Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

The European Project OpenUP: OPENing UP New Methods, Indicators and Tools for Peer Review, Impact Measurement and Dissemination of Research Results

verfasst von : Alessia Bardi, Vittore Casarosa, Paolo Manghi

Erschienen in: Digital Libraries and Multimedia Archives

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Open Access and Open Scholarship are substantially changing the way scholarly artefacts are evaluated, published and assessed, while the introduction of new technologies and media in scientific workflows has changed the “how and to whom” science is communicated, and how stakeholders interact with the scientific community. OpenUP addresses key aspects and challenges of the currently transforming science landscape. Its main objectives are to: (i) identify and determine new mechanisms, processes and tools for the peer-review of all types of research results (publications, data, software, processes, etc.); (ii) explore, identify and classify innovative dissemination mechanisms with an outreach aim towards businesses and industry, education, and society as a whole; (iii) analyse and identify a set of novel indicators that assess the impact of research results and correlate them to channels of dissemination.
OpenUP is engaged with research communities from life sciences, social sciences, energy, arts and humanities, implementing a series of hands-on pilots to assess and verify the proposed new mechanisms for the cycle review-disseminate-assess, to understand how these mechanisms correspond to the requirements and needs of the research communities. The final outcome of the project will be a set of concrete, practical, validated policy recommendations and guidelines for all stakeholders, namely academia, industry and government institutions.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Aksnes, D.W., Schneider, J.W., Gunnarsson, M.: Ranking national research systems by citation Indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods. J. Informetrics 6, 36–43 (2012)CrossRef Aksnes, D.W., Schneider, J.W., Gunnarsson, M.: Ranking national research systems by citation Indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods. J. Informetrics 6, 36–43 (2012)CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., Wouters, P.: Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective? J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66(10), 2003–2019 (2014) Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., Wouters, P.: Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective? J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66(10), 2003–2019 (2014)
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Craig, I.D., Plume, A.M., McVeigh, M.E., Pringle, J., Amin, M.: Do open access articles have greater citation impact?: a critical review of the literature. J. Informetrics 1(3), 239–248 (2007)CrossRef Craig, I.D., Plume, A.M., McVeigh, M.E., Pringle, J., Amin, M.: Do open access articles have greater citation impact?: a critical review of the literature. J. Informetrics 1(3), 239–248 (2007)CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dinsmore, A., Dolby, K.: Alternative perspectives on impact: The potential of ALMs and altmetrics to inform funders about research impact. PLoS Biol. 12 (2014) Dinsmore, A., Dolby, K.: Alternative perspectives on impact: The potential of ALMs and altmetrics to inform funders about research impact. PLoS Biol. 12 (2014)
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Egghe, L., Rousseau, R., van Hooydonk, G.: Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 51(2), 145–157 (2000)CrossRef Egghe, L., Rousseau, R., van Hooydonk, G.: Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 51(2), 145–157 (2000)CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gauffriau, M., Larsen, P.O.: Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies. Scientometrics 64(1), 85–93 (2005)CrossRef Gauffriau, M., Larsen, P.O.: Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies. Scientometrics 64(1), 85–93 (2005)CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gunn, W.: Social signals reflect academic impact: what it means when a scholar adds a paper to mendeley. Inf. Stand. Q. 25(2), 1–8 (2013). ISSN 1041-0031 Gunn, W.: Social signals reflect academic impact: what it means when a scholar adds a paper to mendeley. Inf. Stand. Q. 25(2), 1–8 (2013). ISSN 1041-0031
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Guthrie, S., Guérin, B., Wu, H., Sharif I., Wooding, S.: Alternatives to Peer Review in Research Project Funding, RAND report 2013 update. Rand Europe, April 2013 Guthrie, S., Guérin, B., Wu, H., Sharif I., Wooding, S.: Alternatives to Peer Review in Research Project Funding, RAND report 2013 update. Rand Europe, April 2013
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Haustein, S., Sugimoto, C.R., Larivière, V.: Social media in scholarly communication. Aslib J. Inf. Manage. 67(3) (2015) Haustein, S., Sugimoto, C.R., Larivière, V.: Social media in scholarly communication. Aslib J. Inf. Manage. 67(3) (2015)
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hicks, D., Wouters, P.: The leiden manifesto for research metrics. Nature 520(7548), 429–431 (2015)CrossRef Hicks, D., Wouters, P.: The leiden manifesto for research metrics. Nature 520(7548), 429–431 (2015)CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Peroni, S., Dutton, A., Gray, T., Shotton, D.: Setting our bibliographic references free: towards open citation data. J. Documentation 71(2), 253–277 (2015)CrossRef Peroni, S., Dutton, A., Gray, T., Shotton, D.: Setting our bibliographic references free: towards open citation data. J. Documentation 71(2), 253–277 (2015)CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Roemer, R.C., Borchardt, R.: From bibliometrics to altmetrics. Coll. Res. Libr. News 73(10), 596–600 (2012)CrossRef Roemer, R.C., Borchardt, R.: From bibliometrics to altmetrics. Coll. Res. Libr. News 73(10), 596–600 (2012)CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sotudeh, H., Ghasempour, Z., Yaghtin, M.: The citation advantage of author-pays model: the case of Springer and Elsevier OA journals. Scientometrics 104, 581–608 (2015)CrossRef Sotudeh, H., Ghasempour, Z., Yaghtin, M.: The citation advantage of author-pays model: the case of Springer and Elsevier OA journals. Scientometrics 104, 581–608 (2015)CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Waltman, L., Van Eck, N.J.: The inconsistency of the h-index. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 63(2), 406–415 (2012)CrossRef Waltman, L., Van Eck, N.J.: The inconsistency of the h-index. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 63(2), 406–415 (2012)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The European Project OpenUP: OPENing UP New Methods, Indicators and Tools for Peer Review, Impact Measurement and Dissemination of Research Results
verfasst von
Alessia Bardi
Vittore Casarosa
Paolo Manghi
Copyright-Jahr
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73165-0_24

Neuer Inhalt