Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Making End User Development More Natural Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

End-User Developers – What Are They Like?

verfasst von : Alan F. Blackwell

Erschienen in: New Perspectives in End-User Development

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

End-user developers are identified by their difference from (ordinary) developers. This difference is both a matter of definition, and an essential starting point for investigation. So the question arises how are they different? Since there are so many more non-developers in the world than developers, it seems likely that the differences among end-user developers may be even larger than the difference between (ordinary) developers and end-user developers. This chapter will review these individual differences, to the extent that they have been addressed in the research literature. These differences influence and are determined by education and training, differences in professional and domestic settings, differences in personality and intrinsic motivation, and differences in work practices and habits of thinking. All of these differences between individuals present questions for future investigation in end-user development research, and also opportunities for design of tools and systems that support end-user developers in different ways.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel A Three-Layer Meta-Design Model for Addressing Domain-Specific Customizations
Nächstes Kapitel Malleability in the Hands of End-Users
Fußnoten
Literatur
Aghaee, S., Blackwell, A. F., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D. (2015). Personality and intrinsic motivational factors in end-user programming. In Z. Li, C. Ermel, S. D. Fleming (Eds). Proceedings of IEEE symposium on visual languages and human centric computing (VL/HCC 2015), Atlanta, GA (pp. 29–36). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.CrossRef
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Beckwith, L., Burnett, M., Grigoreanu, V., Wiedenbeck, S. (2006). Gender hci: what about the software? Computer, 39(11), 97–101.CrossRef
Beckwith, L., Kissinger, C., Burnett, B., Wiedenbeck, S., Lawrance, J., Blackwell, A., et al. (2006). Tinkering and gender in end-user programmers’ debugging. In Proceedings of CHI 2006 (pp. 231–240).
Blackwell, A. F. (2002). First steps in programming: a rationale for Attention Investment models. Proceedings of the IEEE symposia on humancentric computing languages and environments, Arlington, VA (pp. 2–10). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
Blackwell, A. F., Rode, J. A., Toye, E. F. (2009). How do we program the home? Gender, attention investment, and the psychology of programming at home. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 67, 324–341.CrossRef
Collins, N., & McLean, A. (2014). Algorave: A survey of the history, aesthetics and technology of live performance of algorithmic electronic dance music. In Proceedings of 14th international conference on new interfaces for musical expression, B. Caramiaux, K. Tahiroğlu, R. Fiebrink, A. Tanaka (Eds.). (pp. 355–359). London: Goldsmiths University.
Cypher, A. (1991). Eager: programming repetitive tasks by example. In S. P. Robertson, G. M. Olson, J. S. Olson (Eds.). Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI'91), New Orleans LA (pp. 33–39). New York: ACM.
Dijkstra, E. W. (1970). Notes on structured programming. Eindhoven Netherlands: Technological University.
Fine, C. (2010). Delusions of gender. London: Icon.
Harper, R., Randall, D., Sharrock, W. (2016). Choice. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Hill, C., Ernst, S., Oleson, A., Horvath, S., Burnett, M. (2016). GenderMag experiences in the field: the whole, the parts, and the workload. In A. Blackwell, B. Plimmer, G. Stapleton (Eds.). Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on visual languages and human-centric computing, Cambridge, UK (pp. 199–207). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2(1999), 102–138.
Kelleher, C., & Pausch, R. (2006). Lessons learned from designing a programming system to support middle school girls creating animated stories. In J. Grundy, J. Howse (Eds.). Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on visual languages and human-centric computing, Brighton, UK (pp. 165–172). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
Kelleher, C., Pausch, R., Kiesler, S. (2007). Storytelling Alice motivates middle school girls to learn computer programming. In M. B. Rosson, D. Gilmore (Eds.). Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'07), San Jose, CA (pp. 1455–1464). New York: ACM.CrossRef
Kosinski, M., Matz, S., Gosling, S., Popov, V., Stillwell, D. (2015). Facebook as a social science research tool: opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations and practical guidelines. American Psychologist, 70(6), 543–556.CrossRef
Leonard, T. C., Thaler, R. H., Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Constitutional Political Economy, 19(4), 356–360.CrossRef
MacLean, A., Carter, K., Lövstrand, L., Moran, T. (1990). User-tailorable systems: pressing the issues with buttons. In J. C. Chew, J. Whiteside (Eds.). Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI'90), Seattle WA (pp. 175–182). New York: ACM.
Margolis, J. (2013). Stuck in the shallow end: education, race and computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2003). Unlocking the clubhouse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.MATH
Mehandjiev, N., Sutcliffe, A., Lee, D. (2006). Organisational view of end-user development. In H. Lieberman, F. Paterno, V. Wulf (Eds.). End user development. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Quercia, D., Las Casas, D. B., Pesce, J. P., Stillwell, D., Kosinski, M., Almeida, V., et al. (2012). Facebook and privacy: the balancing act of personality, gender, and relationship currency. In N. Ellison, J. G. Shanahan, Z. Tufekci (Eds.). Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), Dublin (pp. 306–313). Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.
Rowe, M. B. (1978). Teaching science as continuous inquiry. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Scheib, V., Engell-Nielsen, T., Lehtinen, S., Haines, E., Taylor, P. (2002). The demo scene. In T. Appolloni (Ed.). ACM SIGGRAPH 2002 conference abstracts and applications (pp. 96–97). New York: ACM.CrossRef
Shneiderman, B. (1982). The future of interactive systems and the emergence of direct manipulation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1(3), 237–256.CrossRef
Wilson, A., Burnett, M., Beckwith, L., Granatir, O., Casburn, L., Cook, C., et al. (2003). Harnessing curiosity to increase correctness in end-user programming. In G. Cockton, Panu Korhonen (Eds.). Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’03), Ft. Lauderdale, FL (pp. 305–312). New York: ACM.
Woolford, K., Blackwell, A. F., Norman, S. J., Chevalier, C. (2010). Crafting a critical technical practice. Leonardo, 43(2), 202–203.CrossRef
Wulf, V., & Golombek, B. (2001). Direct activation: a concept to encourage tailoring activities. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20(4), 249–263.CrossRef
Wulf, V., & Jarke, M. (2004). The economics of end-user development. Communications of the ACM, 47(9), 41–42.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
End-User Developers – What Are They Like?
verfasst von
Alan F. Blackwell
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
New Perspectives in End-User Development

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60290-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-60291-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60291-2_6

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise