Skip to main content

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Is the Notion of Human Development Capitalocentric?

verfasst von : Byasdeb Dasgupta

Erschienen in: In Quest of Humane Development

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The very concept of human development as it is used today in the mainstream neoclassical economic and, also in practice (as it is used by UNDP to construct Human Development Index) is based upon Amartya Sen’s capability approach. And hence, it also incorporates Sen’s notion of Development as freedom. The question is which freedom. We know in a capitalistic economic space a human being is generally envisaged as direct producer that is, he/she is the creator of discretionary wealth in terms of creating surplus value for the sake of productive capitalists and for capital accumulation thereby. In the neoliberal space such direct producers are to be homo economicus—the term which was used first in the nineteenth century by some political economists in the context of the works of John Stuart Mill. To be homo economicus the economic man must be self-sufficiently efficient meaning capable of producing surplus value (the term used here in Marxian sense) given his/her level of education and skill, a certain basic quality of health and in the process he/she is supposed to take care of his/her well-being meaning capable of improving his/her quality of life—the “quality” of which is erected on the basis of his/her ability to satisfy his/her own self-interest (as is propounded by Adam Smith). Here, the connotation of human development is very much based upon certain basic conditions of market economy where market is constructed as panacea of all ills in the society including the development of individual human being in the capitalist society. In this paper an attempt is made to disinter the concept of human development from a class-focused Marxist framework as developed by Resnick and Wolff in 1987 in their seminal work Knowledge and Class. In doing this there is an endeavour to have a take on Sen’s concept of (human) development as freedom and strive to find out how the very idea of human development as it is today used in the official circle (UNDP and like) all over the world is guided by capitalocentric logic.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Chakrabarti, A., Dhar, A., & Cullenberg, S. (2012). World of the third and global capitalism. Worldview Publications. Chakrabarti, A., Dhar, A., & Cullenberg, S. (2012). World of the third and global capitalism. Worldview Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Chandler, D. (2013). Where is the human in human-centred approaches to development? A Critique of Amartya Sen’s ‘Development as Freedom’. In S. Mezzadra, J. Reid, & R. Samaddar (Eds.), The biopolitics of development—Reading Michel Foucault in the postcolonial present (pp. 67–86). Springer. Chandler, D. (2013). Where is the human in human-centred approaches to development? A Critique of Amartya Sen’s ‘Development as Freedom’. In S. Mezzadra, J. Reid, & R. Samaddar (Eds.), The biopolitics of development—Reading Michel Foucault in the postcolonial present (pp. 67–86). Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. Manchester School, 28(1954), 139–191.CrossRef Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. Manchester School, 28(1954), 139–191.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Resnick, S. A., & Wolff, R. D. (1987). Knowledge and class—A marxist critique of political economy. University of Chicago. Resnick, S. A., & Wolff, R. D. (1987). Knowledge and class—A marxist critique of political economy. University of Chicago.
Zurück zum Zitat Sen, A. (2000). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press. Sen, A. (2000). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart, F. (2013). Capabilities and human development: Beyond the individual—The critical role of social institutions and social competencies, Occasional Paper 2013/03. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Stewart, F. (2013). Capabilities and human development: Beyond the individual—The critical role of social institutions and social competencies, Occasional Paper 2013/03. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
Metadaten
Titel
Is the Notion of Human Development Capitalocentric?
verfasst von
Byasdeb Dasgupta
Copyright-Jahr
2022
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9579-7_2