Skip to main content

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Developing Solutions for Coexistence in the EU—Legal, Technical, and Economic Issues

verfasst von : Koen Dillen, Ivilin Rizov, Emilio Rodriguez-Cerezo

Erschienen in: The Coexistence of Genetically Modified, Organic and Conventional Foods

Verlag: Springer New York

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Coexistence policy in the European Union (EU) is designed to avoid unintended and adventitious presence of genetically modified (GM) crops in other products, preventing the potential economic loss from admixture (European Commission 2010). Coexistence is a direct consequence of the decision to provide consumers with a well informed choice when it comes to food produced from GM crops. While a mandatory labeling regime identifies GM produce in the market place, the availability of both GM and non-GM depends on the possibility of a downstream supply chain to provide both goods. Therefore, what is commonly called “coexistence measures” are a set of technical, administrative, and liability rules set out to avoid the unintended presence of GM material in non-GM crops at the farm level. Hence coexistence measures are not environmental risk management tools but tools to resolve potential market failures arising from GM crop cultivation in the EU.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The EC funds a research project which will assess the cost of ex ante and ex post coexistence legislation and their effect on adoption. The project’s details and results can be found at http://​price-coexistence.​com/​.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Areal, F.J., L. Riesgo, M. Gómez-Barbero, and E. Rodríguez-Cerezo. 2012. Consequences of a coexistence policy on the adoption of GMHT crops in the European Union. Food Policy 37(4): 401–411.CrossRef Areal, F.J., L. Riesgo, M. Gómez-Barbero, and E. Rodríguez-Cerezo. 2012. Consequences of a coexistence policy on the adoption of GMHT crops in the European Union. Food Policy 37(4): 401–411.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beckmann, V., C. Soregaroli, and J. Wesseler. 2006. Coexistence rules and regulations in the European Union. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(5): 1193–1199.CrossRef Beckmann, V., C. Soregaroli, and J. Wesseler. 2006. Coexistence rules and regulations in the European Union. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(5): 1193–1199.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beckmann, V., C. Soregaroli, and J. Wesseler. 2010. Ex-ante regulation and ex-post liability under uncertainty and irreversibility: Governing the coexistence of GM crops. Economics: The Open-Access Open Assessment E-Journal 4: 9. Beckmann, V., C. Soregaroli, and J. Wesseler. 2010. Ex-ante regulation and ex-post liability under uncertainty and irreversibility: Governing the coexistence of GM crops. Economics: The Open-Access Open Assessment E-Journal 4: 9.
Zurück zum Zitat Breustedt, G., J. Muller-Scheessel, and U. Latacz-Lohmann. 2008. Forecasting the adoption of GM oilseed rape: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Germany. Journal of Agricultural Economics 59(2): 237–257.CrossRef Breustedt, G., J. Muller-Scheessel, and U. Latacz-Lohmann. 2008. Forecasting the adoption of GM oilseed rape: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Germany. Journal of Agricultural Economics 59(2): 237–257.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Demont, M., W. Daems, K. Dillen, E. Mathijs, C. Sausse, and E. Tollens. 2008. Regulating coexistence in Europe: Beware of the domino-effect! Ecological Economics 64(4): 683–689.CrossRef Demont, M., W. Daems, K. Dillen, E. Mathijs, C. Sausse, and E. Tollens. 2008. Regulating coexistence in Europe: Beware of the domino-effect! Ecological Economics 64(4): 683–689.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Demont, M., Y. Devos, and O. Sanvido. 2010. Towards flexible coexistence regulations for GM crops in the EU. EuroChoices 9(2): 18–24.CrossRef Demont, M., Y. Devos, and O. Sanvido. 2010. Towards flexible coexistence regulations for GM crops in the EU. EuroChoices 9(2): 18–24.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Demont, M., K. Dillen, W. Daems, C. Sausse, E. Tollens, and E. Mathijs. 2009. On the proportionality of EU spatial ex ante coexistence regulations. Food Policy 34(6): 508–518.CrossRef Demont, M., K. Dillen, W. Daems, C. Sausse, E. Tollens, and E. Mathijs. 2009. On the proportionality of EU spatial ex ante coexistence regulations. Food Policy 34(6): 508–518.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Devos, Y., M. Demont, K. Dillen, D. Reheul, M. Kaiser, and O. Sanvido. 2009. Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM crops in the European Union. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29: 11–30.CrossRef Devos, Y., M. Demont, K. Dillen, D. Reheul, M. Kaiser, and O. Sanvido. 2009. Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM crops in the European Union. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29: 11–30.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dillen, K., and E. Rodriguez Cerezo. 2013. 15 Years of coexistence between GM and Non-GM maize in Spain: What can be learned from it? Portugal: GMCC Lisbon. Dillen, K., and E. Rodriguez Cerezo. 2013. 15 Years of coexistence between GM and Non-GM maize in Spain: What can be learned from it? Portugal: GMCC Lisbon.
Zurück zum Zitat European Coexistence Bureau. 2010. Best practice documents for coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming: 1. Maize crop production. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. E. Commission. EUR24509. European Coexistence Bureau. 2010. Best practice documents for coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming: 1. Maize crop production. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. E. Commission. EUR24509.
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission. 2003. Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed. Official Journal of the European Union L268: 1–23. European Commission. 2003. Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed. Official Journal of the European Union L268: 1–23.
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission. 2009. On the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming. COM(2009) 153 final. European Commission. 2009. On the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming. COM(2009) 153 final.
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission. 2010. Commission recommendation of 13 July 2010 on guidelines for the development of national co-existence measures to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in conventional and organic crops. Official Journal of the European Union C/200:1–5. European Commission. 2010. Commission recommendation of 13 July 2010 on guidelines for the development of national co-existence measures to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in conventional and organic crops. Official Journal of the European Union C/200:1–5.
Zurück zum Zitat Koch, B.A. 2012. Liability and redress options for damage caused by GMOs. In Genetically modified and non-genetically modified food supply chains: Co-existence and traceability, ed. 403–413. London: Wiley. Koch, B.A. 2012. Liability and redress options for damage caused by GMOs. In Genetically modified and non-genetically modified food supply chains: Co-existence and traceability, ed. 403–413. London: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Riesgo, L., F.J. Areal, O. Sanvido, and E. Rodriguez-Cerezo. 2010. Distances needed to limit cross-fertilization between GM and conventional maize in Europe. Nature Biotechnology 28(8): 780–782.CrossRef Riesgo, L., F.J. Areal, O. Sanvido, and E. Rodriguez-Cerezo. 2010. Distances needed to limit cross-fertilization between GM and conventional maize in Europe. Nature Biotechnology 28(8): 780–782.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sanvido, O., F. Widmer, M. Winzeler, B. Streit, E. Szerencsits, and F. Bigler. 2008. Definition and feasibility of isolation distances for transgenic maize. Transgenic Research 17: 317–335.CrossRef Sanvido, O., F. Widmer, M. Winzeler, B. Streit, E. Szerencsits, and F. Bigler. 2008. Definition and feasibility of isolation distances for transgenic maize. Transgenic Research 17: 317–335.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shavell, S. 1984. A model of the optimal use of liability and safety regulation. Rand Journal of Economics 15(2): 271–280.CrossRef Shavell, S. 1984. A model of the optimal use of liability and safety regulation. Rand Journal of Economics 15(2): 271–280.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Skevas, T., P. Fevereiro, and J. Wesseler. 2010. Coexistence regulations and agriculture production: A case study of five Bt maize producers in Portugal. Ecological Economics 69(12): 2402–2408.CrossRef Skevas, T., P. Fevereiro, and J. Wesseler. 2010. Coexistence regulations and agriculture production: A case study of five Bt maize producers in Portugal. Ecological Economics 69(12): 2402–2408.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Skevas, T., J. Wesseler, and P. Fevereiro. 2009. Coping with ex-ante regulations for planting Bt Maize: The Portuguese experience. AgBioForum 12(1): 60–69. Skevas, T., J. Wesseler, and P. Fevereiro. 2009. Coping with ex-ante regulations for planting Bt Maize: The Portuguese experience. AgBioForum 12(1): 60–69.
Metadaten
Titel
Developing Solutions for Coexistence in the EU—Legal, Technical, and Economic Issues
verfasst von
Koen Dillen
Ivilin Rizov
Emilio Rodriguez-Cerezo
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Verlag
Springer New York
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3727-1_6

Premium Partner