Skip to main content

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Judgment Analysis for Real-Time Decision Support Using the Cognitive Shadow Policy-Capturing System

verfasst von : Daniel Lafond, Katherine Labonté, Aren Hunter, Heather F. Neyedli, Sébastien Tremblay

Erschienen in: Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The present work introduces a prototype intelligent cognitive assistant that continuously learns the decision pattern of the user online, instantly recognizes deviations from that pattern as potential errors and then alerts the user accordingly. We investigated the potential of this prototype system using a human-in-the-loop experiment designed to assess impacts on decision making performance, workload and trust in the decision support capability. Study participants interacted with a naval air-defence testbed to classify radar contacts as friendly, uncertain or hostile based on track parameters displayed on screen. The between-group experimental design included a control condition and two decision support conditions (with system reliability provided either offline or online). Results showed that both decision support conditions significantly improved task accuracy compared to the control condition. The advisory system was successful at improving human performance without burdening the user with excessive additional workload, even when providing reliability information in real time.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooksey, R.W.: Judgment Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego (1996) Cooksey, R.W.: Judgment Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego (1996)
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Meehl, P.E.: Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1954)CrossRef Meehl, P.E.: Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1954)CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammond, K.R.: Probabilistic functioning and the clinical method. Psychol. Rev. 62, 255–262 (1955)CrossRef Hammond, K.R.: Probabilistic functioning and the clinical method. Psychol. Rev. 62, 255–262 (1955)CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffman, P.J.: The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment. Psychol. Bull. 57, 116–131 (1960)CrossRef Hoffman, P.J.: The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment. Psychol. Bull. 57, 116–131 (1960)CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wigton, R.S.: Social judgment theory and medical judgment. Think. Reason 2, 175–190 (1996)CrossRef Wigton, R.S.: Social judgment theory and medical judgment. Think. Reason 2, 175–190 (1996)CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dawes, R.M.: A case study of graduate admissions: application of three principles of human decision making. Am. Psychol. 26, 180–188 (1971)CrossRef Dawes, R.M.: A case study of graduate admissions: application of three principles of human decision making. Am. Psychol. 26, 180–188 (1971)CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald, J.E.: Social judgment theory: applications to educational decision making. Educ. Adm. Q. 27, 343–357 (1991)CrossRef Heald, J.E.: Social judgment theory: applications to educational decision making. Educ. Adm. Q. 27, 343–357 (1991)CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ebert, R.J., Kruse, T.E.: Bootstrapping the security analyst. J. Appl. Psychol. 63, 110–119 (1978)CrossRef Ebert, R.J., Kruse, T.E.: Bootstrapping the security analyst. J. Appl. Psychol. 63, 110–119 (1978)CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Waller, W.S.: Brunswikian research in accounting and auditing. In: Human Judgment: The SJT view, pp. 247–272. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988) Waller, W.S.: Brunswikian research in accounting and auditing. In: Human Judgment: The SJT view, pp. 247–272. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988)
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dhami, M.K.: Psychological models of professional decision making. Psychol. Sci. 14, 175–180 (2003)CrossRef Dhami, M.K.: Psychological models of professional decision making. Psychol. Sci. 14, 175–180 (2003)CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Carretta, T.R.: U.S. Air Force pilot selection and training methods. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 71, 950–956 (2000) Carretta, T.R.: U.S. Air Force pilot selection and training methods. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 71, 950–956 (2000)
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Cropp, N., Banks, A., Elghali, L.: Expert decision making in a complex engineering environment: a comparison of the lens model, explanatory coherence, and matching heuristics. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Mak. 5, 255–276 (2011)CrossRef Cropp, N., Banks, A., Elghali, L.: Expert decision making in a complex engineering environment: a comparison of the lens model, explanatory coherence, and matching heuristics. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Mak. 5, 255–276 (2011)CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Karelaia, N., Hogarth, R.M.: Determinants of linear judgment: a meta-analysis of lens model studies. Psychol. Bull. 134, 404–426 (2008)CrossRef Karelaia, N., Hogarth, R.M.: Determinants of linear judgment: a meta-analysis of lens model studies. Psychol. Bull. 134, 404–426 (2008)CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lafond, D., Vallières, B.R., Vachon, F., Tremblay, S.: Judgment analysis in a dynamic multi-task environment: capturing non-linear policies using decision trees. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Mak. 11, 122–135 (2017)CrossRef Lafond, D., Vallières, B.R., Vachon, F., Tremblay, S.: Judgment analysis in a dynamic multi-task environment: capturing non-linear policies using decision trees. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Mak. 11, 122–135 (2017)CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolpert, D.H.: The lack of a priori distinctions between learning algorithms. Neural Comput. 8, 1341–1390 (1996)CrossRef Wolpert, D.H.: The lack of a priori distinctions between learning algorithms. Neural Comput. 8, 1341–1390 (1996)CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee, J., See, K.: Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. H. Factors 46, 50–80 (2004)CrossRef Lee, J., See, K.: Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. H. Factors 46, 50–80 (2004)CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Human Mental Workload, pp. 139–183. North Holland Press, Amsterdam (1988) Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Human Mental Workload, pp. 139–183. North Holland Press, Amsterdam (1988)
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A.M., Drury, C.G.: Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Int. J. Cognit. Ergon. 4, 53–71 (2000)CrossRef Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A.M., Drury, C.G.: Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Int. J. Cognit. Ergon. 4, 53–71 (2000)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Judgment Analysis for Real-Time Decision Support Using the Cognitive Shadow Policy-Capturing System
verfasst von
Daniel Lafond
Katherine Labonté
Aren Hunter
Heather F. Neyedli
Sébastien Tremblay
Copyright-Jahr
2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25629-6_13

Neuer Inhalt