Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
In Chap. 1, we suggested that the growth of the economy in China as a whole is a story of both top-down centrally managed capitalism (Lin 2009) and bottom-up grass-roots capitalism (Nee and Opper 2012). The former focused on the reform of state-owned enterprises and the attraction of foreign investment, while the latter allowed for the creation of a private economy without much policy guidance or support. Private individuals overcame extremely disadvantageous initial conditions and developed robust enterprises that became the major engine of growth for China. Nee and Opper (2012), through their five-year study of over 700 entrepreneurs in the Yangzi River Delta region, provided convincing evidence and a persuasive argument that this economic miracle is the result of the actions and ambitions of entrepreneurs. Since they could not rely on formal institutions, private entrepreneurs had to develop their own informal lending systems and networks of suppliers and distributors. They contributed a large proportion of the national GDP and provided employment as the state sector’s contributions to both declined steadily over the years. Formal institutional changes that legitimised the private firms’ existence and supported their further development came after their initial success. Private entrepreneurs, the ‘capitalists’ who were despised, scorned and viewed with suspicion in the early years of the reforms, are now legitimate members of Chinese society. Even though the sea is still turbulent and the entrepreneurs are still complaining about the difficult business environment and continued unfair treatment by the government relative to state-sector firms, their economic success is undeniable, earning social acceptance as well as raising expectations by both government and citizens of their role in contributing to a balanced economic and social development of China. Even though the future is uncertain, we can conclude from the solid results that thise resounding success can be credited to the ‘leadership’ or agency of the entrepreneurs and founders of these private enterprises. This conclusion is consistent with the ‘visible hand’ theory of the growth and development of industrial enterprises (Chandler 1978) in the West as well as the strategic choice theory of business and organisation management (Child 1972).
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Batjargal, B., & Liu, B. (2004). Entrepreneurs’ access to private equity in China: The role of social capital. Organization Science, 15(2), 159–171. CrossRef
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Thematic analysis and code development: Transforming qualitative information. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bryson, A., Forth, J. and Zhou, M. (2012). What do we know about China’s CEO’s? Evidence from across the whole economy. NIESR Discussion Paper No. 397 . 25 August, National Institute of Economic and Social Research. Retrieved February 16, 2012, from http://www.niesr.ac.uk/sites/default/files/publications/dp397.pdf
Calder, B. J. (1977). An attribution theory of leadership. In B. M. Staw & G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New direction in organizational behavior (pp. 179–204). Chicago, IL: St. Clair.
Chandler, A. D. (1978). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chen, C.-C., & Lee, Y.-T. (Eds.) (2008). Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, C. C., Chen, X.-P., & Huang, S. (2013). Chinese Guanxi: An integrative review and new directions for future research. Management and Organization Review, 9, 167–207. CrossRef
Chen, L., Yang, B., & Jing, R. (2015). Paternalistic leadership, team conflict, and TMT decision effectiveness: Interactions in the Chinese context. Management and Organization Review, 11(4), 739–762. CrossRef
Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1–22. CrossRef
Collins, J. C. (2001). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap… and others don’t. New York: Jim Collins.
Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In A. S. Tsui, E. Weldon, & J. T. Li (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context (pp. 84–127). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
Fu, P. P., Tsui, A. S., Liu, J., & Li, L. (2010). Pursuit of whose happiness? Executive leaders’ transformational behaviors and personal values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2), 222–254. CrossRef
Hiller, N., & Hambrick, D. (2005). Conceptualizing executive hubris: The role of (hyper-) core self-evaluations in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 297–319. CrossRef
House, R., Hanges, P., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, P. (Eds.) (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The Globe study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jia, L., You, S., & Du, Y. (2012). Chinese context and theoretical contributions to management and organization research: A three-decade review. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 173–209. CrossRef
Krug, B. (2004). China’s rational entrepreneurs: The development of the new private sector. New York: Routledge.
Li, H. Y., & Zhang, Y. (2007). The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China’s transition economy. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8), 791–804. CrossRef
Li, J., & Tsui, A. S. (2002). A citation analysis of management and organization research in the Chinese context: 1984–1999. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(1), 87–107. CrossRef
Li, J., & Tang, Y. I. (2010). CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 45–68. CrossRef
Li, X., & Liang, X. (2015). A Confucian social model of political appointments among Chinese private entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 592–617.
Lin, N. (2011). Capitalism in China: A Centrally Managed Capitalism (CMC) and its future. Management and Organization Review, 7, 63–96. CrossRef
Luo, Y., Huang, Y., & Wang, S. L. (2012). Guanxi and organizational performance: A meta-analysis. Management and Organization Review, 8, 139–172. CrossRef
Ma, L., & Tsui, A. S. (2015). Traditional Chinese philosophy and contemporary leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 13–24. CrossRef
Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. (1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 78–102. CrossRef
Nee, V., & Opper, S. (2012). Capitalism from below: Market and institutional change in China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossRef
Ou, A. Y., Tsui, A. S., Kinicki, A. J., Waldman, D. A., Xiao, Z., & Song, L. J. (2014). Humble chief executive officers’ connections to top management team integration and middle managers’ responses. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(1): 34–72.
Owens, B. (2009). Humility in organizational leadership. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Parsons, T., & Shils, E. A. (1951). Toward a general theory of action: Theoretical foundation for the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossRef
Pfeffer, J. (1977). The ambiguity of leadership. Academy of Management Review, 2, 104–112.
Pfeffer, J. (1981). Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. Research in Organizational Behavior, 3, 1–52.
Redding, S. G. (1990). The spirit of Chinese capitalism. New York: Walter de Gruyter. CrossRef
Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schlevogt, K.-A. (2002). The art of Chinese management: Theory, evidence, and applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
Song, L. J., Zhang, X., & Wu, J. B. (2014). A multilevel analysis of middle manager performance: The role of CEO and top manager leadership. Management and Organization Review, 10(2), 275–297.
Tsui, A. S., Schoonhove, C. B., Meyer, M. W., Lau, C. M., & Milkovich, G. T. (2004a). Organization and management in the midst of societal transformation: The People’s Republic of China. Organization Science, 15(2), 133–144. CrossRef
Tsui, A. S., Wang, H. U. I., Xin, K., Zhang, L., & Fu, P. P. (2004b). ‘Let a thousand flowers bloom’: Variation of leadership styles among Chinese CEOs. Organizational Dynamics, 33(1), 5–20. CrossRef
Tsui, A. S. (2006). Editorial: Contextualization in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 2(1), 1–13.
Tsui, A. S., Zhang, Z. X., Wang, H., Xin, K. R., & Wu, J. B. (2006). Unpacking the relationship between CEO leadership behavior and organizational culture. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(2), 113–137. CrossRef
Wang, H., Tsui, A. S., & Xin, K. R. (2011). CEO leadership behaviors, organizational performance, and employees’ attitudes. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 92–105. CrossRef
Weihrich, H. (1990). Management practices in the United States, Japan, and the People’s Republic of China. Industrial Management, 32, 3–7.
Westwood, R. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for ‘paternalistic leadership’ among the overseas Chinese. Organization Studies, 18, 445–480. CrossRef
Wu, M., Huang, X., & Li, C. (2012). Perceived interactional justice and trust-in-supervisor as mediators for paternalistic leadership. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 97–121. CrossRef
Xin, K. R., & Pearce, J. L. (1996). Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1641–1658. CrossRef
Yin, R.K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
Zhang, Y., Waldman, D., Han, Y., & Li, X. (2015). Paradoxical leader behavior in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal. doi: 10.5465/amj.2012.0995.
Zhang, Z. X., Chen, C. C., Liu, L. A., & Liu, X. F. (2008). Chinese tradition and Western theories: Influences on business leadership in China. In C. C. Chen & Y. T. Lee (Eds.), Leadership and management in China: Philosophy, theories and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, Z. X., Chen, Z. X., Chen, Y. R., & Ang, S. (2014). Business leadership in the Chinese context: Trends, findings, and implications. Management and Organization Review, 10, 199–221.
- Leadership Insights from Published Studies on Chinese Top Executives
Anne S. Tsui
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Voraussetzungen für wirtschaftliche additive Fertigung/© Marco2811 | Fotolia