nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Achieving End User Acceptance: Building Blocks for an Evidence-Based User-Centered Framework for Health Technology Development and Assessment

verfasst von : Matthias R. Hastall, Christoph Dockweiler, Juliane Mühlhaus

Erschienen in: Universal Access in Human–Computer Interaction. Human and Technological Environments

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Innovative healthcare services and technologies show great promises for reducing individual and societal burdens, but predominantly fail to attract sufficient end user acceptance and usage. This renders the aspect of technology adoption as key weakness of most health technology development endeavors, but also as most promising area for implementing changes that can dramatically increase the likelihood of project success. The purpose of this paper is to discuss some core assumptions of a user-centered process framework for technology adoption that addresses three major weaknesses of many current adoption models: First, the inadequate consideration of the process character of health technology adoptions. Second, the restricted view of human motivation, information processing, and behavior as being primarily rational and utilitarian in nature. And third, the insufficient attention to situational and social influences, and the role of individual differences. Theoretical, methodological, user inclusion-related and communication-related implications of the proposed prespective changes are discussed.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Universally Accessible mHealth Apps for Older Adults: Towards Increasing Adoption and Sustained Engagement

Nächstes Kapitel Ergonomic Evaluation of the Portal of the Repository in the Health Area of UNIFESP: Proposal of Specifications and Ergonomic Recommendations for Its Interface

Standing, C., Standing, S., McDermott, M.L., Gururajan, R., Mavi, R.K.: The paradoxes of telehealth: a review of the literature 2000–2015. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. (2016). Advanced Online Publication. doi:10.1002/sres.2442

Zanaboni, P., Wootton, R.: Adoption of telemedicine: from pilot stage to routine delivery. BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Mak. 21, 1–9 (2012). doi:10.1186/1472-6947-12-1 CrossRef

Venkatesh, V.: Technology acceptance model and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Manag. Inf. Syst. 7, 1–9 (2015). doi:10.1002/9781118785317.weom070047

Niklas, S.: Akzeptanz und Nutzung mobiler Applikationen [transl.: Acceptance and use of mobile applications]. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-658-08263-5

Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York (1983)

Kollmann, T.: Attitude, adoption or acceptance? Measuring the market success of telecommunication and multimedia technology. Int. J. Bus. Perform. Manag. 6, 133–152 (2004). doi:10.1504/IJBPM.2004.005012 CrossRef

Bargh, J.A., Morsella, E.: The unconscious mind. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3, 73–79 (2008). doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00064.x CrossRef

Nisbett, R.E., Wilson, T.D.: Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol. Rev. 84, 231–259 (1977). doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231 CrossRef

Al-Shawaf, L., Conroy-Beam, D., Asao, K., Buss, D.M.: Human emotions: an evolutionary psychological perspective. Emot. Rev. 8(2), 173–186 (2015). doi:10.1177/1754073914565518 CrossRef

10.

Barbour, J.B., Rintamaki, L.S., Ramsey, J.A., Brashers, D.E.: Avoiding health information. J. Health Commun. 17(2), 212–229 (2011). doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.585691 CrossRef

11.

van ‘t Riet, J., Ruiter, R.A.C.: Defensive reactions to health-promoting information: an overview and implications for future research. Health Psychol. Rev. 7(Suppl. 1), 104–136 (2013). doi:10.1080/17437199.2011.606782

12.

Nistor, N., Göğüş, A., Lerche, T.: Educational technology acceptance across national and professional cultures: a European study. Educ. Technol. Res. Develop. 61(4), 733–749 (2013). doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9292-7 CrossRef

13.

Gray, J.A.: The Neuropsychology of Anxiety: An Enquiry into the Functions of the Septo-hippocampal System. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1982)

14.

Szalma, J.L.: On the application of motivation theory to human factors/ergonomics: motivational design principles for human-technology interaction. Hum. Factors 56(8), 1453–1471 (2014). doi:10.1177/0018720814553471 CrossRef

15.

Dewar, A.R., Bull, T.P., Malvey, D.M., Szalma, J.L.: Developing a measure of engagement with telehealth systems: the mHealth technology engagement index. J. Telemed. Telecare 23, 248–255 (2017)CrossRef

16.

Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50, 179–211 (1991). doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T CrossRef

17.

Witte, K.: Putting the fear back into fear appeals: the extended parallel process model. Commun. Monogr. 59(4), 329–349 (1992). doi:10.1080/03637759209376276 CrossRef

18.

Prochaska, J.O., Redding, C.A., Evers, K.E.: The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: Glanz, K., Rimer, B.K., Viswanath, K. (eds.) Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice, pp. 97–121. Wiley, San Francisco (2008)

19.

Schwarzer, R.: Modeling health behavior change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl. Psychol. 57(1), 1–29 (2008). doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00325.x CrossRef

20.

Weinstein, N.D.: The precaution adoption process. Health Psychol. 7(4), 355–386 (1988)CrossRef

21.

Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Self-determination theory. In: van Lange, P.A.M., Kruglanski, A.W., Higgins, E.T. (eds.) Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, vol. 1, pp. 416–459. Sage, London (2012)

22.

Armstrong, J.S.: Persuasive Advertising: Evidence-Based Principles. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2010)CrossRef

23.

Hargie, O.: The Handbook of Communication Skills. Routledge, New York (2006)

24.

Robinson, L., Cotten, S.R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., Stern, M.J.: Digital inequalities and why they matter. Inf. Commun. Soc. 18, 569–582 (2015). doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532 CrossRef

25.

Kiesler, D.J., Auerbach, S.M.: Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions. Patient Educ. Counsel. 61(3), 319–341 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.08.002 CrossRef

26.

Case, D.O., Andrews, J.E., Johnson, J.D., Allard, S.L.: Avoiding versus seeking: the relationship of information seeking to avoidance, blunting, coping, dissonance, and related concepts. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 93(3), 353–362 (2005)

27.

Byrne, S., Hart, P.S.: The ‘Boomerang’ effect: a synthesis of findings and a preliminary theoretical framework. In: Beck. C.S. (ed.) Communication Yearbook, vol. 33, pp. 3–38 (2009)

28.

Rains, S.A.: The nature of psychological reactance revisited: a meta-analytic review. Hum. Commun. Res. 39(1), 47–73 (2013). doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01443.x CrossRef

29.

Bischoff, H.-J.: Risks in Modern Society. Springer, New York (2008)CrossRef

30.

Das, E.: Rethinking the role of affect in health communication. Eur. Health Psychol. 14(2), 27–31 (2012)

31.

Hastall, M.R.: Well-being in the context of health communication and health education. In: Reinecke, L., Oliver, M.B. (eds.) Handbook of Media Use and Well-Being: International Perspectives on Theory and Research on Positive Media Effects, pp. 317–328. Routledge, London (2016)

32.

Dockweiler, C., Wewer, A., Beckers, R.: Alters- und geschlechtersensible Nutzerorientierung zur Förderung der Akzeptanz telemedizinischer Verfahren bei Patientinnen und Patienten [transl.: Age- and gender-sensitive user orientation for promoting acceptance of telemedicine from the patients‘ perspective.]. In: Hornberg, C., Pauli, A., Wrede, B. (eds.) Medizin - Gesundheit – Geschlecht [transl.: Medicine – Health – Gender], pp. 299–321. Wiesbaden, VS (2016)

33.

Cooper, A., Gomez, R., Aucote, H.: The behavioural inhibition system and behavioural approach system (BIS/BAS) scales: measurement and structural invariance across adults and adolescents. Pers. Individ. Differ. 43(2), 295–305 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.023 CrossRef

34.

Rahman, M.S.: Does personality matter when we are sick? An empirical study of the role of personality traits and health emotion in healthcare technology adoption decision. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3357–3366 (2017). http://hdl.handle.net/10125/41565

35.

Svendsen, G.B., Johnsen, J.A.K., Almas-Sorensen, L., Vitterso, J.: Personality and technology acceptance: the influence of personality factors on the core constructs of the technology acceptance model. Behav. Inf. Technol. 32, 323–334 (2013). doi:10.1080/0144929x.2011.553740 CrossRef

36.

Hirsh, J.B., Kang, S.K., Bodenhausen, G.V.: Personalized persuasion: tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients’ personality traits. Psychol. Sci. 23(6), 578–581 (2012). doi:10.1177/0956797611436349 CrossRef

37.

Gagnon, M.P., Desmartis, M., Labrecque, M., Car, J., Pagliari, C., Pluye, P., Frémont, P., Gagnon, J., Tremblay, N., Légaré, F.: Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J. Med. Syst. 29, 241–277 (2012). doi:10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4 CrossRef

38.

Dockweiler, C.; Filius, J.; Dockweiler, U.; Hornberg, C.: Adoption telemedizinischer Leistungen in der poststationären Schlaganfallversorgung: Eine qualitative Analyse der Adoptionsfaktoren aus Sicht von Patientinnen und Patienten [transl.: Adoption of Telemedicine Services in Post-Hospital Stroke Care: A Qualitative Analysis of Factors Influencing the Adoption from a Patient’s Perspective]. Akt. Neurol. 42(2), 197–204 (2015). doi:10.1055/s-0035-1548876

39.

Bandiera, O., Rasul, I.: Social networks and technology adoption in Northern Mozambique. Econ. J. 116(514), 869–902 (2006). doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01115.x

40.

Cresswell, K., Sheikh, A.: Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: an interpretative review. Int. J. Med. Inf. 82(5), 73–86 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.10.007 CrossRef

41.

Holden, R.J., Karsh, B.-T.: The technology acceptance model. Its past and its future In Health Care. J. Biomed. Inf. 43(1), 159 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002 CrossRef

42.

Keshavjee, K., Bosomworth, J., Copen, J., Lai, J., Kucukyazici, B., Lilani, R., Holbrook, A.M.: Best practices in EMR implementation: a systematic review. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings/AMIA Symposium, p. 982 (2006)

43.

Ingebrigtsen, T., Georgiou, A., Clay-Williams, R., Magrabi, F., Hordern, A., Prgomet, M., Li, J., Westbrook, J., Braithwaite, J.: The impact of clinical leadership on health information technology adoption: systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inf. 83(6), 393–405 (2014)CrossRef

44.

Leppert, F., Dockweiler, C., Eggers, N., Webel, K., Hornberg, C., Greiner, W.: Financial conditions as influencing factors for telemonitoring acceptance by healthcare professionals in Germany. Value Health 17(7), 422–423 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1045 CrossRef

45.

Hofstede, G.: Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2001)

46.

Hofstede, G., McCrae, R.R.: Personality and culture revisited: linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cult. Res. 38(1), 52–88 (2004). doi:10.1177/1069397103259443 CrossRef

47.

Dockweiler, C., Hornberg, C.: Die Rolle psychologischer und technikbezogener Persönlichkeitsmerkmale sowie individueller Wissensbestände von Ärztinnen und Ärzten für die Adoption des Telemonitoring in der medizinischen Versorgung [transl.: The Role of Psychological and Technology-Related Personality Traits and Knowledge Levels as Factors Influencing Adoption of Telemonitoring by Medical Professionals]. Gesundheitswesen (2015). doi:10.1055/s-0035-1564266

48.

Knipper, M.: Verstehen oder Stigmatisieren? Die Krux mit der “Kultur” in Medizin und Public Health [transl.: Understanding or stigmatizing? The crux with “culture” in medicine and public health]. Pub. Health Forum 23(2), 97–99 (2015). doi:10.1515/pubhef-2015-0036

49.

Zayed, R., Davidson, B., Nadeau, L., Callanan, T.S., Fleisher, W., Hope-Ross, L., Lazier, L.: Canadian rural/remote primary care physicians perspectives on child/adolescent mental health care service delivery. J. Can. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 25(1), 1–24 (2016)

50.

Bullinger, A., Rass, M., Adamczyk, S., Moeslein, K.M., Sohn, S.: Open innovation in health care: analysis of an open health platform. Health Pol. 2–3(105), 165–175 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.02.009 CrossRef

51.

Cornwall, A.: Unpacking ‘Participation’ models, meanings and practices. Commun. Develop. J. 43(4), 269–283 (2008). doi:10.1093/cdj/bsn010 CrossRef

52.

Von Unger, H.: Partizipative Forschung: Einführung in die Forschungspraxis [transl.: Participatory research: An introduction to research practice]. Springer, Wiesbaden (2014)

53.

Wright, M.T., von Unger, H., Block, M.: Partizipation der Zielgruppe in der Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention [transl.: Participation in target groups for health promotion and prevention]. In: Wright, M.T. (ed.) Partizipative Qualitätsentwicklung in der Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention [transl.: Participatory Quality Development in Health Promotion and Prevention], pp. 35–52. Hans Huber Verlag, Bern (2010)

54.

Bergold, J., Thomas, S.: Partizipative Forschungsmethoden: Ein methodischer Ansatz in Bewegung [transl.: Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion]. Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 13(1), 1–24 (2012). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1801/3332

55.

Blackstock, K.L., Kelly, G.J., Horsey, B.L.: Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. J. Evol. Econ. 60(4), 726–742 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.014

56.

Mockford, C., Murray, M., Seers, K., Oyebode, J., Grant, R., Boex, S., Staniszewska, S., Diment, Y., Leach, J., Sharma, U., Clarke, R., Suleman, R.: A SHARED study-the benefits and costs of setting up a health research study involving lay co-researchers and how we overcame the challenges. Res. Involvement Engagem. 2(8), 1–12 (2016). doi:10.1186/s40900-016-0021-3

57.

Kruger, J., Dunning, D.: Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77(6), 1121–1134 (1999). doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121 CrossRef

58.

Sparks, G.G., Pellechia, M., Irvine, C.: The repressive coping style and fright reactions to mass media. Commun. Res. 26(2), 176–192 (1999). doi:10.1177/009365099026002004 CrossRef

59.

Hastall, M.R., Knobloch-Westerwick, S.: Caught in the act: measuring selective exposure to experimental online stimuli. Commun. Methods Meas. 7(2), 94–105 (2013). doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.761190 CrossRef

Titel: Achieving End User Acceptance: Building Blocks for an Evidence-Based User-Centered Framework for Health Technology Development and Assessment
verfasst von: Matthias R. Hastall
Christoph Dockweiler
Juliane Mühlhaus
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Universal Access in Human–Computer Interaction. Human and Technological Environments
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58699-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-58700-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58700-4_2

Neuer Inhalt

Bildnachweise

VDI-Icon, Profil Icon, inhalt2, Springer Professional Modul/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Nachhaltigkeitsaward Key Visual/© Cometis AG/Global ESG Monitor | Daniel Rupp | Generiert mit KI, Search Icon, Banner Hanser, Beijing Auto Show 2024: Deutsche Hersteller wollen angreifen./© EKH-Pictures / Generated with AI / Stock.adobe.com, Buchstaben, die aus einem Megaphon kommen/© MicroStockHub/Getty Images/iStock, Digitale Lieferkette/© zapp2photo / stock.adobe.com, Zeitschrift Wissensmanagement Cover, PatentFit-Logo/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Zukunftswerkstatt Sales Excellence 2024/© AndreyPopov / Getty Images / iStock, 2023_Antrieb/© supervisuell, ATZ-Webinar: Prototypenfreie Entwicklung durch Offline- und Driver-in-the-Loop-HiL-Tests /© (c) VI-grade

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Neuer Inhalt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.