Skip to main content

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

29. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Software

verfasst von : H. Roland Weistroffer, Yan Li

Erschienen in: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis

Verlag: Springer New York

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We provide an updated overview of the state of multiple criteria decision support software. Many methods and approaches have been proposed in the literature to handle multiple criteria decision analysis, and there is an abundance of software that implements or supports many of these approaches. Our review is structured around several decision considerations when searching for appropriate available software.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Agrell, P.J., Steuer, R.E.: ACADEA—a decision support system for faculty performance reviews. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 9(5), 191–204 (2000)CrossRef Agrell, P.J., Steuer, R.E.: ACADEA—a decision support system for faculty performance reviews. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 9(5), 191–204 (2000)CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bana e Costa, C.A., Vansnick, J.-C.: The MACBETH approach: basic ideas, software, and an application. In: Meskens, N., Roubens, M. (eds.) Advances in Decision Analysis, pp. 131–157. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999) Bana e Costa, C.A., Vansnick, J.-C.: The MACBETH approach: basic ideas, software, and an application. In: Meskens, N., Roubens, M. (eds.) Advances in Decision Analysis, pp. 131–157. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999)
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Belton, V., Stewart, T.J.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)CrossRef Belton, V., Stewart, T.J.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bisdorff, R., Meyer, P., Roubens, M.: RUBIS: a bipolar-valued outranking method for the choice problem. 4OR: Q. J. Oper. Res. 6(2), 143–165 (2008) Bisdorff, R., Meyer, P., Roubens, M.: RUBIS: a bipolar-valued outranking method for the choice problem. 4OR: Q. J. Oper. Res. 6(2), 143–165 (2008)
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Brans, J.-P., Mareschal, B.: The PROMCALC & GAIA decision support system for multicriteria decision aid. Decis. Support. Syst. 12(4–5), 297–310 (1994)CrossRef Brans, J.-P., Mareschal, B.: The PROMCALC & GAIA decision support system for multicriteria decision aid. Decis. Support. Syst. 12(4–5), 297–310 (1994)CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Brans, J.P.: L’ingénierie de la décision: élaboration d’instruments d’aide à la décision. La méthode PROMETHEE. L’aide à la décision: Nature, Instruments et Perspectives d’Avenir, pp. 183–213. Presses de l’Université Laval, Québec (1982) Brans, J.P.: L’ingénierie de la décision: élaboration d’instruments d’aide à la décision. La méthode PROMETHEE. L’aide à la décision: Nature, Instruments et Perspectives d’Avenir, pp. 183–213. Presses de l’Université Laval, Québec (1982)
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Brans, J.P., Vincke, P.: A preference ranking organisation method: the PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Manag. Sci. 31(6), 647–656 (1985)CrossRef Brans, J.P., Vincke, P.: A preference ranking organisation method: the PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Manag. Sci. 31(6), 647–656 (1985)CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Brans, J.P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B.: How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 24(2), 228–238 (1986)CrossRef Brans, J.P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B.: How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 24(2), 228–238 (1986)CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Buede, D.: Decision analysis software: aiding the development of insight. OR/MS Today 20(2), 52–60 (1993) Buede, D.: Decision analysis software: aiding the development of insight. OR/MS Today 20(2), 52–60 (1993)
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cahon, S., Melab, N., Talbi, E.G.: ParadisEO: a framework for the reusable design of parallel and distributed metaheuristics. J. Heuristics 10(3), 357–380 (2004)CrossRef Cahon, S., Melab, N., Talbi, E.G.: ParadisEO: a framework for the reusable design of parallel and distributed metaheuristics. J. Heuristics 10(3), 357–380 (2004)CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chelst, K., Canbolat, Y.B.: Value-Added Decision Making for Managers. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012) Chelst, K., Canbolat, Y.B.: Value-Added Decision Making for Managers. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012)
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, J.Q., Lee, S.M.: An exploratory cognitive DSS for strategic decision making. Decis. Support Syst. 36(2), 147–160 (2003)CrossRef Chen, J.Q., Lee, S.M.: An exploratory cognitive DSS for strategic decision making. Decis. Support Syst. 36(2), 147–160 (2003)CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho, K.T.: Multicriteria decision methods: an attempt to evaluate and unify. Math. Comput. Model. 37(9–10), 1099–1119 (2003)CrossRef Cho, K.T.: Multicriteria decision methods: an attempt to evaluate and unify. Math. Comput. Model. 37(9–10), 1099–1119 (2003)CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Clímaco, J., Antunes, C.H.: Implementation of a user friendly software package – a guided tour of TRIMAP. Math. Comput. Model. 12(10–11), 1299–1309 (1989)CrossRef Clímaco, J., Antunes, C.H.: Implementation of a user friendly software package – a guided tour of TRIMAP. Math. Comput. Model. 12(10–11), 1299–1309 (1989)CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Csáki, P., Rapcsák, T., Turchányi, P., Vermes, M.: R and D for group decision aid in Hungary by WINGDSS, a Microsoft Windows based Group Decision Support System. Decis. Support Syst. 14(3), 205–217 (1995)CrossRef Csáki, P., Rapcsák, T., Turchányi, P., Vermes, M.: R and D for group decision aid in Hungary by WINGDSS, a Microsoft Windows based Group Decision Support System. Decis. Support Syst. 14(3), 205–217 (1995)CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L.: A framework for analysing decisions under risk. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 104(3), 474–484 (1998)CrossRef Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L.: A framework for analysing decisions under risk. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 104(3), 474–484 (1998)CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L.: Computing upper and lower bounds in interval decision trees. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181(2), 808–816 (2007)CrossRef Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L.: Computing upper and lower bounds in interval decision trees. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181(2), 808–816 (2007)CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping. Ann. Math. Stat. 38, 325–339 (1967)CrossRef Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping. Ann. Math. Stat. 38, 325–339 (1967)CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Dias, L., Clímaco, J.: ELECTRE TRI for groups with imprecise information on parameter values. Group Decis. Negot. 9(5), 355–377 (2000)CrossRef Dias, L., Clímaco, J.: ELECTRE TRI for groups with imprecise information on parameter values. Group Decis. Negot. 9(5), 355–377 (2000)CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Dias, L.C., Clímaco, J.N.: Additive aggregation with variable interdependent parameters: the VIP analysis software. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 51(9), 1070–1082 (2000)CrossRef Dias, L.C., Clímaco, J.N.: Additive aggregation with variable interdependent parameters: the VIP analysis software. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 51(9), 1070–1082 (2000)CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Dias, L.C., Mousseau, V., Figueira, J., Clímaco, J., Silva, C.G.: IRIS 1.0 software. Newsletter of the European Working Group “Multicriteria Aid for Decisions” 3(5), 4–6 (2002) Dias, L.C., Mousseau, V., Figueira, J., Clímaco, J., Silva, C.G.: IRIS 1.0 software. Newsletter of the European Working Group “Multicriteria Aid for Decisions” 3(5), 4–6 (2002)
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Druzdzel, M.J.: SMILE: Structural Modeling, Inference, and Learning Engine and GeNIe: a development environment for graphical decision-theoretic models. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Eleventh Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Orlando, pp. 902–903 (1999) Druzdzel, M.J.: SMILE: Structural Modeling, Inference, and Learning Engine and GeNIe: a development environment for graphical decision-theoretic models. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Eleventh Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Orlando, pp. 902–903 (1999)
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Dyer, J.S., Fishburn, P.C., Steuer, R.E., Wallenius, J., Zionts, S.: Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: the next ten years. Manag. Sci. 38(5), 645–654 (1992)CrossRef Dyer, J.S., Fishburn, P.C., Steuer, R.E., Wallenius, J., Zionts, S.: Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: the next ten years. Manag. Sci. 38(5), 645–654 (1992)CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards, W.: How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 7(5), 326–340 (1977)CrossRef Edwards, W.: How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 7(5), 326–340 (1977)CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards, W., Barron, F.H.: SMARTS and SMARTER: improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 60(3), 306–325 (1994)CrossRef Edwards, W., Barron, F.H.: SMARTS and SMARTER: improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 60(3), 306–325 (1994)CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Farquhar, P.H.: Utility assessment methods. Manag. Sci. 30(11), 1283–1300 (1984)CrossRef Farquhar, P.H.: Utility assessment methods. Manag. Sci. 30(11), 1283–1300 (1984)CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Figueira, J., Mousseau, V., Roy, B.: ELECTRE methods. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 133–162. Springer, Boston (2005)CrossRef Figueira, J., Mousseau, V., Roy, B.: ELECTRE methods. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 133–162. Springer, Boston (2005)CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Geldermann, J., Zhang, K.: Software review: “Decision Lab 2000”. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 10(6), 317–323 (2001)CrossRef Geldermann, J., Zhang, K.: Software review: “Decision Lab 2000”. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 10(6), 317–323 (2001)CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R.: The Use of Rough Sets and Fuzzy Sets in MCDM. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999)CrossRef Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R.: The Use of Rough Sets and Fuzzy Sets in MCDM. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999)CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R.: Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 129(1), 1–47 (2001)CrossRef Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R.: Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 129(1), 1–47 (2001)CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Greco, S., Mousseau, V., Słowiński, R.: Ordinal regression revisited: multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 191(2), 416–436 (2008)CrossRef Greco, S., Mousseau, V., Słowiński, R.: Ordinal regression revisited: multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 191(2), 416–436 (2008)CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen, P., Ombler, F.: A new method for scoring additive multi-attribute value models using pairwise rankings of alternatives. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 15(3–4), 87–107 (2008)CrossRef Hansen, P., Ombler, F.: A new method for scoring additive multi-attribute value models using pairwise rankings of alternatives. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 15(3–4), 87–107 (2008)CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurwicz, L.: Optimality criteria for decision making under ignorance. Cowles Commission Discussion Paper, Statistics 370 (1951) Hurwicz, L.: Optimality criteria for decision making under ignorance. Cowles Commission Discussion Paper, Statistics 370 (1951)
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Siskos, J.: Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making: the UTA method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 10(2), 151–164 (1982)CrossRef Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Siskos, J.: Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making: the UTA method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 10(2), 151–164 (1982)CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Wiley, New York (1976) Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Wiley, New York (1976)
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly, G.: The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Norton, New York (1955) Kelly, G.: The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Norton, New York (1955)
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Liefooghe, A., Basseur, M., Jourdan, L., Talbi, E.-G.: ParadisEO-MOEO: a framework for evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In: Obayashi, S., Deb, K., Poloni, C., Hiroyasu, T., Murata, T. (eds.) Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, Vol 4403 of Lecure Notes in Computer Science, pp. 386–400. Springer, Berlin (2007) Liefooghe, A., Basseur, M., Jourdan, L., Talbi, E.-G.: ParadisEO-MOEO: a framework for evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In: Obayashi, S., Deb, K., Poloni, C., Hiroyasu, T., Murata, T. (eds.) Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, Vol 4403 of Lecure Notes in Computer Science, pp. 386–400. Springer, Berlin (2007)
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Limayem, M., DeSanctis, G.: Providing decisional guidance for multicriteria decision making in groups. Inf. Syst. Res. 11(4), 386–401 (2000)CrossRef Limayem, M., DeSanctis, G.: Providing decisional guidance for multicriteria decision making in groups. Inf. Syst. Res. 11(4), 386–401 (2000)CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Löhne, A.: Vector Optimization with Infimum and Supremum. Springer, Berlin (2011)CrossRef Löhne, A.: Vector Optimization with Infimum and Supremum. Springer, Berlin (2011)CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Lotov, A.V., Berezkin, V.E., Kamenev, G.K.: Approximation and visualization of the Pareto frontier for non-convex multi-criteria problems. Dokl. Math. 66(2), 260–262 (2002) Lotov, A.V., Berezkin, V.E., Kamenev, G.K.: Approximation and visualization of the Pareto frontier for non-convex multi-criteria problems. Dokl. Math. 66(2), 260–262 (2002)
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Lotov, A.V., Bushenkov, V.A., Chernov, A.V., Gusev, D.V., Kamenev, G.K.: INTERNET, GIS, and interactive decision maps. J. Geogr. Inf. Decis. Anal. 1(2), 118–149 (1997) Lotov, A.V., Bushenkov, V.A., Chernov, A.V., Gusev, D.V., Kamenev, G.K.: INTERNET, GIS, and interactive decision maps. J. Geogr. Inf. Decis. Anal. 1(2), 118–149 (1997)
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Lotov, A.V., Bushenkov, V.A., Kamenev, G.K.: Feasible Goals Method – Search for Smart Decisions. Computing Centre RAS, Moscow (2001) Lotov, A.V., Bushenkov, V.A., Kamenev, G.K.: Feasible Goals Method – Search for Smart Decisions. Computing Centre RAS, Moscow (2001)
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Lourenço, J.C., Morton, A., Bana e Costa, C.A.: PROBE – a multicriteria decision support system for portfolio robustness evaluation. Decis. Support Syst. 54(1), 534–555 (2012) Lourenço, J.C., Morton, A., Bana e Costa, C.A.: PROBE – a multicriteria decision support system for portfolio robustness evaluation. Decis. Support Syst. 54(1), 534–555 (2012)
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsatsinis, N.F., Siskos, Y.: MARKEX: an intelligent decision support system for product development decisions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 113(2), 336–354 (1999)CrossRef Matsatsinis, N.F., Siskos, Y.: MARKEX: an intelligent decision support system for product development decisions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 113(2), 336–354 (1999)CrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Miettinen, K., Mäkelä, M.M.: Synchronous approach in interactive multiobjective optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 170(3), 909–922 (2006)CrossRef Miettinen, K., Mäkelä, M.M.: Synchronous approach in interactive multiobjective optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 170(3), 909–922 (2006)CrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Monte, L., Brittain, J.E., Gallego, E., Håkanson, L., Hofman, D., Jiménez, A.: MOIRA-PLUS: a decision support system for the management of complex fresh water ecosystems contaminated by radionuclides and heavy metals. Comput. Geosci. 35(5), 880–896 (2009)CrossRef Monte, L., Brittain, J.E., Gallego, E., Håkanson, L., Hofman, D., Jiménez, A.: MOIRA-PLUS: a decision support system for the management of complex fresh water ecosystems contaminated by radionuclides and heavy metals. Comput. Geosci. 35(5), 880–896 (2009)CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Mousseau, V., Figueira, J., Dias, L., Gomes da Silva, C., Clímaco, J.: Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 147(1), 72–93 (2003) Mousseau, V., Figueira, J., Dias, L., Gomes da Silva, C., Clímaco, J.: Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 147(1), 72–93 (2003)
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Mousseau, V., Slowinski, R., Zielniewicz, P.: A user-oriented implementation of the ELECTRE-TRI method integrating preference elicitation support. Comput. Oper. Res. 27(7–8), 757–777 (2000)CrossRef Mousseau, V., Slowinski, R., Zielniewicz, P.: A user-oriented implementation of the ELECTRE-TRI method integrating preference elicitation support. Comput. Oper. Res. 27(7–8), 757–777 (2000)CrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Munda, G.: Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (1995)CrossRef Munda, G.: Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (1995)CrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Mustajoki, J., Marttunen, M.: Comparison of multi-criteria decision analytical software – searching for ideas for developing a new EIA-specific multi-criteria software. IMPERIA Project Report, University of Jyväskylä, Finland (2013) Mustajoki, J., Marttunen, M.: Comparison of multi-criteria decision analytical software – searching for ideas for developing a new EIA-specific multi-criteria software. IMPERIA Project Report, University of Jyväskylä, Finland (2013)
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Newman, J.W.: Management Applications of Decision Theory. Harper & Row, New York (1971) Newman, J.W.: Management Applications of Decision Theory. Harper & Row, New York (1971)
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Papamichail, K.N., French, S.: Decision support in nuclear emergencies. J. Hazard. Mater. 71(1–3), 321–342 (2000)CrossRef Papamichail, K.N., French, S.: Decision support in nuclear emergencies. J. Hazard. Mater. 71(1–3), 321–342 (2000)CrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Patchak, W.M.: Software survey: decision analysis. OR/MS Today 39(5), 39–49 (2012) Patchak, W.M.: Software survey: decision analysis. OR/MS Today 39(5), 39–49 (2012)
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Poles, S., Vassileva, M., Sasaki, D.: Multiobjective optimization software. In: Branke, J., Deb, K., Miettinen, K., Słowinski, R. (eds.) Multiobjective Optimization. pp. 329–348. Springer, Berlin (2008) Poles, S., Vassileva, M., Sasaki, D.: Multiobjective optimization software. In: Branke, J., Deb, K., Miettinen, K., Słowinski, R. (eds.) Multiobjective Optimization. pp. 329–348. Springer, Berlin (2008)
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Potapov, M.A., Kabanov, P.N.: SOLVEX – system for solving nonlinear, global and multicriteria problems. In: Proceedings 3rd IFIP WG-7.6 Working Conference on Optimization-Based Computer-Aided Modelling and Design, Prague, pp. 343–347 (1995) Potapov, M.A., Kabanov, P.N.: SOLVEX – system for solving nonlinear, global and multicriteria problems. In: Proceedings 3rd IFIP WG-7.6 Working Conference on Optimization-Based Computer-Aided Modelling and Design, Prague, pp. 343–347 (1995)
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Ríos Insua, D., Gallego, E., Mateos, A., Ríos-Insua, S.: MOIRA: a decision support system for decision making on aquatic ecosystems contaminated by radioactive fallout. Ann. Oper. Res. 95(1), 341–364 (2000)CrossRef Ríos Insua, D., Gallego, E., Mateos, A., Ríos-Insua, S.: MOIRA: a decision support system for decision making on aquatic ecosystems contaminated by radioactive fallout. Ann. Oper. Res. 95(1), 341–364 (2000)CrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Roy, B.: How outranking relation helps multiple criteria decision making. In: Cochrane, J., Zeleny, M. (eds.) Topics in Multiple Criteria Decision Making, pp. 179–201. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia (1973) Roy, B.: How outranking relation helps multiple criteria decision making. In: Cochrane, J., Zeleny, M. (eds.) Topics in Multiple Criteria Decision Making, pp. 179–201. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia (1973)
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Roy, B.: ELECTRE III: Un algorithme de classements fondé sur une représentation floue des préférences en présence de critères multiples. Cahiers du Centre d’Etudes de Recherche Opérationnelle (Belgique) 20(1), 3–24 (1978) Roy, B.: ELECTRE III: Un algorithme de classements fondé sur une représentation floue des préférences en présence de critères multiples. Cahiers du Centre d’Etudes de Recherche Opérationnelle (Belgique) 20(1), 3–24 (1978)
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Roy, B.: The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theor. Decis. 31(1), 49–73 (1991)CrossRef Roy, B.: The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theor. Decis. 31(1), 49–73 (1991)CrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Parashar, S., Clarich, A., Geremia, P., Otani, A.: Reverse Multi-Objective Robust Design Optimization (R-MORDO) using chaos collocation based robustness quantification for engine calibration. In: 13th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conference, Fort Worth, p. 9038 (2010) Parashar, S., Clarich, A., Geremia, P., Otani, A.: Reverse Multi-Objective Robust Design Optimization (R-MORDO) using chaos collocation based robustness quantification for engine calibration. In: 13th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conference, Fort Worth, p. 9038 (2010)
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980) Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Salo, A., Hämäläinen, R.P.: Preference ratio in multiattribute evaluation (PRIME) –elicitation and decision procedures under incomplete information. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A 31(6), 533–545 (2001)CrossRef Salo, A., Hämäläinen, R.P.: Preference ratio in multiattribute evaluation (PRIME) –elicitation and decision procedures under incomplete information. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A 31(6), 533–545 (2001)CrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Salo, A., Hämäläinen, R.P.: Processing interval judgments in the analytic hierarchy process. In: Goicocchea, A., Duckstein, L., Zionts, S. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Making, pp. 359–371. Springer, New York (1991) Salo, A., Hämäläinen, R.P.: Processing interval judgments in the analytic hierarchy process. In: Goicocchea, A., Duckstein, L., Zionts, S. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Making, pp. 359–371. Springer, New York (1991)
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Salo, A., Hämäläinen, R.P.: Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 82(3), 458–475 (1995)CrossRef Salo, A., Hämäläinen, R.P.: Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 82(3), 458–475 (1995)CrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Salo, A., Punkka, A.: Rank inclusion in criteria hierarchies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 163(2), 338–356 (2005)CrossRef Salo, A., Punkka, A.: Rank inclusion in criteria hierarchies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 163(2), 338–356 (2005)CrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Savage, L.J.: The theory of statistical decision. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 46(253), 55–67 (1951)CrossRef Savage, L.J.: The theory of statistical decision. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 46(253), 55–67 (1951)CrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Savage, L.J.: Foundations of Statistics, 2nd edn. Dover, New York (1972) Savage, L.J.: Foundations of Statistics, 2nd edn. Dover, New York (1972)
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Seixedo, C., Tereso, A.: A multicriteria decision aid software application for selecting MCDM software using AHP. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Engineering Optimization, Lisbon (2010) Seixedo, C., Tereso, A.: A multicriteria decision aid software application for selecting MCDM software using AHP. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Engineering Optimization, Lisbon (2010)
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976) Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Siskos, Y., Matsatsinis, N.F.: A DSS for market analysis and new product design. J. Decis. Syst. 2(1), 35–63 (1993)CrossRef Siskos, Y., Matsatsinis, N.F.: A DSS for market analysis and new product design. J. Decis. Syst. 2(1), 35–63 (1993)CrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Siskos, Y., Spyridakos, A., Yannacopoulos, D.: MINORA: a multicriteria decision aiding system for discrete alternatives. J. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2(2), 136–149 (1993) Siskos, Y., Spyridakos, A., Yannacopoulos, D.: MINORA: a multicriteria decision aiding system for discrete alternatives. J. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2(2), 136–149 (1993)
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Talašová, J., Holeček, P.: The FuzzME software package. In: Proceedings of the Joint International Fuzzy Systems Association World Congress and the European Society of Fuzzy Logic and Technology Conference, Lisbon (2009) Talašová, J., Holeček, P.: The FuzzME software package. In: Proceedings of the Joint International Fuzzy Systems Association World Congress and the European Society of Fuzzy Logic and Technology Conference, Lisbon (2009)
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Von Winterfelt, D., Edwards, W.: Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986) Von Winterfelt, D., Edwards, W.: Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Wallenius, J., Dyer, J.S., Fishburn, P.C., Steuer, R.E., Zionts, S., Deb, K.: Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Manag. Sci. 54(7), 1336–1349 (2008)CrossRef Wallenius, J., Dyer, J.S., Fishburn, P.C., Steuer, R.E., Zionts, S., Deb, K.: Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Manag. Sci. 54(7), 1336–1349 (2008)CrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Weistroffer, H.R., Smith, C.H., Narula, S.C.: Multiple criteria decision support software. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott,M. (eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, Springer, Berlin (2005) Weistroffer, H.R., Smith, C.H., Narula, S.C.: Multiple criteria decision support software. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott,M. (eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, Springer, Berlin (2005)
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang, J.B.: Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 131(1), 31–61 (2001)CrossRef Yang, J.B.: Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 131(1), 31–61 (2001)CrossRef
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang, J.B., Singh, M.G.: An evidential reasoning approach for multiple-attribute decision making with uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 24(1), 1–18 (1994)CrossRef Yang, J.B., Singh, M.G.: An evidential reasoning approach for multiple-attribute decision making with uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 24(1), 1–18 (1994)CrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Zapatero, E.G., Smith, C.H., Weistroffer, H.R.: Evaluating multiple-attribute decision support systems. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 6, 201–214 (1997)CrossRef Zapatero, E.G., Smith, C.H., Weistroffer, H.R.: Evaluating multiple-attribute decision support systems. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 6, 201–214 (1997)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Software
verfasst von
H. Roland Weistroffer
Yan Li
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Verlag
Springer New York
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_29

Premium Partner