Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
What Changes from Ubiquitous Computing to Internet of Things in Interaction Evaluation? Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

It Made More Sense: Comparison of User-Elicited On-skin Touch and Freehand Gesture Sets

verfasst von : Hayati Havlucu, Mehmet Yarkın Ergin, İdil Bostan, Oğuz Turan Buruk, Tilbe Göksun, Oğuzhan Özcan

Erschienen in: Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Research on gestural control interfaces is getting more widespread for the purpose of creating natural interfaces. Two of these popular gesture types are freehand and on-skin touch gestures, because they eliminate the use of an intermediary device. Previous studies investigated these modalities separately with user-elicitation methods; however, there is a gap in the field considering their comparison. In this study, we compare user-elicited on-skin touch and freehand gesture sets to explore users’ preferences. Thus, we conducted an experiment in which we compare 13 gestures to control computer tasks for each set. Eighteen young adults participated in our study and filled our survey consisted of NASA Task Load Index and 4 additional items of social acceptability, learnability, memorability, and the goodness. The results show that on-skin touch gestures were less physically demanding and more socially acceptable compared to freehand gestures. On the other hand, freehand gestures were more intuitive than on-skin touch gestures. Overall, our results suggest that different gesture types could be useful in different scenarios. Our contribution to the field might inspire designers and developers to make better judgments for designing new gestural interfaces for a variety of devices.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Freehand Gesture-Based 3D Manipulation Methods for Interaction with Large Displays
Nächstes Kapitel MIDAS-M: A Software Framework for Supporting Multimodal Interaction on Heterogeneous Interaction Devices for Cloud Applications
Literatur
1.
Vogel, D., Balakrishnan, R.: Distant freehand pointing and clicking on very large, high resolution displays. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology - UIST 2005, p. 33 (2005)
2.
Harrison, C., Ramamurthy, S., Hudson, S.E.: On-body interaction: armed and dangerous. In: Proceedings of TEI 2012, pp. 69–76 (2012)
3.
Matthies, D.J.C., Perrault, S.T., Urban, B., Zhao, S., Rostock, F.I.G.D.: Botential: localizing on-body gestures by measuring electrical signatures on t he human skin, pp. 207–216 (2015)
4.
Nakatsuma, K., Takedomi, R., Eguchi, T., Oshima, Y., Torigoe, I.: Active bioacoustic measurement for human-to-human skin contact area detection, pp. 1–4 (2015)
5.
Zhang, Y., Zhou, J., Laput, G., Harrison, C.: SkinTrack. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2016, pp. 1491–1503 (2016)
6.
Wagner, J., Nancel, M., Gustafson, S.G., Huot, S., Mackay, W.E.: Body-centric design space for multi-surface interaction, pp. 1299–1308 (2013)
7.
Harrison, C., Tan, D., Morris, D.: Skinput: appropriating the body as an input surface. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 453–462 (2010)
8.
Gannon, M., Grossman, T., Fitzmaurice, G.: Tactum: a skin-centric approach to digital design and fabrication, pp. 1–10
9.
Wobbrock, J.O., Aung, H.H., Rothrock, B., Myers, B.A.: Maximizing the guessability of symbolic input. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1869–1872 (2005)
10.
Canat, M., Tezcan, M.O., Yurdakul, C., Tiza, E., Sefercik, B.C., Bostan, I., Buruk, O.T., Göksun, T., Özcan, O.: Sensation: measuring the effects of a human-to-human social touch based controller on the player experience. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3944–3955 (2016)
11.
Mauney, D., Howarth, J., Wirtanen, A., Capra, M.: Cultural similarities and differences in user-defined gestures for touchscreen user interfaces. In: Extended Abstracts of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2010), pp. 4015–4020 (2010)
12.
Canat, M., Tezcan, M.O., Yurdakul, C., Buruk, O.T., Özcan, O.: Experiencing human-to-human touch in digital games. In: CHI 2016 (2016)
13.
Bostan, İ., Buruk, O.T., Canat, M., Tezcan, M., Yurdakul, C., Göksun, T., Özcan, O.O.: Hands as a controller: user preferences for hand specific on-skin gestures. In: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM (2017)
14.
Vatavu, R.D.: A comparative study of user-defined handheld vs. freehand gestures for home entertainment environments. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 5, 187–211 (2013)
15.
Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol. 52, 139–183 (1988)CrossRef
16.
Wobbrock, J.O., Morris, M.R., Wilson, A.D.: User-defined gestures for surface computing. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2009, p. 1083 (2009)
17.
Kühnel, C., Westermann, T., Hemmert, F., Kratz, S., Müller, A., Möller, S.: I’m home: defining and evaluating a gesture set for smart-home control. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 69, 693–704 (2011)CrossRef
18.
Vatavu, R.D.: Nomadic gestures: a technique for reusing gesture commands for frequent ambient interactions. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 4, 79–93 (2012)
19.
20.
Shoemaker, G., Tsukitani, T., Kitamura, Y., Booth, K.S.: Body-centric interaction techniques for very large wall displays. In: Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Extending Boundaries - NordiCHI 2010, pp. 463–472 (2010)
21.
Hespanhol, L., Tomitsch, M., Grace, K., Collins, A., Kay, J.: Investigating intuitiveness and effectiveness of gestures for free spatial interaction with large displays. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays - PerDis 2012, pp. 1–6 (2012)
22.
Jansen, B.E.: Teaching users how to interact with gesture-based interfaces (2012)
23.
Nancel, M., Wagner, J., Pietriga, E., Chapuis, O., Mackay, W.: Mid-air pan-and-zoom on wall-sized displays (2011). To cite this version
24.
Wu, H., Wang, J., Zhang, X.: (Luke): User-centered gesture development in TV viewing environment. Multimedia Tools Appl. 75, 733–760 (2016)CrossRef
25.
Vatavu, R.-D., Zaiti, I.-A.: Leap gestures for TV: insights from an elicitation study. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video, pp. 131–138 (2014)
26.
Buruk, O.T., Özcan, O.: DubTouch: exploring human to human touch interaction for gaming in double sided displays. In: Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 333–342 (2014)
27.
Nacenta, M.A., Kamber, Y., Qiang, Y., Kristensson, P.O.: Memorability of pre-designed and user-defined gesture sets. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2013, p. 1099 (2013)
28.
Heydekorn, J., Frisch, M., Dachselt, R.: Evaluating a user-elicited gesture set for interactive displays. In: Mensch & Computer, pp. 191–200 (2011)
29.
Chan, E., Seyed, T., Stuerzlinger, W., Yang, X.-D., Maurer, F.: User elicitation on single-hand microgestures. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3403–3414 (2016)
30.
Yoo, S., Parker, C., Kay, J., Tomitsch, M.: To dwell or not to dwell: an evaluation of mid-air gestures for large information displays. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction on - OzCHI 2015, pp. 187–191 (2015)
31.
Aigner, R., Wigdor, D., Benko, H., Haller, M., Lindlbauer, D., Ion, A., Zhao, S., Koh, J.T.K.V.: Understanding mid-air hand gestures: a study of human preferences in usage of gesture types for HCI. Technical report MSR-TR-2012-11, 10 p. (2012)
32.
Henze, N., Hesselmann, T., Pielot, M.: Free-hand gestures for music playback: deriving gestures with a user-centred process. Methodology, p. 16 (2010)
33.
Zaiţi, I.-A., Pentiuc, Ş.-G., Vatavu, R.-D.: On free-hand TV control: experimental results on user-elicited gestures with leap motion. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 19, 821–838 (2015)CrossRef
34.
Vatavu, R.-D.: User-defined gestures for free-hand TV control. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video - EuroiTV 2012, p. 45. ACM Press, New York (2012)
35.
Hood, S.: The intuitiveness of bimanual, mid-air, gesture-based input methods which provide haptic feedback, pp. 5–7 (2012)
36.
Karvinen, J.: Haptic feedback in freehand gesture interaction, 66 p. (2015)
37.
Jakobsen, M.R., Jansen, Y., Boring, S., Hornbæk, K.: Should I stay or should I go? Selecting between touch and mid-air gestures for large-display interaction. In: Abascal, J., Barbosa, S., Fetter, M., Gross, T., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2015. LNCS, vol. 9298, pp. 455–473. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-319-22698-9_​31 CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
It Made More Sense: Comparison of User-Elicited On-skin Touch and Freehand Gesture Sets
verfasst von
Hayati Havlucu
Mehmet Yarkın Ergin
İdil Bostan
Oğuz Turan Buruk
Tilbe Göksun
Oğuzhan Özcan
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58696-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-58697-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58697-7_11

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise