Skip to main content

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

How Firms Adapt and Interact in Open Source Ecosystems: Analyzing Stakeholder Influence and Collaboration Patterns

verfasst von : Johan Linåker, Patrick Rempel, Björn Regnell, Patrick Mäder

Erschienen in: Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

[Context and motivation] Ecosystems developed as Open Source Software (OSS) are considered to be highly innovative and reactive to new market trends due to their openness and wide-ranging contributor base. Participation in OSS often implies opening up of the software development process and exposure towards new stakeholders. [Question/Problem] Firms considering to engage in such an environment should carefully consider potential opportunities and challenges upfront. The openness may lead to higher innovation potential but also to frictional losses for engaged firms. Further, as an ecosystem progresses, power structures and influence on feature selection may fluctuate accordingly. [Principal ideas/results] We analyze the Apache Hadoop ecosystem in a quantitative longitudinal case study to investigate changing stakeholder influence and collaboration patterns. Further, we investigate how its innovation and time-to-market evolve at the same time. [Contribution] Findings show collaborations between and influence shifting among rivaling and non-competing firms. Network analysis proves valuable on how an awareness of past, present and emerging stakeholders, in regards to power structure and collaborations may be created. Furthermore, the ecosystem’s innovation and time-to-market show strong variations among the release history. Indications were also found that these characteristics are influenced by the way how stakeholders collaborate with each other.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Chesbrough, H.W.: Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2006) Chesbrough, H.W.: Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2006)
2.
Zurück zum Zitat West, J., Gallagher, S.: Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Manage. 36(3), 319–331 (2006)CrossRef West, J., Gallagher, S.: Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Manage. 36(3), 319–331 (2006)CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Jansen, S., Finkelstein, A., Brinkkemper, S.: A sense of community: a research agenda for software ecosystems. In: 31st International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 187–190. IEEE (2009) Jansen, S., Finkelstein, A., Brinkkemper, S.: A sense of community: a research agenda for software ecosystems. In: 31st International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 187–190. IEEE (2009)
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Linåker, J., Regnell, B., Munir, H.: Requirements engineering in open innovation: a research agenda. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Software and System Process, pp. 208–212. ACM (2015) Linåker, J., Regnell, B., Munir, H.: Requirements engineering in open innovation: a research agenda. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Software and System Process, pp. 208–212. ACM (2015)
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahlander, L., Magnusson, M.: How do firms make use of open source communities? Long Range Plan. 41(6), 629–649 (2008)CrossRef Dahlander, L., Magnusson, M.: How do firms make use of open source communities? Long Range Plan. 41(6), 629–649 (2008)CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wnuk, K., Pfahl, D., Callele, D., Karlsson, E.-A.: How can open source software development help requirements management gain the potential of open innovation: an exploratory study. In: Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 271–280. ACM (2012) Wnuk, K., Pfahl, D., Callele, D., Karlsson, E.-A.: How can open source software development help requirements management gain the potential of open innovation: an exploratory study. In: Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 271–280. ACM (2012)
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S., Finkelstein, A.: Business network management as a survival strategy: a tale of two software ecosystems. In: Proccedings of the 1st International Workshop on Software Ecosystems, pp. 34–48 (2009) Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S., Finkelstein, A.: Business network management as a survival strategy: a tale of two software ecosystems. In: Proccedings of the 1st International Workshop on Software Ecosystems, pp. 34–48 (2009)
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., Chesbrough, H.: Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&D Manage. 39(4), 311–316 (2009)CrossRef Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., Chesbrough, H.: Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&D Manage. 39(4), 311–316 (2009)CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Manikas, K., Hansen, K.M.: Software ecosystems-a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 86(5), 1294–1306 (2013)CrossRef Manikas, K., Hansen, K.M.: Software ecosystems-a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 86(5), 1294–1306 (2013)CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S., Souer, J., Luinenburg, L.: Shades of gray: opening up a software producing organization with the open software enterprise model. J. Syst. Softw. 85(7), 1495–1510 (2012)CrossRef Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S., Souer, J., Luinenburg, L.: Shades of gray: opening up a software producing organization with the open software enterprise model. J. Syst. Softw. 85(7), 1495–1510 (2012)CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakakoji, K., Yamamoto, Y., Nishinaka, Y., Kishida, K., Ye, Y.: Evolution patterns of open-source software systems and communities. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, pp. 76–85. ACM (2002) Nakakoji, K., Yamamoto, Y., Nishinaka, Y., Kishida, K., Ye, Y.: Evolution patterns of open-source software systems and communities. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, pp. 76–85. ACM (2002)
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Glinz, M., Wieringa, R.J.: Guest editors’ introduction: stakeholders in requirements engineering. IEEE Softw. 24(2), 18–20 (2007)CrossRef Glinz, M., Wieringa, R.J.: Guest editors’ introduction: stakeholders in requirements engineering. IEEE Softw. 24(2), 18–20 (2007)CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pacheco, C., Garcia, I.: A systematic literature review of stakeholder identification methods in requirements elicitation. J. Syst. Softw. 85(9), 2171–2181 (2012)CrossRef Pacheco, C., Garcia, I.: A systematic literature review of stakeholder identification methods in requirements elicitation. J. Syst. Softw. 85(9), 2171–2181 (2012)CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Damian, D., Marczak, S., Kwan, I.: Collaboration patterns and the impact of distance on awareness in requirements-centred social networks. In: 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp. 59–68. IEEE (2007) Damian, D., Marczak, S., Kwan, I.: Collaboration patterns and the impact of distance on awareness in requirements-centred social networks. In: 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp. 59–68. IEEE (2007)
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim, S.L., Quercia, D., Finkelstein, A.: Stakenet: using social networks to analyse the stakeholders of large-scale software projects. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 295–304. ACM (2010) Lim, S.L., Quercia, D., Finkelstein, A.: Stakenet: using social networks to analyse the stakeholders of large-scale software projects. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 295–304. ACM (2010)
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Fricker, S.: Requirements value chains: stakeholder management and requirements engineering in software ecosystems. In: Wieringa, R., Persson, A. (eds.) REFSQ 2010. LNCS, vol. 6182, pp. 60–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRef Fricker, S.: Requirements value chains: stakeholder management and requirements engineering in software ecosystems. In: Wieringa, R., Persson, A. (eds.) REFSQ 2010. LNCS, vol. 6182, pp. 60–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Knauss, E., Damian, D., Knauss, A., Borici, A.: Openness and requirements: opportunities and tradeoffs in software ecosystems. In: IEEE 22nd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 213–222. IEEE (2014) Knauss, E., Damian, D., Knauss, A., Borici, A.: Openness and requirements: opportunities and tradeoffs in software ecosystems. In: IEEE 22nd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 213–222. IEEE (2014)
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ernst, N., Murphy, G.C.: Case studies in just-in-time requirements analysis. In: IEEE Second International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering, pp. 25–32. IEEE (2012) Ernst, N., Murphy, G.C.: Case studies in just-in-time requirements analysis. In: IEEE Second International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering, pp. 25–32. IEEE (2012)
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Scacchi, W.: Understanding the requirements for developing open source software systems. In: IEE Proceedings Software, vol. 149, pp. 24–39. IET (2002) Scacchi, W.: Understanding the requirements for developing open source software systems. In: IEE Proceedings Software, vol. 149, pp. 24–39. IET (2002)
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen Duc, A., Cruzes, D.S., Ayala, C., Conradi, R.: Impact of stakeholder type and collaboration on issue resolution time in OSS projects. In: Hissam, S.A., Russo, B., de Mendonça Neto, M.G., Kon, F. (eds.) OSS 2011. IFIP AICT, vol. 365, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRef Nguyen Duc, A., Cruzes, D.S., Ayala, C., Conradi, R.: Impact of stakeholder type and collaboration on issue resolution time in OSS projects. In: Hissam, S.A., Russo, B., de Mendonça Neto, M.G., Kon, F. (eds.) OSS 2011. IFIP AICT, vol. 365, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Crowston, K., Howison, J.: The social structure of free and open source software development. First Monday, 10(2) (2005) Crowston, K., Howison, J.: The social structure of free and open source software development. First Monday, 10(2) (2005)
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Martinez-Romo, J., Robles, G., Gonzalez-Barahona, J.M., Ortuño-Perez, M.: Using social network analysis techniques to study collaboration between a floss community and a company. In: Russo, B., Damiani, E., Hissam, S., Lundell, B., Succi, G. (eds.) Open Source Development, Communities and Quality. IFIP, vol. 275, pp. 171–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRef Martinez-Romo, J., Robles, G., Gonzalez-Barahona, J.M., Ortuño-Perez, M.: Using social network analysis techniques to study collaboration between a floss community and a company. In: Russo, B., Damiani, E., Hissam, S., Lundell, B., Succi, G. (eds.) Open Source Development, Communities and Quality. IFIP, vol. 275, pp. 171–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Orucevic-Alagic, A., Höst, M.: Network analysis of a large scale open source project. In: 40th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, pp. 25–29. IEEE, Verona, Italy (2014) Orucevic-Alagic, A., Höst, M.: Network analysis of a large scale open source project. In: 40th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, pp. 25–29. IEEE, Verona, Italy (2014)
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Teixeira, J., Robles, G., González-Barahona, J.M.: Lessons learned from applying social network analysis on an industrial free/libre/open source software ecosystem. J. Internet Serv. Appl. 6(1), 1–27 (2015)CrossRef Teixeira, J., Robles, G., González-Barahona, J.M.: Lessons learned from applying social network analysis on an industrial free/libre/open source software ecosystem. J. Internet Serv. Appl. 6(1), 1–27 (2015)CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Runeson, P., Höst, M.: Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Softw. Eng. 14(2), 131–164 (2009)CrossRef Runeson, P., Höst, M.: Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Softw. Eng. 14(2), 131–164 (2009)CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Knight, D., Randall, R.M., Muller, A., Välikangas, L., Merlyn, P.: Metrics for innovation: guidelines for developing a customized suite of innovation metrics. Strategy Leadersh. 33(1), 37–45 (2005)CrossRef Knight, D., Randall, R.M., Muller, A., Välikangas, L., Merlyn, P.: Metrics for innovation: guidelines for developing a customized suite of innovation metrics. Strategy Leadersh. 33(1), 37–45 (2005)CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Griffin, A.: Metrics for measuring product development cycle time. J. Prod. Innov. Manage. 10(2), 112–125 (1993)CrossRef Griffin, A.: Metrics for measuring product development cycle time. J. Prod. Innov. Manage. 10(2), 112–125 (1993)CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Nalebuff, B.J., Brandenburger, A.M.: Co-opetition: competitive and cooperative business strategies for the digital economy. Strategy Leadersh. 25(6), 28–33 (1997)CrossRef Nalebuff, B.J., Brandenburger, A.M.: Co-opetition: competitive and cooperative business strategies for the digital economy. Strategy Leadersh. 25(6), 28–33 (1997)CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Henkel, J., Schöberl, S., Alexy, O.: The emergence of openness: how and why firms adopt selective revealing in open innovation. Res. Policy 43(5), 879–890 (2014)CrossRef Henkel, J., Schöberl, S., Alexy, O.: The emergence of openness: how and why firms adopt selective revealing in open innovation. Res. Policy 43(5), 879–890 (2014)CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez-Barahona, J.M., Izquierdo-Cortazar, D., Maffulli, S., Robles, G.: Understanding how companies interact with free software communities. IEEE Softw. 5, 38–45 (2013)CrossRef Gonzalez-Barahona, J.M., Izquierdo-Cortazar, D., Maffulli, S., Robles, G.: Understanding how companies interact with free software communities. IEEE Softw. 5, 38–45 (2013)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
How Firms Adapt and Interact in Open Source Ecosystems: Analyzing Stakeholder Influence and Collaboration Patterns
verfasst von
Johan Linåker
Patrick Rempel
Björn Regnell
Patrick Mäder
Copyright-Jahr
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30282-9_5