573–1600CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Introduction
verfasst von
Kyriazis Pitilakis
Helen Crowley
Amir M. Kaynia
Copyright-Jahr
2014
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Buch
SYNER-G: Typology Definition and Fragility Functions for Physical Elements at Seismic Risk

Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7871-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-94-007-7872-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2014

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7872-6_1