nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

10. Income Inequality in Developing Countries, Past and Present

verfasst von : Rolph van der Hoeven

Erschienen in: The Palgrave Handbook of Development Economics

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This chapter deals with income inequality in developing countries. It gives a historical overview on how income inequality has been addressed in developing countries and discusses contemporary issues of income inequality, especially in the context of growing globalization. Globalization and especially financialization and to a certain extent skills based technical change, have been important exogenous drivers of inequality. These drivers have in various cases strengthened existing patterns of inequality through a stubbornly high wealth inequality and through intergenerational transfers of inequality due to skewed access to higher-level education. The adverse effect of financial and trade globalization, on income inequality during the past three decades have been exacerbated by national policies that had a negative impact on income distribution. Monetary policies that emphasized price stability over growth, labour market policies that weakened bargaining position of labour vis-à-vis employers, and fiscal policies that prioritized fiscal consolidation at the expense of benefits and progressive taxation, all contributed to increasing income inequality. However, national policies, including a strengthening of institutions to deal with inequality can play an important role on reducing income inequality. Several countries have managed to use fiscal policies to mitigate a high primary income inequality down to lower levels of secondary and tertiary inequality. Additionally, the right mix of macroeconomic, fiscal, labour market and social policies (policy coherence) can reverse the rising trend in income inequality.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel The Recent Growth Boom in Developing Economies: A Structural-Change Perspective

Nächstes Kapitel The Distribution of Productive Assets and the Economics of Rural Development and Poverty Reduction

The actual year of the early 1990s and the early 2000s differs by country depending on data availability. In these calculations, the starting years range from 1990 to 1993 and the end years range from 2003 to 2010.

Following UN country income classifications, the high-income group represents developed economies, and the low-income and middle-income (both lower and upper) groups represent developing economies.

For a lucid treatment of global income inequality, see Milanovic (2016).

It is true that theGeneral Assembly resolutionlays down a precise quantitative target only for the increase in aggregate incomes, and that there is no similar quantitative target for changes in income distribution. We can, however, take it for granted that the 5 per cent growth target established by the resolution also implies that the increment in income thus achieved should be wisely used for the benefit of the poorer sections of the population and should result in a degree of social progress which is at least in “balance” with the rise in aggregate national income (Meier 1971, p. 54).

Kuznets himself never claimed that the decline in inequality that he observed in the later stages of development was ‘natural’. On the contrary, the major factor that Kuznets identified as reducing inequality was “legislative interference and political decisions” driven by “the growing political power of the urban lower-income groups” Kuznets (1955). See also Luebker (2007).

Stewart argues that internally funded and locally designed antipoverty programmes are more effective in reaching the poor than social funds (Stewart 1995).

Bourguignon (2015) arrives at similar high levels. According to his figures, the decline in world inequality started in the 1990s, somewhat earlier than Milanovic indicates. Nayyar (2017) discusses the figures provided by Bourguignon (2015).

The IMF (Jaumotte and Tytell 2007) investigated the effect of globalization on the labour income share in developed countries as did the OECD (Bessanini and Manfredi 2012), while UNDP (Rodriguez and Jayadev 2010) and ILO (2011) and (2013) carried out several analyses on a broader set of data encompassing all countries in the world.

Other variables used are manufacturing share, GDP per capita, openness, civil liberties and human capital.

For the Standardized World Income Inequality Database (SWIID), see Solt (2016)

The Globalization index is the most widely based index of globalization as it combines the major de facto indicators of globalization (trade, FDI stocks, portfolio investment and income payments to foreign nationals) with various de jure indicators (hidden import barriers, the mean tariff rate, taxes on international trade and capital account restrictions). For detailed definitions of index components and weights, see Dreher, Gaston and Martens (2008). http://globalization.kof.ethz.ch/

Atkinson (2015) provides, in a very understandable and well-argued manner, 15 proposals to reduce income inequality in developed economies.

This success is now however contested, following changes in domestic policies in various countries in the wake of strong adverse international conditions leading to a lower GDP growth rate (Cornia 2017).

Lustig is using slightly different terms: primary income = market income, secondary income = disposable income and tertiary income = final income.

Addison, T. (2002). Structural adjustment. In R. Clarke, C. Kirkpatrick, & C. Polidano (Eds.), Handbook on development policy and management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Adelman, I. (1979). Redistribution before growth. In Institute of social studies, development of societies: The next twenty-five years (pp. 160–176). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.

Aghion, P., Caroli, E., & Garcia-Penalosa, C. (1999). Inequality and economic growth: The perspective of the new growth theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(December), 1615–1660.

Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Income distribution, political instability and investment. European Economic Review, 40(6), 1203–1228.

Alesina, A., & Rodrik, D. (1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 465–490.

Asian development Bank (ADB). (2012). Asian development outlook 2012: Confronting rising income inequality in Asia. Manila.

Atkinson, A. B. (2009). Factor shares: The principal problem of political economy? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(1), 3–16.

Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality, what can be done? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2011). Top incomes in the long run of history. Journal of Economic Literature 2011, 49(1), 3–71. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.1.3. http:www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?CrossRef

Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2003). Inequality and growth: What can the data say? Journal of Economic Growth, 8(3), 267–299.

Behar, A. (2011). Skill-biased technology imports, increased schooling access, and income inequality in developing countries. Journal of Globalization and Development, 2, 2.

Berg, A., Ostry, J. D., & Zettelmeyer, J. (2012). What makes growth sustained? Journal of Development Economics, 98(2), 149–166.

Bessanini, A., & Manfredi, T. (2012). Capital’s grabbing hand? A cross-country/cross-industry analysis of the decline of the labour share (OECD social, employment and migration working papers, no. 133). OECD Publishing.

Birdsall, N. (2005). The world is not flat: Inequality and justice in our global economy (WIDER Lecture 9). Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research.

Bourguignon, F. (2015). The globalization of inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Braunstein, E., & Seguino, E. (2012). The impact of economic policy and structural change on gender employment inequality in Latin America, 1990–2010. Burlington: Mimeo, University of Vermont.

Chen, M., Vanek, J., Lund, F., Heintz, J., Jhabvala, R., & Bonner, C. (2005). Progress of the world’s women 2005: Women, work, and poverty. New York: UNIFEM.

Chenery, H., et al. (1974). Redistribution with growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cornia, G. A. (Ed.). (2004). Inequality, growth and poverty in an era of liberalization and globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cornia, G. A. (2012). The new structuralist macroeconomics and income inequality (Working paper no. 25/2012, November 2012). Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche Università degli Studi di Firenze.

Cornia, G. A. (2017). Chapter 7: Is Latin America’s income inequality decline permanent or temporary? In van Bergeijkand and van der Hoeven (2017).

Credit Suisse. (2012). Global wealth report 2012. Zurich.

Dagdeviren, H., van der Hoeven, R., & Weeks, J. (2004). Redistribution does matter: Growth and redistribution for poverty reduction. In Shorrocks & R. van der Hoeven (Eds.).

Daudey, E., & Garcia-Penalosa, C. (2007). The personal and the factor distribution of income in a cross-section of countries. Journal of Development Studies, 43(5), 812–829.

Davies, J. B. (2008). Personal wealth, from a global perspective. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

di Gropello, E., & Sakellariou, C. (2010). Industry and skill wage premiums, in East Asia (Policy research working paper 5379). The World Bank.

Diwan, I. (1999). Labor shares and financial crises. Washington, DC: World Bank/Mimeo.

Dreher, A., Gaston, N., & Martens, P. (2008). Measuring globalisation – Gauging its consequences. New York: Springer. http://globalization.kof.ethz.ch/.

Easterly, W. (2007). Inequality does cause underdevelopment: Insights from a new instrument. Journal of Development Economics, 84(2), 755–776.

