Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Making End User Development More Natural Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Semiotic Engineering: A Cohering Theory to Connect EUD with HCI, CMC and More

verfasst von : Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza

Erschienen in: New Perspectives in End-User Development

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Theories have an important role to play in research areas whose application faces rapid technological changes. They can provide longer-term intellectual references that shape deeper investigations and contribute to consolidate the identity of such research areas. A recent survey of EUD-related work published between 2004 and 2013 suggests that our field is remarkably techno-centered and could increase its scientific impact by diversifying some of its research approaches and practices. In this paper we show concrete examples of how Semiotic Engineering, originally a semiotic theory of human-computer interaction, can provide a unified theoretical framing for various EUD-related topics of investigation. Our contribution to the collection of chapters in this book is to demonstrate this particular theory’s potential as a catalyst of new kinds of transdisciplinary debate, as well as a source of inspiration for new breeds of technological developments.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Toward Theory-Based End-User Software Engineering
Nächstes Kapitel End-User Development and Social Big Data – Towards Tailorable Situation Assessment with Social Media
Fußnoten
13
Kidsim has been known as Stagecast Creator since 1997 – more about it at http://​web.​archive.​org/​web/​20150517004640/​http://​www.​stagecast.​com/​index.​html
 
14
PoliFacets sample projects can be accessed at http://​www.​serg.​inf.​puc-rio.​br/​polifacets/​project/​list.​lua?​lg=​en&​page=​example. The user can use the search box to access “Fireworks,” “AnotherFireworks” and “YetAnotherFireworks” more quickly. To run the programs, a Java-enabled browser is required.
 
Literatur
Andersen, P. B. (1997). A theory of computer semiotics: semiotic approaches to construction and assessment of computer systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Andersen, P. B. (1985). Semiotics and informatics: computers as media Proceedings of the Conference on Information Technology for Information Use. Copenhagen: The Royal School of Librarianship.
Andersen, P. B., Holmqvist, B., Jensen, J. F. (1993). The computer as medium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arias, E. G., Eden, H., Fischer, G. (2015). The envisionment and discovery collaboratory (EDC): explorations in human-centered informatics with tabletop computing environments. San Rafael, California: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
Barbosa, S. D. J., & de Souza, C. S. (2001). Extending software through metaphors and metonymies. Knowledge-Based Systems, 14(1), 15–27.CrossRef
Blackwell, A. (2006). Psychological issues in end-user programming. In H. Liberman, F. Parternò, V. Wulf (Eds.). End user development (pp. 9–30). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRef
Blackwell, A., & Green, T. (2003). Notational systems–the cognitive dimensions of notations framework. In J. Carroll (Ed.), HCI models, theories, and frameworks: toward an interdisciplinary science (pp. 103–133). San Francisco, Calif: Morgan Kaufmann.
Blandford, A., Furniss, D., Makri, S. (2016). “Qualitative HCI research: going behind the scenes.” Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, 9(1), 1–115.CrossRef
Boden, M. A., & Edmonds, E. A. (2009). What is generative art? Digital Creativity, 20, 21–46.CrossRef
Burke, Q., & Kafai, Y. B. (2010). Programming & storytelling: opportunities for learning about coding & composition. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’10) (pp. 348–351). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.​1145/​1810543.​1810611.
Burke, Q., & Kafai, Y. B. (2012). The writers’ workshop for youth programmers: digital storytelling with scratch in middle school classrooms. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’12) (pp. 433–438). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.​1145/​2157136.​2157264.
Bush, V. (1990). Science: the endless frontier: a report to the president on a program for postwar scientific research. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. 192 p.
Calvo, R. A., & Peters, D. (2013). The irony and re-interpretation of our quantified self. In H. Shen, R. Smith, J. Paay, P. Calder & T. Wyeld (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Australian computer-human interaction conference: augmentation, application, innovation, collaboration (OzCHI ’13) (pp. 367–370). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.​1145/​2541016.​2541070.
de Souza, C., Barbosa, S., da Silva, S. (2001). Semiotic engineering principles for evaluating end-user programming environments. Interacting with Computers, 13, 467–495.CrossRef
de Souza, C. S. (1993). The semiotic engineering of user interface languages. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Academic Press, 39, 753–773.CrossRef
de Souza, C. S. (2005a). The semiotic engineering of human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
de Souza, C. S. (2005b). Semiotic engineering: bringing designers and users together at interaction time. Interacting with Computers, 17(3), 317–341.CrossRef
de Souza, C. S. (2013). Semiotic perspectives on interactive languages for life on the screen. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 24(3), 218–221.CrossRef
de Souza, C. S., & Barbosa, S. D. J. (2006). A semiotic framing for end-user development. In H. Lieberman, F. Paternò, V. Wulf (Eds.). End user development (pp. 401–426). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRef
de Souza, C. S., Cerqueira, R. F. G., Afonso, L. M., Brandão, R. M. R., Ferreira, J. S. J. (2016). Software developers as users: semiotic investigations in human-centered software development. Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRef
de Souza, C. S., Garcia, A. C. B., Slaviero, C., Pinto, H., Repenning, A. (2011). End-user development: third international symposium, IS-EUD 2011, Torre Canne (BR), Italy, June 7–10, 2011. Proceedings (pp. 155–170). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.CrossRef
de Souza, C. S., & Leitão, C. F. (2009). Semiotic engineering methods for scientific research in HCI. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, 2(1), 1–122.CrossRef
de Souza, C. S., Salgado, L. C., Leitão, C. F., Serra, M. M. (2014). Cultural appropriation of computational thinking acquisition research: seeding fields of diversity. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education (ITiCSE ’14) (pp. 117–122). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.​1145/​2591708.​2591729.
diSessa, A. A., & Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77–103.CrossRef
Edmonds, E. A. (2007) Reflections on the Nature of Interaction CoDesign, 3, 139–143.
Ferreira, J. J., de Souza, C. S., de Castro Salgado, L. C., Slaviero, C., Leitão, C. F., de F. Moreira F. (2012), Combining cognitive, semiotic and discourse analysis to explore the power of notations in visual programming. In 2012 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)., September, 2012 (pp. 101–108). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
Fischer, G., & Giaccardi, E. (2006). Meta-design: a framework for the future of end-user development. End user development (pp. 427–457). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRef
Franchi, S., & Güzeldere, G. (2005). Machinations of the mind: cybernetics and artificial intelligence from automata to cyborgs. In S. Franchi, & G. Güzeldere (Eds.). Mechanical bodies, computational minds (pp. 15–149). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Green, T. (2006). Aims, achievements, agenda—where CDs stand now. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 17(4), 288–291.CrossRef
Green, T. R. G., & Petre, M. (1996). Usability analysis of visual programming environments: a ‘cognitive dimensions’ framework. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 7(2), 131–174.CrossRef
Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research. Social research for social change (2nd Edition) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.CrossRef
Hundhausen, C. D. (2005). Using end user visualization environments to mediate conversations: a ‘communicative dimensions’ framework. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 16(3), 153–185.CrossRef
Intrator, C., & de Souza, C. S. (2008). Using Web scripts to improve accessibility. In IHC 2008 - VIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais, 2008, Porto Alegre. Proceedings of the VIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (v. 378. pp. 292–295). New York: ACM.
Jones, S. P., Blackwell, A., Burnett, M. (2003). A user-centred approach to functions in Excel. In Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional programming (ICFP ’03) (pp. 165–176). New York: ACM.
Kammersggard, J. (1988). Four different perspectives on human–computer interaction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 28, 343–362.CrossRef
Kelleher, C., & Pausch, R. (2007). Using storytelling to motivate programming. Communications of the ACM, 50, 58–64.CrossRef
Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17–44). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Leshed, G., Haber, E. M., Matthews, T., Lau, T. (2008). CoScripter: automating & sharing how-to knowledge in the enterprise. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’08) (pp. 1719–1728). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.​1145/​1357054.​1357323.
Lieberman, H., Paternò, F., Wulf, V. (Eds.) (2006). End user development. Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer.
Liu, K. (2000). Semiotics in information systems engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maceli, M., & Atwood, M. E. (2011). From human crafters to human factors to human actors and back again: bridging the design time–use time divide. In International symposium on end user development (pp. 76–91). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Maceli, M., & Atwood, M. E. (2013). “Human crafters” once again: supporting users as designers in continuous co-design. In International symposium on end user development (pp. 9–24). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Mehra, A., Grundy J., Hosking, J. (2005). A generic approach to supporting diagram differencing and merging for collaborative design. In Proceedings of the 20th IEEE/ACM international conference on automated software engineering (ASE ’05) (pp. 204–213). New York: ACM.
Monteiro, I. T., da Silva Alves, A., de Souza, C. S. (2013). Using mediated communication to teach vocational concepts to deaf users. In C. Stephanidis, & M. Antona (Eds.). Universal access in human-computer interaction. applications and services for quality of life: 7th international conference, UAHCI 2013, held as part of HCI international 2013, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 21–26, 2013, Proceedings, Part III (pp. 213–222). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Monteiro, I. T., & de Souza, C. S. (2012). The representation of self in mediated interaction with computers. In Proceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC ’12) (pp. 219–228). Porto Alegre, Brazil: Brazilian Computer Society.
Monteiro, I. T., de Souza, C. S., Tolmasquim, E. T. (2015). My program, my world: insights from 1st-person reflective programming in EUD education. In P. Díaz, V. Pipek, C. Ardito, C. Jensen, I. Aedo, A. Boden (Eds.), End-user development: 5th international symposium, IS-EUD 2015, Madrid, Spain, May 26–29, 2015. Proceedings (pp. 76–91). Cham: Springer.
Monteiro, I. T., de Castro Salgado, L. C., Mota, M. P., Sampaio, A. L., de Souza, C. S. (June 2017). Signifying software engineering to computational thinking learners with AgentSheets and PoliFacets. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 40, 91–112. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jvlc.​2017.​01.​005.CrossRef
Monteiro, I. T., Tolmasquim, E. T., & de Souza, C. S. (2013). Going back and forth in metacommunication threads. In Proceedings of the 12th Brazilian symposium on human factors in computing systems (IHC ’13). Brazilian computer society, Porto Alegre, Brazil (pp. 102–111).
Mota, M. P., Faria, L. S., de Souza, C. S. (2012). Documentation comes to life in computational thinking acquisition with agentsheets. In Proceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC ’12) (pp. 151–160). Porto Alegre, Brazil: Brazilian Computer Society.
Mota, M. P., Monteiro, I. T., Ferreira, J. J., Slaviero, C., de Souza, C. S. (2013). On signifying the complexity of inter-agent relations in AgentSheets games and simulations. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM international conference on design of communication (pp. 133–142). New York: ACM.
Nadin, M. (1988). Interface design and evaluation – semiotic implications. In H. R. Hartson, & D. Hix (Ed.), Advances in human-computer interaction ablex (v. 2, pp. 45–100).
Nadin, M. (2011). Computation, information, meaning. Anticipation and Games International Journal of Applied Research on Information Technology and Computing, 2, 50–76.
Nake, F., & Grabowski, S. (2001). Human–computer interaction viewed as pseudo-communication. Knowledge-Based Systems, 14, 441–447.CrossRef
Norman, D. A. (1986). Cognitive engineering. In D. Norman, & S. Draper (Eds.), User centered systems design (pp. 31–629). Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Norman, D. A. (2009). THE WAY I SEE IT: Systems thinking: a product is more than the product. Interactions, 16, 52–54.CrossRef
Oberquelle, H., Kupka, I., Maass, S. (1983). A view of human—machine communication and co-operation. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 19, 309–333.CrossRef
Peirce, C. S. (1992). The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings Volume 1 (1987–1893) edited by Nathan Houser and Christian Kloesel. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1998). The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings Volume 2 (1893–1913) edited by Nathan Houser and Christian Kloesel. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.
Repenning, A. (2011). Making programming more conversational. 2011 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (pp. 191–194). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.CrossRef
Repenning, A., & Ioannidou, A. (2004). Agent-based end-user development. Communications of the ACM, 47(9), 43–46.CrossRef
Repenning, A., & Ioannidou, A. (2006). What makes end-user development tick? 13 design guidelines. In H. Lieberman, F. Paternò, V. Wulf, (Eds.). End user development (pp. 51–85). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRef
Repenning, A., Webb, D., Ioannidou, A. (2010). Scalable game design and the development of a checklist for getting computational thinking into public schools. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE ’10) (pp. 265–269). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.​1145/​1734263.​1734357.CrossRef
Rogers, Y. (2012). HCI theory: classical, modern, and contemporary. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 5.2, 1–129.
Salgado, L. C. C., Leitão, C. F., de Souza, C. (2012). A journey through cultures: metaphors for guiding the design of cross-cultural interactive systems. London; New York: Springer.
Searle, J. R. (1985). Expression and meaning: studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. 3rd Edition Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Stokes, D. E. (2011). Pasteur’s quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Tanaka-Ishii, K. (2010). Semiotics of programming. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tetteroo, D., & Markopoulos. (2015). A review of research methods in end user development. In P. Díaz, V. Pipek, C. Ardito, C. Jensen, I. Aedo, A. Boden (Eds.), End-user development: 5th international symposium, IS-EUD 2015, Madrid, Spain, May 26–29, 2015 (pp. 58–75). Cham: Springer.
Turkle, S. (2005). The second self: computers and the human spirit. Twentieth Anniversary Edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Venable, J. (2006). The role of theory and theorising in design science research. In S. Chatterjee & A. Hevner (Eds), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Design Science in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2006) (pp. 1–18). Claremont, CA: Claremont Graduate University.
Winograd, T. (1997). The design of interaction. In P. Denning (Ed.). Beyond calculation: the next fifty years of computing (pp. 149–161). New York: Springer.CrossRef
Winograd, T. (2006). Designing a new foundation for design. Communications of the ACM, 49, 71–74.CrossRef
Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: a new foundation for design. Boston, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Wolz, U., Stone, M., Pearson, K., Pulimood, S. M., Switzer, M. (2011). Computational thinking and expository writing in the middle school. Transactions on Computing Education, 11, 9:1–9:22.CrossRefMATH
Metadaten
Titel
Semiotic Engineering: A Cohering Theory to Connect EUD with HCI, CMC and More
verfasst von
Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
New Perspectives in End-User Development

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60290-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-60291-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60291-2_11

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise