nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

7. Controlling Labor in Makeathons: On the Recuperation of Emancipation in Industrial Labor Processes

verfasst von : Klara-Aylin Wenten

Erschienen in: Digitalization in Industry

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper discusses the recuperation of emancipatory principles of the maker culture in the context of labor organization. By examining an event for prototyping (the ‘makeathon’), the paper illustrates how emancipatory demands were co-opted in capitalist innovation processes. Makeathons represent the recuperation of emancipation as they provide testing fields for organizing innovation labor differently. They are connected to the maker culture that calls for autonomous physical labor, collaborative communities and personal authority over technological knowledge. Yet, industrial companies have started to adopt such events for changing current innovation processes. The paper argues that the recuperation is mediated by the introduction of organizational control, collective control and self-control. The makeathon can be interpreted as an instance for the manufacturing of consent that might entail new and often conflicting work requirements.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Concrete Utopias of Digitalization Compared: The Case of the Post-Work and the Maker Movements

Nächstes Kapitel Unpacking Reshoring: The GE GeoSpring Case

Banks, M. (2010). Craft Labor and Creative Industries. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 16(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630903055885.

Bauwens, M., & Vasilis, K. (2014). From the Communism of Capital to Capital for the Commons: Towards an Open Co-operativism. TripleC, 12(1), 356–361.CrossRef

Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Commons-Based Peer Production and Virtue. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(4), 394–419.CrossRef

Bennett, J., & Strange, N. (Eds.). (2015). Media Independence: Working with Freedom or Working for Free? New York, NY: Routledge.

Böhmer, A., Beckmann, A., & Lindemann, U. (2015, December). Open Innovation Ecosystem: Makerspaces Within an Agile Innovation Process. Paper Presented at the ISPIM Innovation Summit, Brisbane, Australia.

Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, È. (2007). The New Spirit of Capitalism. London and New York: Verso.

Braverman, H. (1998). Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century (25th Anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

Briken, K., Chillas, S., & Krzywdzinski, M. (2017). The New Digital Workplace: How New Technologies Revolutionise Work. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Burawoy, M. (1979). Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism. Chicago, IL: University Press of Chicago.

Burawoy, M. (1985). The Politics of Production: Factory Regimes Under Capitalism and Socialism. London: Verso.

Dahlander, L., & Magnusson, M. G. (2005). Relationships Between Open Source Software Companies and Communities: Observations from Nordic Firms. Research Policy, 34(4), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.003.CrossRef

Delfanti, A. (2014). Is Do-It-Yourself Biology Being Co-opted by Institutions? UC Davis Previously Published Works. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4nz3p0hf.

Dickel, S., Schneider, C., Thiem, C., & Wenten, K.-A. (2019). Engineering Publics: The Different Modes of Civic Technoscience. Science and Technology Studies, 32(2), 8–23.

Dickel, S., & Schrape, J.-F. (2015). Dezentralisierung, Demokratisierung, Emanzipation: Zur Architektur des digitalen Technikutopismus. Leviathan, 43(3), 442–463.CrossRef

Dolata, U., & Schrape, J.-F. (Eds.). (2018). Kollektivität und Macht im Internet: Soziale Bewegungen - Open Source Communities - Internetkonzerne. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Dougherty, D. (Author) (2011, January). We Are Makers [Television Broadcast]. TED Talk. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/dale_dougherty_we_are_makers.

Dougherty, D. (2012). The Maker Movement. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 7(3), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00135.

Drewlani, T., & Seibt, D. (2018). Configuring the Independent Developer. Journal of Peer Production, Issue 12: Makerspaces and Institutions (12). Retrieved from http://peerproduction.net/editsuite/issues/issue-12-makerspaces-and-institutions/peer-reviewed-papers/configuring-the-independent-developer/.

Frayssé, O., & O’Neil, M. (Eds.). (2015). Digital Labor and Prosumer Capitalism: The US Matrix. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital Labor and Karl Marx. New York: Routledge.CrossRef

Gauntlett, D. (2011). Making Is Connecting: The Social Meaning of Creativity from DIY and Knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Harhoff, D., & Lakhani, K. R. (2016). Revolutionizing Innovation: Users, Communities, and Open Innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRef

Hatch, M. (2014). The Maker Movement Manifesto: Rules for Innovation in the New World of Crafters, Hackers, and Tinkerers. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.

Hippel, E. V. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from http://mit.edu/evhippel/www/books/DI/DemocInn.pdf.

Hostettler, R., & Böhmer, A. (2018). Experience TAF. Retrieved from https://taf.expert/experience/.

Huws, U. (2010). Schöpfung und Enteignung: Die Dialektik von Autonomie und Kontrolle in der kreativen Arbeit. Standpunkte, 38(38), 1–6.

Huws, U. (2014). Labor in the Global Digital Economy: The Cybertariat Comes of Age. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

Irani, L. (2015). Hackathons and the Making of Entrepreneurial Citizenship. Science, Technology and Human Values, 40(5), 799–824.CrossRef

Kalff, Y. (2018). Organisierendes Arbeiten. Bielefeld: transcript.

Kröger, M. (2018, February 15). Mobileye, Nvidia und Co. Diese Start-ups erfinden die Zukunft des Autos. Spiegel Online. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/unternehmen/autoindustrie-so-treiben-start-ups-daimler-bmw-und-co-vor-sich-her-a-1193319.html.

Lee, D. (2013). Creative Labor in the Cultural Industries. Sociopedia.Isa, 1–13.

Lindtner, S., & Avle, S. (2017). Tinkering with Governance. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(CSCW), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134705.

Lindtner, S., Hertz, G. D., & Dourish, P. (2014). Emerging Sites of HCI Innovation: Hackerspaces, Hardware Startups & Incubators. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 439–448). New York, NY: ACM.

Mason, P. (2015). Postcapitalism: A Guide to Our Future. New York, NY: Penguin Random House.

Maxigas. (2017). Hackers Against Technology: Critique and Recuperation in Technological Cycles. Social Studies of Science, 47(6), 841–860. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717736387.CrossRef

Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken (11., aktual. u. überarb. Aufl). Weinheim/Basel: Beltz.

Menichinelli, M., Bianchini, M., Carosi, A., & Maffei, S. (2017). Makers as a New Work Condition Between Self-Employment and Community Peer-Production: Insights from a Survey on Makers in Italy. Journal of Peer Production (10). Retrieved from http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-10-peer-production-and-work/peer-reviewed-papers/makers-as-a-new-work-condition-between-self-employment-and-community-peer-production-insights-from-a-survey-on-makers-in-italy/.

Mota, C. (2011). The Rise of Personal Fabrication. In C&C ‘11 Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition. New York, NY: ACM.

P2P Foundation. (2012). Synthetic Overview of the Collaborative Economy. Amsterdam: P2P Foundation.

Pfeiffer, S., Schütt, P., & Wühr, D. (Eds.). (2012). Smarte Innovation: Ergebnisse und neue Ansätze im Maschinen- und Anlagenbau. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Richardson, M. (2016). Pre-hacked: Open Design and the Democratisation of Product Development. New Media & Society, 18(4), 653–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816629476.CrossRef

Smith, A., Hielscher, S., Dickel, S., Söderberg, J., & van Oost, E. (2013). Grassroots Digital Fabrication and Makerspaces: Reconfiguring, Relocating and Recalibrating Innovation? (SPRU Working Paper Series; No. 2013–02). Brighton: SPRU, Science and Technology Policy Research.

Söderberg, J., & Delfanti, A. (2015a). Hacking Hacked!: The Life Cycles of Digital Innovation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 40(5), 793–798.CrossRef

Söderberg, J., & Delfanti, A. (2015b). Repurposing the Hacker: Three Temporalities of Recuperation. UC Davis Previsouly Published Works, 1–22. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9c86493g.

Stangler, D., & Maxwell, K. (2012). DIY Producer Society. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 7(3), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00134.

Troxler, P., & Maxigas. (2014). We Now Have the Means of Production, But Where Is My Revolution? Journal of Peer Production (5). Retrieved from http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-5-shared-machine-shops/editorial-section/editorial-note-we-now-have-the-means-of-production-but-where-is-my-revolution/.

Turner, F. (2006). From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef

Wark, M. (2004). A Hacker Manifesto. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014). Open Innovation: The Next Decade. Research Policy, 43(5), 805–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001.CrossRef

Zukin, S., & Papadantonakis, M. (2017). Hackathons as Co-optation Ritual: Socializing Workers and Institutionalizing Innovation in the “New” Economy. In A. Kalleberg & S. Vallas (Eds.), Precarious Work: Research in the Sociology of Work (31st ed., pp. 157–181). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.CrossRef

Titel: Controlling Labor in Makeathons: On the Recuperation of Emancipation in Industrial Labor Processes
verfasst von: Klara-Aylin Wenten
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Digitalization in Industry
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28257-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-28258-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28258-5_7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"