Skip to main content

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

From Paraconsistent Logic to Dialetheic Logic

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The only condition for a logic to be paraconsistent is to invalidate the so-called explosion. However, the understanding of the only connective involved in the explosion, namely negation, is not shared among paraconsistentists. By returning to the modern origin of paraconsistent logic, this paper proposes an account of negation, and explores some of its implications. These will be followed by a consideration on underlying logics for dialetheic theories, especially those following the suggestion of Laura Goodship. More specifically, I will introduce a special kind of paraconsistent logic, called dialetheic logic, and present a new system of paraconsistent logic, which is dialetheic, by expanding the Logic of Paradox of Graham Priest. The new logic is obtained by combining connectives from different traditions of paraconsistency, and has some distinctive features such as its propositional fragment being Post complete. The logic is presented in a Hilbert-style calculus, and the soundness and completeness results are established.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Cf. [5, 3033].
 
2
Here, (Abs) and (Ext) are \(\exists y \forall x (x\in y \leftrightarrow B)\) and \(\forall x (x\in z\leftrightarrow x\in y)\rightarrow z=y\) respectively where B is any formula which does not contain y free, and \(\rightarrow \) and \(\leftrightarrow \) are suitable conditional and biconditional.
 
3
For an up-to-date survey on negation, see [16]. Note also that the following discussion focuses on the sentential negation since this is the key notion in the criteria for paraconsistent logics.
 
4
Cf. [17, p.38]. The notation of negation is adjusted.
 
5
Cf. [11, p.497]. The notation of negation is adjusted.
 
6
Note that we need the relativized truth and falsity conditions for modal logics, Nelson logics and relevant logics.
 
7
One may of course have some strong arguments against such a view on logic, and if that is the case, then the above expressivity requirement will not be substantial.
 
8
A simple way to see this is that ‘classical’ values are closed under the operations in LFI1, and thus the constant function mapping every argument to the intermediate value is not definable.
 
9
Note that connexive logics are not necessarily paraconsistent in general. But the idea imported in expanding LP relies on a kind of connexive logics that are also paraconsistent, and this is why I counted connexive logic as a tradition in paraconsistency.
 
10
See also [22] for a survey by Storrs McCall, one of the modern founders of connexive logics.
 
11
Note here that if expansions of BD is concerned, then not only that we obtain truth tables from truth and falsity conditions of relational semantics, but we can also go the other way around mechanically, namely to obtain truth and falsity conditions of relational semantics out of given any truth tables. For the details, see [27].
 
12
For an examination of the propagation of consistency in LFIs, see [29].
 
13
This was discovered after the first submission. I would like to thank Heinrich Wansing who informed me of Olkhovikov’s system, and Grigory Olkhovikov who sent me his paper and translated some of the results during a discussion.
 
14
For some discussions on classical negation in expansions of Belnap-Dunn logic, see [12].
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Arieli, O., & Avron, A. (1998). The value of the four values. Artificial Intelligence, 102, 97–141.CrossRef Arieli, O., & Avron, A. (1998). The value of the four values. Artificial Intelligence, 102, 97–141.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Avron, A. (1999). On the expressive power of three-valued and four-valued languages. Journal of Logic and Computation, 9, 977–994.CrossRef Avron, A. (1999). On the expressive power of three-valued and four-valued languages. Journal of Logic and Computation, 9, 977–994.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Batens, D. (1980). Paraconsistent extensional propositional logics. Logique et Analyse, 90–91, 195–234. Batens, D. (1980). Paraconsistent extensional propositional logics. Logique et Analyse, 90–91, 195–234.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Batens, D., & De Clercq, K. (2004). A rich paraconsistent extension of full positive logic. Logique et Analyse, 185–188, 227–257. Batens, D., & De Clercq, K. (2004). A rich paraconsistent extension of full positive logic. Logique et Analyse, 185–188, 227–257.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Beall, J. C. (2009). Spandrels of truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Beall, J. C. (2009). Spandrels of truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cantwell, J. (2008). The logic of conditional negation. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 49, 245–260.CrossRef Cantwell, J. (2008). The logic of conditional negation. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 49, 245–260.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Carnielli, W., Coniglio, M., & Marcos, J. (2007). Logics of formal inconsistency. In D. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of philosphical logic (Vol. 14, pp. 1–93). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef Carnielli, W., Coniglio, M., & Marcos, J. (2007). Logics of formal inconsistency. In D. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of philosphical logic (Vol. 14, pp. 1–93). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Carnielli, W. & Marcos, J. (2002). A Taxonomy of C-systems. In W. A. Carnielli, M. E. Coniglio, & I. M. L. d’Ottaviano, (Eds.), Paraconsistency: the logical way to the inconsistent, (pp. 1–94). New York: Marcel Dekker. Carnielli, W. & Marcos, J. (2002). A Taxonomy of C-systems. In W. A. Carnielli, M. E. Coniglio, & I. M. L. d’Ottaviano, (Eds.), Paraconsistency: the logical way to the inconsistent, (pp. 1–94). New York: Marcel Dekker.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Carnielli, W., Marcos, J., & de Amo, S. (2000). Formal inconsistency and evolutionary databases. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 8, 115–152.CrossRef Carnielli, W., Marcos, J., & de Amo, S. (2000). Formal inconsistency and evolutionary databases. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 8, 115–152.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciuciura, J. (2008). Frontiers of the discursive logic. Bulletin of the Section of Logic, 37(2), 81–92. Ciuciura, J. (2008). Frontiers of the discursive logic. Bulletin of the Section of Logic, 37(2), 81–92.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat da Costa, & Newton, C. A. (1974). On the theory of inconsistent formal systems. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 15, 497–510. da Costa, & Newton, C. A. (1974). On the theory of inconsistent formal systems. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 15, 497–510.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat de Michael, & Omori, H. (2015). Classical negation and expansions of BD. Studia Logica, 103(4), 825–851. de Michael, & Omori, H. (2015). Classical negation and expansions of BD. Studia Logica, 103(4), 825–851.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat d’Ottaviano, I. M. L. (1985).The completeness and compactness of a three-valued first-order logic. Revista Colombiana de Matemáticas, 19:77–94, d’Ottaviano, I. M. L. (1985).The completeness and compactness of a three-valued first-order logic. Revista Colombiana de Matemáticas, 19:77–94,
14.
Zurück zum Zitat d’Ottaviano, I. M. L., Newton C. A. & da Costa. (1970). Sur un problème de jaśkowski. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie de Sciences de Paris (A-B), 270:1349–1353 d’Ottaviano, I. M. L., Newton C. A. & da Costa. (1970). Sur un problème de jaśkowski. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie de Sciences de Paris (A-B), 270:1349–1353
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodship, L. (1996). On dialethism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74(1), 153–161.CrossRef Goodship, L. (1996). On dialethism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74(1), 153–161.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Jaśkowski, S. (1999). A propositional calculus for inconsistent deductive systems. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 7:35–56 (A new translation based on [?]) Jaśkowski, S. (1999). A propositional calculus for inconsistent deductive systems. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 7:35–56 (A new translation based on [?])
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Jaśkowski, S. (1999). On the discussive conjunction in the propositional calculus for inconsistent deductive systems. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 7, 57–59.CrossRef Jaśkowski, S. (1999). On the discussive conjunction in the propositional calculus for inconsistent deductive systems. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 7, 57–59.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamide, N., & Wansing, H. (2012). Proof theory of nelson’s paraconsistent logic: a uniform perspective. Theoretical Computer Science, 415, 1–38.CrossRef Kamide, N., & Wansing, H. (2012). Proof theory of nelson’s paraconsistent logic: a uniform perspective. Theoretical Computer Science, 415, 1–38.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lenzen, W. (1996). Necessary conditions for negation operators. In Wansing, H. (Ed.), Negation: a notion in focus, Perspective in Analytical Philosophy (pp. 37–58). Walter de Gruyter, Lenzen, W. (1996). Necessary conditions for negation operators. In Wansing, H. (Ed.), Negation: a notion in focus, Perspective in Analytical Philosophy (pp. 37–58). Walter de Gruyter,
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Marcos, J. (2005). On negation: pure local rules. Journal of Applied Logic, 3, 185–219.CrossRef Marcos, J. (2005). On negation: pure local rules. Journal of Applied Logic, 3, 185–219.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat McCall, S. (2012). A history of connexivity. In D. M. Gabbay, F. Pelletier, & J. Woods (Eds.), Logic: a history of its central concepts, Handbook of the history of logic, (Vol. 11, pp. 415–449). Elsevier McCall, S. (2012). A history of connexivity. In D. M. Gabbay, F. Pelletier, & J. Woods (Eds.), Logic: a history of its central concepts, Handbook of the history of logic, (Vol. 11, pp. 415–449). Elsevier
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Muskens, R. (1999). On partial and paraconsistent logics. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 40(3), 352–374.CrossRef Muskens, R. (1999). On partial and paraconsistent logics. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 40(3), 352–374.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Olkhovikov, G. (2001). On a new three-valued paraconsistent logic (in Russian). In Logic of Law and Tolerance (pp. 96–113). Yekaterinburg: Ural State University Press Olkhovikov, G. (2001). On a new three-valued paraconsistent logic (in Russian). In Logic of Law and Tolerance (pp. 96–113). Yekaterinburg: Ural State University Press
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Omori, Hitoshi. (2015). Remarks on naive set theory based on LP. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 8(2), 279–295.CrossRef Omori, Hitoshi. (2015). Remarks on naive set theory based on LP. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 8(2), 279–295.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Omori, H., & Sano, K. (2014). da Costa meets Belnap and Nelson. In R. Ciuni, H. Wansing, & C. Willkommen (Eds.), Recent Trends in Philosophical Logic (pp. 145–166). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Omori, H., & Sano, K. (2014). da Costa meets Belnap and Nelson. In R. Ciuni, H. Wansing, & C. Willkommen (Eds.), Recent Trends in Philosophical Logic (pp. 145–166). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Omori, H., & Sano, K. (2015). Generalizing Functional Completeness in Belnap-Dunn Logic. Studia Logica, 103(5), 883–917.CrossRef Omori, H., & Sano, K. (2015). Generalizing Functional Completeness in Belnap-Dunn Logic. Studia Logica, 103(5), 883–917.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Omori, H., & Waragai, T. (2011). Some Observations on the Systems LFI1 and LFI1 \(^\ast \). Proceedings of Twenty-Second International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA2011) (pp. 320–324) Omori, H., & Waragai, T. (2011). Some Observations on the Systems LFI1 and LFI1 \(^\ast \). Proceedings of Twenty-Second International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA2011) (pp. 320–324)
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Omori, H. & Waragai, T. (2014). On the propagation of consistency in some systems of paraconsistent logic. In E. Weber, D. Wouters, & J. Meheus, (Eds.), Logic, reasoning and rationality, (pp. 153–178). Heidelberg: Springer Omori, H. & Waragai, T. (2014). On the propagation of consistency in some systems of paraconsistent logic. In E. Weber, D. Wouters, & J. Meheus, (Eds.), Logic, reasoning and rationality, (pp. 153–178). Heidelberg: Springer
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Priest, G. (2002). Beyond the limits of thought (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Priest, G. (2002). Beyond the limits of thought (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Priest, G. (2006). Doubt truth to be a liar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Priest, G. (2006). Doubt truth to be a liar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Priest, G. (2006). Contradiction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Priest, G. (2006). Contradiction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Priest, G., & Routley, R. (1989). Systems of paraconsistent logic. In G. Priest, R. Routley, & J. Norman (Eds.), Paraconsistent logic: essays on the inconsistent (pp. 151–186). Munich: Philosophia Priest, G., & Routley, R. (1989). Systems of paraconsistent logic. In G. Priest, R. Routley, & J. Norman (Eds.), Paraconsistent logic: essays on the inconsistent (pp. 151–186). Munich: Philosophia
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Pynko, A. P. (1999). Functional completeness and axiomatizability within Belnap’s four-valued logic and its expansions. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 9(1), 61–105.CrossRef Pynko, A. P. (1999). Functional completeness and axiomatizability within Belnap’s four-valued logic and its expansions. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 9(1), 61–105.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Restall, G. (1992). A note on naive set theory in LP. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 33, 422–432.CrossRef Restall, G. (1992). A note on naive set theory in LP. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 33, 422–432.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruet, P. (1996). Complete set of connectives and complete sequent calculus for Belnap’s logic. Technical report, Ecole Normale Superieure, Logic Colloquium 96, Document LIENS-96-28. Ruet, P. (1996). Complete set of connectives and complete sequent calculus for Belnap’s logic. Technical report, Ecole Normale Superieure, Logic Colloquium 96, Document LIENS-96-28.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Słupecki, J. (1972). A criterion of fullness of many-valued systems of propositional logic. Studia Logica, 30, 153–157.CrossRef Słupecki, J. (1972). A criterion of fullness of many-valued systems of propositional logic. Studia Logica, 30, 153–157.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Tokarz, M. (1973). Connections between some notions of completeness of structural propositional calculi. Studia Logica, 32(1), 77–89.CrossRef Tokarz, M. (1973). Connections between some notions of completeness of structural propositional calculi. Studia Logica, 32(1), 77–89.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Wansing, H. (2001). Negation. In L. Goble (Ed.), The blackwell guide to philosophical logic (pp. 415–436). Cambridge: Basil Blackwell Publishers. Wansing, H. (2001). Negation. In L. Goble (Ed.), The blackwell guide to philosophical logic (pp. 415–436). Cambridge: Basil Blackwell Publishers.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Wansing, H. (2005). Connexive modal logic. In R. Schmidt, I. Pratt-Hartmann, M. Reynolds & H. Wansing, (Eds.), Advances in modal logic (Vol. 5, pp. 367–383). London: King’s College Publications Wansing, H. (2005). Connexive modal logic. In R. Schmidt, I. Pratt-Hartmann, M. Reynolds & H. Wansing, (Eds.), Advances in modal logic (Vol. 5, pp. 367–383). London: King’s College Publications
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber, Z. (2010). Transfinite numbers in paraconsistent set theory. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 3(1), 71–92.CrossRef Weber, Z. (2010). Transfinite numbers in paraconsistent set theory. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 3(1), 71–92.CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber, Z. (2012). Transfinite cardinals in paraconsistent set theory. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 5(2), 269–293.CrossRef Weber, Z. (2012). Transfinite cardinals in paraconsistent set theory. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 5(2), 269–293.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
From Paraconsistent Logic to Dialetheic Logic
verfasst von
Hitoshi Omori
Copyright-Jahr
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40220-8_8