nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

14. Container Orchestration: A Survey

verfasst von : Emiliano Casalicchio

Erschienen in: Systems Modeling: Methodologies and Tools

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Container technologies are changing the way cloud platforms and distributed applications are architected and managed. Containers are used to run enterprise, scientific and big data applications, to architect IoT and edge/fog computing systems, and by cloud providers to internally manage their infrastructure and services. However, we are far away from the maturity stage and there are still many research challenges to be solved. One of them is container orchestration that makes it possible to define how to select, deploy, monitor, and dynamically control the configuration of multi-container packaged applications in the cloud. This paper surveys the state-of-the-art solutions and discusses research challenges in autonomic orchestration of containers. A reference architecture of an autonomic container orchestrator is also proposed.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel A Technique to Identify Data Exchange Between Cloud Virtual Machines

Nächstes Kapitel A Cloud-Based Overlay Networking for the Internet of Things: Quantitative Evaluation

M. Abdelbaky, J. Diaz-Montes, M. Parashar, M. Unuvar, M. Steinder, Docker containers across multiple clouds and data centers, in 2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC) (2015), pp. 368–371. https://doi.org/10.1109/UCC.2015.58

T. Adufu, J. Choi, Y. Kim, Is container-based technology a winner for high performance scientific applications? in 17th Asia-Pacific Network Operations and Management Symposium, APNOMS 2015, Busan, August 19–21 (IEEE, New York, 2015), pp. 507–510. https://doi.org/10.1109/APNOMS.2015.7275379

Y. Al-Dhuraibi, F. Paraiso, N. Djarallah, P. Merle, Autonomic vertical elasticity of docker containers with elasticdocker, in 2017 IEEE 10th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD) (2017), pp. 472–479. https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD.2017.67

A. Asnaghi, M. Ferroni, M.D. Santambrogio, Dockercap: a software-level power capping orchestrator for docker containers, in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) and IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing (EUC) and 15th Intl Symposium on Distributed Computing and Applications for Business Engineering (DCABES) (2016), pp. 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSE-EUC-DCABES.2016.166

B. Burns, B. Grant, D. Oppenheimer, E. Brewer, J. Wilkes, Borg, omega, and kubernetes. ACM Queue 14, 70–93 (2016). http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2898444 CrossRef

E. Casalicchio, Autonomic orchestration of containers: problem definition and research challenges, in 10th EAI International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools, EAI (2016)

E. Casalicchio, V. Perciballi, Auto-scaling of containers: The impact of relative and absolute metrics, in 2017 IEEE 2nd International Workshops on Foundations and Applications of Self* Systems (FAS*W) (2017), pp. 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1109/FAS-W.2017.149

E. Casalicchio, V. Perciballi, Measuring docker performance: what a mess!!! in Proceedings of the 8th ACM/SPEC on International Conference on Performance Engineering Companion, ICPE ’17 Companion (ACM, New York, 2017), pp. 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3053600.3053605.

A. Celesti, M. Fazio, M. Giacobbe, A. Puliafito, M. Villari, Characterizing cloud federation in IoT, in 2016 30th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA) (2016), pp. 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1109/WAINA.2016.152

10.

R. Dua, A.R. Raja, D. Kakadia, Virtualization vs containerization to support PaaS, in Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering, IC2E ’14 (2014), pp. 610–614

11.

R. Dua, V. Kohli, S. Patil, S. Patil, Performance analysis of union and cow file systems with docker, in 2016 International Conference on Computing, Analytics and Security Trends (CAST) (2016), pp. 550–555. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAST.2016.7915029

12.

F. Faniyi, R. Bahsoon, A systematic review of service level management in the cloud. ACM Comput. Surv. 48(3), 43:1–43:27 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2843890 CrossRef

13.

W. Felter, A. Ferreira, R. Rajamony, J. Rubio, An updated performance comparison of virtual machines and Linux containers. Technical Report, RC25482(AUS1407–001), IBM, IBM Research Division, Austin Research Laboratory (2014)

14.

W. Gerlach, W. Tang, K. Keegan, T. Harrison, A. Wilke, J. Bischof, M. D’Souza, S. Devoid, D. Murphy-Olson, N. Desai, F. Meyer, Skyport: container-based execution environment management for multi-cloud scientific workflows, in Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Data-Intensive Computing in the Clouds, DataCloud ’14 (IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 2014), pp. 25–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/DataCloud.2014.6

15.

X. Guan, X. Wan, B.Y. Choi, S. Song, J. Zhu, Application oriented dynamic resource allocation for data centers using docker containers. IEEE Commun. Lett. 21(3), 504–507 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2016.2644658 CrossRef

16.

S. He, L. Guo, Y. Guo, C. Wu, M. Ghanem, R. Han, Elastic application container: A lightweight approach for cloud resource provisioning, in 2012 IEEE 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (2012). pp. 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/AINA.2012.74

17.

M.C. Huebscher, J.A. McCann, A survey of autonomic computing — degrees, models, and applications. ACM Comput. Surv. 40(3), 7:1–7:28 (2008). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1380584.1380585

18.

B.I. Ismail, E.M. Goortani, M.B.A. Karim, W.M. Tat, S. Setapa, J.Y. Luke, O.H. Hoe, Evaluation of docker as edge computing platform, in 2015 IEEE Conference on Open Systems (ICOS) (2015), pp. 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOS.2015.7377291

19.

C. Kaewkasi, K. Chuenmuneewong, Improvement of container scheduling for docker using ant colony optimization, in 2017 9th International Conference on Knowledge and Smart Technology (KST) (2017), pp. 254–259. https://doi.org/10.1109/KST.2017.7886112

20.

J.O. Kephart, D.M. Chess, The vision of autonomic computing. Computer 36(1), 41–50 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2003.1160055 MathSciNetCrossRef

21.

Z. Kozhirbayev, R.O. Sinnott, A performance comparison of container-based technologies for the cloud. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 68, 175–182 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2016.08.025. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X16303041 CrossRef

22.

A.L. Lemos, F. Daniel, B. Benatallah Web service composition: a survey of techniques and tools. ACM Comput. Surv. 48(3), 33:1–33:41 (2015). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2831270 CrossRef

23.

B.D. Martino, G. Cretella, A. Esposito, Advances in applications portability and services interoperability among multiple clouds. IEEE Cloud Comput. 2(2), 22–28 (2015)CrossRef

24.

S. McDaniel, S. Herbein, M. Taufer, A two-tiered approach to I/O quality of service in docker containers, in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (2015), pp. 490–491. https://doi.org/10.1109/CLUSTER.2015.77

25.

S. McDaniel, S. Herbein, M. Taufer, A two-tiered approach to I/O quality of service in Docker containers, in Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, CLUSTER ’15 (2015), pp. 490–491

26.

J. McGee, The 6 steps of the container lifecycle (2016). https://www.ibm.com/blogs/cloud-computing/2016/02/the-6-steps-of-the-container-lifecycle/

27.

R. Morabito, A performance evaluation of container technologies on internet of things devices, in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS) (2016), pp. 999–1000. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOMW.2016.7562228

28.

R. Morabito, J. Kjällman, M. Komu, Hypervisors vs. lightweight virtualization: a performance comparison, in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering (2015), pp. 386–393. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC2E.2015.74

29.

N. Naik, Applying computational intelligence for enhancing the dependability of multi-cloud systems using docker swarm, in 2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), (2016), pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI.2016.7850194

30.

M. Nardelli, C. Hochreiner, S. Schulte Elastic provisioning of virtual machines for container deployment, in Proceedings of the 8th ACM/SPEC on International Conference on Performance Engineering Companion, ICPE ’17 Companion (ACM, New York, 2017), pp. 5–10. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3053600.3053602

31.

S. Natarajan, A. Ghanwani, D. Krishnaswamy, R. Krishnan, P. Willis, A. Chaudhary, An analysis of container-based platforms for NFV. Technical Report, IETF (2016)

32.

D.T. Nguyen, C.H. Yong, X.Q. Pham, H.Q. Nguyen, T.T.K. Loan, E.N. Huh, An index scheme for similarity search on cloud computing using mapreduce over docker container, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, IMCOM ’16 (ACM, New York, 2016), pp. 60:1–60:6. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2857546.2857607

33.

OASIS, Topology and orchestration specification for cloud applications. Technical Report Version 1.0, OASIS Standard (2013)

34.

C. Pahl, Containerization and the PaaS cloud. IEEE Cloud Comput. 2(3), 24–31 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCC.2015.51 CrossRef

35.

A. Pelaez, A. Quiroz, M. Parashar, Dynamic adaptation of policies using machine learning, in 2016 16th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid) (2016), pp. 501–510, https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGrid.2016.64

36.

S. Singh, I. Chana, Qos-aware autonomic resource management in cloud computing: a systematic review. ACM Comput. Surv. 48(3), 42:1–42:46 (2015). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2843889 CrossRef

37.

V. Stankovski, J. Trnkoczy, S. Taherizadeh, M. Cigale, Implementing time-critical functionalities with a distributed adaptive container architecture, in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services, IIWAS ’16 (ACM, New York, 2016), pp. 453–457. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3011141.3011202

38.

J. Stubbs, W. Moreira, R. Dooley Distributed systems of microservices using docker and serfnode, in 2015 7th International Workshop on Science Gateways (2015). pp. 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWSG.2015.16

39.

V. Tarasov, L. Rupprecht, D. Skourtis, A. Warke, D. Hildebrand, M. Mohamed, N. Mandagere, W. Li, R. Rangaswami, M. Zhao, In search of the ideal storage configuration for docker containers, in 2017 IEEE 2nd International Workshops on Foundations and Applications of Self* Systems (FAS*W) (2017), pp. 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1109/FAS-W.2017.148

40.

W. Vogels, Under the hood of Amazon EC2 container service (2015). http://www.allthingsdistributed.com/2015/07/under-the-hood-of-the-amazon-ec2-container-service.html

41.

K. Ye, Y. Ji, Performance tuning and modeling for big data applications in docker containers, in 2017 International Conference on Networking, Architecture, and Storage (NAS) (2017), pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/NAS.2017.8026871

Titel: Container Orchestration: A Survey
verfasst von: Emiliano Casalicchio
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Systems Modeling: Methodologies and Tools
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92377-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-92378-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92378-9_14

Neuer Inhalt

Bildnachweise

VDI-Icon, Profil Icon, inhalt2, Springer Professional Modul/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Zukunftswerkstatt Sales Excellence_ieS/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Search Icon, Banner Hanser, Bunte Männchen, die Kunden darstelle, werden von einem riesigen Magneten angezogen. /© Oleksiy Mark, Dr. Daniel Schneider/© Fraunhofer IESE, Interview Level Ten PPA Bild/© LevelTen, Zeitschrift Wissensmanagement Cover, PatentFit-Logo/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Zukunftswerkstatt Sales Excellence 2024/© AndreyPopov / Getty Images / iStock, 2023_Antrieb/© supervisuell, ATZ-Webinar: Prototypenfreie Entwicklung durch Offline- und Driver-in-the-Loop-HiL-Tests /© (c) VI-grade

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Neuer Inhalt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.