ECLAC. (2010). Time for equality, closing gaps, opening trails. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago, Chile, May.

Elson, D. (2007). Chapter 4: Macro-economic policy, employment, unemployment and gender inequality. In Ocampo and Jomo, 2007.

Epstein, G. A., & Yeldan, E. (2009). Beyond inflation targeting, assessing the impacts and policy alternative. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Ferreira, F. H. G. (1999). Inequality and economic performance. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Forbes, K. J. (2000). A reassessment of the relationship between inequality and growth. American Economic Review, 90(4), 869–887.

Freeman, R. (2004). Trade wars: The exaggerated impact of trade in economic debate. The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, 27(1), 1–23, 01.

Freeman, R. (2005). Labour market institutions without blinders: The debate over flexibility and labour market performance (NBER working paper, no. 11286).

Freeman, R. (2010). It’s financialization. International Labour Review, 149(2) 163–183.

Ghosh, J. (2007). Macroeconomic and growth policies. Background note, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York.

Ghosh, J. (2011). Reo-orienting development in uncertain time. In van Bergeijk, de Haan and van der Hoeven.

Glyn, A. (2009). Functional distribution and inequality. In W. Salverda, B. Nolan, & T. M. Smeeding (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic inequality (pp. 101–126). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2008). The race between education and technology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Gunther, B., & van der Hoeven, R. (2004). The social dimension of globalization: A review of the literature. International Labour Review, 143(1–2), 7–43.

Halter, D., Oechslin, M., & Zweimüller, J. (2010). Inequality and growth: The neglected time dimension (CEPR discussion paper no. 8033). Centre for Economic Policy Research.

Harrison, A., McLaren, J., & McMillan, M. (2011). Recent perspectives on trade and inequality. Annual Review of Economics, 3, 261–289.

Heintz, J. (2006). Globalization, economic policy and employment: Poverty and gender Implications (Employment strategy paper 2006.3). International Labour Organization, Geneva.

Hopkins, M., & van der Hoeven, R. (1983). Basic needs in development planning. Aldershot: Gower.

Horton, S. (1999). Marginalization revisited: Women’s market work and pay, and economic development. World Development, 27(3), 571–582.

ILO. (2004). A fair globalization: Creating opportunities for all. Geneva: World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization.

ILO. (2008a). World of work report 2008: Income inequalities in the age of financial globalization. Geneva: ILO.

ILO. (2008b). Global wage report 2008/09: Minimum wages and collective bargaining. Geneva: ILO.

ILO. (2011). World of work report 2011: Income inequalities in the age of financial globalization. Geneva: ILO.

ILO. (2013). Global wage report 2012/13: Wage and equitable growth. Geneva: ILO.

ILO. (2014). World of work report 2014. Geneva: ILO.

Jaumotte, F., & Tytell, I. (2007). How has the globalization of labor affected the labor income share in advanced countries? (IMF WP/07/298). Washington, DC: IMF.

Jayadev, A. (2007). Capital account openness’ and the labour share income. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(3), 423–443.

Karabarbounis, L., & Neiman, B. (2015). The global decline of the labor share. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 61–103. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt032.

Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, XLV, 1–28.

Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School, 22, 133–191.

Lindert, P. H. (2004). Growing public: Social spending and economic growth since the eighteenth century. Cambridge, UK: University Press.

Lopez-Calva, L. F., & Lustig, N. (2010). Declining inequality in Latin America: A decade of progress? New York: Brookings Institution and UNDP.

Luebker, M. (2002). Assessing the impact of past distributional shifts on global poverty levels (Employment paper 2002–37). International Labour Organization, Geneva.

Luebker, M. (2007). Labour shares (ILO technical brief no. 1). Geneva, ILO.

Luebker, M. (2013). Chapter 8: Redistribution policies. In Berg (2015).

Lustig, N., et al. (2012, August). The impact of taxes and social spending on inequality and poverty in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Mexico and Peru (CEQ working paper no. 32012). Tulane University.

Machin, S. (2009). Education and inequality. In W. Salverda, B. Nolan, & T. Smeeding (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McMillan, M., & Rodrik, D. (2011). Globalization, structural change and productivity growth. In M. Bacetta & M. Jansen (Eds.), Making globalization socially sustainable. Geneva: World Trade Organization/International Labour Office.

Meier, G. M. (1971). Leading issues in development (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Melaned, C. (2012). After 2015: Contexts, politics and processes for a post 2015 global agreement on development. London: ODI.

Milanovic, B. (1999). Explaining the increase in inequality during the transition. In World Bank policy research department paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Milanovic, B. (2012). Global inequality recalculated and updated: The effect of new PPP estimates on global inequality and 2005 estimates. Journal of Economic Inequality, 10(1), 1–18.

Milanovic, B. (2016). Global inequality, a new approach for the age of globalization. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

Nayyar, D. (2013). Catch up, developing countries in the world economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nayyar, D. (2017) Chapter 9: Can catch up reduce inequality? In van Bergeijk and van der Hoeven, 2017.

Nissanke, M., & Thorbecke, E. (2005). Channels and policy debate in the globalization–inequality–poverty nexus (Discussion paper 2005/08, June 2005). Helsinki UNU-WIDER.

Nissanke, M., & Thorbecke, E. (2006). Channels and policy debate in the globalization–inequality–poverty Nexus. World Development, 34(8), 1338–1360.

Ocampo, J. A. (2003). Development and the global order. In H. J. Chang (Ed.), Rethinking development economics. London: Anthem Press.

Ocampo, J. A., & Jomo, K. S. (2007). Towards full and decent employment. London: Zed Books.

Ostry, J. D., Berg, A., & Tsangarides, C. G. (2014). Redistribution, inequality, and growth (IMF staff discussion note 14/02). Washington, DC: IMF.

Palma, J. G. (2011). Homogeneous middles vs. heterogeneous tails, and the end of the ‘inverted-U’: It’s all about the share of the rich. Development and Change, 42, 87–153.

Perotti, R. (1996). Growth, income distribution, and democracy: What the data say. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(2), 149–187.

Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (1996). Federal fiscal constitutions: Risk sharing and redistribution. Journal of Political Economy, 104(5), 979–1009.

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Piketty, T. (2017). Towards a reconciliation between economics and social sciences, lessons from capital in the twenty-first century. In H. Boushey, B. Bradford de Long, & M. Steinbaum (Eds.), After Piketty: The agenda for economics and inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Prebisch, R. (1970). Change and development – Latin America’s great task: Report submitted to the inter-American Development Bank. New York: Praeger.

Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2009). This time it is different, eight centuries of financial folly. Princeton: Princeton University press.

Rodriguez, F., & Jayadev, A. (2010). The declining labor share of income (Human development reports research paper 2010/36). New York: UNDP.

Saget, C. (2001). Poverty reduction and decent work in developing countries: Do minimum wages help? International Labour Review, 140(3), 237–269.

Saget, C. (2008). Fixing minimum wage levels in developing countries: Common failures and remedies. International Labour Review, 147(1), 25–42.

Seguino, S. (2000). The effects of structural change and economic liberalization on gender wage differentials in South Korea and Taiwan. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24(4), 437–459.

Seguino, S. (2007). Is more mobility good? Firm mobility and the low wage-low productivity trap. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 18(1), 27–51.

Sen, A. (1995). The political economy of targeting. In D. van de Walle & K. Neat (Eds.), Public spending and the poor (pp. 11–24). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press for the World Bank.

Sharma, M., Inhauste, C., & Feng, J. (2011). Rising inequality with high growth and falling poverty. World Bank: East Asia and Pacific Office.

Shorrocks, A., & van der Hoeven, R. (Eds.). (2004). Growth, inequality, and poverty: Prospects for pro poor economic development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Singh, A., & Dhumale, R. (2004). Globalization, technology, and income inequality: A critical analysis. In Cornia, 2004.

Solt, Frederick. (2016). The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science, Quarterly 97. SWIID Version 6.0, July 2017.

Stewart, F. (1995). Adjustment and poverty, options and choices. London: Routledge.

Stockhammer, E. (2013). Why have wage shares fallen? A panel analysis of the determinants of functional income distribution (Conditions of work and employment series no. 35). ILO, Geneva.

Sumner, A. (2012). Where do the poor live? A new update. (IDS working paper 2012–339). IDS, Sussex.

Tanzi, V., & Zee, H. (1997). Fiscal policy and long-run growth. IMF Staff Papers, 44(2), 179–209.

Taylor, L. (2004). External liberalization, economic performance, and distribution in Latin America and elsewhere. In Cornia, 2004.

Tinbergen, J. (1975). Income distribution, analysis and policies. Amsterdam: North Holland.

Trapp, K. (2015). Measuring the labour income share of developing countries (WIDER working paper 2015/041). UNU-WIDER, Helsinki.

UNCTAD. (2012). Trade and Development Report 2012. Geneva.

UNDP. (2013). Humanity divided: Confronting inequality in developing countries. New York: UNDP.

UNESCAP. (2013). Economic and social survey of Asia and the Pacific 2013, Forward-looking macroeconomic policies or inclusive and sustainable development. Bangkok.

van Bergeijk, P. A. G. (2011). In A. de Haan & R. van der Hoeven (Eds.), The financial crisis and developing countries, a global multidisciplinary perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

van Bergeijk, P. A. G. (2013). Earth economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

van Bergeijk, P. A. G., & van der Hoeven, R. (2017). Sustainable development goals and income inequality. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

van der Hoeven, R. (1988). Planning for basic needs: A soft option or a solid policy, a basic needs simulation model applied to Kenya. Aldershot: Gower.

van der Hoeven, R. (2002). Poverty and structural adjustment: Some remarks on the trade-off between equity and growth. In A. Booth & P. Mosley (Eds.), New poverty strategies: What have they achieved, what have we learned? London: Macmillan.

van der Hoeven, R. (2011a). Income inequality and employment revisited: Can one make sense of economic policy? In van der Hoeven, 2011b.

van der Hoeven, R. (Ed.). (2011b). Employment, inequality and globalization: A continuous concern. London: Routledge.

van der Hoeven, R. (2012). A global social contract to follow the millennium development goals. New York/Washington, DC: Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

van der Hoeven, R. (2015). Can the sustainable development goals stem the growing income inequality in the world? Valedictory lecture, 8-10-2015. The Hague: ISS (International Institute of Social Studies) of EUR (Erasmus University Rotterdam).

van der Hoeven, R. (2017). Can the SDGs stem rising income inequality in the world? In Chapter 10 in van Bergeijk and van der Hoeven (2017).

van der Hoeven, R., & Luebker, M. (2007). Financial openness and employment: The need for coherent international and national policies. In Ocampo and Jomo, 2007.

van der Hoeven, R., & Saget, C. (2004). Labour market institutions and income inequality: What are the new insights after the Washington Consensus? In G.A. Cornia, 2004.

van der Hoeven, R., & Taylor, L. (2000, April). Introduction: Structural adjustment, labour markets and employment: Some considerations for sensible people. Journal of Development Studies, 36(4), 57–65.

Vandemoortele, J. (2011). The MDG story: Intention denied. Development and Change, 42, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01678.x.CrossRef

Vos, R. P. (2011). The crisis of globalization as an opportunity to create a fairer world. In van der Hoeven, 2011b.

Weeks, J. (1997). Analysis of the Demery and Squire “adjustment and poverty” evidence. Journal of International Development, 9, 827–836.

Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level, why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen Lane

Titel: Income Inequality in Developing Countries, Past and Present
verfasst von: Rolph van der Hoeven
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: The Palgrave Handbook of Development Economics
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13999-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-14000-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14000-7_10