nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Identifying Candidate Tasks for Robotic Process Automation in Textual Process Descriptions

verfasst von : Henrik Leopold, Han van der Aa, Hajo A. Reijers

Erschienen in: Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The continuous digitization requires organizations to improve the automation of their business processes. Among others, this has lead to an increased interest in Robotic Process Automation (RPA). RPA solutions emerge in the form of software that automatically executes repetitive and routine tasks. While the benefits of RPA on cost savings and other relevant performance indicators have been demonstrated in different contexts, one of the key challenges for RPA endeavors is to effectively identify processes and tasks that are suitable for automation. Textual process descriptions, such as work instructions, provide rich and important insights about this matter. However, organizations often maintain hundreds or even thousands of them, which makes a manual analysis unfeasible for larger organizations. Recognizing the large manual effort required to determine the current degree of automation in an organization’s business processes, we use this paper to propose an approach that is able to automatically do so. More specifically, we leverage supervised machine learning to automatically identify whether a task described in a textual process description is manual, an interaction of a human with an information system or automated. An evaluation with a set of 424 activities from a total of 47 textual process descriptions demonstrates that our approach produces satisfactory results.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Business Process Canvas as a Process Model in a Nutshell

Nächstes Kapitel Toward an Automated Labeling of Event Log Attributes

http://www.math.utah.edu/~wisnia/glossary.html.

Note that the way Weka generates ROC curves results in only as many threshold values as there are distinct probability values assigned to the positive class. Therefore, the ROC curves from Fig. 3 are only based on three data points. This, however, does not reduce their informative value.

Van der Aa, H., Leopold, H., Reijers, H.A.: Dealing with behavioral ambiguity in textual process descriptions. In: La Rosa, M., Loos, P., Pastor, O. (eds.) BPM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9850, pp. 271–288. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45348-4_16CrossRef

Van der Aa, H., Leopold, H., Reijers, H.A.: Comparing textual descriptions to process models: the automatic detection of inconsistencies. Inf. Syst. 64, 447–460 (2017)CrossRef

Van der Aa, H., Leopold, H., van de Weerd, I., Reijers, H.A.: Causes and consequences of fragmented process information: insights from a case study. In: Proceedings of the Annual Americas’ Conference on Information Systems (2017)

van der Aalst, W.M.P., Barros, A.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B.: Advanced workflow patterns. In: Scheuermann, P., Etzion, O. (eds.) CoopIS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1901, pp. 18–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/10722620_2CrossRef

Aguirre, S., Rodriguez, A.: Automation of a business process using robotic process automation (RPA): a case study. In: Figueroa-García, J.C., López-Santana, E.R., Villa-Ramírez, J.L., Ferro-Escobar, R. (eds.) WEA 2017. CCIS, vol. 742, pp. 65–71. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66963-2_7CrossRef

Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20(3), 273–297 (1995)

Davenport, T.H., Kirby, J.: Just how smart are smart machines? MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 57(3), 21 (2016)

Domingos, P.: A few useful things to know about machine learning. Commun. ACM 55(10), 78–87 (2012)CrossRef

Dumas, M., Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33143-5CrossRef

10.

Friedrich, F., Mendling, J., Puhlmann, F.: Process model generation from natural language text. In: Mouratidis, H., Rolland, C. (eds.) CAiSE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6741, pp. 482–496. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21640-4_36CrossRef

11.

Fung, H.P.: Criteria, use cases and effects of information technology process automation (ITPA). Browser Download This Paper (2014)

12.

Gacitua-Decar, V., Pahl, C.: Automatic business process pattern matching for enterprise services design. In: IEEE Congress on Services Part II, pp. 111–118 (2009)

13.

Georgakopoulos, D., Hornick, M., Sheth, A.: An overview of workflow management: from process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure. Distrib. Parallel Databases 3(2), 119–153 (1995)CrossRef

14.

Ghose, A.K., Koliadis, G., Chueng, A.: Process discovery from model and text artefacts. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Services, pp. 167–174. IEEE Computer Society (2007)

15.

Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newslett. 11(1), 10–18 (2009)CrossRef

16.

Joachims, T.: Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. In: Nédellec, C., Rouveirol, C. (eds.) ECML 1998. LNCS, vol. 1398, pp. 137–142. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0026683CrossRef

17.

Kirchmer, M.: Robotic process automation-pragmatic solution or dangerous illusion? BTOES Insights, June 2017

18.

Klein, D., Manning, C.D.: Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In: 41st Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 423–430 (2003)

19.

Klinkmüller, C., Weber, I., Mendling, J., Leopold, H., Ludwig, A.: Increasing recall of process model matching by improved activity label matching. In: Daniel, F., Wang, J., Weber, B. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8094, pp. 211–218. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40176-3_17CrossRef

20.

Lacity, M., Willcocks, L.P., Craig, A.: Robotic process automation at telefonica O2 (2015)

21.

Lacity, M.C., Willcocks, L.P.: A new approach to automating services. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 58(1), 41 (2016)

22.

Leopold, H., van der Aa, H., Pittke, F., Raffel, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Searching textual and model-based process descriptions based on a unified data format. Softw. Syst. Model. 1–16 (2017)

23.

Leopold, H., Eid-Sabbagh, R.H., Mendling, J., Azevedo, L.G., Baião, F.A.: Detection of naming convention violations in process models for different languages. Decis. Support Syst. 56, 310–325 (2013)CrossRef

24.

Leopold, H., Mendling, J.: Automatic derivation of service candidates from business process model repositories. In: Abramowicz, W., Kriksciuniene, D., Sakalauskas, V. (eds.) BIS 2012. LNBIP, vol. 117, pp. 84–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30359-3_8CrossRef

25.

Leopold, H., Niepert, M., Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Dijkman, R., Stuckenschmidt, H.: Probabilistic optimization of semantic process model matching. In: Barros, A., Gal, A., Kindler, E. (eds.) BPM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7481, pp. 319–334. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_25CrossRef

26.

Leopold, H., Smirnov, S., Mendling, J.: On the refactoring of activity labels in business process models. Inf. Syst. 37(5), 443–459 (2012)CrossRef

27.

Levin, B.: English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1993)

28.

Leyh, C., Bley, K., Seek, S.: Elicitation of processes in business process management in the era of digitization – the same techniques as decades ago? In: Piazolo, F., Geist, V., Brehm, L., Schmidt, R. (eds.) ERP Future 2016. LNBIP, vol. 285, pp. 42–56. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58801-8_4CrossRef

29.

Miller, G., Fellbaum, C.: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

30.

Pittke, F., Leopold, H., Mendling, J.: Automatic detection and resolution of lexical ambiguity in process models (2015)

31.

Riefer, M., Ternis, S.F., Thaler, T.: Mining process models from natural language text: A state-of-the-art analysis. In: Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI-16). Universität Illmenau , Illmenau, Germany, 9–11 March 2016

32.

Sànchez-Ferreres, J., Carmona, J., Padró, L.: Aligning textual and graphical descriptions of processes through ILP techniques. In: Dubois, E., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10253, pp. 413–427. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59536-8_26CrossRef

33.

Schuler, K.K.: Verbnet: a broad-coverage, comprehensive verb lexicon. Ph.D. thesis, Philadelphia, PA, USA (2005)

34.

Stohr, E.A., Zhao, J.L.: Workflow automation: overview and research issues. Inf. Syst. Front. 3(3), 281–296 (2001)CrossRef

35.

Tong, S., Koller, D.: Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2, 45–66 (2001)

36.

Walenz, B., Didion, J.: JWNL: Java wordnet library (2011)

37.

Willcocks, L., Lacity, M.C.: Service Automation: Robots and the Future of Work. Steve Brookes Publishing, Warwickshire (2016)

Titel: Identifying Candidate Tasks for Robotic Process Automation in Textual Process Descriptions
verfasst von: Henrik Leopold
Han van der Aa
Hajo A. Reijers
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91703-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-91704-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91704-7_5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner