nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | Supplement | Buchkapitel

Augmented Reality Smart Glasses: Definition, Concepts and Impact on Firm Value Creation

verfasst von : Young K. Ro, Alexander Brem, Philipp A. Rauschnabel

Erschienen in: Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In recent decades, the developments of new media have revolutionized individuals’ behaviors tremendously. Mobile devices, in particular, have developed an ‘always and everywhere online’ mentality. But what comes next? Recent developments emphasize the rise of a new technology that is termed ‘Wearable Augmented Reality Devices’, where Augmented Reality Smart Glasses (such as Microsoft HoloLens or Google Glass) represent prominent examples. These technologies offer huge innovation potential for companies and societies, which are discussed in this article. By doing so, this paper provides managers and researchers an applied description of the technology and a discussion of how it differs from existing mobile and augmented reality technologies. Finally, insights are given into how these technologies may increase firm value and further change the behaviors of consumers and adopters.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Measuring Consumer Engagement in the Brain to Online Interactive Shopping Environments

Nächstes Kapitel The Sensorama Revisited: Evaluating the Application of Multi-sensory Input on the Sense of Presence in 360-Degree Immersive Film in Virtual Reality

This chapter is a revised version of a working paper published by the authors on researchgate.net, see Rauschnabel, Brem and Ro (2015).

Albrecht, U. V., von Jan, U., Kuebler, J., Zoeller, C., Lacher, M., Muensterer, O. J., & Hagemeier, L. (2014). Google Glass for Documentation of Medical Findings: Evaluation in Forensic Medicine. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(2).

Attewell, P. (1992). Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organization Science, 3(1), 1–19.CrossRef

Barrie, J. (2014). Google Glass Is Now Banned From All US Movie Theaters. Business Insider Retrieved from http:// businessinsider.com/movie-industry-bans-google-glass (6/09/2015).

Bearden, W. O., & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 183–194.

Berneburg, A. (2007). Interactive 3D Simulations in Measuring Consumer Preferences: Friend or Foe to Test Results? Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8(1), 1–13.CrossRef

Brem, A., & Viardot, É. (2015). Adoption of Innovation: Balancing Internal and External Stakeholders in the Marketing of Innovation (pp. 1–10). Springer International Publishing.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.CrossRef

Eisenmann, T., Barley, L. & Kind, L. (2014). Google Glass, Harvard Business School Case 814–102.

Felix, R. (2012). Brand communities for mainstream brands: the example of the Yamaha R1 brand community. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(3), 225–232.CrossRef

Felix, R., Rauschnabel, P. A., & Hinsch, C. (2017). Elements of strategic social media marketing: A holistic framework. Journal of Business Research, 70, 118–126.CrossRef

Fodor, M., & Brem, A. (2015). Do Privacy Concerns Matter for Millennials? Results from an Empirical Analysis of Location-Based Services Adoption in Germany. Computers in Human Behavior, 53(12), 344–353.CrossRef

Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic Word-of-Mouth via Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52.CrossRef

Hein, D. W., & Rauschnabel, P. A. (2016). Augmented reality smart glasses and knowledge management: A conceptual framework for enterprise social networks. In Enterprise social networks (pp. 83–109). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

Javornik, A. (2016a). ‘It’s an illusion, but it looks real!’ Consumer affective, cognitive and behavioural responses to augmented reality applications. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(9–10), 987–1011.CrossRef

Javornik, A. (2016c). What Marketers Need to Know about Augmented Reality, Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2016/04/what-marketers-need-to-understand-about-augmented-reality.

Javornik, A., Rogers, Y., Moutinho, A. M., & Freeman, R. (2016). Revealing the Shopper Experience of Using a” Magic Mirror” Augmented Reality Make-Up Application. In Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Vol. 2016, pp. 871–882). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).

Jung, T., Chung, N., & Leue, M. C. (2015). The determinants of recommendations to use augmented reality technologies: The case of a Korean theme park. Tourism Management, 49, 75–86.CrossRef

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.CrossRef

King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A Meta-Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740–755.CrossRef

Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A Social Technology that Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-Being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017.CrossRef

Lee, I., & Lee, K. (2015). The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, Investments, and Challenges for Enterprises. Business Horizons, 58(4), 431–440.CrossRef

Leue, M. C., Jung, T., & tom Dieck, D. (2015). Google glass augmented reality: Generic learning outcomes for art galleries. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015 (pp. 463–476). Springer International Publishing.

McNaney, R., Vines, J., Roggen, D., Balaam, M., Zhang, P., Poliakov, I., & Olivier, P. (2014). Exploring the Acceptability of Google Glass as an Everyday Assistive Device for People with Parkinson’s. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2551–2554). ACM.

Muniz, A. M., & O’guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of consumer research, 27(4), 412–432.

Muensterer, O. J., Lacher, M., Zoeller, C., Bronstein, M., & Kübler, J. (2014). Google Glass in Pediatric Surgery: An Exploratory Study. International Journal of Surgery, 12(4), 281–289.CrossRef

Pantano, E., Rese, A., & Baier, D. (2017). Enhancing the online decision-making process by using augmented reality: A two country comparison of youth markets. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 38, 81–95.

Rauschnabel, P. A., & Ro, Y. K. (2016). Augmented reality smart glasses: An investigation of technology acceptance drivers. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 11(2), 123–148.CrossRef

Rauschnabel, P. A., Brem, A., & Ivens, B. S. (2015a). Who will buy Smart Glasses? Empirical Results of two Pre-market-entry Studies on the Role of Personality in Individual Awareness and Intended Adoption of Google Glass Wearables. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 635–647.CrossRef

Rauschnabel, P. A., Brem, A., & Ro, Y. (2015b). Augmented reality smart glasses: definition, conceptual insights, and managerial importance. Working paper, The University of Michigan-Dearborn, ResearchGate.

Stockinger, H. (2016). The future of augmented reality-an Open Delphi study on technology acceptance. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 11(1), 55–96.CrossRef

Technavio (2015). Global Smart Glasses Market for Augmented Reality 2015–2019, Elmhurst, IL.

Tomiuc, A. (2014). Navigating culture. Enhancing visitor museum experience through mobile technologies. From smartphone to google glass. Journal of Media Research, 7(3), 33–47.

tom Dieck, M. C., & Jung, T. (2015). A theoretical model of mobile augmented reality acceptance in urban heritage tourism. Current Issues in Tourism, 1–21.

Tyler, T. R. (2002). Is the Internet Changing Social Life? It seems the more Things Change, the more they Stay the Same. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 195–205.CrossRef

Titel: Augmented Reality Smart Glasses: Definition, Concepts and Impact on Firm Value Creation
verfasst von: Young K. Ro
Alexander Brem
Philipp A. Rauschnabel
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64026-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-64027-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64027-3_12

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner